Connect with us

World

The Observer, The World’s Oldest Sunday Newspaper And A Liberal Staple, Will Be Sold.

Published

on

Observer
(AP Photo/Raphael Satter, File)

(VOR News) – Even though journalists had organised a two-day protest earlier this week, the sale of the Observer, which is the world’s oldest Sunday newspaper and a stronghold of liberal principles in Britain’s media landscape, was sanctioned on Friday.

The Observer is still the oldest newspaper in the world.

The Scott Trust, the owner of the Guardian Media Group, which is comprised of the Observer and the Guardian, has made the announcement that the sale to Tortoise Media is anticipated to be finalised within the next few days.

It has been reported that the Scott Trust has made an investment in Tortoise Media. As a result, the Scott Trust has become a significant shareholder in the company and has assumed roles on both the editorial and commercial boards respectively.

Tortoise must invest 25 million pounds (32 million dollars) in the Observer.

In the year 1791, The Observer was established, and in 1993, it became a member of the Guardian Media Group. On the other hand, Tortoise is dedicated to maintaining its Sunday print edition while also expanding its presence on the internet.

The editorial code of the Observer has made a commitment to respect the “liberal values and journalistic standards” of the Scott Trust. This commitment is part of the Observer’s commitment to protecting journalistic freedom and the editorial autonomy of the publication.

In 2019, James Harding, who had previously served as the editor of the London Times and as the chief of news at the BBC, and Matthew Barzun, who had previously served as the United States ambassador to London, established Tortoise publishing.

The readers were given the assurance that “we will make every effort to honour its legacy as a champion of human dignity and to revitalise it as a formidable, progressive voice globally.”

This was a pledge that was made to the readers. Harding argued that the Observer exemplifies “the pinnacle of liberal, pioneering journalism.” He said this on multiple occasions.

Ole Jacob Sunde, who serves as the chairperson of the Scott Trust, stated that the Observer need “a sufficiently funded, long-term ally that upholds editorial independence and liberal values.”

Wednesday and Thursday, Guardian and Observer journalists struck.

In addition to publishing print editions from Monday through Saturday, The Guardian also maintains a significant presence on the internet around the world. There has been a walkout that has been started by journalists from both organisations.

Despite the fact that the Guardian is unquestionably the more prestigious brand, particularly in the realm of digital media, the two newspapers have maintained a strong partnership, sharing resources and operating from the same site in London.

Katharine Viner, editor-in-chief of Guardian News & Media, remarked, “I acknowledge the disquiet this period has caused for Observer staff, yet we are assured that we have determined the most advantageous path forward for the title’s journalists, its readership, and the future of both the Observer and the Guardian.”

It has been announced by Laura Davison, who will soon take over as general secretary of the National Union of Journalists, that union members from both publications will get together later on Friday to discuss the next steps that will be taken.

She stated that the timing of the decision, which was made prior to the conclusion of two days of action that received a lot of support, was particularly unfortunate.

Giao Pacey, a partner at Simkins LLP, a law firm that specialises in media and entertainment, says that the new leadership of the Observer must exercise caution in order to protect the value of the newspaper, which is inextricably linked to the brand that it has created over the course of centuries.

Keeping the company’s legacy, culture, and integrity intact while also securing the resources and support necessary for success in a market that is constantly shifting is something that Pacey believes the leadership team needs to accomplish in order to strike a balance. “Upon completion of the sale, the leadership team must achieve an appropriate equilibrium for the business.”

SOURCE: AP

SEE ALSO:

French President Macron Shifts Blame for Government Collapse

Macron of France Will Complete His Tenure And Choose a New Prime Minister Shortly.

 

Salman Ahmad is a seasoned freelance writer who contributes insightful articles to VORNews. With years of experience in journalism, he possesses a knack for crafting compelling narratives that resonate with readers. Salman's writing style strikes a balance between depth and accessibility, allowing him to tackle complex topics while maintaining clarity.

Continue Reading

World

The Goal Of Donald Trump’s Transition Team Is To Withdraw The US From WHO “On Day One.”

Published

on

Donald Trump
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

(VOR News) – The transition team led by Donald Trump is reportedly planning to remove the United States from the World Health Organization (WHO) on the first day of the next government, according to experts.

This would have a “catastrophic” impact on people’s health all throughout the world, these experts warn.

On January 20, the day the president-elect becomes office, these individuals want to announce their desire to depart the global health agency, Donald Trump’s team members informed analysts.

If the World Health Organization were to depart, it would lose its most significant source of funding, which would hinder its ability to respond to public health emergencies such as the Coronavirus pandemic.

Donald Trump’s leadership and funding for global health are noteworthy.

The United States of America is most likely to leave a significant void. According to Georgetown Law professor of global health Lawrence Gostin, “I see no one that is going to fill the breach.” He went on to say that the withdrawal “on day one” will have “catastrophic” effects on people’s health all around the world.

Trump’s nomination of several allies, including vaccine skeptic Robert F. Kennedy, for important health positions in the incoming government has led to a disagreement over US relations with the World Health Organization (WHO). Nevertheless, Gostin expressed doubt that Donald Trump would prioritize a prompt withdrawal as much as some of his colleagues.

The United States of America was the largest single donor to the World Health Organization (WHO), accounting for almost 16 percent of its funding in fiscal years 2022–2023.

In 2020, President Donald Trump began the process of disbanding the World Health Organization (WHO) after accusing it of being under Chinese control.

However, the process has never been completed, and his vice presidential replacement, Joe Biden, resumed relations with the agency on the first day of his administration in 2021.

Experts have seen that after initiating the process immediately, some Donald Trump administration officials are keen to proceed much more quickly this time.

Ashish Jha, a former White House Covid response coordinator for Biden and the director of Brown University’s school of public health, stated that the transition team wanted Donald Trump to withdraw on the first day because to the “symbolism” of reversing Biden’s own inauguration-day decision.

He remarked, “Many individuals within the administration’s inner circle lack trust in the WHO and wish to symbolically demonstrate their disassociation from it on the first day.”

“If you do not actively participate in these Donald Trump institutions.

You will not be able to respond quickly when the next outbreak happens,” he stated. Gostin predicted “very lean years for the WHO,” which would mean the organization would have to substantially cut back on its scientific workforce and struggle to respond to health emergencies.

If the United States withdrew, he said, European countries would likely not increase their contributions to the World Health Organization (WHO), and China might try to strengthen its influence. He claimed that since leaving would give China more authority, it would not be a smart move.

Questions concerning the possible withdrawal were not immediately answered by the Donald Trump transition team. “Is this the same WHO we left in place for the initial administration?” a person familiar with the arrangements told the Financial Times. Right now, we don’t appear to care all that much about what they have to say.

There was no response from the World Health Organization. The group’s director-general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, called it a “unique organization” earlier this month and said it aimed to collaborate with U.S. officials.

He continued, “From our end, we are prepared to collaborate with one another.” “I believe that the leaders of the United States of America are aware of the fact that the United States cannot be safe unless the rest of the world is safe.

SOURCE: FT

SEE ALSO:

The IRS Will Give a Million People Up To $1,400. Their Identity—And Why Now?

King Charles Could Millions Annually from Renting His Properties

Continue Reading

World

Do Microplastics in the Atmosphere Endanger Your Fertility?

Published

on

Microplastic
HealthDay

(VOR News) – It is quite possible that the presence of small microplastic particles in the air may be a contributing factor to a wide variety of health problems, including malignancies of the lungs and colon.

This is something that needs additional research to be determined. There is one more item to take into consideration, and that is the potential that this is the exact circumstance.

A recent study found that tires and debris that are decomposing shed minute fragments of plastic that go airborne, so creating a form of air pollution that is not particularly widely known. This type of pollution is caused by the degradation of plastic. An example of this type of pollution is that which is discharged into the atmosphere.

The industry refers to microplastic as “air pollution.”

According to the findings of a researcher named Tracey Woodruff, who is a professor of obstetrics, gynaecology, and reproductive sciences at the University of California, San Francisco, “These microplastics are basically particulate matter from air pollution,” and it is common knowledge that this particular type of air pollution is particularly hazardous.

The researchers who supplied background notes stated that the size of microplastics is less than 5 millimetres, which is smaller than a grain of rice.

This information was provided, according to researchers. These details were supplied by the researchers who conducted the study. These particulars were provided by researchers who were responsible for carrying out the study.

The amount of plastic that is created on a yearly basis by enterprises all over the world is roughly 460 million tonnes, as indicated by the data that were provided by academics all over the world. The forecasts indicate that by the year 2050, this quantity is anticipated to have increased to 1.1 billion tonnes.

Driving is a substantial contributor to the amount of plastic that is floating around in the atmosphere, according to the conclusions of the experts who conducted the study about the phenomenon. When tires are worn down to the point where they scrape against the surface of the road, they allow microplastics to be released into the environment.

As a result of the tires wearing down, this occurs. This impact is brought about as a consequence of the inevitable amount of wear and tear that tires are subjected to.

A study that was published on December 18 in the journal Environmental Science & Technology was the result of researchers conducting an examination of data collected from over 3,000 previous investigations.

The paper was published as a consequence of this procedure. The review was constructed with the help of this analysis that was carried out.

Microplastic used this analysis to put together the review.

A number of diseases, such as cancer, lung problems, and infertility, may be influenced by the presence of microplastics in the air, according to the data, which led to the conclusion that this may be the case.

Despite the fact that the vast majority of the studies that were incorporated into the study were carried out on animals, the researchers claimed that it is very certainly plausible that the findings can also be applied to people. The fact that the majority of investigations were conducted on animals does not change the reality that this is the case.

“We urge regulatory agencies and policy leaders to consider the growing evidence of health harms from microplastics, including colon and lung cancer,” stated Nicholas Chartres, the principal investigator and senior research fellow at the University of Sydney.

The organisation reported this comment. The University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) issued a press release on behalf of the organisation that contained this statement. The news release was disseminated to the public. We are convinced that state officials will act quickly to make sure that no leaks of this kind occur, which is of the highest importance.

SOURCE: USN

SEE ALSO:

Justin Trudeau’s Fight for Gender Equity in Canada

Liberal MPs Call on Trudeau to Resign

Continue Reading

World

Russian Oil Ships In The Kerch Strait Are Undergoing Rescue Operations.

Published

on

Russian
AP

(VOR News) – Following Sunday’s powerful storm, a Russian oil tanker carrying hundreds of tonnes of oil products ultimately broke apart, causing an oil spill into the Kerch Strait below. Additionally, Russian officials reported that the damage was causing problems for another vessel.

Sunday, Russian authorities announced an emergency rescue operation.

According to the Russian state news agency TASS, which claimed the Emergency Situations Ministry as its source, the Volgoneft-212 tanker, carrying fuel oil and carrying thirteen crew members, ran aground and suffered damage to its bow. A shipment of fuel oil was being transported by the tanker.

Authorities have told the public that the damage was brought on by the extreme weather conditions that are currently occurring.

A second tanker, the Volgoneft-239, was damaged during the storm and is currently stranded in the same area with 14 crew members on board, according to the Ministry of Emergency Situations. The tanker was discovered abandoned and alone in the same spot.

Additional tankers also suffered damage. The 132-meter-long cruiser, which was constructed in 1973, hangs the Russian flag around its neck.

The footage posted by state media showed the 136-meter Volgoneft-212 tanker, which was cut in two with its bow underwater, and waves crashing over its deck. At least one person lost his life as a result of this tragedy. This led to the opening of two distinct criminal investigations by the Russian authorities to look into potential violations of certain safety regulations.

Having flown the Russian flag since 1969, the yacht was finished.

Rosmorrechflot, the Russian government agency in charge of water transportation, reported a petroleum product spill.

It is believed that the cargo capacity of each tanker is around 4,200 tonnes of oil products.

The magnitude of the leak and the cause of the substantial damage one of the tankers received were not specified in the official remarks. This is in accordance with the official remarks.

Several news sites cited Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov as saying that President Vladimir Putin directed the formation of a working committee to handle the rescue effort and lessen the effects of the oil disaster.

Peskov recommended that the government appoint the working committee’s members. This comment was made public right after Putin met with the ministries responsible for ecology and disaster management.

The Russian government has said that it will be sending more than fifty individuals and pieces of equipment to the area in response to the current crisis. Mi-8 helicopters and rescue tugboats are examples of these people and tools.

The news that experts are presently investigating the damage at the event site was announced by Svetlana Radionova, who is in charge of Rosprirodnadzor, Russia’s natural resources regulating entity.

Kommersant reports that Volgoneft-212 used 4,300 tonnes of fuel oil.

The footage, which showed a partially submerged ship and murky water on rough seas, was posted to Telegram without the owner’s consent.

The warships were located in the Kerch Strait, which separates Crimea from the Russian mainland, when the distress signals were sent out.

The Kerch Strait is a crucial international marine passage that connects the Black Sea with the Sea of Azov, allowing for easier traffic between the two bodies of water. It also acts as a border between Russia and the Crimean Peninsula, which is under Russian occupation. The Kerch Strait is located in the centre of the two nations.

The peninsula has remained a major source of contention between the two national governments ever since Russia annexed it from Ukraine in 2014. Russia was the one who seized the peninsula. Ukraine brought legal action against Russia before the Permanent Court of Arbitration in 2016.

Specifically, the lawsuit claimed that Russia intended to illegally take over a location. The argument was supported by evidence pertaining to Russia’s conduct in the region. In 2021, the Russian Federation closed the strait for several consecutive months

SOURCE: VN

SEE ALSO:

Indian Students Studying in Canada Fret Over Visa Scrutiny

Trudeau Sparks Anger After Labeling Trump Voters “Misogynists”

Continue Reading

Trending