Connect with us

News

Prosecutors intend to retry Karen Read following a mistrial declared in the murder case.

Published

on

Karen Read
Greg Derr/The Patriot Ledger

(VOR News) – Karen Read, a Massachusetts woman accused of killing her police officer lover in 2022, had her trial declared a mistrial by a judge on Monday.

The verdict was rendered on the fifth day of a nine-week trial that took place in a courtroom outside Boston. During the trial, Read’s attorneys claimed that the death of 46-year-old John O’Keefe was a police cover-up.

Prosecutors claim that on January 29, 2022, Karen Read, 44, crashed her Lexus SUV into her fiancé, leaving him for dead.

Read was accused of DUI manslaughter, second-degree murder, and escaping the scene of a tragic collision.

Six men and six women made up the jury, and on Monday afternoon the foreman wrote to Norfolk County Superior Court Judge Beverly Cannone to express that despite their best efforts, the panel remained divided. The letter stated that while some believed the prosecution’s case to be weak, others believed there was sufficient evidence to condemn Read.

The jurors were devoted to their duty, but they were also “deeply divided by fundamental differences in our opinions and state of mind,” as they wrote to Cannone.

Cannone scheduled a status hearing for later this month following the mistrial.

In addition to thanking O’Keefe’s family, the district attorney’s office declared a retrial.

Reporters were informed outside the courthouse by Karen Read lawyer,

Alan Jackson, that the prosecution had employed dishonest detectives and an improper investigation. “We will not give up on our struggle,” he declared.

That morning, O’Keefe was discovered to be unresponsive and declared deceased. The medical examiner concluded that the patient died from blunt force injuries to the brain and hypothermia.

In order to hide an attack that O’Keefe had during a party at the apartment where his body was discovered, her defense team alleged that the police conspired to frame her.

The chief investigator in the case, Massachusetts state trooper Michael Proctor, was accused by the defense of falsifying evidence, neglecting to look into O’Keefe’s death, and sending derogatory messages and epithets about Karen Read to his friends, family, and superiors.

During his last Tuesday’s closing remarks, Assistant District Attorney for Norfolk County, Adam Lally, referred to Proctor’s texts as “indefensible,” although he clarified that they had no bearing on the investigation.

Lally dismissed the defense’s cover-up claim as “rampant speculation.”

Read allegedly told first responders that Lally had struck O’Keefe more than once. According to vehicle data, on January 29, at midnight, she reversing her SUV about 62 feet at 24 mph near Brian Albert’s house.

Evidence, according to Lally, proved she hit him. Authorities discovered O’Keefe’s hair and DNA on the back of the car, along with a broken tail light.

According to Lally, nobody at the party remembered seeing O’Keefe at Albert’s house.

Karen Read dropped O’Keefe off at Albert’s house, drove home, and ran away in a panic, breaking the tail lamp, according to defense attorney Alan Jackson. Hours later, she discovered her partner was vanished.

Using surveillance footage from O’Keefe’s house, the defense presented evidence of Read reversing her SUV into her boyfriend’s vehicle on her way out to find him. O’Keefe’s iPhone, according to Jackson, recorded dozens of steps around the moment that prosecutors claim he was struck. It could have been Albert’s basement down those steps.

In contrast to the prosecution, Karen Read lawyers were able to prove O’Keefe’s death was the result of third-party wrongdoing. A BATFE agent suspected of O’Keefe’s murder exchanged passionate texts with Read.

Before the Albert’s house party, Jackson thought that Karen Read had abandoned him at a pub, which had infuriated agent Brian Higgins. Jackson thought O’Keefe may have fallen and struck his skull during a fight between Higgins and O’Keefe at Albert’s house over Read.

Higgins claimed that he had never seen O’Keefe at Albert’s house and that Karen Read lack of emotion didn’t bother him.

O’Keefe’s injuries should have been worse if he had been struck by a car traveling more than 20 mph, according to a forensic engineer who assessed law enforcement’s case management for the Department of Justice, as reported by The Associated Press.

Expert Andrew Rentschler reportedly told the Associated Press, “We do not have sufficient evidence in this case to ascertain which specific event caused the injury.”

SEE ALSO:

The Supreme Court says Trump has absolute immunity for core acts

Prince Harry Opens Up About Grief And Bereavement

Eagles singer Don Henley sues for return of handwritten ‘Hotel California’ lyrics

Salman Ahmad is a seasoned freelance writer who contributes insightful articles to VORNews. With years of experience in journalism, he possesses a knack for crafting compelling narratives that resonate with readers. Salman's writing style strikes a balance between depth and accessibility, allowing him to tackle complex topics while maintaining clarity. His commitment to thorough research ensures his pieces are well-informed and thought-provoking. Salman's contributions enrich VORNews' content, offering readers a fresh perspective on current events and pressing issues.

Continue Reading

World

NBC To Use AI Version Of Announcer Al Michaels’ Voice For Olympics Recaps

Published

on

NBC is bringing a version of legendary sportscaster Al Michaels back to the Olympics this summer, but with an unexpected twist: his voice will be powered by artificial intelligence.

On Wednesday, NBC said that it will utilize AI software to reproduce Michaels’ voice to offer daily Summer Games summaries to users of its Peacock streaming platform. This marks a significant milestone in the application of AI by a major media firm.

NBC | CTV Image

NBC To Use AI Version Of Announcer Al Michaels’ Voice For Olympics Recaps

The employment of an artificial intelligence voice for the Olympics comes at a time when technology has advanced dramatically, particularly in its ability to generate images, sounds, and text. This has sparked concerns in creative industries, such as journalism, regarding how artificial intelligence may—or should—be utilized.

A new tool, “Your Daily Olympic Recap on Peacock,” will allow subscribers to create 10-minute highlights packages incorporating event updates, athlete back stories, and other related content based on their preferences.

The company stated that the highlights could be packaged in approximately 7 million distinct ways, based on 5,000 hours of live coverage in Paris, thereby making AI (artificial intelligence, not the guy) a far more efficient way to give individualized summaries.

“When I was approached about this, I was skeptical but obviously curious,” Michaels stated in a press statement. “Then I saw a demonstration of what they had in mind. I replied, ‘I’m in.'”

An NBC representative told CNN that Michaels is being rewarded for his participation.

A veteran broadcaster, Michaels is now the play-by-play sportscaster for Thursday Night Football on Amazon Prime. He is well noted for his work on earlier Olympic Games broadcasts for NBC and ABC and for announcing the Miracle on Ice Game at the 1980 Winter Olympics in Lake Placid, New York.

NBC | Fox Image

NBC To Use AI Version Of Announcer Al Michaels’ Voice For Olympics Recaps

NBC stated that the AI system was trained using previous NBC broadcast audio from Michaels.

The business stated that a team of NBC Sports editors will evaluate all of the content, including audio and footage, to ensure that it is factually correct and that names are pronounced correctly.

Beginning July 27, the highlights tool will be available on Peacock in web browsers and iOS and iPad apps.

SOURCE – CNN

Continue Reading

News

Jamie Foxx Shares New Details About Health Crisis That Left Him ‘Gone For 20 Days’

Published

on

Jamie Foxx | CNN Image

Jamie Foxx has yet to publicly divulge the reason for his hospitalization last year, although he did share further facts during a videotaped encounter.

The Oscar-winning actor was hospitalized in April 2023 due to a health problem while filming the Netflix film “Back in Action” in Atlanta.

In a TikTok video posted this week, Foxx informs an unidentified group of people that he has a “bad headache” on April 11, 2023. He remembers asking his friend for an Advil, and then “I was gone for 20 days.”

Jamie Foxx Shares New Details About Health Crisis That Left Him ‘Gone For 20 Days’

“I don’t remember anything,” he claimed in a video shot on June 29 in Phoenix.

Foxx went on to say in the video that he was told his sister and daughter took him to the doctor, who him a cortisone shot. Another doctor told him something was “going on up there,” as Foxx pointed to his head.

“I won’t say it on camera,” he remarked throughout the video.

The singer is known to be discreet about his personal life, and he disappeared from the spotlight at the time due to what his daughter Corinne Foxx described as a “medical complication” on social media.

In July 2023, the “Ray” star revealed that he chose not to reveal more information because he did not want the public “to see me like that.”

“I want you to see me laughing, having fun, partying, cracking jokes, or performing in a movie or television show. I didn’t want you to see me with tubes coming out of me and wondering if I was going to make it,” he said in a video posted on Instagram at the time, adding that he felt like he had gone “to hell and back.”

Foxx provided another health update on his verified social media accounts in August 2023.

Jamie Foxx | Fox Image

Jamie Foxx Shares New Details About Health Crisis That Left Him ‘Gone For 20 Days’

“You are looking at a thankful man…” “I’m finally starting to feel like myself,” he wrote at the time. “The journey has been unexpectedly dark…” “But I can see the light.”

He added that he was “thankful to everyone who reached out and sent well wishes and prayers.”

According to IMDB, “Back in Action” is now in post-production.

SOURCE – CNN

Continue Reading

News

Hunter Biden Sues Fox News Over Explicit Images Featured In A Streaming Series

Published

on

NEW YORK — Hunter Biden filed a complaint accusing Fox News of illegally distributing sexual photographs of him as part of a streaming series.

The president’s son filed the complaint on Sunday in state court in Manhattan over photos from “The Trial of Hunter Biden,” which will premiere on Fox Nation in 2022. According to the lawsuit, the series included a “mock trial” of Hunter Biden on crimes he has not faced, as well as photos of Biden naked and engaging in sex acts.

Hunter Biden | AP News Image

The lawsuit argues that the distribution of intimate photographs without his consent violated New York’s so-called revenge porn legislation.

“Fox published and disseminated these Intimate Images to its vast audience of millions as part of an entertainment program in order to humiliate, harass, annoy and alarm Mr. Biden and to tarnish his reputation,” the lawsuit states.

In an emailed statement, a Fox News representative termed it an “entirely politically motivated lawsuit” that was “devoid of merit.” According to the statement, Biden’s attorneys filed a letter demanding its removal from streaming sites in April 2024.

“The program was removed within days of the letter, out of prudence, because Hunter Biden is a public figure who has been investigated several times and is now a convicted felon. According to the emailed statement, Fox News has faithfully covered Mr. Biden’s newsworthy events by the First Amendment, and we look forward to defending our rights in court.

Hunter Biden was convicted last month of three felony charges stemming from the purchase of a revolver in 2018. Prosecutors claimed the president’s son lied on a mandated gun-buy form by claiming he was not unlawfully using or addicted to narcotics.

Hunter Biden | AP News Image

According to the lawsuit, the series’ simulated trial included bribery claims and inappropriate financial relationships with foreign governments, which Hunter Biden has not faced.

The lawsuit demands compensatory and punitive damages, as well as an injunction forcing Fox to erase all copies of the obscene photographs.

The lawsuit says Fox did not completely remove promotional materials and that the program is still available on some third-party streaming sites.

SOURCE – (AP)

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version