Connect with us

Tech

Report: OpenAI Whistleblowers Seek to Investigate “Restrictive Non-Disclosures.”

Published

on

OpenAI
REUTERS

(VOR News) – “OpenAI whistleblowers have filed a complaint with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, calling for an investigation over the artificial intelligence company’s allegedly restrictive non-disclosure agreements,” the Washington Post reported on Saturday, citing a copy of the letter that was sent to the SEC.

The letter was sent back to the SEC. It was decided to send the letter back to the SEC. It was consensus that the letter should be sent back to the SEC.

These individuals who have come forward with information are seeking that the allegations be made available to the general public.

According to the journal, there were allegations that OpenAI had given employment, severance, and nondisclosure agreements to its employees that were excessively restrictive.

OpenAI confidentiality restrictions were included in these agreements.

Clauses prohibiting disclosure were incorporated in these agreements. Whistleblowers are responsible for bringing this entire list of allegations to light.

Because of these agreements, it was possible that persons who had brought concerns about OpenAI to the attention of federal authorities would have been subject to fines. This was a possibility. This was a different possibility.

According to the letter that was obtained by the Washington Post, the artificial intelligence corporation demanded that its employees sign agreements that compelled them to give up their federal rights to receive compensation for blowing the whistle on wrongdoing.

These agreements were signed by the employees with the intention of obtaining compensation. It was assumed that all of the employees would sign these agreements without any exceptions.

According to the journal, the agreements also said that in order for employees to disclose information to federal regulators, they were had to acquire prior clearance from the company. As mentioned in the agreement, this is the case.

One of the clauses of the agreements included this instruction as one of its provisions.

There is another information that may be of interest, and that is the fact that the newspaper noted that OpenAI did not include any exemptions in the employee nondisparagement provisions for the purpose of notifying securities violations to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

An individual who is a representative of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) claimed in a statement that was distributed via email that the agency does not comment on the reality of a potential submission from a whistleblower. This statement was put out to the public.

OpenAI sent the message to regular people.

Despite the fact that OpenAI was asked to provide a reaction to the piece that was published in the Washington Post, the firm did not immediately respond to the demands that were made.

Certain individuals are concerned about the security of OpenAI’s chatbots due to the fact that they include generative artificial intelligence capabilities.

Some examples of these capabilities are the capacity to carry on conversations that are analogous to those that humans have and the ability to generate visuals based on text inputs. As the capabilities of these chatbots continue to improve, questions have been raised concerning the safety of these artificial intelligence models.

These chatbots have recently developed the ability to generate graphics based on text questions, which is one of the capabilities that they have acquired.

OpenAI, which is a company which focuses on the development of artificial intelligence, has initiated the process of training its most recent AI model in the month of May, as well as creating a Safety and Security Committee during that period.

There are two noteworthy developments within the context of OpenAI’s operations that should be noted. There is a simultaneous occurrence of both of these occurrences at the same time, and they are occurring at the same time.

It is expected that members of the board, including CEO Sam Altman, will be exercising supervisory authority over this group of people. In the course of his work obligations, he will supervise this group as part of the responsibilities he has.

SOURCE: NDTV

SEE ALSO:

Meta lifts Trump’s Facebook and Instagram bans ahead of the Election.

Almost all of AT&T’s wireless customers’ call and text records were stolen by hackers.

Intel is the primary investor in Buildots, an Israeli AI construction technology venture.

Continue Reading

Tech

Intel Products May Be Subject To Security Evaluation In China.

Published

on

Intel

(VOR News) – The Cybersecurity Association of China (CSAC) has alluded to the possibility that American chipmaker Intel may be subject to a security inspection in China.

The CSAC’s official website was the source of this information, which was gathered from there.

Concerns have been raised by the group regarding the possibility that the items that Intel creates could put China’s national security and interests in jeopardy. This is a concern that a significant number of people in the group have.

A major ally of the Chinese government, the China State Security Council (CSAC), has made their accusations public on WeChat by means of an official post. This was done in order to draw attention to the allegations.

In reaction to this action, it is likely that the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC), which is the most important internet regulator in the nation, will initiate a formal security evaluation. This is a possibility.

Intel and the CAC have not responded to the story.

“In order to effectively safeguard China’s national security as well as the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese consumers, it is recommended that a network security review be initiated on the products Intel sells in China,” according to the report that was released by the CSAC.

A situation that is analogous to the one that is currently taking place occurred during the time that the CAC prohibited local key infrastructure providers from obtaining products from the American memory chipmaker Micron Technology. This situation is currently going place.

The occurrence of this occurred place after the conclusion of a network security examination that was not carried out in the acceptable manner.

Given that China was responsible for more than 25 percent of Intel’s sales in the previous year, the revenue of the corporation may be significantly impacted in the event that it were to be subjected to constraints and an inspection of a similar type. This is because China was responsible for more than 25 percent of Intel’s sales.

Within the context of the bigger backdrop, this new development takes place within the context of the larger framework of the United States’ restriction of China’s access to essential components and equipment for chipmaking.

When viewed from the perspective of the government of the United States of America, these limits are legitimate because they are a means of preventing China’s military capabilities from developing further through additional development.

According to CSAC, Intel CPUs have several vulnerabilities.

The Xeon processors, which are utilized for applications that are related to artificial intelligence (AI), are particularly susceptible to these flaws.

Intel “has major defects when it comes to product quality, security management, indicating that it is extremely irresponsible attitude towards customers,” according to the association’s website.

In addition, the Cyber Security and Counterintelligence Center (CSAC) is of the opinion that backdoors connected to the National Security Agency (NSA) of the United States can be discovered in the operating systems of all central processing units (CPUs) manufactured by Intel.

It is probable that China’s supply of artificial intelligence processors would become even more risky if Intel goods were to be restricted, even for a short period of time. This would be the case even if the restrictions were only for a short length of time.

As a result of the cutting-edge technologies that NVIDIA has created, the market is having a tough time identifying legitimate alternatives to these technologies. These products are now not allowed to be sold to China, despite the fact that NVIDIA is the market leader in this particular sector of the business.

The story that was previously published by an independent media outlet and titled “Intel products face potential security review in China” was initially written by Verdict, a brand that is owned by GlobalData. With regard to the aforementioned content, Verdict was the original author

SOURCE: YFN

SEE ALSO:

Will Netflix Once More Change Its Rates? Critics Believe This.

Positive Outlook for TSMC Could Inspire A Trillion-Dollar Cap Reversal.

 

Continue Reading

Tech

Will Netflix Once More Change Its Rates? Critics Believe This.

Published

on

Netflix

(VOR News) – The subject of whether Netflix plans to raise the cost of its streaming memberships has come up again as the company approaches its third-quarter results.

In the United States, Netflix charges $6.99 a month for its ad-supported subscription. The service has monthly fees of $15.49 for the Standard tier and $22.99 for the Premium tier. There are no adverts on either choice.

The streaming giant raised the price of the Premium tier and the now-canceled Basic plan for US customers in the fall of the previous year, which was the most recent price rise.

Netflix subscription costs rose in France and the UK simultaneously.

In a research report released on October 9, Oppenheimer & Co. predicted “a premium pricing escalation for additional regions, and notably, an 8%-15% rise in the Standard plan.”

According to the company’s representative, Jason Helfstein, the price of Netflix’s Standard plan in the US hasn’t changed since January 2022, when it was raised by $1.50.

The NFLX Standard Plan was 53% more expensive than its rivals in January 2022; this has since dropped to 4%. He pointed out that the pricing of the plans is currently 18%, 9%, and 3% less in the US than those of Hulu, Max, and Disney+, respectively. “Additionally, a 15% increase corresponds to a 23% discount on the Premium plan, consistent with the historical average.”

According to Helfstein, “Robust third-quarter viewership and the fourth-quarter content lineup, featuring the NFL, should further mitigate churn risk.”

In order to account for the potential for an increase, Oppenheimer raised its estimates by 2% for the average revenue per member for the fourth quarter and fiscal year 2025.

Senior media tech analyst Tim Nollen of Macquarie US Equity Research increased his target price for Netflix on Friday. “He expressed confidence in the long-term viability of its advertising tier, supported by sports content and prospective price hikes,” according to a study he conducted.

Nollen changed his mind and decided to raise his goal price. Before the third-quarter results were revealed, the memo offered information about media technology companies.

The analyst predicts that there might be a spike in American subscribers soon.

According to Macquarie’s research study, Netflix has a lot of pricing power because it hasn’t raised the price of its regular tier since January 2022, but both Hulu and Max have increased in price relative to Netflix’s basic plan.

“Netflix can also reduce churn, as it offers the most affordable video streaming service at $6.99 with no advertisements, demonstrating its compelling price-to-value ratio.”

Executives from Netflix have told investors and analysts that the firm takes into account metrics like participant engagement, member retention, and member acquisition when deciding when to raise membership fees.

Netflix co-CEO Gregory Peters said earlier this year that the company did not raise subscription prices during the campaign because it saw the company’s efforts to prevent password-sharing as a “substitute price increase”.

The previous year, Netflix started to strictly limit account sharing to people living in the same house. As a result, those who did not live in the same house had to either purchase a new membership or sign up as a “extra member” on an already-existing subscription account.

They cost $7.99 more a month in the US, but the “extra members” have increased the streaming behemoth’s customer base and earnings.

“We provide various pricing options to enable consumers to choose a plan that most appropriately aligns with their circumstances and requirements,” the company claims on its website. “We provide a range of pricing alternatives for consumers.”

This enables us to make service improvements to improve our members’ experiences. In addition, we constantly modify the prices. In order to improve our understanding of customer demand, we also assess different pricing tactics, such as offering different plans and price points.

More than 190 nations around the world have access to Netflix and its content on its website.

SOURCE: FBN

SEE ALSO:

Adobe Commences The Implementation Of AI Video Tools, Which Poses A Challenge To OpenAI And Meta.

Connection Problems With The App Store Are Stopping Customers From Downloading Apps.

 

Continue Reading

Tech

The Meta Foundation Launches a New Anti-Sextortion Campaign on Instagram.

Published

on

Meta

(VOR News) – Meta has announced that Instagram will launch a new campaign on Thursday aimed at assisting parents and teenagers in preventing sextortion and countering financially motivated criminals who exploit young individuals.

The initiative will also assist in combating fraudsters who exploit young individuals.

“Sextortion is a heinous crime in which financially motivated scammers prey on young adults and teenagers globally, threatening to disclose their intimate images unless their demands are met,” Meta declared in a statement released on Thursday.

“Today, we are unveiling new initiatives in our battle against these offenders, including an educational campaign aimed at informing adolescents and parents about identifying sextortion scams and the appropriate actions to regain control if targeted by such schemes.”

Meta tested nudity protection, now it’s global.

Moreover, screenshots of specific photographs are prohibited in direct messages, and the lists of followers and followers are obscured from possible sextortion perpetrators.

Sextortion is the act of extorting funds from minors by threatening to publicly disclose their private images. Con artists deceive victims into transmitting images via email.

The substantial rise in sextortion schemes has inflicted considerable distress on children and adolescents; from 2021 to 2023, complaints related to internet enticement surged by over 300 percent. John Shehan, Senior Vice President of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, stated, “Campaigns like this provide essential education to assist families in early recognition of these threats.”

Meta includes a link to the Take It Down Tool, developed by NCMEC, which aids in preventing the online distribution of private pictures. The film is intended to assist teens impacted by sextortion schemes.

The film will be watched on Instagram by millions of adolescents and young adults in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia.

Meta announced the removal of 820 profiles associated with Yahoo Boys and 800 Facebook groups from the network in the past week. Meta reports that the gang said they were endeavoring to organize, recruit, and train fresh sextortion scammers.

Due to their classification as a possibly hazardous group, Yahoo Boys are prohibited from engaging in Meta’s policies. To combat sextortion, Meta has collaborated with prominent young producers to enhance awareness of the associated risks.

The authors are scheduled to participate in a campaign against sextortion.

In alignment with the anti-sextortion program, Meta’s applications have been enhanced with new safety features aimed at safeguarding underage users against sextortion.

These encompass adolescent accounts that feature inherent protections and limitations on the maximum number of contacts. Adolescents under the age of 16 cannot modify these safeguards without parental consent. Meta said Thursday that private chat users cannot capture or record fleeting photos or videos.

“This indicates that when an individual transmits a photo or video via Instagram DM or Messenger utilizing our ‘view once’ or ‘allow replay’ feature, they need not be concerned about it being screenshotted or recorded within the application without their permission.”

A trait that can inhibit exposure on Meta, which underwent testing in April, will soon be universally accessible. The feature obscures images classified as nudes in direct messaging on Instagram and is enabled by default for users under 18 years of age.

A 24/7 Crisis Text Line will provide discreet mental health support for sextortion-related issues.

Meta is testing new safety notifications for Messenger and Direct Messages that inform adolescents if they are interacting with someone situated in a different country.

Meta announced, “We are consistently enhancing our methods for identifying scammers, eliminating their accounts, and preventing their return.”

In July, Meta terminated 63,000 Instagram accounts of Nigerian users to combat sextortion. Moreover, Yahoo Boys, a loosely affiliated collective of hackers primarily based in Nigeria, were alleged to be managing Facebook pages, groups, and accounts on the social networking platform

SOURCE: UPI

SEE ALSO:

Connection Problems With The App Store Are Stopping Customers From Downloading Apps.

NVIDIA’s Market Capitalization Now Exceeds $3.4 Trillion, Putting It On Track For A Record Close.

Continue Reading

Download Our App

vornews app

Buy FUT Coins

comprar monedas FC 25

Volunteering at Soi Dog

Soi Dog

Trending