Connect with us

U.K News

Tom Watson Is The Latest To Want Answers On The PGA Tour’s 2023 Deal With Saudi Backers

Published

on

watson

LA – Tom Watson, an eight-time major winner, wrote PGA Tour Commissioner Jay Monahan on Monday to clarify the new business relationship between the Tour and Saudi investors in LIV Golf. Watson also questioned whether the arrangement was the only approach to address the Tour’s financial difficulties.

In the letter, obtained by The Associated Press and addressed to Monahan, the PGA Tour board, and “my fellow players,” Watson asked several questions, including that one.

He claimed that the hypocrisy in ignoring the moral issue “compounded” the questions.

The day after Wyndham Clark won the U.S. Open and became the sport’s newest major champion, attention returned to a problem that had dominated golf for the previous three years. The PGA Tour announced on June 6 that it had partnered with the European Tour and Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund to house commercial enterprises under one roof.

During a meeting two weeks ago at the Canadian Open, Monahan, who has referred to it as a “framework agreement,” had few responses for the players. Before the Travellers Championship in Connecticut on Tuesday, a meeting of the Player Advisory Council is scheduled.

Monahan, who left for a “medical situation” on Wednesday, is not anticipated to go. The daily management of the trip is under the direction of two of his senior executives.

Yasir Al-Rumayyan, the governor of the Public Investment Fund, was listed as the chairman of the new firm and Monahan as the CEO in the Tour’s release on June 6. Ed Herlihy and Jimmy Dunne, two other PGA Tour board members, would join them on the executive committee.

Tom Watson, an eight-time major winner.

According to a person who has read the agreement, it guarantees that the Tour would maintain a controlling voting interest in the new commercial organization regardless of how much the PIF invests.

According to the source, the arrangement provides for a financial contribution from PIF and the pooling of the three companies’ existing and future golf-related assets. The source spoke to The Associated Press on the condition of anonymity because the contract has not been made public. LIV Golf would be a part of that.

According to the deal, the PGA Tour would nominate most of the new company’s board members. The PGA Tour would still completely control how its competition is managed.

Important information, such as LIV Golf’s future, still needs to be added. Bryson DeChambeau and Dustin Johnson have stated that they are preparing for the 2024 season.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat from Connecticut, hinted on Sunday that congressional hearings would take place in the coming weeks.

The Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations is presided over by Blumenthal. On CBS’s “Face the Nation,” he claimed that the subcommittee wanted specifics on the factors that led to the purchase, the people involved, and the organization’s structure and governance.

Blumenthal remarked, “There are very, very few details. But keep in mind; he added, “What we have here is essentially an oppressive, autocratic foreign government taking control over an iconic, beloved American institution for the clear purpose of cleaning its public image.”

All legal disputes were resolved as part of the agreement. To avoid having to give depositions in the litigation, the PGA Tour and Saudi-backed LIV Golf filed a request on Friday to dismiss with prejudice the antitrust complaint LIV players filed in August, the countersuit the Tour filed in September, and even a PIF appeal to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. They are not resubmittable.

Tom Watson, an eight-time major winner.

Monahan said the lawsuits had caused the Tour a “significant” blow. A trial date was not anticipated until at least the middle of 2024, with plenty of filings in between.

Is the PIF the only practical solution to the Tour’s financial issues, Watson questioned in his letter? Was there or is there a backup strategy? And once more, what transaction exactly?

He made two references to hypocrisy, particularly about criticism of the Tour’s cancellation from organizations like 9/11 Families United.

“My loyalty to golf and this country live in the same place and have held equal and significant weight with me over the course of my lifetime,” stated Watson. “Please educate me and others in a way that allows loyalty to both, in a way that makes it easy to look the families of 9/11 in the eye and ourselves in the mirror.”

Tom Watson, an eight-time major winner.

Among his inquiries, Watson is not by himself. Since last summer, the Justice Department’s antitrust division has scrutinized the golf industry. Now, it is beginning to investigate whether the Tour’s relationship with the Saudis violates federal antitrust laws. Since the deal is still being finalized and is just a few weeks old, the investigation is still in its early stages.

According to Monahan, everything in the framework agreement would require board approval.

According to Blumenthal, a hearing might happen “within weeks.”

“The American people deserve a clear look at the facts here,” he declared. “Again, I’m not going to predict the results. But the Saudis need to hire a single player or seizing control of a single team in this situation. They are effectively running the entire sport, and it’s not just one Saudi player. There is a regime.

SOURCE – (AP)

Kiara Grace is a staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. Her writing focuses on technology trends, particularly in the realm of consumer electronics and software. With a keen eye for detail and a knack for breaking down complex topics. Kiara delivers insightful analyses that resonate with tech enthusiasts and casual readers alike. Her articles strike a balance between in-depth coverage and accessibility, making them a go-to resource for anyone seeking to stay informed about the latest innovations shaping our digital world.

Continue Reading

U.K News

Keir Starmer Rejects Meeting With WW2 Veteran Over Her Frozen Pension

Published

on

"It's the injustice of it that is so unfair, the fact that we were never warned."

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has rejected a request from a 99-year-old WW2 for a meeting to discuss the frozen state pension policy for citizens living abroad. Starmer declined the meeting but offered an alternative meeting with Pensions Minister Emma Reynolds.

Anne Puckridge, who turns 100 this month, went from her home in Canada to agitate Keir Starmer’s Labour government over the state pension freeze.

The World War II veteran told the BBC that she is “angry” and “heartbroken” following a meeting with the pensions minister, who led her to believe that the government will not reconsider its policy of freezing the state pensions of some British people living abroad.

Anne Puckridge is one of approximately 453,000 British retirees living overseas who do not receive an annual increase in their state pension.

Pensions Minister Emma Reynolds agreed to a meeting after Sir Keir Starmer’s request to meet was denied owing to purported “pressures on his diary.”

Ms. Puckridge stated that the meeting in Parliament left her feeling “bitterly disappointed” and “disgusted”.

She stated that she had the idea Reynolds had been “polite enough and kind enough to come in and spend her time with her,” but that her mind had already been made up before the meeting began.

Ms Puckridge stated that she and her other campaigners would have to think carefully about what they could do from now on, but she assured them that they would take action.

State Pension Minister Reynolds thanked Ms Puckridge for the meeting and for sharing her insights.

A Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) representative stated that the government recognizes that “people move abroad for various reasons, and we provide clear information on how this can affect their pensions.”

The policy of increasing the UK state pension for recipients living abroad has existed for many years.

Since she relocated to Canada in 2001 at the age of 76 to live closer to her daughter, Ms Puckridge has received £72.50 (C$129.00) per week.

Her state pension is now less than half the £169.50 (C$302.00) paid to seniors still residing in the United Kingdom. She told the BBC that frozen pensions touch all aspects of life.

“You’ve got to be careful about entertainment,” she told me. “You must realize that you cannot be as kind to your grandkids as you would like.

“You feel you’ve lost all sense of dignity, the government has thrown you away, you know, out of sight out of mind.”

Ms. Puckridge stated that when she alerted the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) that she was moving to Canada, “they never said a word about [my] pension being frozen”.

“The first I knew about it was when my first rise was due,” she recalled.

“I didn’t understand it. So I wrote and enquired about it, and I was told no… you will not receive any additional pension rises when you leave the UK.” She said, “It’s the injustice of it that is so unfair, the fact that we were never warned.”

Related News:

Paris Trash Strike Ends, Pension Protest Numbers Shrink

 

 

 

Continue Reading

U.K News

Air Force Drones Spotted Over UK Military Bases

Published

on

The drones were not considered hostile, the USAF said,

British military expertise has been brought in to assist in identifying persons responsible for flying Air Force drones near US military locations. According to the BBC, 60 RAF troops have been dispatched to assist the US Air Force with its probe.

The Air Force drones were not deemed hostile, according to the USAF, who added that the sightings “fluctuated and varied between the bases” and “ranged in sizes and configurations”.

According to the Ministry of Defence, “We are supporting the US Air Force response.”

The announcement follows several recent reports of unmanned aerial vehicles sighted near RAF Lakenheath and RAF Mildenhall in Suffolk and RAF Feltwell in adjacent Norfolk.

There have been other reports of drone activity overnight. According to the USAF, the vehicles were few in number and modest in size.

A representative for the US Air Forces in Europe stated, “We can confirm that there were sightings yesterday during nighttime hours, but the number fluctuated and varied between the bases throughout the night.”

The official stated that since the first sightings on November 20th, there has been “no impact on residents or infrastructure, and they have not been identified as hostile.”

However, the Air Force drones remained under surveillance “to ensure the safety and security of the installations.”

They said, “We request individuals in the area to contact either local police or security forces if they see anything suspicious.”

Treat threats seriously’

Officials in the United States and the United Kingdom have not said who is responsible for the recent drone activity.

However, the BBC understands there were worries that a state actor could be involved.

In recent months, intelligence officials have warned of increasing Russian sabotage operations against Western countries supporting Ukraine.

RAF Mildenhall is primarily home to the USAF’s 100th Air Refuelling Wing; RAF Lakenheath is home to USAF F-35A and F-15E fighter jets; and RAF Feltwell is mainly concerned with logistics and provides housing for military personnel.

A spokesman for the MoD, which owns the bases, said: “We take threats seriously and maintain robust measures at defence sites.

“We are supporting the US Air Force response.”

The USAF has not said who it believed to be behind the incidents.

Related News:

US Military Shoots Down Missiles And Drones

US Military Shoots Down Missiles And Drones As It Faces Growing Threats In Volatile Middle East

Continue Reading

U.K News

General Election Petition in UK Hits 2 Million Signatures

Published

on

Starmer has ruled out an general election after a petition reached two million signatures

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has ruled out holding an early general election after a petition calling for a second vote garnered two million signatures.

Over the weekend, a petition calling for another general election was started on the UK Parliament website. It cited Starmer’s failure to keep all his pledges made in the run-up to the previous election. By Monday mid-morning, it had surpassed two million signatures.

When asked about the petition, Starmer said he was “not surprised” that some individuals who did not vote for Labour in the previous election want a “re-run” of the poll.

He claimed that he had “inherited a lot of problems” from the previous administration and had resolved to “take the hard decisions first.”

Starmer ruled out an early general election, stating that only the Prime Minister can request that the King call a general election; it simply will not happen, he said.

This petition, started last week and sponsored by Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, calls on the government to schedule a new general election.
To sign a petition, you must verify that you are a British citizen or resident and provide a postcode.

The petition states, “I would prefer there to be another general election. I believe the present Labour government has broken the pledges they made before the last election.”

The petition comes only five months after Labour won the July general election with 9.7 million votes and 412 seats in the House of Commons.

However, the Labour Party garnered only 35% of the vote, the lowest percentage gained by a single-party administration since the conclusion of WWII.

Some of the policies implemented by Starmer and his Labour government have received significant criticism, including an inheritance tax on farms, a reduction in winter heating payments, an increase in employers’ national insurance, and applying VAT to private school fees.

According to the most recent Ipsos political pulse poll, the Labour Party is unpopular, with 28% of the public favoring it and 49% opposing it.

Related News:

Hamas Calls for Peace After Trump Wins General Election

Hamas Calls for Peace After Trump Wins Election

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version