Connect with us

Politics

Republicans House Speaker Debacle Becoming a Clown Show

Published

on

Republicans House Speaker Debacle Becoming a Clown Show

House Republicans embarrassingly floundered through another day of multiple balloting on Wednesday, with Kevin McCarthy unable to be elected as House speaker. Republicans were unable to unite and end the political chaos, that is becoming an embarrassing clown show for the Republican majority in the house.

Republicans attempted to vote McCarthy into the top job for the fourth, fifth, and sixth time as the House fell further into disarray. But the votes were almost identical, with 20 conservative holdouts still refusing to support him, leaving him far short of the 218 required to win the gavel. In fact, McCarthy’s vote total dropped to 201 after one Republican switched to voting simply present.

“Well, it’s Groundhog Day,” Rep. Kat Cammack, R-Fla., said of McCarthy’s nomination on the sixth ballot.

“To all Americans watching right now, we hear you,” she said. And no matter how messy it gets, we’ll get through it.”

However, right-wing conservatives led by the Freedom Caucus and aligned with Donald Trump appeared emboldened by the standoff — despite Trump’s public support for McCarthy.

“This is actually an energizing day for America,” said Rep. Byron Donalds, R-Fla., who was nominated three times as an alternative by his conservative colleagues. “There are a lot of members in the chamber who want to have serious discussions about how we can wrap this up and elect a speaker.”

A Grueling spectacle

Kevin McCarthy, a California Republican, vowed to fight on despite the grueling spectacle that threw the new majority into disarray a day earlier. On the chamber floor, heated private debates erupted between McCarthy supporters and detractors looking for a way out.

The House convened at noon, but no other business could be done until the speaker was elected, including swearing in new members, forming committees, tackling legislation, and investigating the Biden administration.

“I still have the most votes,” McCarthy declared at the beginning of the session. “We’ll be able to get there at the end of the day.”

But the dynamic remained unchanged from Day One, as Democrats re-nominated their leader, Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, for speaker, and Donalds issued another historic challenge to McCarthy. Jeffries and Donalds are both black.

“This country needs leadership,” said Texas Republican Rep. Chip Roy, noting that it was the first time in history that two Black Americans were nominated for high office, and lawmakers from both parties rose to applaud.

Republicans embarrassing themselves

It was the first time in 100 years that a House speaker nominee did not take the gavel on the first vote, but McCarthy seemed unfazed. Instead, he vowed to fight until the end. With Republicans now in control of the House, the disorganized start to the new Congress portended difficulties ahead.

As he left the White House for a bipartisan event in Kentucky with Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell, President Joe Biden said, “the rest of the world is looking” at the scene on the House floor.

“I just think it’s really embarrassing how long it’s taking,” Biden said. “I’m not sure” who will win.

Tensions rose among the new House majority as their campaign promises failed to materialize. A speaker’s election has not gone to multiple ballots since 1923, and the longest and most grueling battle for the gavel began in late 1855 and lasted two months, with 133 ballots, during debates over slavery in the run-up to the Civil War.

A new generation of conservative Republicans, many of whom support Trump’s Make America Great Again agenda, want to upend Washington’s status quo and are determined to derail McCarthy’s rise without making concessions to their priorities.

McCarthy opposed by Freedom Caucus

Even Trump’s staunchest supporters, however, disagreed on this point. Rep. Lauren Boebert, a staunch Colorado conservative who nominated Donald Trump for the second time, urged the former president to tell McCarthy, “Sir, you do not have the votes, and it is time to withdraw.”

Trump had done the opposite earlier in the day, urging Republicans to vote for McCarthy. “Close the deal, take the victory,” he wrote in all capital letters on his social media site. “Do not turn a great victory into a massive and humiliating defeat.”

As the election dragged on, McCarthy’s supporters begged the remaining holdouts to vote for the California Republican.

“I think members on both sides are feeling a lot of pressure right now,” said Rep. Tom Cole, R-Oklahoma. “So I think the message from home is, ‘Hey, sort this out; we don’t have time for the small stuff and egos.'”

Since Republicans won control of the House in the midterm elections, there has been a standoff over McCarthy. While the Senate is still in Democratic hands, House Republicans are eager to confront Biden after Democrats controlled both houses of Congress for two years.

McCarthy was opposed by the conservative Freedom Caucus, which believes he is neither conservative nor tough enough to face Democrats.

McCarthy has already agreed to many of the Freedom Caucus’ demands for rule changes and other concessions that give rank-and-file members more influence in the legislative process in order to gain support. He’s been here before, having dropped out of the race for Speaker of the House in 2015 after failing to win over conservatives.

“Everything is on the table,” said ally Rep. Patrick McHenry, R-North Carolina, except having McCarthy step down. “Certainly not. That is not an option.”

Democrats enthusiastically nominated Jeffries, the party’s new leader, as their candidate for speaker. He received the most votes overall (212).

McCarthy could lower the threshold required by the rules to have a majority if he could win 213 votes and then persuade the remaining dissenters to simply vote present.

Former House speakers, including outgoing Democratic Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Republican Speaker John Boehner, have used this strategy in the past when confronted with opposition, winning the gavel with fewer than 218 votes.

Rep. Victoria Spartz of Indiana, a Republican, voted present in the fourth and fifth rounds, but it made no difference in the immediate outcome.

Source: AP, VOR News

Geoff Brown is a seasoned staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. With his sharp writing skills he consistently delivers high-quality, engaging content that resonates with readers. Geoff's' articles are well-researched, informative, and written in a clear, concise style that keeps audiences hooked. His ability to craft compelling narratives while seamlessly incorporating relevant keywords has made him a valuable asset to the VORNews team.

Politics

Trudeau Accused of “Phony Feminism” After Freeland’s Departure

Published

on

Freeland's resignation letter didn't mention gender, but Trudeau accused of phoney feminism anyway

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is facing a backlash for claiming to be a feminist after firing Chrystia Freeland as Finance Minister and replacing her with Dominic Leblanc on Tuesday.

Justin Trudeau has positioned himself as a feminist leader, a central element of his political identity. In 2015, Canada made history by appointing its first gender-equal cabinet, a significant step in the ongoing effort to champion women’s rights policies.

Trudeau aimed to solidify his reputation as a pioneer in the fight for gender equality. Recent accusations of “phoney feminism” have sparked a heated debate regarding the consistency between his statements and his actions.

Chrystia Freeland’s resignation from the cabinet has sparked criticism directed at Prime Minister Trudeau, raising questions about his approach to women in leadership roles.

Chrystia Freeland, previously regarded as one of Prime Minister Trudeau’s closest allies, has officially resigned from her position as Finance Minister. In her resignation letter, she notably omitted any reference to gender issues.

Freeland’s departure mirrors Trudeau’s removal of several high-profile women;

  • Jody Wilson-Raybould, former Attorney General, was removed in 2019 after the SNC-Lavalin controversy.
  • Jane Philpott, then President of the Treasury Board, was also ousted following her support for Wilson-Raybould.
  • Celina Caesar-Chavannes, a Liberal MP, left politics after claiming Trudeau didn’t handle internal disagreements well.

These firings have fuelled debates about his handling of women in leadership positions and made a mockery of his claims of being a feminist.

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre criticized Trudeau for the optics of replacing Freeland with a male cabinet member, calling it evidence of Trudeau’s “fake feminism.”

“Just blame Chrystia Freeland and make her wear it all. Some feminist,” Poilievre said at a news conference on Tuesday.

The same week as Trudeau was insulting Americans for not electing a woman president, he was busy throwing his own woman deputy prime minister under the bus to replace her with a man, Poilievre commented.

Prominent Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner asked how any woman in that caucus could “defend that man instead of calling for an election now,” while Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said Trudeau needed to start proving himself if he was going to keep declaring himself “to be such a supporter of women.”

MP Melissa Lantsman referred to an “old boys’ club” being in charge.

“It’s time for credible leadership in the seriousness of this moment, not the fake feminism of this phoney prime minister,” said Lantsman, who represents the Conservatives in the Thornhill riding.

Former Liberal MP Celina Caesar-Chavannes said she believes there is a pattern of female cabinet ministers who were “thrown under the bus” after “challenging someone whose name is Trudeau.”

Trudeau Defended

However, while Freeland’s resignation has sparked accusations of sexism, political experts suggest that focusing solely on gender may oversimplify the issue.

Freeland, an accomplished politician and the country’s first female Finance Minister left primarily due to policy disagreements. Her decision was less about being a powerful woman and more about divergent views on leadership and economic strategy.

Political scientist Dr. Melanee Thomas remarked that qualified women in politics often face frustrations when their expertise is dismissed.

She cautioned against reducing complex political dynamics to gender alone. By framing Freeland’s resignation solely as evidence of sexism, the broader challenges faced by all leaders in Trudeau’s cabinets—men and women alike—are overlooked.

Trudeau has remained relatively quiet, stating that Freeland’s departure was not an “easy day” for him.

Unlike previous controversies, he has not publicly defended his feminist credentials since Freeland’s resignation, leaving a vacuum for critics to dominate the narrative.

Over the years, Trudeau has said that “adding women changes politics,” presenting himself as an ally for feminist causes. His silence now begs the question: does he believe his track record speaks for itself, or is he struggling to respond to the growing skepticism?

Continue Reading

Politics

Liberal MPs Call on Trudeau to Resign

Published

on

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau may actually planning to resign.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is facing extreme political pressure, with Liberal MPs publicly urging him to step down for the sake of the Liberal Party of Canada.

Yesterday, Trudeau faced a triple setback: the resignations of Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland and Housing Minister Sean Fraser and a crushing byelection loss in British Columbia.

Trudeau is facing an uphill battle to maintain his grip on leadership as dissatisfaction among Liberal MPs is mounting. The recent events have added fuel to the fire.

Freeland, formerly one of Trudeau’s most prominent cabinet members, resigned in protest after allegedly being informed she’d be shuffled out of her role as finance minister. Many MPs believe this was poorly handled and symbolic of deeper issues within Trudeau’s leadership.

Adding insult to injury, the Liberals lost a B.C. byelection by 50 percentage points to the Conservatives—a seat they had held in the last general election. This loss has amplified concerns that Trudeau can no longer resonate with voters.

For the Good of the Party

Some Liberal MPs said Tuesday that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau cannot continue as party leader and needs to resign for the party’s good.

Liberal MPs like Wayne Long and Ken Hardie are now outspoken critics, claiming that Trudeau’s leadership is a huge liability for the party. Long described the Prime Minister as “living in a false reality,” warning that staying the course could lead the Liberals to electoral disaster.

Ontario MP Francis Drouin, a longstanding defender of Trudeau, has joined the chorus of dissent. He doubted the party’s ability to move forward under Trudeau, saying, “I’ve been a great defender, but I just don’t see how we recover.”

Other MPs, including Alexandra Mendès and Sean Casey, have echoed similar sentiments. Mendès stated she was deeply affected by Freeland’s treatment, while Casey suggested that Trudeau no longer enjoys the confidence of the caucus.

The Liberal caucus appears more divided than ever, with roughly a third of MPs reportedly favouring Trudeau’s immediate resignation. According to Long, between 40 and 50 MPs actively push for his resignation, while around 50 remain loyal to him. The rest are seemingly undecided or staying silent.

Trudeau’s Unwillingness to relinquish power

This lack of unity is becoming a significant issue. MP Chad Collins admitted, “I can say we’re united.” He suggested a secret ballot within the caucus would reveal overwhelming opposition to Trudeau’s continued leadership.

At a Liberal caucus meeting today, Trudeau acknowledged the growing discontent; however, he hasn’t shown any signs of stepping down. He assured MPs he understood their concerns, but many doubted his willingness to relinquish power.

The Liberals are at a crossroads. Liberal MPs worry they could lose the next general election if Trudeau remains in office, with polls showing Trudeau’s public support hovering around 20 percent.
MPs have called for a change before it’s too late, calling Trudeau’s leadership a “drag” on the party’s prospects.

The internal division might deepen if Trudeau doesn’t resign. According to some political analysts, more backbenchers will switch sides against Trudeau, especially if they are left out of the next cabinet move.

One thing is certain: the Liberal Party must decide soon. The longer the ambiguity persists, the more difficult it will be to regain voters’ confidence. For now, Canadians are left wondering whether Trudeau’s tenure as prime minister is ending—or if he will beat the odds once more.

Related News:

Dominic LeBlanc Sworn in as Canada’s New Finance Minister

Continue Reading

Politics

Justin Trudeau’s Fight for Gender Equity in Canada

Published

on

Justin Trudeau made news in 2015 by introducing Canada’s first gender-balanced cabinet, a decision that established the tone for the government’s commitment to gender equity and representation.

Since his election in 2015, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government has prioritized gender parity. From cabinet makeup to legislative efforts, the government has taken significant steps to reduce disparities and promote inclusion in Canada.

By assuring equal representation in top positions, the Trudeau government sends a strong message: varied perspectives improve governance.

While symbolic steps such as a balanced cabinet are vital, some believe that more than representation alone needs to address underlying issues. The Trudeau government has supported representation through measures to overcome these hurdles, leading us to the following issue.

Gender Equity in Pay

In 2021, Canada passed the Pay Equity Act, which requires federal workplaces to provide equal pay for equal work. This was a significant step towards narrowing the salary disparity between men and women.

The rule applies to firms with ten or more employees in federally regulated industries, promoting openness and fair compensation.

The government also developed the National Strategy to Prevent and Address Gender-Based Violence, prioritizing prevention, social services, and judicial reforms. Shelters, crisis centres, and advocacy groups have received extra funding to ensure survivors can access support.

Affordable childcare is crucial for allowing women to participate in the workforce. The Liberal government implemented a $10-per-day childcare program to alleviate the financial burden on families. This approach benefits parents, particularly mothers, who bear the burden of caring tasks.

One of the Trudeau administration’s most prominent innovations is using a “gender-based analysis plus” (GBA+) methodology for federal budgeting. This guarantees that government spending decisions consider the effects on different genders and other intersecting characteristics such as race, handicap, and income level.

Sexual and reproductive health projects

For example, the 2024 Autumn Economic Statement included continuous spending to protect women’s reproductive health and eliminate disparities in healthcare access. This approach prioritizes equity in resource allocation, recognizing that blanket policies frequently fail to adequately serve marginalized people.

In September 2024, Trudeau announced over $200 million in funding for worldwide sexual and reproductive health projects. These initiatives prioritize education, contraceptive access, and maternity healthcare.

Domestically, the government has boosted funding for abortion services, especially in impoverished areas. These initiatives demonstrate a commitment to empowering women and giving them authority over their healthcare decisions.

Despite these attempts, women in Canada continue to encounter challenges in the workplace. The gender pay gap is severe, particularly among racialized and Indigenous women. Critics believe that while regulations like the Pay Equity Act are a fine place to start, enforcement and oversight must improve.

Some campaigners have argued that the government’s approach to gender equity fails to address the unique issues that non-binary people confront, as well as those who face numerous types of discrimination. For example, racialized women and women with disabilities frequently suffer compounded injustices that broad measures can not fully address.

Advocating for Gender Equity

Efforts to promote gender equality have also encountered opposition. Some accuse the administration of focusing too much on identity politics, claiming that these programs take attention away from more serious issues.

However, supporters argue that equity is essential for a successful society and economy.

The Trudeau government continues to advocate for gender equality on several fronts. There is reason to be optimistic about future policy reforms and increased investments in healthcare and education.

Simultaneously, persistent advocacy will be required to guarantee that progress accomplished thus far does not stall.

Gender fairness isn’t just a moral obligation; it’s also a sound policy. The Trudeau government has worked to make Canada more equitable and inclusive by removing barriers and providing new possibilities.

While problems persist, the foundation has been created for future improvement. The challenge is how to capitalize on this momentum to achieve long-term change. Gender equity is a never-ending goal through policy, representation, or public dialogue.

It’s a difficult but important trip, and everyone’s opinion counts.

Related News:

Walmart Abandons DEI Ahead of Trump’s Inauguration

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version