Connect with us

World

North Korea Claims it Tested a New Multiwarhead Missile

Published

on

North Korea Claims it Tested a New Multiwarhead Missile

In the first known launch of a weapon under development that North Korean leader Kim Jong Un hopes can overwhelm South Korea’s and the United States’ missile defenses, the country stated on Thursday that it had successfully tested a multiwarhead missile.

South Korea promptly rejected the assertion as an attempt to conceal an unsuccessful launch. According to North Korea’s official media, the launch on Wednesday demonstrated the capacity of the Multiple Independent Reentry Vehicles to separate and operate individual mobile warheads.

It said that a decoy that detached from the missile was confirmed by radar and that the separated warheads “were guided correctly to the three coordinate targets.” If verified, it would be North Korea’s first public launch associated with the development of a multiwarhead missile, although one in its early stages.

Later on Thursday, the South Korean military said that the combined study by South Korean and American officials concluded that the North Korean missile launch was unsuccessful.

The North Korean missile burst on its first flight, but Joint Chiefs of Staff spokesman Lee Sung Joon informed reporters that warheads are separated in descending phases during MIRV testing. He said that images of the launch taken by North Korea revealed a missile like the liquid-fuel Hwasong-17 ICBM that the nation tested in March 2023.

According to an earlier assessment made by the South Korean military on Wednesday, a hypersonic missile suspected of being solid-fueled was launched, burst off the coast of North Korea’s east, and scattered pieces into the ocean. It claimed to have found more smoke than usual during launches, which may indicate a problem with combustion brought on by an engine malfunction.

During a meeting of the governing party in early 2021, Kim listed several high-tech military systems on his wish list. These included hypersonic weapons, surveillance satellites, solid-fuel intercontinental ballistic missiles, and submarine-launched nuclear missiles.

North Korea has conducted several tests to create this kind of weaponry

Ankit Panda, a senior analyst at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said, “I had been anticipating a MIRV test for some time now, as this was one of the last remaining items on Kim Jong Un’s modernization wish list from the 8th Party Congress back in January 2021.”

According to Panda, the test on Wednesday seemed to be a preliminary assessment of some of the essential subsystems needed to create a functional MIRV. He anticipates that a series of technical tests will come before an intercontinental ballistic missile is launched on an elevated trajectory. According to Panda, “South Korea initially misinterpreted the nature of this test.”

According to Lee Choon Geun, an honorary research fellow at the Science and Technology Policy Institute in South Korea, North Korea seems to have started testing several multiwarhead missile components. He said that more testing is anticipated to refine multiwarhead missile technology in other areas, including as separation and guidance control.

According to Chang Young-keun, a missile specialist at Seoul’s Korea Research Institute for National Strategy, the North Korean test hasn’t yet shown that it has the necessary MIRV-controlling capabilities for ICBMs.

He said that North Korea provided insufficient data to confirm that its MIRVs successfully reentered the atmosphere and struck their intended targets. Panda said that it is important that a dummy be used in the North Korean test. However, South Korea’s military claimed it could not instantly verify if North Korea had the capability to construct a ruse of this kind.

Panda said, “North Korea has not concealed its goal to undermine and surpass American homeland missile defenses.” “Decoys will help with that effort and probably end up on their single-warhead missiles as well.”

The North Korean test, its first weaponry demonstration in a month, coincided with demonstrations against the U.S. aircraft carrier’s regional deployment for the first-ever joint training with South Korea and Japan. On Monday, North Korean Vice Defense Minister Kim Kang Il denounced th” the carrier’s deployment as recklessand warned with undefined consequences.

The multidomain South Korea-U.S.-Japan training started on Thursday and will last three days, according to the South Korean military. According to the statement, the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt will be joined by destroyers, fighter fighters, and helicopters from all three nations for the “Freedom Edge” drill. Drills for maritime interdiction, anti-submarine warfare, and missile defense will be part of the training.

Additionally, in what it has characterized as a tit-for-tat reaction to South Korean activists delivering political literature via their own balloons, North Korea has flown a large number of trash-carrying balloons toward South Korea in recent weeks. In retaliation, South Korea aired propaganda audio over loudspeakers in border regions for a limited period on June 9, which it had not done in years.

On Thursday, South Korea threatened to switch on the loudspeakers once again if North Korea continued to deliver garbage balloons. Concerns over North Korea also increased last week when Kim Jong Un and Russian President Vladimir Putin struck an agreement stipulating that each nation help the other in the event of an attack and promising to increase cooperation.

According to analysts, the agreement signifies the most robust relationship between the two nations since the conclusion of the Cold War. According to the expert Lee, North Korea’s ability to finish developing a multiwarhead weapon hinges on whether and to what extent Russia offers technological help. The South Korean military said that there is no proof of Russian support for the MIRV program in North Korea.

In the first known launch of a weapon under development that North Korean leader Kim Jong Un hopes can overwhelm South Korea’s and the United States’ missile defenses, the country stated on Thursday that it had successfully tested a multiwarhead missile. South Korea promptly rejected the assertion as an attempt to conceal an unsuccessful launch.

According to North Korea’s official media, the launch on Wednesday demonstrated the capacity of the Multiple Independent Reentry Vehicles to separate and operate individual mobile warheads. It said that a decoy that detached from the missile was confirmed by radar and that the separated warheads “were guided correctly to the three coordinate targets.”

If verified, it would be North Korea’s first public launch associated with the development of a multiwarhead missile, although one in its early stages. Later on Thursday, the South Korean military said that the combined study by South Korean and American officials concluded that the North Korean missile launch was unsuccessful.

The North Korean missile burst on its first flight, but Joint Chiefs of Staff spokesman Lee Sung Joon informed reporters that warheads are separated in descending phases during MIRV testing. He said that images of the launch taken by North Korea revealed a missile like the liquid-fuel Hwasong-17 ICBM that the nation tested in March 2023.

According to an earlier assessment made by the South Korean military on Wednesday, a hypersonic missile suspected of being solid-fueled was launched, burst off the coast of North Korea’s east, and scattered pieces into the ocean. It claimed to have found more smoke than usual during launches, which may indicate a problem with combustion brought on by an engine malfunction.

During a meeting of the governing party in early 2021, Kim listed several high-tech military systems on his wish list. These included hypersonic weapons, surveillance satellites, solid-fuel intercontinental ballistic missiles, and submarine-launched nuclear missiles. Since then, North Korea has conducted several tests to create these kinds of weaponry.

Ankit Panda, a senior analyst at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said, “I had been anticipating a MIRV test for some time now, as this was one of the last remaining items on Kim Jong Un’s modernization wish list from the 8th Party Congress back in January 2021.”

According to Panda, the test on Wednesday seemed to be a preliminary assessment of some of the essential subsystems needed to create a functional MIRV. He anticipates that a series of technical tests will come before an intercontinental ballistic missile is launched on an elevated trajectory. According to Panda, “South Korea initially misinterpreted the nature of this test.”

According to Lee Choon Geun, an honorary research fellow at the Science and Technology Policy Institute in South Korea, North Korea seems to have started testing several multiwarhead missile components. He said that more testing is anticipated to refine multiwarhead missile technology in other areas, including separation and guidance control.

According to Chang Young-keun, a missile specialist at Seoul’s Korea Research Institute for National Strategy, the North Korean test hasn’t yet shown that it has the necessary MIRV-controlling capabilities for ICBMs. He said that North Korea provided insufficient data to confirm that its MIRVs successfully reentered the atmosphere and struck their intended targets.

Panda said that it is important that a dummy be used in the North Korean test. However, South Korea’s military claimed it could not instantly verify if North Korea had the capability to construct a ruse of this kind.

Panda said, “North Korea has not concealed its goal to undermine and surpass American homeland missile defenses.” “Decoys will help with that effort and probably end up on their single-warhead missiles as well.”

The North Korean test, which was its first weaponry demonstration in a month, coincided with demonstrations against the U.S. aircraft carrier’s regional deployment for the first-ever joint training with South Korea and Japan. On Monday, North Korean Vice Defense Minister Kim Kang Il denounced” the carrier’s deployment as reckless and warned of undefined consequences.

The multidomain South Korea-U.S.-Japan training started on Thursday and will last for three days, according to the South Korean military. According to the statement, the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt will be joined by destroyers, fighter fighters, and helicopters from all three nations for the “Freedom Edge” drill. Drills for maritime interdiction, anti-submarine warfare, and missile defense will be part of the training.

Additionally, in what it has characterized as a tit-for-tat reaction to South Korean activists delivering political literature via their balloons, North Korea has flown a large number of trash-carrying balloons toward South Korea in recent weeks. In retaliation, South Korea aired propaganda audio over loudspeakers in border regions for a limited period on June 9, which it had not done in years. On Thursday, South Korea threatened to switch on the loudspeakers once again if North Korea continued to deliver garbage balloons.

Concerns over North Korea also increased last week when Kim Jong Un and Russian President Vladimir Putin struck an agreement stipulating that each nation help the other in the event of an attack and promising to increase cooperation. According to analysts, the agreement signifies the most robust relationship between the two nations since the conclusion of the Cold War.

According to the expert Lee, North Korea’s ability to finish developing a multiwarhead weapon hinges on whether and to what extent Russia offers technological help. The South Korean military said that there is no proof of Russian support for the MIRV program in North Korea.

Related VOR News:

US Supreme Court Rejects Drug Deal that Protects the Sackler Family

author avatar
Ana Wong
Ana Wong is a sharp and insightful journalist known for her in-depth reporting on tech and finance. With a knack for breaking down complex topics, she makes them accessible for everyday readers.
Continue Reading

World

Archbishop of Canterbury Resigns Over Christian Camp Abuse

Published

on

Archbishop of Canterbury Resigns
Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby resigned “in sorrow” on Tuesday.

Archbishop of Canterbury resigned on Tuesday, claiming he failed to oversee a thorough inquiry into allegations of abuse by a volunteer at Christian summer camps decades ago.

Justin Welby, the senior bishop of the Church of England and spiritual leader of 85 million Anglicans worldwide, faced calls to quit after a report last week revealed that he had taken insufficient action to stop a man characterized as the Church’s most frequent serial abuser.

“The last few days have renewed my long felt and profound sense of shame at the historic safeguarding failures of the Church of England,” Welby said in a news release.

“I hope this decision demonstrates how seriously the Church of England takes the need for reform and our deep commitment to building a safer church. As I step down, I do so with grief for all victims and survivors of abuse.”

Welby’s term spanned a decade of considerable change, during which he had to navigate disagreements over homosexual rights and women clergy between liberal churches, primarily in North America and Britain, and their conservative counterparts, particularly in Africa.

The Anglican churches in African countries such as Uganda and Nigeria will likely celebrate Welby’s resignation, having stated last year that they no longer trusted him. His successor’s key responsibilities will be to unite the more divided global Anglican Church and reverse a fivefold decrease in church attendance in Britain since 2019.

Archbishop resigned after Makin Report.

Welby resigned five days after the independent Makin Report singled him out for criticism of his treatment of abuse complaints dating back to the 1970s. According to the investigation, John Smyth, a British lawyer, subjected over 100 boys and young men to “brutal and horrific” physical and sexual abuse over 40 years.

According to the investigation, Smyth beat some victims with a cane for up to 800 strokes and provided diapers to absorb the bleeding. He would then drape himself over his victims, occasionally kissing them on the neck or back.

Smyth chaired the Iwerne Trust, which financed Christian camps in Dorset, England, and Welby worked as a dormitory officer there before becoming an ordained minister.

According to the study, Smyth moved to Africa in 1984 and continued to torture people until shortly before he died in 2018.

In 2013, the Church of England was fully aware of sexual abuse allegations at the camps. According to the study, Welby became aware of the claims at least in the same year, months after becoming archbishop.

Recommends two candidates

If the claims had been brought to the police in 2013, there may have been a thorough investigation, and Smyth could have faced prosecution before his death, according to the study. The Makin Report was commissioned in 2019.

Welby apologized for “failures and omissions” but stated that he had “no idea or suspicion” of the claims before 2013. The report stated that this was improbable and accused him of failing to uphold his “personal and moral responsibility” to conduct a thorough investigation.

Church protocols for appointing a new archbishop of Canterbury involve a committee of clerics and a chair, selected by the British prime minister, to recommend two candidates to him.

Graham Usher, Bishop of Norwich, and Guli Francis-Dehqani, Bishop of Chelmsford, are expected to follow Welby and become the 106th Archbishop of Canterbury.

Usher supports homosexual rights and has been outspoken on the need to address climate change.

Francis-Dehqani was born in Iran and has spoken about her brother’s assassination following the Iranian Revolution. She would be the first woman to hold the position.

Related News:

Pope Francis Issues Apology for Faggot Comment

Pope Francis Issues Apology for “Faggotness” Comment

author avatar
Geoff Thomas
Geoffrey Thomas is a seasoned staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. With his sharp writing skills and deep understanding of SEO, he consistently delivers high-quality, engaging content that resonates with readers. Thomas' articles are well-researched, informative, and written in a clear, concise style that keeps audiences hooked. His ability to craft compelling narratives while seamlessly incorporating relevant keywords has made him a valuable asset to the VORNews team.
Continue Reading

World

Trudeau Condemned in India By Sikhs and Hindus

Published

on

Trudeau, India
A protest against Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau erupted in Delhi, India, on Sunday.

A protest against Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau erupted in Delhi, India, on Sunday, November 10, in response to the attack on a Hindu temple in Brampton, Canada. Hindus and Sikhs united to protest in front of the Canadian embassy in Delhi.

During the protest, a member of the Sikh Global Forum stated, “We are here to demonstrate that Sikhs have not attacked Hindus; we are both linked by blood relations.”

For Hindus, Guru Tegh Bahadur and Guru Gobind Singh sacrificed for their religion. How can they fight with one another? We are here at the Canadian Embassy to deliver a memorandum,” PTI reported.

People from the Hindu Sikh Global Forum were on their way to the High Commission of Canada, Chanakyapuri, to condemn the attack on a Hindu Temple in Canada when they were stopped near Teen Murti Marg by Delhi Police.

Notably, Khalistanis stormed a prominent Hindu temple in Brampton, Canada, with Canadian police officials implicated. The incident raised concerns about the safety of Hindus in Canada.

Relations between India and Canada have been strained for more than a year, and there is little indication of improvement as recriminations persist.

Because Sikhs play an important role in Canadian politics, both the ruling Liberal Party and the opposition parties court them. India accused Trudeau of engaging in “vote bank politics.” Canada respects India’s territorial integrity and sovereignty but cannot restrict its citizens’ political activity.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, India

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau with members of the Sikh Caucus.

Recent Indian statements have once again portrayed Trudeau as responsible for the worsening of relations. However, even under a different government, India cannot be certain or optimistic that Canada will comply with its demands for restrictions on Sikh activism.

In April this year, Prime Minister Trudeau, Conservative opposition leader Pierre Poilievre, New Democratic Party leader Jagmeet Singh, Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow, and several legislators attended a Sikh event in Toronto, demonstrating the community’s clout.

India opposed the use of “Khalistan” slogans on the day. Years ago, it was clear that relations between Canada and India were strained.

Trudeau traveled to India in February 2018 as part of a high-profile tour. The Indian media claimed the state visit was “downgraded” because Modi did not join his guest on a tour to Gujarat.

The media also noted that Modi did not send a tweet greeting Trudeau.

Surprisingly, the Indian Foreign Ministry addressed Prime Minister Trudeau’s 2018 visit in a statement in October, claiming that it was “aimed at currying favor with a vote bank,” but “rebounded to his discomfort.”

In recent days, Canada and India have exchanged additional allegations. The most significant of these concerns are those of Home Minister Amit Shah, often regarded as the most powerful man behind Modi in the Indian government.

Related News:

India Slams Trudeau for Leaking Baseless Allegations

India Slams Trudeau for Leaking Baseless Allegations

author avatar
Geoff Thomas
Geoffrey Thomas is a seasoned staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. With his sharp writing skills and deep understanding of SEO, he consistently delivers high-quality, engaging content that resonates with readers. Thomas' articles are well-researched, informative, and written in a clear, concise style that keeps audiences hooked. His ability to craft compelling narratives while seamlessly incorporating relevant keywords has made him a valuable asset to the VORNews team.
Continue Reading

World

Hamas Leaders Ordered to Leave Qatar

Published

on

Qatar has instructed Hamas leaders to leave the country

Qatar has ordered Hamas leaders to leave the country in response to a US request to stop Qatar’s support for the terrorist organization.

In a series of high-stakes communications, Washington informed Qatar that Hamas’ continued presence in Doha is no longer acceptable in light of the militant group’s rejection of recent ceasefire and hostage exchange proposals, prompting Qatar to deliver a similar message to Hamas leaders about ten days earlier.

A US official emphasized the US stance, telling Reuters that “after rejecting repeated proposals to release hostages, its leaders should no longer be welcome in the capitals of any American partner.” We made this clear to Qatar after Hamas’ rejection weeks ago.”

Despite US pressure, three Hamas officials have denied that Qatar formally requested their departure, Reuters reports.

Since 2012, Qatar has sheltered Hamas leaders as part of a deal to encourage negotiations, particularly during times of heavy tension between Hamas and Israel.

In recent months, Qatar, along with the United States and Egypt, has led many rounds of discussions to end the carnage in Gaza—a goal that has proven elusive since Hamas rejected a previous cease-fire agreement in mid-October.

The Biden administration’s effort for a resolution in Gaza has acquired urgency as Israel’s retaliatory strikes have ravaged the area, killing an estimated 43,000 Palestinians and causing enormous destruction.

Meanwhile, the recent election of Republican Donald Trump as the next US president has reportedly reduced President Biden’s clout in the last weeks of his presidency.

Previous rounds of talks collapsed when Israel imposed new criteria, including a prospective military presence in Gaza, which Hamas interpreted as changing “last-minute goalposts.”

Last year, similar discussions mediated in Doha resulted in a seven-day cease-fire in Gaza, allowing captives to be released and humanitarian aid to be delivered, but hostilities immediately resumed.

Qatar’s long-standing stance as a mediator has come under growing scrutiny from US politicians. Fourteen Republican senators recently wrote to the Department of State, seeking penalties on Hamas officials in Qatar, their extradition, and a demand that Qatar “end its hospitality” to Hamas.

Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, Qatar’s Prime Minister, has defended his country’s hosting of Hamas officials, claiming that their presence promotes crucial diplomatic conversations.

Source: Reuters

Related News:

Hamas Calls for Peace After Trump Wins Election

Hamas Calls for Peace After Trump Wins Election

author avatar
Geoff Thomas
Geoffrey Thomas is a seasoned staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. With his sharp writing skills and deep understanding of SEO, he consistently delivers high-quality, engaging content that resonates with readers. Thomas' articles are well-researched, informative, and written in a clear, concise style that keeps audiences hooked. His ability to craft compelling narratives while seamlessly incorporating relevant keywords has made him a valuable asset to the VORNews team.
Continue Reading

Download Our App

vornews app

Buy FUT Coins

comprar monedas FC 25

Volunteering at Soi Dog

Soi Dog

Trending