News
The Supreme Court says Trump has absolute immunity for core acts
(VOR News) – The United States Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 decision that a former president is entitled to a presumption of immunity for his official activities and has complete immunity for his essential constitutional duties. The decision was ideologically fraught.
Nevertheless, his unofficial actions render him susceptible to consequences. The Supreme Court concurrently remanded the case to the trial judge to determine whether any of the actions taken by the former president, Donald Trump, were part of his official duties and, as a result, exempt from prosecution.
The Supreme Court decision regarding this matter is likely to ensure that the litigation against Trump will not be heard before the election and will not be heard until after he has lost his reelection campaign. In the event of an additional election, Trump may either instruct the Justice Department to withdraw the accusations against him or attempt to pardon himself in the two ongoing federal cases.
Chief Justice John Roberts, who was endorsed by his conservative colleagues, authored the Supreme Court judgment. Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan, the three liberal justices, expressed their disagreement.
Roberts acknowledged that this was an unusual situation.
He criticized the subordinate courts for “rendering their decisions on a highly expedited basis” and asserted that no court has yet considered how to differentiate between official and unofficial actions.
According to him, the lower courts “did not conduct an analysis of the conduct alleged in the indictment to determine which of it should be classified as official and which as unofficial.”
“Trump asserts a far broader immunity than the limited one we have recognized,” according to Roberts. Nevertheless, the perspective also disproved some of the most significant allegations made against the previous president.
“In light of the President’s official relationship to the office held by that individual, certain allegations—such as those involving Trump’s discussions with the Acting Attorney General—are easily categorized,” said the attorney general. Alternatively, “Trump is … absolutely immune from prosecution for the alleged conduct involving his discussions with Justice Department officials.”
The allegations of election interference against Trump will not be subject to a trial for several months as a result of Judge Tanya Chutkan’s decision to return the matter to trial on Monday.
Judge Chutkan anticipated that the trial preparations would necessitate approximately three months prior to the immunity case. She is now obligated to ascertain which of the allegations in the Trump indictment should be pursued further and which are associated with official conduct that is exempt from prosecution under the Supreme Court’s ruling.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor stated in her dissenting opinion that the majority “in effect, completely insulate[s] Presidents from criminal liability.”
“Today’s decision to grant criminal immunity to former Presidents fundamentally alters the institution of the Presidency.” According to her perspective, “It is a mockery of the principle, which is fundamental to our Constitution and system of government, that no man is above the law.”
“The Supreme Court grants former President Trump all the immunity he requested and more, relying on little more than its own misguided wisdom about the necessity of “bold and unhesitating action” by the President.”
Trump may request further delays, as immunity concerns are among the few that can be challenged prior to trial, even when Judge Chutkan separates the constitutional granules from the chaff.
The Supreme Court rendered its verdict on Monday, months after deciding to hear the case on February 28 and scheduling arguments for two months later.
Critics of the Supreme Court contend that the justices may have examined the case as early as December, when special counsel Jack Smith of the Justice Department unsuccessfully requested that the same issues be considered as those that Trump subsequently raised.
This is in striking contrast to the way in which the court has handled previous cases involving presidential authority. In 1974, the justices issued a decision against President Richard Nixon just sixteen days after hearing oral arguments.
Justice William Rehnquist abstained from voting in the 8-0 decision as a result of his personal relationship with specific authorities who were accused of malfeasance in the case. This year, the court unanimously determined that states were unable to exclude Trump from the ballot in less than a month.
SEE ALSO:
Prince Harry Opens Up About Grief And Bereavement
Eagles singer Don Henley sues for return of handwritten ‘Hotel California’ lyrics
ESPN Slammed for Giving Prince Harry the Pat Tillman Award
NBC is bringing a version of legendary sportscaster Al Michaels back to the Olympics this summer, but with an unexpected twist: his voice will be powered by artificial intelligence.
On Wednesday, NBC said that it will utilize AI software to reproduce Michaels’ voice to offer daily Summer Games summaries to users of its Peacock streaming platform. This marks a significant milestone in the application of AI by a major media firm.
NBC | CTV Image
NBC To Use AI Version Of Announcer Al Michaels’ Voice For Olympics Recaps
The employment of an artificial intelligence voice for the Olympics comes at a time when technology has advanced dramatically, particularly in its ability to generate images, sounds, and text. This has sparked concerns in creative industries, such as journalism, regarding how artificial intelligence may—or should—be utilized.
A new tool, “Your Daily Olympic Recap on Peacock,” will allow subscribers to create 10-minute highlights packages incorporating event updates, athlete back stories, and other related content based on their preferences.
The company stated that the highlights could be packaged in approximately 7 million distinct ways, based on 5,000 hours of live coverage in Paris, thereby making AI (artificial intelligence, not the guy) a far more efficient way to give individualized summaries.
“When I was approached about this, I was skeptical but obviously curious,” Michaels stated in a press statement. “Then I saw a demonstration of what they had in mind. I replied, ‘I’m in.'”
An NBC representative told CNN that Michaels is being rewarded for his participation.
A veteran broadcaster, Michaels is now the play-by-play sportscaster for Thursday Night Football on Amazon Prime. He is well noted for his work on earlier Olympic Games broadcasts for NBC and ABC and for announcing the Miracle on Ice Game at the 1980 Winter Olympics in Lake Placid, New York.
NBC | Fox Image
NBC To Use AI Version Of Announcer Al Michaels’ Voice For Olympics Recaps
NBC stated that the AI system was trained using previous NBC broadcast audio from Michaels.
The business stated that a team of NBC Sports editors will evaluate all of the content, including audio and footage, to ensure that it is factually correct and that names are pronounced correctly.
Beginning July 27, the highlights tool will be available on Peacock in web browsers and iOS and iPad apps.
SOURCE – CNN
Jamie Foxx has yet to publicly divulge the reason for his hospitalization last year, although he did share further facts during a videotaped encounter.
The Oscar-winning actor was hospitalized in April 2023 due to a health problem while filming the Netflix film “Back in Action” in Atlanta.
In a TikTok video posted this week, Foxx informs an unidentified group of people that he has a “bad headache” on April 11, 2023. He remembers asking his friend for an Advil, and then “I was gone for 20 days.”
Jamie Foxx Shares New Details About Health Crisis That Left Him ‘Gone For 20 Days’
“I don’t remember anything,” he claimed in a video shot on June 29 in Phoenix.
Foxx went on to say in the video that he was told his sister and daughter took him to the doctor, who him a cortisone shot. Another doctor told him something was “going on up there,” as Foxx pointed to his head.
“I won’t say it on camera,” he remarked throughout the video.
The singer is known to be discreet about his personal life, and he disappeared from the spotlight at the time due to what his daughter Corinne Foxx described as a “medical complication” on social media.
In July 2023, the “Ray” star revealed that he chose not to reveal more information because he did not want the public “to see me like that.”
“I want you to see me laughing, having fun, partying, cracking jokes, or performing in a movie or television show. I didn’t want you to see me with tubes coming out of me and wondering if I was going to make it,” he said in a video posted on Instagram at the time, adding that he felt like he had gone “to hell and back.”
Foxx provided another health update on his verified social media accounts in August 2023.
Jamie Foxx | Fox Image
Jamie Foxx Shares New Details About Health Crisis That Left Him ‘Gone For 20 Days’
“You are looking at a thankful man…” “I’m finally starting to feel like myself,” he wrote at the time. “The journey has been unexpectedly dark…” “But I can see the light.”
He added that he was “thankful to everyone who reached out and sent well wishes and prayers.”
According to IMDB, “Back in Action” is now in post-production.
SOURCE – CNN
NEW YORK — Hunter Biden filed a complaint accusing Fox News of illegally distributing sexual photographs of him as part of a streaming series.
The president’s son filed the complaint on Sunday in state court in Manhattan over photos from “The Trial of Hunter Biden,” which will premiere on Fox Nation in 2022. According to the lawsuit, the series included a “mock trial” of Hunter Biden on crimes he has not faced, as well as photos of Biden naked and engaging in sex acts.
Hunter Biden | AP News Image
Hunter Biden Sues Fox News Over Explicit Images Featured In A Streaming Series
The lawsuit argues that the distribution of intimate photographs without his consent violated New York’s so-called revenge porn legislation.
“Fox published and disseminated these Intimate Images to its vast audience of millions as part of an entertainment program in order to humiliate, harass, annoy and alarm Mr. Biden and to tarnish his reputation,” the lawsuit states.
In an emailed statement, a Fox News representative termed it an “entirely politically motivated lawsuit” that was “devoid of merit.” According to the statement, Biden’s attorneys filed a letter demanding its removal from streaming sites in April 2024.
“The program was removed within days of the letter, out of prudence, because Hunter Biden is a public figure who has been investigated several times and is now a convicted felon. According to the emailed statement, Fox News has faithfully covered Mr. Biden’s newsworthy events by the First Amendment, and we look forward to defending our rights in court.
Hunter Biden was convicted last month of three felony charges stemming from the purchase of a revolver in 2018. Prosecutors claimed the president’s son lied on a mandated gun-buy form by claiming he was not unlawfully using or addicted to narcotics.
Hunter Biden | AP News Image
Hunter Biden Sues Fox News Over Explicit Images Featured In A Streaming Series
According to the lawsuit, the series’ simulated trial included bribery claims and inappropriate financial relationships with foreign governments, which Hunter Biden has not faced.
The lawsuit says Fox did not completely remove promotional materials and that the program is still available on some third-party streaming sites.
SOURCE – (AP)
-
News3 weeks agoFIA Warns of Rising WhatsApp Hacks Targeting Women
-
Sports4 weeks agoNHL To Broadcast Stanley Cup Final Games In American Sign Language, A 1st For A Major Sports League
-
Election News4 weeks ago
India Election Results: Narendra Modi Loses His Majority
-
World4 weeks ago
NASA Sends First Manned Starliner Spacecraft to International Space Station
-
Sports4 weeks ago
Edmonton Oilers Goaltender Stuart Skinner’s Play Is The Biggest Uncertainty In The Stanley Cup Final
-
Tech4 weeks ago
OpenAI’s ChatGPT Back Online After Major Outage
