Connect with us

Politics

Canada’s Trudeau Continues to Piss-Off India for Political Gain

Published

on

Canada's Trudeau Continues to Piss-Off India

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has escalated his criticism of India, claiming that the Indian government’s crackdown on Canadian diplomats is complicating life for millions of people in both nations.

Trudeau spoke a day after Canada announced the withdrawal of 41 diplomats in response to an Indian threat to remove their status unilaterally.

Indians are enraged over Justin Trudeau for suggesting “credible allegations of a potential link” between Indian government agents and the June murder of Sikh-Canadian separatist Hardeep Singh Nijjar in a Vancouver neighbourhood.

“The Indian government is making it extremely difficult for millions of people in India and Canada to go about their daily lives.” “And they’re doing it by violating a fundamental principle of diplomacy,” Trudeau said.

“It’s something that has me very concerned for the well-being and happiness of millions of Canadians who trace their ancestry to the Indian subcontinent,” he said during a televised press conference in Brampton, Ontario.

According to Trudeau, the expulsion of some of Canada’s diplomats will impede travel and trade and create issues for Indian students studying in Canada.

Around two million Canadians, or 5% of the total population, are of Indian descent. India is by far Canada’s greatest source of international students, accounting for over 40% of study permit holders.

The Indian foreign ministry had denied violating the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.

“The state of our bilateral relations, the much higher number of Canadian diplomats in India, and their continued interference in our internal affairs warrant a parity in mutual diplomatic presence in New Delhi and Ottawa,” the Canadian Embassy in Delhi said in a statement. Canada currently maintains 21 diplomats in India.

Trudeau’s diplomatic blunder

The US State Department somewhat backed  Trudeau in the diplomatic controversy saying “We have urged the Indian government not to insist upon a reduction in Canada’s diplomatic presence and to cooperate in the ongoing Canadian investigation,” Matthew Miller, a spokesperson for the ministry, said.

Canada’s relationship with India has been severely strained since September 18, when Prime Minister Justin Trudeau declared, “Canadian security agencies have been actively pursuing credible allegations of a potential link between agents of the Government of India and the killing of a Canadian citizen, (Sikh separatist leader) Hardeep Singh Nijjar.”

The government of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi deemed the allegation “irrational.” That could possibly be the case or not. However, the diplomatic repercussions of this unfounded allegation have been significant thus far.

Every nation has expelled its diplomats, and India has ceased granting Canadians visas. At present, the bilateral relations between the two nations are in a shambles, leaving future commerce and tourism in a precarious position.

Just why would Trudeau act in this manner?

Some in the Indian press contend that Trudeau’s political survival is in the hands of NDP leader Jagmeet Singh, an outspoken Sikh who has expressed strong disapproval towards the Indian government. India reportedly denied Singh, who was born in Canada, a visa in 2013 on the grounds of remarks he allegedly made regarding the Indian government’s management of anti-Sikh unrest in 1984.

Singh penned the following following Trudeau’s denunciation of India: “Sikh-Canadians have consistently harboured suspicions that India was infringing upon the democratic liberties of the Canadian people. “The prime minister’s announcement yesterday validates these suspicions.”

In actuality, however, Trudeau’s statement reinforces suspicions rather than confirming them, relying on ambiguous intelligence. The intelligence, which was provided to the Associated Press by a Canadian official, was obtained through the surveillance of Indian diplomats and was obtained from an ally.

Even so, India asserts that Ottawa has been uncooperative. Arindam Bagchi, a spokesman for the Ministry of External Affairs of India, stated on September 21 that Canada had not provided any conclusive details regarding this case at that time, prior to it, or since.

Conducting a worldwide smear campaign against India was a dubious, if not irresponsible, decision on the part of Trudeau. Former Indian high commissioner in Canada Vikas Swarup questioned Ottawa’s management of the affair at a recent conference in Banff, Alberta. “The allegations that have been put forth are denied by me.” He advocated for the unveiling of the truth in a public setting. “An individual remains innocent until proven guilty.”

However, this will never occur. Trudeau enlisted a friend, David Johnston, to investigate allegations that China meddled in Canada’s electoral process when opposition parties demanded transparency.

Because investigators would require access to classified documents, which are inaccessible to the public due to their classified nature, he stated that a public investigation is impossible.

By employing the catch-22 reasoning, the classified intelligence regarding purported misconduct by India will remain undisclosed, as it is not permissible to disclose. This implies that the prime minister’s allegation regarding India will remain unknown to the public.

The inquiry that Canadians have is whether Singh is the legitimate prime minister of Canada and why Trudeau committed this action. Their partnership has apparently now also harmed the Canadian people diplomatically in addition to economically.

Continue Reading

Politics

Trudeau GST Tax Holiday to Cost Taxpayers $6.3 Billion

Published

on

Trudeau. GST

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced a two-month GST break on some purchases and a one-time $250 rebate for all Canadians earning less than $150,000. The proposed GST break would last from December 14 to February 15.

The Liberals said it would cover various things, including children’s clothing and shoes, toys, diapers, restaurant meals, and beer and wine. It also refers to real and artificial Christmas trees, snack foods and beverages, and video game systems.

The move will cost taxpayers almost $4.7 billion, and the GST exemption will cost an additional $1.6 billion, totaling $6.3 Billion.

The federal government is now running a significant deficit. This raises the question of who will have to foot the $6.3 billion bill for today’s one-time payments. The government will have to borrow the money, and future taxpayers must either repay it or service the additional debt perpetually.

Critics argue that the GST credit is a collection of terrible ideas that will do little to lift Canada out of the long-term economic rut in which our economy is stuck.

Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre responded Thursday to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s pledge of a “GST Holiday” for Canadians, calling it a “tax trick.”

Poilievre stated that the temporary exemption from the Goods and Services Tax on various ordinary commodities “would not make up for the permanent quadrupling carbon tax on heat, housing, food, and fuel.”

Bloc Québécois leader Yves-François Blanchet stated he is “against any idea of a prime minister who says, ‘I will give you money in order for you to consider voting for me.'”

According to the Canadian Federation of Independent Business, temporary sales tax holidays will only increase confusion and administrative burden for small business owners.

A temporary sales tax decrease would help boost demand in some industries, including restaurants, Canadians, and companies, which require sustainable tax relief during the slow post-holiday season.

The changes amid an inflation-driven affordability crisis have left many dissatisfied with the Trudeau government. A federal election is scheduled for before next October, although it might happen sooner if the minority government falls before then.

For months, the Conservatives have held a double-digit lead over the Liberals in public opinion polls, with Leader Pierre Poilievre promising to cut taxes and government spending to restore affordability.

High inflation has also pressured the Liberals to avoid proposing policies that would boost spending and raise fuel prices.

According to the Fraser Institute, The Trudeau government got one thing fundamentally right: Lowering the tax burden on Canadians has benefits. Unfortunately, the policy package it has proposed to deliver tax relief is completely wrong.

It lowers the incorrect taxes, moves taxes temporarily rather than lowering them, does little to improve economic incentives, and punishes future taxpayers. With the holiday season approaching, this attempt at a gift for Canadian taxpayers is the economic equivalent of a lump of coal in the stocking.

Related News:

Trudeau Blames Immigration Failures on Bad Actors

Justin Trudeau Blames Immigration Failures on Bad Actors

 

Continue Reading

Politics

Matt Gaetz Withdraws as Trump’s Pick for Attorney General

Published

on

Matt Gaetz,attorney general, Trump
Matt Gaetz talks to reporters

Congressman Matt Gaetz has withdrawn as President-elect Donald Trump’s candidate for Attorney General, citing concerns about a federal sex trafficking probe that cast doubt on his ability to be confirmed.

Gaetz resigned after failing to persuade the Senate to endorse his contentious candidacy. Shortly after Gaetz’s unexpected departure, the president-elect issued a statement applauding his former AG nominee’s choice to seek Senate confirmation.

“I greatly appreciate the recent efforts of Matt Gaetz in seeking approval to be Attorney General. He was doing very well but, at the same time, did not want to be a distraction for the Administration, for which he has much respect. Matt has a wonderful future, and I look forward to watching all the great things he will do!” the president-elect wrote on Truth Social.

Gaetz had earlier stated that he was retiring from his current seat in Congress and would not take the oath of office for the upcoming session, which begins in January. Now that he has withdrawn from consideration for AG, his future in Washington is uncertain.

Related News:

Concerned About Matt Gaetz Senate Republicans Call for a House Ethics Investigation

Concerned About Matt Gaetz’s Campaign, Senate Republicans Call for a House Ethics Investigation.

 

 

Continue Reading

Politics

Eric Hovde Concedes The United States Senate Race To Tammy Baldwin.

Published

on

Eric Hovde

(VOR News) – Eric Hovde, the Republican candidate for the United States Senate, has acknowledged that he was defeated by Tammy Baldwin, the Democratic candidate for the same seat on the ballot.

Baldwin acknowledged Hovde’s defeat and consented to it. Furthermore, he released a statement in which he contends that the election results are not only inaccurate, but also devoid of any factual foundation.

Eric Hovde experienced this two weeks after the election.

Baldwin emerged as the unofficial victor of the Senate campaign in Wisconsin, a race that was closely monitored by a significant number of individuals. Baldwin was awarded the title of victor on November 6th. Baldwin emerged victorious by a razor-thin margin.

According to the data provided by the Associated Press, Baldwin emerged victorious by a margin of 29,116 ballots, which is approximately equivalent to 0.9 percent of the total votes cast. Baldwin emerged victorious by a substantial margin, as indicated by the results.

Hovde issued his public apology subsequent to the conclusion of the canvassing of the results by the majority of county clerks throughout the state. This process will ultimately result in the results being recognized as official. Publication of Eric Hovde’s decision. Not only were the results announced at this time, but they were also proclaimed in an official capacity.

The exact phrase of the announcement, “Thank you for your support,” was included in a post by Eric Hovde on Monday and published on the social networking site X.

The public was notified of this announcement. The announcement was public on Monday. It has drawn a lot of attention. “It is time to begin moving on.”

In contrast, Eric Hovde’s film began with a somewhat less inclusive tone, which persisted throughout. He made this assumption without offering any evidence to back it up, and his claims that there were “many troubling issues” with absentee ballots tabulated late on election night were factually incorrect. His claims were not supported by empirical evidence.

His claims were unsupported by any proof. Not a single piece of evidence could possibly prove that his allegations were correct. He stated in the statement that “numerous supporters” had demanded that he challenge the election results. He acknowledged receiving the request.

Eric Hovde acknowledged receiving these demands.

In particular, Eric Hovde asserts, “However, a request for a recount would serve no purpose if it were not for a detailed review of all the ballots and their legitimacy, which will be difficult to obtain in the courts.”

Subsequently, you would recount the identical ballots, regardless of their authenticity. This is the reason, as elucidated in this article. This is the rationale for the current state of affairs.

Hovde and his campaign refrained from issuing any public statements subsequent to Baldwin’s disclosure that Eric Hovde had emerged victorious in the election, which transpired over a week after Baldwin’s initial announcement.

The previous week, he uploaded a video to social media platforms that expressed his “deeply concerned” sentiments regarding the election results in Milwaukee.

The election was conducted in Milwaukee. While the film was being screened, there was a discussion regarding the results of the election in Milwaukee. As the ballots were still being counted in the largest city in Wisconsin on the evening of the election, he expressed his “shock” at the sequence of events that had transpired.

Eric Hovde was emphasizing the occurrence of specific events.

In addition, he declared that ballots were still being tallied at the time of the election. Eric Hovde made this declaration during the voting period, while ballots were still being tabulated.

Baldwin’s team referenced her victory speech, which she delivered the week prior to the election, in response to a request for comment that was submitted on Monday.

In response to the campaign’s request, this action was implemented.

A representative of Baldwin’s team has verified that “Hovde has not called,” which is consistent with the information that was disclosed on Monday morning. The representative who provided these details has worked in a variety of capacities throughout their career.

SOURCE: WPR

SEE ALSO:

Tesla Shares Rise After Trump Proposes liberalizing Self-Driving Vehicle Laws.

Despite losing, Kamala Harris raised more than a billion dollars. She continues to appeal to donors.

Continue Reading

Trending