Connect with us

U.K News

A Neonatal Nurse In A British Hospital Has Been Found Guilty Of Killing 7 Babies

Published

on

hospital

LONDON, England – A neonatal nurse in a British hospital was found guilty Friday of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder six more following a yearlong deception campaign in which she preyed on the weaknesses of ailing newborns and their worried parents.

The jury at Manchester Crown Court convicted Lucy Letby, 33, of killing the babies, including two triplet boys, in the newborn ward at the Countess of Chester Hospital in northwest England between June 2015 and June 2016. On Monday, she will be sentenced.

“Parents were exposed to her morbid curiosity and fake compassion,” senior prosecutor Pascale Jones said. “Far too many of them went home to empty baby rooms.” Many surviving children are still dealing with the long-term effects of her assaults on their lives.”

Jones described her attacks as “a complete betrayal of the trust placed in her.”

Families of the victims said they would “forever be grateful” to jurors who had to suffer through 145 days of “gruelling” evidence since last October.

They also expressed their appreciation to all individuals who came to give evidence throughout the trial, which they described as “extremely harrowing and distressing” to listen to in a joint statement read outside court.

“Losing a baby is a heartbreaking experience that no parent should ever have to go through,” they stated. “But losing a baby or having a baby harmed in these specific circumstances is unimaginable.”

Letby’s motivations are unknown, but the scope of her acts suggests meticulous planning.

hospital

A neonatal nurse in a British hospital was found guilty Friday of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder six more.

She was accused of intentionally injuring the newborns, pumping air into their bloodstreams and putting air or milk into their stomachs through nasogastric tubes. She was also accused of poisoning infants by tainting intravenous feeding with insulin and messing with breathing tubes.

Soon after the verdicts, the British government established an independent review into the broader circumstances surrounding what happened at the hospital, including handling employee concerns.

“This inquiry will seek to ensure that the parents and families affected receive the answers they require,” stated Health Secretary Steve Barclay. “I am determined that their voices are heard, and that they are involved in shaping the scope of the inquiry if they so desire.”

One of the Countess of Chester Hospital ‘s senior doctors told the BBC that he had frequently sought to raise the alarm about Letby, but hospital management refused to investigate the claims.

Dr. Stephen Brearley, the neonatal unit’s lead doctor, stated that the hospital attempted to suppress clinicians who complained about Letby and delayed notifying the police.

Before reaching its decision, the jury of seven women and four men pondered for 22 days. One juror was excused for personal reasons during deliberations, and the judge later allowed the other 11 jurors to reach a result with 10 individuals in agreement rather than a unanimous vote.

Letby was convicted guilty of seven murders and seven attempted murder charges involving six minors. She was found not guilty on two counts of attempted murder, and the jury could not decide on several others.

hospital

A neonatal nurse in a British hospital was found guilty Friday of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder six more.

Some verdicts were announced in court earlier this month, but the judge barred them from being reported until the deliberations were completed.

During the lengthy trial, prosecutors said that in 2015, the hospital began to see a large increase in the number of babies dying or suffering rapid deterioration in their health for no apparent cause. Some experienced “serious catastrophic collapses” but lived thanks to medical assistance.

Prosecutors described Letby as a “constant malevolent presence” in the neonatal ward when the children collapsed or died in all of the incidents. They said the nurse damaged the newborns inconspicuously and convinced her colleagues that the collapses and deaths were normal.

Letby was accused in November 2020 after police inquired into the hospital’s baby fatalities in May 2017.

“The last thing we expected to find was a suspect responsible for these deaths and non-fatal collapses,” said Detective Superintendent Paul Hughes, the lead investigating officer.

“It’s difficult enough to show up at the home of a family who has lost a baby, grieved for their loss, and is trying to move on from that, but having to tell them that someone who was supposed to be caring for their little one could ultimately be responsible for their death — that’s not an easy task,” he added.

hospital

A neonatal nurse in a British hospital was found guilty Friday of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder six more.

Letby testified for 14 days and declared her innocence. During the trial, the defense argued that she was a “hard-working, dedicated, and caring” nurse who loved her job and that the infants’ sudden collapses and deaths could have been caused by natural causes or by other factors such as hospital staffing shortages or failure by others to provide appropriate care.

Letby fought back tears as the jury found her guilty of two counts of attempted murder on Aug. 8 and burst into tears as she exited the courtroom. She was back in court three days later when she was found guilty of four murders and two attempted murders.

She did not appear in court as more verdicts were revealed on Friday, and she has informed the court that she does not desire to be in court on Monday or to watch the sentencing hearing by video link.

A message discovered at Letby’s home following her arrest in 2018 will now be used as a terrifying confession.

“I don’t deserve to live,” she scribbled on a green sticky note displayed in court. “I killed them on purpose because I’m not good enough to care for them.”

“I am a horrible evil person,” she said. “I AM THE EVIL WHO DID THIS.”

SOURCE – (AP)

Kiara Grace is a staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. Her writing focuses on technology trends, particularly in the realm of consumer electronics and software. With a keen eye for detail and a knack for breaking down complex topics.

Continue Reading

U.K News

Keir Starmer Rejects Meeting With WW2 Veteran Over Her Frozen Pension

Published

on

Anne Puckridge, orld War Two veteran, state pension
"It's the injustice of it that is so unfair, the fact that we were never warned."

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has rejected a request from a 99-year-old WW2 for a meeting to discuss the frozen state pension policy for citizens living abroad. Starmer declined the meeting but offered an alternative meeting with Pensions Minister Emma Reynolds.

Anne Puckridge, who turns 100 this month, went from her home in Canada to agitate Keir Starmer’s Labour government over the state pension freeze.

The World War II veteran told the BBC that she is “angry” and “heartbroken” following a meeting with the pensions minister, who led her to believe that the government will not reconsider its policy of freezing the state pensions of some British people living abroad.

Anne Puckridge is one of approximately 453,000 British retirees living overseas who do not receive an annual increase in their state pension.

Pensions Minister Emma Reynolds agreed to a meeting after Sir Keir Starmer’s request to meet was denied owing to purported “pressures on his diary.”

Ms. Puckridge stated that the meeting in Parliament left her feeling “bitterly disappointed” and “disgusted”.

She stated that she had the idea Reynolds had been “polite enough and kind enough to come in and spend her time with her,” but that her mind had already been made up before the meeting began.

Ms Puckridge stated that she and her other campaigners would have to think carefully about what they could do from now on, but she assured them that they would take action.

State Pension Minister Reynolds thanked Ms Puckridge for the meeting and for sharing her insights.

A Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) representative stated that the government recognizes that “people move abroad for various reasons, and we provide clear information on how this can affect their pensions.”

The policy of increasing the UK state pension for recipients living abroad has existed for many years.

Since she relocated to Canada in 2001 at the age of 76 to live closer to her daughter, Ms Puckridge has received £72.50 (C$129.00) per week.

Her state pension is now less than half the £169.50 (C$302.00) paid to seniors still residing in the United Kingdom. She told the BBC that frozen pensions touch all aspects of life.

“You’ve got to be careful about entertainment,” she told me. “You must realize that you cannot be as kind to your grandkids as you would like.

“You feel you’ve lost all sense of dignity, the government has thrown you away, you know, out of sight out of mind.”

Ms. Puckridge stated that when she alerted the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) that she was moving to Canada, “they never said a word about [my] pension being frozen”.

“The first I knew about it was when my first rise was due,” she recalled.

“I didn’t understand it. So I wrote and enquired about it, and I was told no… you will not receive any additional pension rises when you leave the UK.” She said, “It’s the injustice of it that is so unfair, the fact that we were never warned.”

Related News:

Paris Trash Strike Ends, Pension Protest Numbers Shrink

 

 

 

Continue Reading

U.K News

Air Force Drones Spotted Over UK Military Bases

Published

on

Air Force Drones Spotted Over UK Military Bases
The drones were not considered hostile, the USAF said,

British military expertise has been brought in to assist in identifying persons responsible for flying Air Force drones near US military locations. According to the BBC, 60 RAF troops have been dispatched to assist the US Air Force with its probe.

The Air Force drones were not deemed hostile, according to the USAF, who added that the sightings “fluctuated and varied between the bases” and “ranged in sizes and configurations”.

According to the Ministry of Defence, “We are supporting the US Air Force response.”

The announcement follows several recent reports of unmanned aerial vehicles sighted near RAF Lakenheath and RAF Mildenhall in Suffolk and RAF Feltwell in adjacent Norfolk.

There have been other reports of drone activity overnight. According to the USAF, the vehicles were few in number and modest in size.

A representative for the US Air Forces in Europe stated, “We can confirm that there were sightings yesterday during nighttime hours, but the number fluctuated and varied between the bases throughout the night.”

The official stated that since the first sightings on November 20th, there has been “no impact on residents or infrastructure, and they have not been identified as hostile.”

However, the Air Force drones remained under surveillance “to ensure the safety and security of the installations.”

They said, “We request individuals in the area to contact either local police or security forces if they see anything suspicious.”

Treat threats seriously’

Officials in the United States and the United Kingdom have not said who is responsible for the recent drone activity.

However, the BBC understands there were worries that a state actor could be involved.

In recent months, intelligence officials have warned of increasing Russian sabotage operations against Western countries supporting Ukraine.

RAF Mildenhall is primarily home to the USAF’s 100th Air Refuelling Wing; RAF Lakenheath is home to USAF F-35A and F-15E fighter jets; and RAF Feltwell is mainly concerned with logistics and provides housing for military personnel.

A spokesman for the MoD, which owns the bases, said: “We take threats seriously and maintain robust measures at defence sites.

“We are supporting the US Air Force response.”

The USAF has not said who it believed to be behind the incidents.

Related News:

US Military Shoots Down Missiles And Drones

US Military Shoots Down Missiles And Drones As It Faces Growing Threats In Volatile Middle East

Continue Reading

U.K News

General Election Petition in UK Hits 2 Million Signatures

Published

on

Keir Starmer, UK, General Election
Starmer has ruled out an general election after a petition reached two million signatures

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has ruled out holding an early general election after a petition calling for a second vote garnered two million signatures.

Over the weekend, a petition calling for another general election was started on the UK Parliament website. It cited Starmer’s failure to keep all his pledges made in the run-up to the previous election. By Monday mid-morning, it had surpassed two million signatures.

When asked about the petition, Starmer said he was “not surprised” that some individuals who did not vote for Labour in the previous election want a “re-run” of the poll.

He claimed that he had “inherited a lot of problems” from the previous administration and had resolved to “take the hard decisions first.”

Starmer ruled out an early general election, stating that only the Prime Minister can request that the King call a general election; it simply will not happen, he said.

This petition, started last week and sponsored by Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, calls on the government to schedule a new general election.
To sign a petition, you must verify that you are a British citizen or resident and provide a postcode.

The petition states, “I would prefer there to be another general election. I believe the present Labour government has broken the pledges they made before the last election.”

The petition comes only five months after Labour won the July general election with 9.7 million votes and 412 seats in the House of Commons.

However, the Labour Party garnered only 35% of the vote, the lowest percentage gained by a single-party administration since the conclusion of WWII.

Some of the policies implemented by Starmer and his Labour government have received significant criticism, including an inheritance tax on farms, a reduction in winter heating payments, an increase in employers’ national insurance, and applying VAT to private school fees.

According to the most recent Ipsos political pulse poll, the Labour Party is unpopular, with 28% of the public favoring it and 49% opposing it.

Related News:

Hamas Calls for Peace After Trump Wins General Election

Hamas Calls for Peace After Trump Wins Election

Continue Reading

Trending