Connect with us

Politics

US Prosecutors Revise Charges Against Donald Trump Over Alleged 2020 Election Interference

Published

on

US Prosecutors Revise Charges Against Donald Trump Over Alleged 2020 Election Interference

US prosecutors have filed amended accusations against Donald Trump for allegedly attempting to intervene in the 2020 election after losing the contest.

The revised language attempts to skirt a Supreme Court decision that grants presidents extensive immunity from criminal punishment for official activities. The ruling called this case into question.

Donald Trump denies pressuring officials to alter the results, spreading false information about election fraud, and attempting to use a riot at the US Capitol to delay the certification of Joe Biden’s victory.

It looks doubtful that the case, along with the other criminal cases he faces, will be heard before the next election on November 5.

The revised indictment, filed by Department of Justice (DoJ) Special Counsel Jack Smith, maintains the four crimes Donald Trump is accused of committing: conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, attempting to obstruct an official proceeding, and conspiracy against rights.

However, these now refer to Donald Trump’s standing as a political contender, not a serving president.

Donald Trump has already pleaded not guilty to all allegations.

He stated in a post on his Truth Social platform that the new charge was “an effort to resurrect a ‘dead’ Witch Hunt” and “distract the American People” from this year’s election. He demanded that it be “dismissed IMMEDIATELY”.

His campaign did not respond to a BBC request for comment. According to a source close to his legal team, the second indictment “was not a surprise” to CBS News, the BBC’s US partner.

“This is what the government is supposed to do based on what the Supreme Court did,” a source told me. “It doesn’t change our position that we believe Smith’s case is flawed and it should be dismissed.”

The amended charging sheet, which was reduced from 45 to 36 pages, reworked the language of the claims in response to the Supreme Court’s verdict on presidential immunity last month.

It claims Trump behaved as a private man, not as president, when he allegedly attempted to impact the election.

“The defendant had no official responsibilities related to the certification proceeding, but he did have a personal interest as a candidate in being named the winner of the election,” according to a newly added section in the indictment.

Another additional paragraph mentions a lawsuit brought by Donald Trump’s campaign in Georgia. The action was “filed in his name” in the old language, but the new indictment says it was “filed in his capacity as a candidate for president”.

The new document also appears to have dropped the accusations against Jeffrey Clark, a former Department of Justice officer who prosecutors say played a crucial role in the so-called phoney electors conspiracy. Mr Clark was not named in any charge, but he has been identified by the media using public records.

The new indictment also dismisses the argument that Donald Trump attempted to compel DOJ personnel to strive to reverse his defeat. The Supreme Court found that Trump’s directive to justice officials was not illegal.

The special counsel’s office stated that the superseding indictment was submitted to a new grand jury that had not previously heard evidence in the case.

A prosecutor convenes a grand jury to evaluate whether there is sufficient evidence to proceed with a prosecution.

The latest indictment upholds numerous significant charges against Trump, including his attempt to persuade Vice President Mike Pence to obstruct Mr Biden’s election certification.

That is despite the fact that conversations between Trump and Pence are likely to come under the category of “official” activities, for which Donald Trump is immune from prosecution under the Supreme Court’s ruling.

According to Prof Daniel Richman, a constitutional law expert at Columbia Law School, the new indictment demonstrates that Mr Smith read the Supreme Court verdict to suggest that his prosecution could still proceed.

Prof Richman told the BBC that it was uncertain whether it would satisfy the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity framework. “The court was painfully vague as to what private conduct done by a president can be charged criminally,” Mr. Trump stated.

Donald Trump’s Response and Legal Team’s Position

Professor Richman stated that the revised indictment would not necessarily hasten the process. He questioned if it would be heard before the 2024 election.

According to a CBS News source close to Trump’s legal team, the former president’s lawyers would seek additional time to prepare for the case. They stated that if the judge agreed, the trial would most certainly be delayed.

In 2022, Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed Mr. Smith to oversee two federal investigations into Donald Trump: the election interference case and another involving the ex-president’s alleged removal of classified documents from his Florida home.

On Monday, Mr Smith’s lawyers filed an appeal against a Florida judge’s decision to reject the latter lawsuit. Judge Aileen Cannon argued that the sheer existence of special counsels violated the United States Constitution.

Mr Smith argued that the judge’s decision “deviated” from legal tradition.

Both cases have uncertain fates following the Supreme Court’s momentous ruling.

In a second Georgia lawsuit, Donald Trump and 18 other defendants are accused of criminally scheming to overturn his narrow 2020 defeat. He pleaded not guilty, and no trial date has been scheduled.

In May, Donald Trump was convicted in New York of falsifying business documents to conceal hush money payments to a porn star. He is currently awaiting sentencing.

If Donald Trump defeats Democratic challenger Kamala Harris in November, he is generally expected to instruct officials to drop any lingering federal charges against him.

Source: BBC

Politics

Trump Media Stock Jumps After Former President Says He Won’t Sell Shares When Lockup Expires

Published

on

trump

NEW YORK — Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. shares rose on Friday after former President Donald Trump said he would not sell his ownership in the social media company.

“I don’t want to sell my stock. “I don’t need money,” Donald told reporters at his golf club in Los Angeles.

Donald owns over 115 million shares in the corporation, according to a recent SEC filing. According to Thursday’s closing price of $16.08, Donald’s stock is worth nearly $1.85 billion.

trump

Trump Media Stock Jumps After Former President Says He Won’t Sell Shares When Lockup Expires

If the former president desires, he can begin selling shares of Trump Media, the parent company of Truth Social, on September 19, when a lockup provision expires. The lockup agreement banned corporate insiders from selling newly issued shares for six months after the company went public in March.

Even though Donald would earn a sizable payoff if he sold, Trump Media’s stock is now significantly less valuable than it was six months ago. When the company debuted on the Nasdaq in March, it reached a high of $79.38.

Donald founded Truth Social after being barred from Twitter and Facebook following the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol brawl. Trump Media, headquartered in Sarasota, Florida, has been losing money and failing to generate revenue. According to regulatory documents, it lost approximately $58.2 million last year and generated only $4.1 million in revenue.

trump

Trump Media Stock Jumps After Former President Says He Won’t Sell Shares When Lockup Expires

“I use it as a method of getting out my word,” Donald remarked on Friday about Truth Social. “For me, it is a great voice.”

Following Donald’s debate with Vice President Kamala Harris, the stock fell by more than 10% on Wednesday. On Friday, shares rose as much as 29% and closed up 11.8%.

SOURCE | AP

Continue Reading

Politics

Liberal Defence Departments Spends $34 Million on Sleeping Bags Unsuitable for Canadian Winters

Published

on

Sleeping Bags Unsuitable for Canadian Winters

Canadian soldiers travelling to an Alaskan military drill were given 1960s military sleeping bags after complaining that the new ones were poor quality and unsuitable for sub-zero weather.

Despite the Liberal government spending more than $34.8 million on new sleeping bags, the Canadian Army requested late last year that hundreds of soldiers attending a joint northern exercise in Alaska with the Americans be provided antiquated, 1960s-vintage sleeping bags.

In late November last year, about 350 men from the 3rd battalion of the Canadian Princess Patricia’s Light Infantry went to Ram Falls Provincial Park, west of Red Deer, Alta., to train for northern operations.

During the training exercise last autumn, soldiers stated that despite using both the inner and outer shells and sleeping in stove-heated tents, they remained cold.

The temperatures during the exercise ranged from -5°C during the day to -20°C at night. According to an internal DND report dated December 5, 2023, the soldiers noticed “critical issues” with the new GPSBS sleeping bags, including a lack of warmth.

GPSB sleeping bags

GPSB sleeping bags cost taxpayers $34.8 million, were not suitable for for typical Canadian winter conditions – CBC Image

The inadequacy of the new GPSB sleeping bags caused the Department of National Defence (DND) to begin seeking for extra sleeping bags to keep soldiers warm and usable in the Far North.

The briefing memo proposed that soldiers participating in the drill with the US be “loaned” 500 of the army’s old Arctic sleeping bags, which the new system was intended to replace.

The Trudeau administration has emphasised the importance of protecting Canada’s Arctic in recent defence policy updates, and has committed a series of new equipment acquisitions for cold weather operations.

Specifically, the policy promised to purchase “new vehicles adapted to ice, snow, and tundra.”

However, some soldiers who contacted CBC News with complaints about the sleeping bags expressed scepticism about such claims, citing DND’s failure to deliver on something as fundamental as a sleeping bag fit for the Canadian winter.

The DND stated that the 3rd battalion was the second unit to complain about the new sleeping bags. During a separate drill, troops from the 2nd Battalion, Royal Canadian Regiment, discovered flaws in the new sleeping bags.

Nonetheless, the government stated that it will not abandon the new sleeping bags and has begun a separate procurement of sleeping bags fit for a Canadian winter at an undisclosed cost to taxpayers.

In its statement to the CBC, the DND stated that it solicited comments from soldiers, but they did not respond immediately when asked what type of cold weather testing was conducted before purchasing the sleeping bags.

The GPSBS sleeping bags were chosen through a rigorous competition process, with technical requirements such as insulation value, bag weight, and packing volume, according to the DND.

Related News:

NATO Secretary-General Urges Trudeau to Honour Canada’s Spending Target

NATO Secretary-General Urges Trudeau to Honour Canada’s Spending Target

 

 

 

Continue Reading

Politics

Trudeau’s Grapples With a Mass Exodus of Senior Staff

Published

on

Trudeau
Five chiefs of staff for Liberal ministers have quit - Image Counter Signal

The minority Liberals are returning to a precarious position in the House of Commons, having lost the automatic support of the New Democratic Party, as Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government is currently grappling with an exodus of senior staff.

According to six Liberal sources who each confirmed some of the names of those leaving, five of his 38 ministers are losing their chiefs of staff in quick succession, with several already gone. These chiefs of staff include the top advisers at Global Affairs, Heritage, Environment, National Revenue, and Mental Health and Addictions.

According to the sources, a number of employees had been contemplating their departures for months, while others had been entertaining the idea for an extended period before ultimately making the decision. Some of the sources stated that five out of 38 is a significant decrease, despite the fact that the Liberals have frequently encountered turnover among their ministerial staff since assuming office in 2015.

The Globe and Mail is refraining from disclosing the sources due to their inability to disclose an internal staffing change.

A spokesperson for the Prime Minister’s Office downplayed the importance of the departures. Hundreds of political personnel are responsible for providing support to our government, cabinet ministers, and members of Parliament. Turnover is a typical aspect of the employment process for the personnel who perform this critical function, according to Mohammad Hussain, the press secretary for the PMO.

Trudeau’s loss of its top executive

Peter Wilkinson, the director of staff to Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly, is departing the office less than two years after his appointment. Senior staff member Jamie Kippen, who has served as the chief of staff to Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault for an extended period, has already completed his final day. Jude Welch, the director of staff for Heritage Minister Pascale St-Onge, has already departed.

Sarah Welch, the chief for Ya’ara Saks, the Minister of Mental Health and Addictions, and Frédérique Tsai-Klassen, the chief to Minister of National Revenue Marie-Claude Bibeau, are also departing. According to the sources, the majority of the senior staff who are departing do not currently have a position lined up. However, they are eligible for severance payments that are calculated based on their years of service.

The party’s loss of its top executive, national campaign director Jeremy Broadhurst, a prominent senior Liberal for the past two decades, coincides with the exodus of top staff in ministerial offices. He was previously the national campaign director in 2019 and a senior adviser in the PMO before returning to the party last year.

Mr. Broadhurst tendered his resignation on Thursday, mere days prior to Mr. Trudeau’s scheduled meeting with his caucus in Nanaimo, British Columbia. Three Members of Parliament informed The Globe that they are anticipating the Prime Minister’s presentation of a credible strategy to regain the support of Canadian electors.

Senior staff members have resigned

According to two senior officials, it is unlikely that Mr. Trudeau will designate a replacement for Mr. Broadhurst at the caucus meeting. Nevertheless, an official in the PMO stated that the caucus will be provided with a comprehensive roadmap for the upcoming election. The two officials who were prohibited from disclosing the internal planning are not being identified by The Globe and Mail.

In addition to the anticipated resignation of Transportation Minister Pablo Rodriguez and the departure of Labour Minister Seamus O’Regan in July, all of the senior staff members have resigned.

Mr. O’Regan was a significant political ally of Mr. Trudeau. Mr. Rodriguez is anticipated to declare his departure from the federal Liberals in order to participate in the provincial party’s leadership race, as he currently occupies the most significant political position in Quebec for the government.

“I believe it is a sign of the end of government,” Lori Turnbull, chair of the public and international affairs department at Dalhousie University told the Globe and Mail. She said senior staff members are aware that their departures will only exacerbate the perception and reality of the current state of Trudeau and the government.”

“There is a perception that the Trudeau government has reached its conclusion and that the upcoming election will result in a loss.” The departure of senior staff indicates that even those who are committed to Team Trudeau can perceive the impending doom.

“It raises the question of whether we would witness the same departures in the event that a new leader were selected,” she continued.

The second-in-commands for each office have already been appointed to numerous top-level positions; however, the most critical position at Global Affairs has yet to be permanently replaced.

As of Sunday, Alexandre Boulé has assumed the role of interim chief for Ms. Joly, according to her office. In the interim, deputy chief of staff Joanna Dafoe will succeed Mr Kippen at Environment, and deputy Michael Lartigau will succeed Mr Welch at Heritage.

Marianne Dandurand has succeeded Ms. Tsai-Klassen as the superintendent of National Revenue.

The office announced on Sunday that the position of chief to the Mental Health and Addictions minister is still vacant.

Related News:

Trudeau Courts Canadian Separatists Party to Stay in Power

Trudeau Courts Canadian Separatists Party to Stay in Power

Continue Reading

Download Our App

vornews app

Advertise Here

Volunteering at Soi Dog

Soi Dog

Trending