Business

No Room For Privacy: How Airbnb Fails To Protect Guests From Hidden Cameras

Published

4 months ago

2024-07-09

Airbnb | PixaBay Image

Another victim filed a lawsuit after her fun-filled vacation turned into a voyeuristic nightmare: A woman was secretly caught undressing at a rental property, and her photographs were saved on the computer of an alleged sexual predator accused of spying on unsuspecting renters for years.

Airbnb, one of the world’s leading short-term rental providers, has encountered this situation before. Typically, the company works to resolve hidden camera instances quickly and confidentially.

Airbnb | CNN Image

No Room For Privacy: How Airbnb Fails To Protect Guests From Hidden Cameras

But this one turned out differently.

An Airbnb representative testified at a court-ordered deposition early last year, providing a rare glimpse into the company’s hidden camera problem: Over the previous decade, Airbnb has received tens of thousands of customer support calls related to surveillance equipment.

During the hours-long deposition, the Airbnb employee also stated that when a guest complains about a concealed camera, the company does not typically alert law police, even when a child is involved. The business may, however, contact hosts about complaints as part of internal investigations, which law enforcement experts warn could impede criminal investigations by giving suspects time to erase evidence.

A CNN investigation discovered that Airbnb regularly fails to protect its visitors despite knowing that hidden cameras are a recurrent issue in the industry. Airbnb’s corporate practices have also tried to prevent regulation of the short-term rental sector, allowing the corporation to avoid responsibility for guest safety and privacy.

Law enforcement officers recovered thousands of pictures from short-term rental hosts. According to CNN’s review of court and police records, as well as interviews with nearly two dozen guests who discovered surveillance devices at short-term rental properties or were informed by police that they had been secretly recorded, hidden cameras placed in bedrooms and bathrooms show guests during their most private moments – changing clothes, being with their children, and even having sex.

Victims say they live in terror that their intimate moments will become online fodder.

“This is neither my Social Security number nor my email address. “This is my naked body,” remarked one woman, whose host secretly recorded her having sex with her spouse in a Texas cottage.

Airbnb denied CNN’s request for an interview. However, in a written statement, a representative stated that hidden camera complaints are uncommon, but when they occur, “we take appropriate, swift action, which can include removing hosts and listings that violate the policy.”

The representative continued: “Airbnb’s trust and safety policies lead the vacation rental industry and include background checks on US-based hosts and guests.”

CNN discovered that several of Airbnb’s policies include considerable disclaimers.

The company’s website warns consumers against relying on its background checks to identify “all past criminal convictions or sex offender registrations … or other red flags.”

Even if Airbnb discovers a user’s criminal history, convictions for “murder, terrorism, rape, or child molestation” do not automatically disqualify them under the company’s policy.

‘The Wild West’
Brian Chesky was unemployed when he and his roommate came up with the idea for Airbnb in 2007 while trying to pay rent in San Francisco. They opened their home to three guests for $80 per night, providing them with air beds, breakfast, and WiFi. They named their startup Air Bed and Breakfast. Thirteen years later, the business went public with the greatest IPO of 2020, valued at $47 billion.

Today, Airbnb, worth more than Hyatt Hotels Corporation and Marriott International combined, continues to pursue the benefits of being a global hotel chain while bearing few expenses or obligations.

Unlike hotels, Airbnb does not own the properties it promotes or employs on-site personnel such as security guards, receptionists, or cleaners. Instead, it shifts the burden of maintaining and protecting short-term rentals to hosts.

And although hotels can be held legally liable for visitor injuries on their premises, Airbnb typically does not. Airbnb has battled such liability in court, claiming it has little influence over what happens at its listings while earning approximately 17% of each booking.

The multibillion-dollar short-term rental sector paints a bright picture, with commercials emphasizing how home sharing fosters human connection and provides intimate, private settings for busy travelers.

Nonetheless, violent crime, prostitution, and visitor deaths have regularly thrust Airbnb and its competitors into the international spotlight.

Hidden cameras are a security problem that Airbnb and the rest of the short-term rental business have mostly overlooked. Airbnb has been aware of the problem for at least a decade, and the firm has periodically informed its shareholders about it in annual reports since going public.

“We were aware of it; there were a large number of cases coming in,” claimed one former Airbnb employee who requested anonymity owing to a non-disclosure agreement with the company. The employee, whose team dealt with safety and privacy issues, stated that hidden cameras were one of the group’s main worries.

Despite these concerns, the corporation enabled hosts to monitor communal areas via video surveillance for years, as long as the cameras were revealed to visitors.

Chloe LeBrument, who visited London, Ontario, with her fiancé for a music festival last summer, discovered a camera placed in a charger in the bedroom of an Airbnb apartment.

Airbnb | Pixa Bay Image

No Room For Privacy: How Airbnb Fails To Protect Guests From Hidden Cameras

LeBrument, whose host has been charged with voyeurism, believes many guests left the room unaware they were being recorded. LeBrument expressed anger and disappointment at the encounter.

“It felt really gross,” she explained.

In January, CNN began contacting former Airbnb employees to inquire about hidden camera concerns in the sector. In early March, Saturday Night Live parodied the issue’s prevalence in a spoof. Just over a week later, the business announced a ban on all indoor cameras beginning April 30. The corporation did not explain how it would force hosts to follow the guidelines.

Attorney Bianca Zuniga-Goldwater, who represents victims of hidden cameras in lawsuits against Airbnb and Vrbo, warns that if standards are not enforced, it’s similar to the Wild West.

CNN examined more than a dozen police investigations and lawsuits in the United States involving at least 75 victims and discovered that Airbnb frequently moves quickly to restrict user concerns and resolve them outside of court.

SOURCE | CNN

Kiara Grace

Kiara Grace is a staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. Her writing focuses on technology trends, particularly in the realm of consumer electronics and software. With a keen eye for detail and a knack for breaking down complex topics. Kiara delivers insightful analyses that resonate with tech enthusiasts and casual readers alike. Her articles strike a balance between in-depth coverage and accessibility, making them a go-to resource for anyone seeking to stay informed about the latest innovations shaping our digital world.

See Full Bio

Business

Subsidies for Electric Vehicles Cut as Consumer Interest Fades

Published

5 days ago

2024-11-04

Geoff Thomas

Electric vehicles (EVs) are still considerably more expensive than traditional alternatives.

Pressure is building on Canada’s electric vehicle manufacturers, and several are rethinking their stance on E.V.s in favor of plug-in hybrids. Automobile manufacturers are now bracing themselves for an even more challenging era in the Canadian market for electric vehicles (E.V.s).

President Kristian Aquilina of General Motors Canada claims that support and expectations are misaligned because the Canadian government is reducing subsidies for electric vehicles while trying to phase out gas-powered cars.

Manufacturers find pushing for an all-electric future in Canada increasingly difficult due to fewer consumer financial incentives and increasingly strict sales targets.

With subsidies totaling up to C$12,000 (about $8,500), Canadian consumers may save a tonne of money on electric automobiles. The federal government offers a rebate of up to $5,000 Canadian, and the provinces of Quebec and British Columbia provide further incentives of up to $7,000 and $4,000, respectively.

Ford lost about 2,000 US for every EV it sold in the first three months of the year.

Ford lost about $132,000 US for every E.V. it sold in the first three months of the year.

Ontario, which eliminated rebates in 2018, had the lowest market share for electric vehicles compared to Quebec and British Columbia, two regions that offered bigger incentives and thereby drove E.V. adoption in Canada.

Although this backing is dwindling, the province of Quebec has now declared that all subsidies will end in 2027. In June, the British Columbia government restricted incentives to a smaller subset of E.V. purchasers for “available funding” and higher-than-expected E.V. sales growth.

These reductions indicate a larger pattern: provincial governments reevaluate the sustainability of taxpayer-financed incentives for E.V.s as budget deficits widen.

With lofty goals to cut pollution from gas-powered cars and increase sales of electric vehicles, the Canadian government has reduced subsidies for these vehicles. Electric or plug-in hybrid vehicles will be mandatory for all new light-duty vehicle sales in Canada by 2035.

B.C. needs to step up with incentives for consumers to buy used EVs, some opposition critics say.

Some opposition critics say that B.C. needs to step up with incentives for consumers to buy used E.V.s.

To meet our intermediate goals, 20% of new sales must be electric vehicles (E.V.s) by 2026 and 60% by 2030. Car companies are already under a lot of pressure due to dwindling incentives and increasing demands, and the clock is ticking faster by the second.

In addition, these rules impose new forms of responsibility. Automakers that do not reach their provincial sales targets may be subject to financial fines imposed by provinces such as British Columbia.

Canadian manufacturers are already under financial pressure from federal compliance credit system standards, which they must meet or face deficits. This system gives them credit for electric vehicle sales and infrastructure improvements, but it’s not without its challenges.

“The timing is not necessarily lining up very well, in that the purchase incentive support comes off just as mandates and regulations start to bite,” GMC Canada President Kristian Aquilina told Bloomberg. “It must make a difference.

Therefore, we must consider that. Despite the cutbacks, Aquilina argued that the government’s investment in enhancing the charging infrastructure could benefit E.V. sales.

Tesla Sales Fall As More Electric Vehicles Crowd the Market

Tesla Sales Fall Again As More Automakers Crowd Electric Vehicle Market

Geoff Thomas

Geoffrey Thomas is a seasoned staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. With his sharp writing skills and deep understanding of SEO, he consistently delivers high-quality, engaging content that resonates with readers. Thomas' articles are well-researched, informative, and written in a clear, concise style that keeps audiences hooked. His ability to craft compelling narratives while seamlessly incorporating relevant keywords has made him a valuable asset to the VORNews team.

See Full Bio

Business

Chewy Slides After Filing Shows 3rd-Biggest Shareholder, ‘Roaring Kitty,’ Sold His Stake

Published

1 week ago

2024-10-30

Kiara Grace

Washington — Chewy shares fell about 2% overnight Wednesday after a regulatory filing showed that Roaring Kitty, a meme stock trader, sold his interest in the online pet retailer.

According to a beneficial ownership document filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Tuesday, Roaring Kitty, whose legal name is Keith Gill, sold all his Chewy shares, totaling 6.6% of the company.

Chewy Slides After Filing Shows Third-Biggest Shareholder, ‘Roaring Kitty,’ Sold His Stake

Plantation, Florida-based Chewy dropped 1.9% after hours to $26.19 per share.

Gill, an investor at the core of the meme stock craze, bought more than 9 million shares of Chewy in July, making him the company’s third-largest stakeholder.

Gill built a name for himself in 2021 by rallying ordinary investors around GameStop. At the time, the video game shop was fighting to stay in business, and major Wall Street hedge funds and investors were betting against it or shorting the stock. But Gill and those who agreed with him altered GameStop’s direction by purchasing thousands of shares despite practically all acknowledged criteria indicating that the firm was in deep peril.

Chewy Slides After Filing Shows Third-Biggest Shareholder, ‘Roaring Kitty,’ Sold His Stake

That triggered what is known as a “short squeeze,” in which large investors who had bet on GameStop were obliged to buy its swiftly increasing stock to offset significant losses.

Gill has expressed confidence in GameStop Chairman and CEO Ryan Cohen’s ability to revamp the company following his success at Chewy. Cohen cofounded Chewy in 2011 and stepped down as CEO in 2018.

SOURCE | AP

Kiara Grace

See Full Bio

Business

Canada CBC News CEO Catherine Tait Recalled to Parliamentary Committee

Published

1 week ago

2024-10-30

Geoff Thomas

Catherine Tait won't rule out taking bonus once she leaves CBC/Radio-Canada

Canada CBC News reports that MPs have voted to recall CBC CEO Catherine Tait to a Commons committee for questioning, only a week after her last appearance, over the awarding of $18 million in bonuses to Canada CBC news executives.

The Conservatives, the Bloc Québécois, and the NDP joined forces to re-invite Ms. Tait, her successor Marie-Philippe Bouchard, and Heritage Minister Pascale St-Onge to appear before the Commons Heritage Committee.

Ms. Tait, who will relinquish her position as CEO and president of CBC/Radio Canada in January, addressed the committee last week. The House of Commons has passed a motion recalling her before the conclusion of her term, and she is now subject to an additional two hours of interrogation, which includes inquiries regarding bonuses.

MPs also resolved to summon Quebec broadcasting executive Marie-Philippe Bouchard, appointed as the new chief of CBC/Radio-Canada last week, to appear before she begins her new job following a House of Commons chamber debate.

Catherine Tait Exit Package

Catherine Tait rejected the Conservatives’ requests to deny an exit package, including bonuses, when she departed the position in January during last week’s committee hearing.

She also defended the award of $18.4 million in incentives to 1,194 staff members for the 2023-2024 fiscal year, which concluded in March, following the broadcaster’s achievement of performance indicators.

Kevin Waugh, a Conservative committee member who introduced the motion, stated that his party aimed to ensure Ms. Tait was “accountable to taxpayers” before her departure in January.

He informed The Globe and Mail that “Canadians are dissatisfied with the bonuses” and that Catherine Tait‘s exit package, which will not be disclosed, is a cause for concern.

“I am apprehensive that she has not received her bonuses in over two years, and that the Minister of Heritage or Privy Council will lavish her with bonuses when she departs in January,” he stated.

The Liberals opposed a portion of the motion that claimed that “the Liberal threat to cut funding” had resulted in the elimination of hundreds of jobs at CBC/Radio-Canada.

Defunding CBC News Canada

The Heritage Minister informed The Globe that the claim was “hypocritical,” as the Conservatives intended to completely defund CBC.

“The Conservatives’ actions today are a clear example of hypocrisy.” Ms. St-Onge stated that performance bonuses increased by 65% during the Harper Conservatives’ tenure, while CBC News Atlantic Canada experienced substantial budget cutbacks.

“As a government, we do not require any lessons from a party that has pledged to reduce the funding of CBC/Radio-Canada and the 8,000 jobs associated with it during its campaign.”

During the Tuesday debate, NDP MP Niki Ashton stated that her party endorses the “banning of executive bonuses” at CBC News Atlantic Canada but is opposed to “the Conservatives’ full frontal attack” on the broadcaster.

She stated, “We require a robust public broadcaster, but not one that distributes executive bonuses and eliminates positions.”

If the Conservatives establish the next government, they intend to deprive the CBC of public funding while maintaining French services.

Catherine Tait defended CBC and rebuffed MPs’ assaults during last week’s committee hearing. “It is evident that the members of this committee are making a concerted effort to discredit the organization and vilify me,” she stated.