Anyone with eyes and brains can see that rogue Canadian spies are de facto running the country’s foreign policy. Foreign Minister Melanie Joly is formally second in command to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who is the de facto head of diplomatic missions.
The events of the past year have proven, however, that Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is powerless in the face of the unaccountable security services, over which he, his cabinet, and his inept national security advisers have no control.
Giddy editorial writers and columnists have been celebrating the planned behaviour of nameless bureaucrats with badges focused on getting their way regardless of the human and geopolitical implications, instead of acknowledging this alarming fact.
For months, an entitled group of spies has been responsible for the leak — drip, drip, drip — of cherry-picked so-called “intelligence” fragments concerning China’s purported intervention in Canada’s domestic affairs, with handpicked, credulous conduits in the press at the agreeable ready.
In my opinion, Trudeau and his closest advisors saw early on that caving to pressure would set a terrible example. Instead of taking either extreme, Trudeau appointed a special rapporteur to investigate the mounting charges.
Trudeau’s Bungling
The spooks’ explicit demand at the base of the domino-like series of hyperbolic, uncorroborated “revelations” was the institution of a public inquiry, and he bungled it and then caved to it.
Canadian spies, now full of arrogance and convinced they will never be caught, have apparently set their sights on India.
While appearing on the podcast of Canada’s national newspaper, The Globe and Mail, a journalist revealed that he had been briefed by “sources” on the emerging allegation that India had murdered Canadian Sikh separatist Hardeep Singh Nijjar in Canada.
Later, he claimed, the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) asked the paper’s editor to delay the story’s publication for at least a week so that Canadian intelligence agencies could continue their “work,” presumably to gather and corroborate the still nebulous “evidence” connecting India to the murder plot.
The Globe declined. The newspaper counter offered that, due to the importance of the subject, it may wait a day or two before publishing.
At some point, just before Trudeau was to make his hasty, qualified address to parliament and the nation, the Globe published an article online suggesting a “potential link” between Indian “agents” and Nijjar’s June killing in the parking lot of a Sikh temple in British Columbia.
Canada’s failed trade mission
As far as I can gather from unofficial sources, the PMO had approached a small number of reporters in order to inform them of the prime minister’s upcoming announcement on India’s alleged role in Nijjar’s killing.
The goal of this move was to head off any inquiries or criticisms that might have arisen from Canada’s failed trade mission to New Delhi or from Trudeau’s weak, clumsy handshake with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the G20 meeting.
The fact that Trudeau felt pressured to “get ahead” of the leak to the Globe is further proof that emboldened spies are in charge of what amounts to a parallel administration out to shame and blackmail a sitting prime minister into doing their bidding.
This is a gross disregard for the democratic process and a serious breach of the security services’ advisory role in Canada.
Starry-eyed commentators and writers, who have lost sight of the enormous damage being done, celebrate these shadowy scoundrels as “whistle blowers” rather than censoring them for gross abuses of power and dangerous behaviour.
Champion of foreign interference
Here’s the other inconvenient truth that journalists-turned-cheerleaders who don’t know anything about the seedy underbelly of “espionage” fail to understand: There are more sinners than saints living there, and it doesn’t matter where they came from.
Take, for example, the “disclosure” that a member of the Five Eyes, a group consisting of Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand, had spied on Indian diplomats and allegedly passed on incriminating information about Nijjar’s killing to Ottawa.
These ignorant defenders seem to believe that the Five Eyes alliance only spies on the “bad guys” since that is what “we” (the “good guys”) do to keep you and me safe.
I hate to be the one to break news to the wish-upon-a-star-Jiminy-Cricket brigade, but the Five Eyes constantly spies on its closest allies and each other as well.
Why? In order to gain future power and influence, it is necessary to amass vast amounts of sensitive diplomatic, military, and commercial information, as well as personal, lurid details.
Oh, where is the outcry over involvement from abroad? The New York Times, that champion of “foreign interference,” gave full voice to the lowest point of the West’s always convenient and galling duplicity on the “extrajudicial” killing count.
Orchestrated assassinations by the spy services
Meanwhile, India is definitely snooping on its “strategic allies” in retaliation (nudge nudge, wink wink). For the “good guys” who engage in interference and “targeted killings” (the Times’ sterile euphemism for murder), the Times has recently supplied expected cover.
The crime and the potential participation of the Indian government have stunned officials in Washington. It is unusual for a democratic country to conduct a lethal covert action in another democracy,” the Times wrote, contrasting this with the practise of targeted killing by democracies in unstable countries or regions and the orchestration of assassinations by the spy services of more authoritarian governments, such as Russia.
Yes, the “good guys” kill people, but they only do it in “unstable countries or regions.” That appears to be the majority of our tumultuous globe right now. Anyway, autocratic “bad guys” like Putin kill people all around the world, unlike the democratic “good guys.”
Reports out of Washington DC indicate widespread disbelief and perplexity in the White House and State Department. Their friend Modi may be either a “good guy” or a “bad guy,” and they can’t decide which he is.
The Times, of course, has forgotten America’s long, bloody, not-so-distant and recent history of encouraging and helping orchestrate coups against democratically elected governments in the Balkans, Central and South America, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia, not to mention the disastrous invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan.
They seem to be irrelevant. To put it bluntly, Trudeau needs to catch Canada’s freelance spies and make it quite obvious who the boss is.
He may also be curious as to how an Indian agent who is sure to get away with murdering a Canadian on Canadian soil was able to get away with it, and how they and their similarly groggy colleagues at the Royal Canadian Mounted Police allowed it to happen.
A second investigation by the public might be in order in that case.
