Politics
Anger Erupts Over Trudeau’s’ Open Door Immigration Policies
The premiers of British Columbia and Quebec, as well as the general people, are desperately trying to convince Justin Trudeau and the Liberals to abandon their open-door immigration policy.
Hard core reality is teaching Prime Minister Justin Trudeau some valuable lessons about flirting with the fantasy of virtually free borders. The same is true for Canada’s premiers and the general people. Especially in relation to asylum seekers.
For months, British Columbia Premier David Eby and Quebec Premier François Legault have been working tirelessly to convince Justin Trudeau and his childhood buddy, Immigration Minister Marc Miller, to abandon their open border policy.
Provincial premiers have attempted to educate Justin Trudeau about the financial costs of such grandstanding on asylum seekers. According to Statistics Canada, there are now 363,000 asylum claimants in the country, which is more than double the number two years ago.
Most claimants were strolling across the US border into Eastern Canada a few years ago, which US President Joe Biden helped tighten last year.
Claimants arrive at airports in Toronto, Montreal, and, to a lesser extent, Calgary and Vancouver, primarily from Asia. They enter legitimately on study or travel visas and then make their claims after leaving the airport, claiming they are fleeing various sorts of persecution.
Trudeau Governments Failure of Vetting
According to Anne Michèle Meggs, a former Quebec immigration official who now writes independently on the subject, the refugee board typically takes around two years to study backgrounds and rule on a case, and often more if there is an appeal.
According to Meggs, the average number of asylum claims lodged per month in British Columbia this year has risen to 640, up 37% from previous year. B.C. has the third highest influx of asylum seekers in the country. Most still go to Ontario, where average monthly claims have increased by 53%, or Quebec, where they are up 20%.
Canada’s premiers have been telling Trudeau for months that, regardless of the legitimacy of their claims, asylum seekers cost taxpayers a lot of money.
Most arrive with no money. While they wait for their cases to be reviewed to determine whether they will be granted coveted permanent resident status, federal and provincial organisations frequently provide social services such as shelter, food, clothes, health care, children’s education, and (in Quebec) creche.
Stories about an out-of-control refugee system are likely contributing to rapidly changing opinion survey results. Last week, Leger discovered that 60 percent of Canadians believe there are “too many” newcomers. This represents a significant increase from 35 percent in 2019.
It is the highest level of unhappiness in decades, owing in part to demand pressure on housing and infrastructure expenses. The negative polling results are constant among white and non-white Canadians.
Provinces Overloaded Under Funded
In response to protests from Quebec, Trudeau provided an additional $750 million this year to support refugee claims who came in recent years, primarily at the land border. Last year, Quebec handled 65,000 claims, while Ontario handled 63,000, with the greatest groups coming from Mexico and India.
But, as Eby tells anyone who will listen, B.C. has received no funding from Ottawa. The premier expressed how “frustrating” it is for B.C. to “scrabble around” for cash in the province, where housing is among the most expensive in the world, while Quebec receives more.
“Our most recent total for last year was 180,000 new British Columbians,” Eby said last month, including asylum seekers and all other international migrants to the province. “And that’s great and that’s exciting and it’s necessary, and it’s completely overwhelming.”
Eby made no public mention of the increasingly strange anomaly based on the three-decade-old Quebec Accord, which results in Quebec receiving ten times more funds than British Columbia and Ontario to settle newcomers each year.
According to Postmedia News, Metro Vancouver’s shelters are being overcrowded as the number of asylum applicants in British Columbia has nearly doubled in the last year.
Canada’s Immigration out of control
The Salvation Army, which operates 100 beds in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside, reported that since last summer, the proportion of refugee claimants requesting shelter has increased to roughly 80%. Meanwhile, refugee claimants filled over 60% of the beds at the Catholic Charities Men’s Shelter in Vancouver. Taxpayers provide the majority of the funding for shelters.
According to Meggs, government figures reveal that British Columbia now has 16,837 asylum claimants. This excludes the 5,300 refugees who arrived in the province in a more organised manner last year, thanks to government assistance.
Meggs claims her “jaw dropped” when Trudeau stated in April that the number of temporary immigrants, including asylum seekers, was “out of control” and “growing at a rate far beyond what Canada has been able to absorb.”
The cognitive dissonance, she noted, stems from Trudeau’s government’s complete responsibility for the system’s spiralling out of control since 2015, not just in terms of numbers, but also in selection criteria, or lack thereof.
Trudeau has confessed that pandemonium characterises the situation with international students, whose numbers have risen under his leadership to 1.1 million. Many people are now demanding asylum. B.C. has 217,000 international students in post-secondary institutions and 49,000 in kindergarten-to-Grade-12 programs.
Vancouver immigration lawyer Richard Kurland is among many who believe it would be preferable if Canada processed roughly 50,000 refugee claims every year, as it lacks the absorptive capacity for more — such as the 144,000 who applied last year.
One major issue, according to Kurland, is that the government knows very little about many asylum seekers. The immigration department’s ignorance stems in part from the fact that many people file claims online. Officials don’t even know where tens of thousands of people reside. Source: The Sun
Related News:
Justin Trudeau Needs to Read the Writing on the Wall
Politics
Trump Takes Aim at Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau
President-elect Donald Trump has shifted his attention from Congress’s spending plans to criticize Canada and its Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau.
Trump’s provocative statements directed at Prime Minister Justin Trudeau made headlines this week, eliciting responses from both sides of the frontier.
Trump suggested on his platform, Truth Social, that Canadians may prefer their country to become the 51st state of the United States. He claimed that they would receive substantial benefits from reduced taxation and military protection.
He even addressed Justin Trudeau as “Governor,” a statement that has undoubtedly caused controversy in Canada. Many Canadian officials expressed their indignation in a prompt manner.
“We are Canadians first,” remarked a Canadian commentator, discounting Trump’s remarks as misguided.
The tension intensified after a surprise Thanksgiving dinner at Mar-a-Lago, during which Trump initially proposed that Canada could circumvent tariffs by becoming the 51st state to join the United States.
Trump has since expressed his apprehension regarding border security and has threatened to impose a substantial 25% tariff on all Canadian products.
It is important to acknowledge that the statistics provide a different perspective. The Canadian border has experienced a fraction of the number of arrests in comparison to the southern border of the United States with Mexico.
US Canada Ties
The economic relationship between the United States and Canada is substantial, with an exchange of products valued at approximately $2.7 billion on a daily basis.
Nevertheless, the notion of becoming the 51st state is profoundly offensive to many Canadians, despite the fact that Trump’s allies in Washington D.C. have characterized his remarks as humorous.
Kirsten Hillman, Canada’s ambassador to the United States, downplayed any indication of tensions between the two countries. Hillman stated, “I believe that the president-elect is enjoying himself.” “Canada is capable of accommodating it.” You are aware that we possess a robust sense of self and are capable of communicating it.
“The United States is like family,” she stated to Politico.
The president-elect is well-known to Hillman. She played a critical role in the negotiation of Canada’s portion of the United States-Mexico-Canada agreement during his most recent administration. Additionally, she traveled to Mar-a-Lago with Trudeau for the diplomatic dinner just a few weeks ago.
Canada is considering retaliatory tariffs in response to Trump’s threats. It is crucial to bear in mind that a significant fraction of the energy imports of the United States are sourced from Canada.
Specifically, approximately 60% of crude oil and 85% of electricity are sourced from our northern neighbor.
The consequences of Trump’s remarks on U.S.-Canada relations are far from clear as the situation continues to develop.
Navigating these tensions and preserving a robust economic partnership will require the ongoing dialogue between the two nations.
Support for Trudeau Diminishing
Meanwhile, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is facing increasing pressure to resign, as an increasing number of Liberal MPs have joined the call for his resignation in response to the tumultuous week that has befallen his party.
Global News reported that over half of the 75 Liberal MPs from Ontario convened for a one-hour meeting on Saturday to discuss the leadership of their party.
At the caucus meeting, only a small number of MPs expressed their support for Trudeau’s continued leadership. However, a significant number of them expressed their desire for him to step down, stating that his brand has become “toxic.”
Chandra Arya, who represents the Ottawa constituency of Nepean, was among the attendees at the meeting on Saturday.
Arya published a letter he wrote to Trudeau on Friday, in which he requested that he “step aside as leader of the Liberal caucus immediately.”
Arya wrote in the letter dated Dec. 20 and shared on X, “I have consistently supported you since last summer, even when some of our colleagues called for your resignation, while I align as a fiscally-center-right Liberal and have often disagreed with your left-leaning positions.”
“However, it was evident today that the House of Commons no longer has faith in you.” I am now reasonably certain that the Liberal caucus’s majority no longer endorses your leadership.
Arya did not disclose the events of Saturday’s meeting during an interview with Global News on Sunday; however, he stated that it verified the information he had previously written in his letter.
He stated that the number of Liberal MPs who have joined calls for Trudeau to step down has “begun to increase” over the past 48 to 72 hours.
“I believe that the prime minister is seriously considering,” Arya stated.
Related News:
NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh Vows to Topple Trudeau Government
Politics
NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh Vows to Topple Trudeau Government
Canada’s opposition leader said his caucus plans to vote against Justin Trudeau’s government. If the prime minister does not seek a temporary suspension of parliament, the country will be plunged into an election early next year.
If the NDP gains support from other major opposition parties, Trudeau’s government would be forced to step down, sparking an election shortly after Donald Trump’s expected return to the White House in Washington DC.
Trudeau’s Liberals currently lack a majority in the House of Commons and have relied on NDP backing to pass laws and remain in power. Singh and Trudeau previously agreed on a cooperation deal, but the NDP leader ended that arrangement in September.
Singh’s declaration came just before Trudeau unveiled changes to his cabinet, a move aimed at steadying his government following Chrystia Freeland’s surprising resignation as finance minister earlier in the week. Polls show the Liberals are unpopular, and Trudeau is under internal pressure to resign after Freeland’s departure.
“The Liberals don’t deserve another chance,” Singh said. “That’s why the NDP will vote to end this government and let Canadians choose new leadership.”
Trudeau is expected to consider his political future over the holidays, and parliament will reconvene on January 27.
One option for Trudeau is asking the governor-general to prorogue parliament, which would end the current session. This move could delay Singh’s non-confidence vote by postponing lawmakers’ return to Ottawa.
The new cabinet begins its term amid economic uncertainty, worsened by Trump’s threat to impose 25 percent tariffs on Canadian goods.
Dominic LeBlanc — who joined the prime minister at a dinner meeting with Trump at Mar-a-Lago in November — was sworn in as finance minister on Monday after Freeland quit.
Today, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced changes to his Cabinet. He said the new cabinet will prioritize Canadians’ most important objectives: enhancing the economy and reducing the cost of living.
The team will continue to advance in housing, child care, and school food while striving to return more money to Canadians’ wallets, building on the investments made since 2015.
The changes to the cabinet are as follows:
- Anita Anand becomes Minister of Transport and Internal Trade
- Gary Anandasangaree becomes Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs and Minister responsible for the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency
- Steven MacKinnon becomes Minister of Employment, Workforce Development and Labour
- Ginette Petitpas Taylor becomes President of the Treasury Board
The Prime Minister also welcomed the following new members of his Cabinet:
- Rachel Bendayan becomes Minister of Official Languages and Associate Minister of Public Safety
- Élisabeth Brière becomes Minister of National Revenue
- Terry Duguid becomes Minister of Sport and Minister responsible for Prairies Economic Development Canada
- Nate Erskine-Smith becomes Minister of Housing, Infrastructure and Communities
- Darren Fisher becomes Minister of Veterans Affairs and Associate Minister of National Defence
- David J. McGuinty becomes Minister of Public Safety
- Ruby Sahota becomes Minister of Democratic Institutions and Minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario.
- Joanne Thompson becomes Minister of Seniors.
These new ministers will work with all members of the Cabinet to deliver real, positive change for Canadians. They join the following ministers remaining in their portfolio:
- Terry Beech, Minister of Citizens’ Services
- Bill Blair, Minister of National Defence
- François-Philippe Champagne, Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry
- Jean-Yves Duclos, Minister of Public Services and Procurement and Quebec Lieutenant
- Karina Gould, Leader of the Government in the House of Commons
- Steven Guilbeault, Minister of Environment and Climate Change
- Patty Hajdu, Minister of Indigenous Services and Minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Northern Ontario
- Mark Holland, Minister of Health
- Ahmed Hussen, Minister of International Development
- Gudie Hutchings, Minister of Rural Economic Development and Minister responsible for the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
- Marci Ien, Minister for Women and Gender Equality and Youth
- Mélanie Joly, Minister of Foreign Affairs
- Kamal Khera, Minister of Diversity, Inclusion and Persons with Disabilities
- Dominic LeBlanc, Minister of Finance and Intergovernmental Affairs
- Diane Lebouthillier, Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard
- Lawrence MacAulay, Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food
- Soraya Martinez Ferrada, Minister of Tourism and Minister responsible for the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec
- Marc Miller, Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship
- Mary Ng, Minister of Export Promotion, International Trade and Economic Development
- Harjit S. Sajjan, President of the King’s Privy Council for Canada and Minister of Emergency Preparedness and Minister responsible for the Pacific Economic Development Agency of Canada
- Ya’ara Saks, Minister of Mental Health and Addictions and Associate Minister of Health
- Pascale St-Onge, Minister of Canadian Heritage
- Jenna Sudds, Minister of Families, Children and Social Development
- Rechie Valdez, Minister of Small Business
- Arif Virani, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
- Jonathan Wilkinson, Minister of Energy and Natural Resources
Politics
Trudeau Accused of “Phony Feminism” After Freeland’s Departure
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is facing a backlash for claiming to be a feminist after firing Chrystia Freeland as Finance Minister and replacing her with Dominic Leblanc on Tuesday.
Justin Trudeau has positioned himself as a feminist leader, a central element of his political identity. In 2015, Canada made history by appointing its first gender-equal cabinet, a significant step in the ongoing effort to champion women’s rights policies.
Trudeau aimed to solidify his reputation as a pioneer in the fight for gender equality. Recent accusations of “phoney feminism” have sparked a heated debate regarding the consistency between his statements and his actions.
Chrystia Freeland’s resignation from the cabinet has sparked criticism directed at Prime Minister Trudeau, raising questions about his approach to women in leadership roles.
Chrystia Freeland, previously regarded as one of Prime Minister Trudeau’s closest allies, has officially resigned from her position as Finance Minister. In her resignation letter, she notably omitted any reference to gender issues.
Freeland’s departure mirrors Trudeau’s removal of several high-profile women;
- Jody Wilson-Raybould, former Attorney General, was removed in 2019 after the SNC-Lavalin controversy.
- Jane Philpott, then President of the Treasury Board, was also ousted following her support for Wilson-Raybould.
- Celina Caesar-Chavannes, a Liberal MP, left politics after claiming Trudeau didn’t handle internal disagreements well.
These firings have fuelled debates about his handling of women in leadership positions and made a mockery of his claims of being a feminist.
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre criticized Trudeau for the optics of replacing Freeland with a male cabinet member, calling it evidence of Trudeau’s “fake feminism.”
“Just blame Chrystia Freeland and make her wear it all. Some feminist,” Poilievre said at a news conference on Tuesday.
The same week as Trudeau was insulting Americans for not electing a woman president, he was busy throwing his own woman deputy prime minister under the bus to replace her with a man, Poilievre commented.
Prominent Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner asked how any woman in that caucus could “defend that man instead of calling for an election now,” while Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said Trudeau needed to start proving himself if he was going to keep declaring himself “to be such a supporter of women.”
MP Melissa Lantsman referred to an “old boys’ club” being in charge.
“It’s time for credible leadership in the seriousness of this moment, not the fake feminism of this phoney prime minister,” said Lantsman, who represents the Conservatives in the Thornhill riding.
Former Liberal MP Celina Caesar-Chavannes said she believes there is a pattern of female cabinet ministers who were “thrown under the bus” after “challenging someone whose name is Trudeau.”
Trudeau Defended
However, while Freeland’s resignation has sparked accusations of sexism, political experts suggest that focusing solely on gender may oversimplify the issue.
Freeland, an accomplished politician and the country’s first female Finance Minister left primarily due to policy disagreements. Her decision was less about being a powerful woman and more about divergent views on leadership and economic strategy.
Political scientist Dr. Melanee Thomas remarked that qualified women in politics often face frustrations when their expertise is dismissed.
She cautioned against reducing complex political dynamics to gender alone. By framing Freeland’s resignation solely as evidence of sexism, the broader challenges faced by all leaders in Trudeau’s cabinets—men and women alike—are overlooked.
Trudeau has remained relatively quiet, stating that Freeland’s departure was not an “easy day” for him.
Unlike previous controversies, he has not publicly defended his feminist credentials since Freeland’s resignation, leaving a vacuum for critics to dominate the narrative.
Over the years, Trudeau has said that “adding women changes politics,” presenting himself as an ally for feminist causes. His silence now begs the question: does he believe his track record speaks for itself, or is he struggling to respond to the growing skepticism?
-
Politics4 weeks ago
Miller Expects 4.9 Million Foreigners to Leave Canada Voluntarily
-
News4 weeks ago
Nolinor Boeing 737 Crash Lands in Montreal
-
News3 weeks ago
“Shocking Video” Vancouver Police Shoot Armed Suspect 10 Times
-
Tech4 weeks ago
Increasing its Stake in OpenAI by $1.5 Billion is a Possibility for SoftBank.
-
Tech4 weeks ago
Canadian Media Firms Are Suing OpenAI in a Potential Billion-Dollar Dispute.
-
Finance2 weeks ago
Chrystia Freeland Promises Mini-Budget By Dec 16th