News
Alaska Oil Project Approval Adds Yet Another Climate Concern
Alaska, Juneau — Even as experts urgently warn that only a halt to more fossil fuel emissions can stem climate change, the Biden administration’s approval of a large oil development in northern Alaska binds the U.S. to yet another decades-long crude project.
At its height, the Willow project by ConocoPhillips would produce 180,000 barrels of oil per day, and burning that oil would emit at least 263 million tons (239 million metric tons) of greenhouse gases over 30 years.
As the earth warms, oil demand isn’t declining, and a contentious political battle over the project, which was approved on Monday, has highlighted the Democratic administration’s struggle to strike a balance between economic constraints and commitments to reduce fossil fuel use. The plan in the isolated area north of the Arctic Circle also draws attention to the contradiction that the United States and other countries are currently dealing with: the world’s transition to renewable energy lags behind the realities of an economy that is still mainly dependent on oil consumption.
We must eventually leave coal, oil, and gas in the ground. And that time is now, especially in a delicate ecosystem like the Arctic, according to Stanford University climate scientist Rob Jackson.
Upon announcing Willow’s clearance, Interior Secretary Deb Haaland emphasized that the number of drill pads had been decreased from ConocoPhillips’ initial plan by 40%, noting that this would benefit both humans and wildlife. Yet, according to official estimates, the corporation will still likely obtain the majority of the oil it sought, resulting in a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions of only 8%.
After a severe decline in oil production since the late 1980s, the project hopes to revitalize Alaska’s economy. It had the support of both party leaders in the state. The North Slope of Alaska, which is petroleum-rich, is where distant communities and villages can benefit from oil’s economic vitality.
Greenhouse gases produced by the project would contribute to melting the Arctic sea ice in Alaska.
Yet, the state has also experienced the effects of climate change: sea ice is receding, unique wildfires are surfacing, and melting permafrost threatens to release carbon into the atmosphere.
Lawyers for an Alaska Native organization and environmentalists have petitioned a federal judge to halt Willow’s approval in a lawsuit filed on Tuesday. According to The Sovereign Iupiat for a Living Arctic, Sierra Club, and other organizations, Interior Department officials disregarded that every ton of greenhouse gases produced by the project would contribute to melting the Arctic sea ice, endangering polar bears and Alaskan villages.
If nations, including the United States, are to achieve their 2050 objective of net-zero emissions—where only as much planet-warming gas is emitted into the atmosphere as can be absorbed—new drilling investments must be halted, according to the International Energy Agency.
90% of global carbon dioxide emissions and 75% of all greenhouse gases produced by humans are attributed to the energy industry.
Nonetheless, industry analysts and the U.S. Energy Information Administration predict that the demand for crude will keep growing globally.
Jim Krane, an energy specialist, suggested that authorities should concentrate on lowering demand rather than aiming to reduce domestic supplies of such fuels, such as initiatives like Willow.
According to Krane of Rice University’s Baker Center for Public Affairs, refiners will withdraw their oil from abroad if supply in the United States is targeted without any effort made to reduce demand in Alaska.
Willow’s greenhouse gas emissions would be almost 1.7 million automobiles worth or little over 0.1% of all emissions.
Electric vehicles are a potential replacement for gasoline-powered automobiles and trucks, but they have yet to do much to reduce the demand for fossil fuels. According to Enverus Intelligence Research, a company specializing in data research for the energy sector, EVs are anticipated to replace 2.7 million barrels of oil annually by 2030 in Alaska.
That is less than 3% of the world’s total oil consumption, which Al Salazar, senior vice president of the research firm, predicts will be around 100 million barrels per day in 2030.
Demand doesn’t suddenly disappear, according to Salazar. “Replacing the whole fleet of light duty vehicles takes time.”
Republican U.S. senators have stated that drilling should be anticipated in the National Petroleum Reserve- Alaska, where the Willow project is located.
Willow’s greenhouse gas emissions would be almost 1.7 million automobiles worth or little over 0.1% of all emissions in the United States. Officials from the Interior Department have used these comparatively tiny numbers to justify approving coal mines and oil and gas leases for years.
According to Jackson, if the worst effects of climate change are to be avoided, this perspective cannot be maintained. The Earth is “as far from zero emissions as we’ve ever been,” despite the focus on renewable energy.
It’s the same as thinking that any new automobile we build or coal plant in Alaska we construct is irrelevant because millions of other coal plants and thousands of other coal plants are functioning worldwide, he said.
In contrast to the early months of Biden’s presidency, the administration had already eased its attitude to oil and gas before the Willow decision. To win over Democratic holdout U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, the administration committed to tens of millions of acres of new leasing during discussions over last year’s climate package.
The legislation includes clauses connecting renewable energy sources’ growth and oil and gas leasing. As a result, on March 29, the administration will put up for sale oil and gas leases Alaska covering more than 73 million acres (29.5 million hectares) in the Gulf of Mexico. It also intends to auction off around 350,000 acres (141,600 hectares) of onshore oil and gas leases in Wyoming, New Mexico, Montana, Nevada, and other states over months beginning in May.
Activists claim that during 50 years, the Gulf sale alone may produce more than 1 billion barrels of oil.
“This administration has promised to supervise a historic shift to renewable energy, but deeds speak louder than words,” said George Torgun of Earthjustice, who represents environmental groups attempting to halt additional lease sales.
SOURCE – (AP)
News
Man Creates Candy Cane Car to Spread Christmas Cheer
In a delightful display of holiday spirit, a local resident in North Providence, Maine, has transformed his vehicle into a candy cane delight that is capturing hearts and spreading Christmas Cheer.
Over the past 15 years, Dave Clayman has transformed a simple 1991 Toyota Camry into a rolling holiday icon that captivates everyone who encounters it.
It’s wrapped in $3,000 worth of reflective tape, the same kind used on trailer trucks. Whether parked at a mall or cruising down the highway, you can’t miss it with its candy cane decorations.
This whimsical project started with an unusual idea. When an old exercise bike landed in Clayman’s possession, he mounted it on top of his car instead of letting it gather dust in his garage.
“There’s nothing like working out in the fresh air,” Dave said. That quirky addition quickly drew eyes, inspiring him to keep going.
The car features homemade rockets built from trash cans and salad bowls, candy cane-themed hubcaps, and candy cane lights dangling from the mounted exercise bike.
The Candy Cane Car cost Clayman $3,000
To top it off, it boasts a PA system and a custom horn, making it a true sensory experience.
The candy cane car has now become a local landmark every Christmas. Parked outside Clayman’s house, it’s a favourite backdrop for people snapping photos or simply stopping to admire it.
Some visitors even share stories of seeing the car as a child, reminiscing about how it’s been a beloved part of their neighbourhood for years.
“When people see it, their mood amplifies,” Clayman explained. “If they’re happy, they become happier. If they’re upset, well, they sometimes get angrier.” But for the most part, he estimates that over 96% of people love the festive car, particularly around Christmas.
Clayman said he used to wear a Santa costume when riding in his festive car for years. A few years ago, he bought a Grinch costume and never looked back.
“It’s like a state of euphoria. Every time I get behind the wheel and people see it,” he said. “Anything that people are in a better mood, it seems to make you in a better mood. It’s a labor of love you got to be committed to it.”
Related News:
Costco Is Offering The Peloton Bike+ At 300 Locations This Holiday Season.
News
Senate Approves Social Security Fairness Act, Heads to Final Vote
(VOR News) – On Wednesday, the United States Senate Social Security passed a measure with a vote of 73-27, indicating that the legislation, which is co-sponsored by Senator Susan Collins of Maine, is likely to be implemented before the end of the year.
The law may be beneficial to personnel working in the public sector in Maine, including teachers, firefighters, and other workers.
The Social Security Fairness Act would repeal two restrictions that lower the amount of Social Security payments paid to public employees.
These regulations would be eliminated with the passage of the act. A provision known as the Windfall Elimination Provision makes it impossible for public employees who are currently receiving pensions to continue receiving them.
The Government Pension Offset, as it is commonly referred to, is designed to limit the amount of money that can be paid to the surviving spouses of recipients who are also receiving government pensions.
This problematic situation impacts Social Security benefits.”
In November 2024, the Social Security Administration reported that more than 2 million individuals, including more than 20,000 in the state of Maine, had their Social Security benefits reduced as a result of the Windfall Elimination Provision,” Collins stated in a statement that was released by her department.
In November 2024, the Government Pension Offset had an impact on more than 650,000 individuals, with more than 6,000 of those individuals residing in the state of Maine, according to the previously mentioned line of reasoning.
A vote of 327 to 75 was necessary for the measure to be approved by the House of Representatives the previous month. On Wednesday, Chuck Schumer, the Democratic leader of the Senate, announced that he intended to work rapidly in order to deliver the act from the House of Representatives to the president’s desk.
As indicated by Schumer, who was speaking on the floor of the United States Senate today, “Passing this Social Security fix right before Christmas would be a great gift for our retired firefighters, police officers, postal workers, teachers, and others who have contributed to Social Security for years but are now being penalised because of their time spent serving the public.”
In the beginning, the measure was supported by two individuals: Sherrod Brown, a Democrat from Ohio, and Collins, a Republican. During her speech in support of the proposal, which was made on the floor of the Senate on Wednesday afternoon, Collins stated that the idea will have a significant impact on a number of individuals, including teachers in the state of Maine.
These advantages are the direct result of the effort that they put forth. During the course of her remarks, Collins asserted that the punishment in question was both unreasonable and unacceptable.
This will strain Social Security’s already shaky budget.
In a recent examination, it was discovered that the Windfall Elimination Provision was one of the primary problems that contributed to the difficulties that the teacher workforce in Maine is experiencing, which experts are referring to as a crisis.
A poll that was conducted and released by the non-profit organisation Educate Maine found that teachers in each and every county in the state of Maine identified the provision as a hindering factor in the process of recruiting new teachers.
According to the findings of the study, “this federal policy that reduces social security payouts is a disincentive,” which implies that it is detrimental to teachers who take on additional work and discourages people from switching careers in order to become teachers.
Sharon Gallant, a retired educator who worked in Gardiner for a total of 31 years, is one of the educators that are now employed there. Prior to beginning his career as a teacher in the public school system, Gallant was employed in the business sector. He made a little contribution to the Social Security system during the entirety of this time period.
“When you move into public education, you are faced with a certain degree of punishment,” according to her statement.
In letters that Gallant sent to Collins and to Sen. Angus King of Maine, who is an independent, he urged both of them to support the concept. She stated that even if it is unsuccessful, Maine will still have a difficult time recruiting teachers because of the clause that deters them from employment.
She made the observation, “If this does not pass, then it is just another reason not to enter public service.”
SOURCE: FR
SEE ALSO:
The Federal Reserve Will Drop Key Rates, But Consumers May Not Gain Immediately.
News
The Federal Reserve Will Drop Key Rates, But Consumers May Not Gain Immediately.
(VOR News) – If the Federal Reserve indicates on Wednesday that interest rate reductions will proceed more gradually next year than in recent months, the United States may experience only slight alleviation from the persistently elevated costs of borrowing for credit cards, auto loans, and mortgages.
The Federal Reserve is set to announce a quarter-point reduction in its benchmark rate, anticipated to decrease from around 4.6% to approximately 4.3%.
This represents the latest action undertaken, subsequent to a quarter-point cut in interest rates in November and a larger-than-usual half-point reduction in September.
The Wednesday meeting may mark a new era for the Federal Reserve.
The Federal Reserve is more inclined to adjust its monetary policy at alternate meetings, rather than at each meeting. The central bank policymakers may announce that they now expect to reduce their primary rate only two or three times in 2025, instead of the four reductions previously planned three months ago.
The Federal Reserve has utilised the rationale of a “recalibration” of ultra-high interest rates, originally aimed at curbing inflation that peaked at a four-decade high in 2022, to defend its measures thus far.
A considerable number of Federal Reserve officials contend that interest rates should not remain as elevated as they currently are, given the substantial decline in inflation. The Federal Reserve’s chosen index shows that inflation was 2.3% in October, a notable decline from the peak of 7.2% in June 2022.
Conversely, despite the swift economic growth, inflation has consistently exceeded the Federal Reserve’s 2% target for several months. The monthly retail sales statistics released by the government on Tuesday reveals that Americans, especially those with higher incomes, are inclined to spend liberally.
These trends, as per the views of several economists, suggest that further rate decreases could unduly stimulate the economy, perhaps leading to sustained high inflation.
The incoming president, Donald Trump, has advocated reducing taxes on overtime income, tips, and Social Security benefits, along with diminishing regulations in these domains.
When combined, these Federal Reserve practices can advance progress.
Alongside the threat of imposing various tariffs, President Trump has pledged to execute extensive deportations of migrants, both of which could exacerbate inflation.
Chair Jerome Powell and other Federal Reserve officials have indicated that they cannot assess the potential effects of President-elect Trump’s policies on the economy or their own interest rate decisions until further information is available and the likelihood of the proposed initiatives being enacted becomes clearer.
Consequently, the result of the presidential election has predominantly led to heightened economic uncertainty up to that point.
It seems improbable that the United States would soon experience the advantages of significantly reduced loan interest rates. As of last week, the average rate for a 30-year mortgage was 6.6%, lower than the top rate of 7.8% recorded in October 2023, according to Freddie Mac.
It is quite unlikely that mortgage rates of approximately three percent, which were common for nearly a decade prior to the onset of the pandemic, would be restored in the foreseeable future.
Federal Reserve officials have indicated a deceleration in interest rate reductions as the benchmark rate nears what policymakers designate as a “neutral” rate, a one that provides neither advantages nor disadvantages to the economy.
During a recent meeting, Powell stated, “Inflation is slightly elevated, and growth is unequivocally stronger than we anticipated.” Nevertheless, the positive aspect is that we can afford to use greater caution while we persist in our pursuit of neutrality.
Most other central banks globally are likewise lowering their benchmark interest rates. This week, the European Central Bank lowered its benchmark interest rate for the fourth time this year, from 3.25% to 3%.
This action was taken in reaction to the decline of inflation in the 20 euro-using countries, which has fallen to 2.3% from a peak of 10.6% in late 2022.
SOURCE: AP
SEE ALSO:
Liberal MPs Call on Trudeau to Resign
ABC Gives Donald Trump’s Presidential Library $15 Million To Settle a Defamation Dispute.
-
Politics3 weeks ago
Miller Expects 4.9 Million Foreigners to Leave Canada Voluntarily
-
News3 weeks ago
Nolinor Boeing 737 Crash Lands in Montreal
-
News2 weeks ago
“Shocking Video” Vancouver Police Shoot Armed Suspect 10 Times
-
Tech3 weeks ago
Increasing its Stake in OpenAI by $1.5 Billion is a Possibility for SoftBank.
-
News4 weeks ago
Facebook Securities Fraud Case Dropped
-
Health4 weeks ago
A Canadian Teenager’s Bird Flu Virus Has Mutations