U.K News
CORONATION: Prince Harry Will Attend Father’s Coronation, Meghan Won’t
LONDON, England – Buckingham Palace announced Wednesday that Prince Harry would attend his father’s coronation, ending months of debate over whether the prince would be welcomed after accusing the royal family of racism and media manipulation.
The couple’s two young children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, will remain at the couple’s home in Southern California, according to the palace. Sussex’s spokespeople verified the news with an almost identical statement.
The coronation at Westminster Abbey on May 6 falls on their son’s birthday.
While the revelation should end the “will he or won’t he” argument in the British media, it won’t stop the royal soap opera involving Harry and Meghan as King Charles III prepares for his coronation.
When Harry attended the funerals of his grandfather, Prince Philip, and grandmother, Queen Elizabeth II, pundits debated everything from whether he could wear his military uniform to the coronation where he sat. And there’s always the question of whether he’ll see his father and older brother, Prince William.
The coronation at Westminster Abbey on May 6 falls on their son’s birthday.
That excitement will be heightened by Harry and Meghan’s critique of the royal family in a six-part Netflix series on their decision to step back from royal duties three years ago, followed by Harry’s decision to divulge family secrets in his bestseller memoir “Spare.”
Harry and Meghan, who is biracial, have claimed that she was subjected to racist remarks from both the palace and the British press. Their treatment influenced their decision to leave the country.
The “Spare” allegations, including private discussions with his father and brother, Prince William, fueled tensions between Harry and his family, which became public when he and his wife relocated to North America in 2020.
The book also contained charges that members of the royal family routinely provided unpleasant information about other members of the House of Windsor to the press in exchange for favorable treatment of themselves.
Royal coaches prepared for the coronation of the King.
The prince singled out Camilla, the queen’s consort, accusing her of leaking private discussions to the public to restore her image following her marriage to Charles. Camilla was often derided for her long-running affair with Charles, which contributed to the dissolution of his marriage to the late Princess Diana, Harry and William’s mother.
The rift between Harry and his family erupted again last month when the Sussexes announced they had been ordered to leave their residence in Britain.
Royal coaches prepared for the coronation of the King.
The couple’s main house before relinquishing royal duties and moving to Montecito, a wealthy enclave in Southern California, was Frogmore Cottage, a royal residence on the grounds of Windsor Castle west of London.
SOURCE – (AP)
U.K News
Keir Starmer Rejects Meeting With WW2 Veteran Over Her Frozen Pension
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has rejected a request from a 99-year-old WW2 for a meeting to discuss the frozen state pension policy for citizens living abroad. Starmer declined the meeting but offered an alternative meeting with Pensions Minister Emma Reynolds.
Anne Puckridge, who turns 100 this month, went from her home in Canada to agitate Keir Starmer’s Labour government over the state pension freeze.
The World War II veteran told the BBC that she is “angry” and “heartbroken” following a meeting with the pensions minister, who led her to believe that the government will not reconsider its policy of freezing the state pensions of some British people living abroad.
Anne Puckridge is one of approximately 453,000 British retirees living overseas who do not receive an annual increase in their state pension.
Pensions Minister Emma Reynolds agreed to a meeting after Sir Keir Starmer’s request to meet was denied owing to purported “pressures on his diary.”
Ms. Puckridge stated that the meeting in Parliament left her feeling “bitterly disappointed” and “disgusted”.
She stated that she had the idea Reynolds had been “polite enough and kind enough to come in and spend her time with her,” but that her mind had already been made up before the meeting began.
Ms Puckridge stated that she and her other campaigners would have to think carefully about what they could do from now on, but she assured them that they would take action.
State Pension Minister Reynolds thanked Ms Puckridge for the meeting and for sharing her insights.
A Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) representative stated that the government recognizes that “people move abroad for various reasons, and we provide clear information on how this can affect their pensions.”
The policy of increasing the UK state pension for recipients living abroad has existed for many years.
Since she relocated to Canada in 2001 at the age of 76 to live closer to her daughter, Ms Puckridge has received £72.50 (C$129.00) per week.
Her state pension is now less than half the £169.50 (C$302.00) paid to seniors still residing in the United Kingdom. She told the BBC that frozen pensions touch all aspects of life.
“You’ve got to be careful about entertainment,” she told me. “You must realize that you cannot be as kind to your grandkids as you would like.
“You feel you’ve lost all sense of dignity, the government has thrown you away, you know, out of sight out of mind.”
Ms. Puckridge stated that when she alerted the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) that she was moving to Canada, “they never said a word about [my] pension being frozen”.
“The first I knew about it was when my first rise was due,” she recalled.
“I didn’t understand it. So I wrote and enquired about it, and I was told no… you will not receive any additional pension rises when you leave the UK.” She said, “It’s the injustice of it that is so unfair, the fact that we were never warned.”
Related News:
Paris Trash Strike Ends, Pension Protest Numbers Shrink
U.K News
Air Force Drones Spotted Over UK Military Bases
British military expertise has been brought in to assist in identifying persons responsible for flying Air Force drones near US military locations. According to the BBC, 60 RAF troops have been dispatched to assist the US Air Force with its probe.
The Air Force drones were not deemed hostile, according to the USAF, who added that the sightings “fluctuated and varied between the bases” and “ranged in sizes and configurations”.
According to the Ministry of Defence, “We are supporting the US Air Force response.”
The announcement follows several recent reports of unmanned aerial vehicles sighted near RAF Lakenheath and RAF Mildenhall in Suffolk and RAF Feltwell in adjacent Norfolk.
There have been other reports of drone activity overnight. According to the USAF, the vehicles were few in number and modest in size.
A representative for the US Air Forces in Europe stated, “We can confirm that there were sightings yesterday during nighttime hours, but the number fluctuated and varied between the bases throughout the night.”
The official stated that since the first sightings on November 20th, there has been “no impact on residents or infrastructure, and they have not been identified as hostile.”
However, the Air Force drones remained under surveillance “to ensure the safety and security of the installations.”
They said, “We request individuals in the area to contact either local police or security forces if they see anything suspicious.”
‘Treat threats seriously’
Officials in the United States and the United Kingdom have not said who is responsible for the recent drone activity.
However, the BBC understands there were worries that a state actor could be involved.
In recent months, intelligence officials have warned of increasing Russian sabotage operations against Western countries supporting Ukraine.
RAF Mildenhall is primarily home to the USAF’s 100th Air Refuelling Wing; RAF Lakenheath is home to USAF F-35A and F-15E fighter jets; and RAF Feltwell is mainly concerned with logistics and provides housing for military personnel.
A spokesman for the MoD, which owns the bases, said: “We take threats seriously and maintain robust measures at defence sites.
“We are supporting the US Air Force response.”
The USAF has not said who it believed to be behind the incidents.
Related News:
US Military Shoots Down Missiles And Drones
US Military Shoots Down Missiles And Drones As It Faces Growing Threats In Volatile Middle East
U.K News
General Election Petition in UK Hits 2 Million Signatures
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has ruled out holding an early general election after a petition calling for a second vote garnered two million signatures.
Over the weekend, a petition calling for another general election was started on the UK Parliament website. It cited Starmer’s failure to keep all his pledges made in the run-up to the previous election. By Monday mid-morning, it had surpassed two million signatures.
When asked about the petition, Starmer said he was “not surprised” that some individuals who did not vote for Labour in the previous election want a “re-run” of the poll.
He claimed that he had “inherited a lot of problems” from the previous administration and had resolved to “take the hard decisions first.”
Starmer ruled out an early general election, stating that only the Prime Minister can request that the King call a general election; it simply will not happen, he said.
This petition, started last week and sponsored by Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, calls on the government to schedule a new general election.
To sign a petition, you must verify that you are a British citizen or resident and provide a postcode.
The petition states, “I would prefer there to be another general election. I believe the present Labour government has broken the pledges they made before the last election.”
The petition comes only five months after Labour won the July general election with 9.7 million votes and 412 seats in the House of Commons.
However, the Labour Party garnered only 35% of the vote, the lowest percentage gained by a single-party administration since the conclusion of WWII.
Some of the policies implemented by Starmer and his Labour government have received significant criticism, including an inheritance tax on farms, a reduction in winter heating payments, an increase in employers’ national insurance, and applying VAT to private school fees.
According to the most recent Ipsos political pulse poll, the Labour Party is unpopular, with 28% of the public favoring it and 49% opposing it.
Related News:
Hamas Calls for Peace After Trump Wins General Election
-
Politics4 weeks ago
Miller Expects 4.9 Million Foreigners to Leave Canada Voluntarily
-
News3 weeks ago
Nolinor Boeing 737 Crash Lands in Montreal
-
News2 weeks ago
“Shocking Video” Vancouver Police Shoot Armed Suspect 10 Times
-
Tech3 weeks ago
Increasing its Stake in OpenAI by $1.5 Billion is a Possibility for SoftBank.
-
News4 weeks ago
Facebook Securities Fraud Case Dropped
-
Health4 weeks ago
A Canadian Teenager’s Bird Flu Virus Has Mutations