(VOR News) – Though they continue to have regulatory disputes with EU authorities, Apple and Meta have decided not to sign the new artificial intelligence safety pact that was formed by the EU.

An initiative to ensure the development of safe and reliable artificial intelligence (AI) systems is the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence (AI) Pact.

More than a hundred businesses, including OpenAI, the company that created ChatGPT, and some of the industry’s biggest names including Amazon, Google, and Microsoft, have ratified the pact.

Anthropic, An Apple AI firm, and TikTok also declined to sign.

The three main goals of this agreement are to identify high-risk AI systems, raise public awareness of the risks involved with artificial intelligence (AI), and establish governance structures to monitor the development of AI.

The European Union has taken the lead in creating global legal standards for artificial intelligence with the recent enactment of the Artificial Intelligence Act.

This comprehensive regulatory framework is the first of its kind and aims to control companies that are creating artificial intelligence technologies while also lowering the risks that these technologies could pose to people’s health, safety, and fundamental rights.

In spite of this, the decision by Apple and Meta not to sign the contract is seen as a component of a wider dispute between the companies and the EU regulatory bodies.

This year, Meta in particular has had to deal with legal challenges. One of these difficulties has to do with an order from the Irish Data Protection Commission that forced the company to stop distributing its AI assistant throughout Europe.

The main point of contention was how Meta used user data to develop its AI models for Facebook, Instagram, and other platforms.

Meta declared its intention to abide by the new laws in response to the Artificial Intelligence Act. The business did, however, add that at this point it was not ready to join the AI Pact. “We welcome harmonised EU regulations and are focused on complying with the AI Act,” a Meta spokesman said, “but we do not rule out joining the AI Pact later.”

The company also emphasised how artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to boost innovation and competitiveness in Europe. However, it issued a warning, stating that the EU would lose out on significant opportunities if it only prioritises risk mitigation and ignores the advantages of AI development.

Apple, on the other hand, has not yet offered a thorough explanation for its decision not to sign the agreement, although it appears that observing the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act is a top priority.

The reluctance of both corporations to participate underscores the ongoing conflict between major tech firms and European regulators in their efforts to reconcile the transformative potential of artificial intelligence with the necessity of sufficient safety measures.

Apple and Meta are working on artificial intelligence.

According to a Wall Street Journal source, Apple and Meta had earlier this year discussed the prospect of collaborating in the artificial intelligence space. An previous event this year was a related development.

Reports state that Apple’s recently revealed artificial intelligence system for iPhones might use Meta’s generative artificial intelligence paradigm. Facebook’s parent business is Meta.

Two artificial intelligence (AI) startups, Anthropic and Perplexity, were also mentioned in the discussion because they were considering integrating their AI technologies into Apple’s development platform.

Although no agreements were finalised, these partnerships might have helped artificial intelligence businesses increase the reach of their goods within Apple’s ecosystem.

The analysis suggests that these collaborations may have involved artificial intelligence companies charging premium rates for their services via Apple Intelligence.

One of the most important steps in Apple’s broader AI agenda—which the firm disclosed earlier this month—would have been the incorporation of third-party artificial intelligence models into the ecosystem. Still unknown, though, were the possible arrangements’ financial details.

Part of this approach was bringing OpenAI’s ChatGPT to Apple devices and integrating artificial intelligence into basic apps like Siri.

SOURCE: TET

SEE ALSO:

Google Filed a Complaint With The EU About Microsoft’s Cloud Licensing Policies.

Upon Request, Telegram Will Share Police Phone Numbers and User IP Addresses.

Probably in Early 2025, Apple Will Release An Updated Siri With AI.

(VOR News) – Google has filed a complaint with the European Commission, saying Google has lodged a complaint with the European Commission, claiming that Microsoft’s cloud licensing model engages in anticompetitive activity.

The complaint was filed by Google.

The European Commission has informed us that they have received the complaint. The filing of the lawsuit took place in the context of antitrust procedures that were taking place within the European Union.

The cloud platform known as Azur, which was developed by Microsoft, is the particular subject of the case that the company has filed. Azur is allegedly to blame for stopping European clients from transferring their workload to cloud platforms that were developed by one of Google’s competitors, according to statements made by Google.

According to Google, the platform is unable to provide consumers with access to the Windows server, which is necessary for the operation of apps and services provided by Microsoft.

Google asserts that Microsoft imposes financial penalties on organisations who want to use other cloud providers. These penalties, in addition to challenges in terms of security or compatibility, are imposed by Microsoft.

Google claims their platform prevents users from leaving because it uses Windows.

The Chief Executive Officer of Google Cloud, Amit Zavery, was asked the following question during an interview with Euronews: “How do you remove the restriction that Microsoft has created, given that a lot of IT departments and businesses are dependent on Microsoft products?”

“We want the Commission to act quickly, investigate and have Microsoft remove restrictions so that it becomes easy for customers to have choices,” according to Zavery, who finished by stating that: “And the market in Europe can thrive and vendors can really compete for the business and innovate.”

It has been asserted that the antitrust enforcer of the European Union has pursued Microsoft multiple times for allegedly engaging in unfair activity on the cloud market. It is not the first time that something like this has occurred; in fact, it has happened before.

In the year 2022, the Cloud Infrastructure Services Providers in Europe (CISPE), which is a cloud lobby that is funded by Amazon, lodged a complaint with the European Commission against the contractual provisions that Microsoft had committed to.

Google complained about Microsoft.

An agreement with CISPE that was worth 22 million euros resulted in the lawsuit being dropped in July of 2010, which was the month in which it was dropped.

Internet service provider Amazon Web Services (AWS). The “Big Three” are currently engaged in heated competition with one another, with Microsoft and Google currently leading the cloud market infrastructure wherever they may be and wherever they may be located in the world.

Teams, the company’s product for communication and collaboration, is the subject of an investigation by the European Commission, which is also looking into allegations of antitrust violations. These allegations date back to July 27 of the previous year and belong to Microsoft.

That product is the subject of an inquiry that is currently being carried out. If it is determined that the company holds a dominant position in the consumer market, the corporation may be subject to a fine of up to ten percent of its annual income. This can be the case if the corporation is found to be in violation of the law.

Even after Google expressed the hope that they would continue to suit, Microsoft has found a peaceful conclusion to issues that were raised by other European cloud providers, according to a representative for the company.

The concerns were raised by other cloud providers in Europe. A number of other cloud service providers in Europe have voiced their concerns. “Having failed to persuade European companies, we expect Google to similarly fail to persuade the European Commission,” the spokesman added. “We expect Google to fail to convince the European Commission.”

SOURCE: EN

SEE ALSO:

Upon Request, Telegram Will Share Police Phone Numbers and User IP Addresses.

 

(VOR News) – One month after French officials accused him of supporting drug trafficking and child abuse on his platform, Telegram CEO Pavel Durov announced on Monday that the widely used messaging app has installed several safeguards to eradicate criminal content.

The announcement came one month after the French authorities published their accusations. Elimination of harmful content from the website is one of the procedures that are being taken.

Following the receipt of legitimate legal requests, the company has changed its position and will now provide law enforcement organisations with the IP addresses and phone numbers of Telegram users.

The company’s frequently asked questions page was stated.

“All Telegram chats and group chats are private among their participants,” prior to Durov’s detention when the page was established. Any requests that are associated with them are not processed by us.

According to a report that was published by Bloomberg, Durov stated in a Telegram discussion that a group of moderators had focused their efforts over the past several weeks on removing anything that was deemed to be illegal or harmful. In addition, Telegram altered the search mechanism of the platform in order to reduce the likelihood of content of this nature being displayed.

The statement made by Durov was that “these measures should deter criminals.” It is not the intention of Telegram Search to market illegal goods; rather, it is designed to assist users in identifying friends and discovering news.

In order to protect the integrity of our platform, which serves more than one billion customers, we will not allow dishonest individuals to compromise it.

When Durov, a citizen of France, returned from a holiday in Azerbaijan on August 28, he was taken into custody during his return.

His private Telegram jet stopped at an airport near Paris.

He was charged with enabling the transmission of material relating to child sexual abuse, organised fraud, and coordination with criminals to perpetrate illegal acts. These charges were brought against him by French prosecutors.

Additional allegations were included in the news statement made by the prosecution, which stated that Telegram had failed to provide authorities with information regarding illegal behaviour that was taking place on the network.

In the beginning, the Iranian and Russian governments did not allow the application to be used since it refused to provide information to the authorities. However, Russia eventually removed the ban that had been placed on the application.

Immediately following the arrest of Durov, Telegram made the assertion that its creator did not own any secrets and regarded it as “absurd” to hold the firm or its owner accountable for users who violated the restrictions of the platform. This remark was made in response to the incarceration of Durov when it was issued.

Durov said “The French Telegram authorities could contact me for assistance.”

This included a dedicated email address that was designed to receive requests from law enforcement authorities located in Europe. It was acknowledged by him that the website is going through “growing pains” as a result of its rapid expansion, which has resulted in more than 950 million customers already.

A number of modifications to the Telegram network have been implemented in the weeks that have followed Durov’s detention. One of these modifications is a new policy that regulates the requests of law enforcement.

According to Durov, the company restricted the amount of media that could be uploaded to the Telegraph, which is the company’s blogging platform. He claimed that the platform “appears to have been utilised by anonymous entities.”

In addition, it removed the People Nearby function, which displayed a list of other users who were located in close vicinity to the individual who was being discussed.

SOURCE: Gizmodo

SEE ALSO:

Probably in Early 2025, Apple Will Release An Updated Siri With AI.

Beginning on November 12, Qualcomm intends to lay off 226 staff members in San Diego.