Police in Brampton, Ontario, were summoned to the Hindu Temple after a group of pro-Khalistanis Sikhs attacked Hindu worshipers on Sunday. According to the Hindu Canadian Foundation, supporters of the Khalistaani movement in Canada helped to carry out the “attack.”

Following its posting on X, a video of the attack with demonstrators brandishing Khalistan flags at the Hindu Temple’s front entrance quickly became viral, inciting indignation among the Hindu community in Canada and India.

Chandra Arya, a Liberal MP from Canada, denounced the violence and claimed that under the country’s “freedom of expression,” extremists are getting away with it.

According to Arya, he began to think there might be some truth to the claims that Khalistanis have successfully infiltrated Canada’s law enforcement forces and political machinery.

Today, Canadian Khalistani fanatics have crossed a line. The attack by Khalistanis on Hindu-Canadian worshipers within the Hindu Sabha temple’s grounds demonstrates the extent and blatantness of Khalistani violent extremism in Canada.

In a post on X, he stated, “I start to believe that there is a sliver of truth in the reports that Khalistanis have successfully infiltrated not only our political apparatus but also our law enforcement agencies.”

It is understandable why Khalistani fanatics are receiving a free pass in Canada under the guise of “freedom of expression.” As I’ve been saying for a while, Hindu Canadians must stand up, defend their rights, and hold politicians responsible for the safety and security of our community,” he continued.

Peel Regional Police said they were aware of the demonstration in the city’s northeast and are investigating the situation.

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states, “We respect the individual right to protest, but it is still our duty and responsibility to maintain public order and ensure everyone’s safety. ” Therefore, we request the public’s help participating in and supporting a nonviolent and legal protest.

Peel police warned that any acts of violence, threats of violence, or vandalism would be looked into and said they would be more visible and present to keep an eye on the situation.

Taking his X account, Brampton Mayor Patrick Brown also conveyed his dissatisfaction after learning of the “acts of violence” outside the Hindu Sabha.

“In Canada, religious freedom is a fundamental virtue. In their house of worship, everyone ought to feel secure. Brown stated in his letter that he is “completely confident that Peel police will do everything in their authority to keep the peace and hold those accountable who commit acts of violence.” “I strongly condemn any acts of violence outside of a place of worship,” Brown added.

“The violence at the Hindu Sabha Mandir in Brampton was unacceptable,” Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau also posted on X.

Every Canadian has the right to freely and securely follow their religion. “Swiftly responding to protect the community and investigate this incident” was how he praised the cops.

As Ottawa frequently rejected New Delhi’s demands for tough measures against Khalistani radicals in Canada, the incident took place during a time of poor relations between India and Canada. Instead, it sparked a huge diplomatic dispute by accusing India of targeting Khalistani people inside its borders.

India Accuses Trudeau of Harboring Pro-Khalistanis Criminals

India Accuses Trudeau of Harboring Pro-Khalistan Criminals in Canada

Geoff Thomas

Geoff Thomas is a seasoned staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. With his sharp writing skills and deep understanding of SEO, he consistently delivers high-quality, engaging content that resonates with readers. Thomas' articles are well-researched, informative, and written in a clear, concise style that keeps audiences hooked. His ability to craft compelling narratives while seamlessly incorporating relevant keywords has made him a valuable asset to the VORNews team.

See Full Bio

The New York Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) ‘s killing of Peanut the squirrel, well-known on Instagram for his enormous and loyal fan base, has sparked indignation among Internet users worldwide.

The government’s move horrified Peanut’s owner, Mark Longo. He lost his squirrel companion Peanut and his raccoon friend Fred when agents from the DEC stormed his home. It was a double murder!

Using Instagram to express his desire for Peanut’s safe return, Mr. Longo vowed to authorities that the DEC would have a “special place in hell” in his heart.

But the authorities said they had to put Peanut the squirrel down because it bit a government employee who was helping with his seizure. During the raid on Mr. Longo’s residence, the DEC also claimed to have euthanized a raccoon named Fred.

“Multiple reports from the public about the potentially unsafe housing of wildlife that could carry rabies and the illegal keeping of wildlife as pets” prompted the DEC to announce that they were conducting an inquiry.

A petition demanding Peanut’s return had collected over 30,000 signatures by Friday afternoon when word of his demise arrived.

What started as an ordeal turned into a “terrible nightmare,” according to his Friday morning message.

Following Peanut’s passing, Mr. Longo encouraged fans to contact the DEC by posting their phone information online and asking them to “express your feelings” by calling. “We will not let this be Peanuts final memory,” he concluded.

The government should leave people and their animals alone https://t.co/wFHZHuqJEv

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 2, 2024

As the news of the DEC killing Peanut the squirrel sparked ire on social media, Musk, the owner of X and a Trump supporter, wrote: “The government should leave people and their animals alone.”

In another post, the Tesla CEO extended condolences to Longo over the death of Peanut. “President @realDonaldTrump will save the squirrels 🐿️ 😢 RIP P’Nut.”

His reaction came as several Trump supporters posted a picture of a squirrel wearing a Trump hat as a tribute to Peanut. Meanwhile, Squirrels for Trump also started trending on X.

Reacting to Musk’s post, Andrew Tate wrote: “This is peak government. Busting down your door because you dont have a squirrel licence and murdering your pet. Who gains? Who benefits? Who did the police “save”?”

“Only death and sadness and wasted money,” he added.

“First they were eating the cats, now, they’re executing the squirrels. Terrible times,” commented Collin Rugg, the co-owner of Trending Politics.

Mr. Longo adopted Peanut seven years ago after seeing the newborn squirrel near the scene of his mother’s vehicle accident.

Despite his best efforts, he could not free Peanut; the next morning, he discovered the animal on his porch with “a chunk of his tail missing.”

More than half a million people have followed Peanut the squirrel on Instagram since then.

Trending News:

Walking Pneumonia Cases Among Children Rises

Walking Pneumonia Cases Among Children On the Rise in Canada

Geoff Thomas

Geoff Thomas is a seasoned staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. With his sharp writing skills and deep understanding of SEO, he consistently delivers high-quality, engaging content that resonates with readers. Thomas' articles are well-researched, informative, and written in a clear, concise style that keeps audiences hooked. His ability to craft compelling narratives while seamlessly incorporating relevant keywords has made him a valuable asset to the VORNews team.

See Full Bio

A Supreme Court Judge in British Columbia has given a rare, last-minute injunction prohibiting a woman from receiving medical assistance in dying (Maid) after physicians in her home province refused to approve the request.

The lady’s common-law partner received the injunction, which prohibits Vancouver physician Ellen Wiebe or any other medical professional from “causing the death” of an Alberta woman within the next 30 days.

The court judgment came as the country remains embroiled in a contentious debate over extending medical assistance to dying or Maid.

Earlier this week, Quebec became the first province to enable people to make the decision years in advance, in breach of federal legislation.

While official records show that the vast majority of people who use Maid have terminal diseases, critics are concerned that a tiny but growing proportion of cases reflect poverty and social inequity, which drives people to end their lives.

According to the Canadian Press, the injunction in the British Columbia case comes after the woman’s partner filed a notice of civil claim alleging Wiebe negligently approved the procedure for a patient who does not legally qualify and that administering Maid would constitute wrongful death and possibly a criminal offense.

According to court documents, the 53-year-old lady flew from Alberta to BC to obtain Maid after doctors in her native province refused to approve it. The woman had requested Maid, alleging akathisia, a movement disorder associated with altering doses of psychotropic or antipsychotic medication.

The woman had “distressing side effects” after reducing her dose of a bipolar illness medication.

Symptoms include “an inner sense of terror all day long, the inability to sleep at night, nightmares, the inability to lie down during the day due to a feeling of falling, the inability to sit or remain still suicidal thoughts”.

According to court records, the woman and her partner were assured that the disease was curable and that the symptoms would resolve within a few months. As a result, doctors denied her request for assisted death.

The woman found Wiebe and connected with her via Zoom. “At the end of the first meeting, Dr Wiebe approved [the woman] for Maid,” the allegations state. Wiebe, a clinical professor at the University of British Columbia, has emerged as a staunch supporter of Maid, claiming that current laws recognize “basic human rights.”

According to the British Columbia lawsuit, Wiebe failed to consult with the woman’s doctors or obtain the patient’s complete medical information. Instead, Wiebe is accused of email reviewing only a fraction of the woman’s medical records.

In Canada, the euthanasia framework comprises two “tracks” – one for terminal diseases and another when “natural death is not reasonably foreseeable”. Applicants with a medical condition involving mental illness will be ineligible until at least March 2027.

Federal law requires a second, independent doctor to accept a request for treatment when the petitioner has a chronic, irreversible physical condition. The complaint claims that it did not occur in the case of the Alberta woman.

British Columbia Supreme Court Justice Simon Coval stated in his decision that the woman looked to have a mental health illness rather than a medical one. He said he allowed the plea since the case was “clearly a situation of extreme irreparable harm” if she carried out her plan to die on October 27th.

Justice Coval recognized that the order “is a severe intrusion” on the woman’s personal and medical autonomy.

“I can only imagine the pain she has been experiencing and I recognize that this injunction will likely make that worse,” stated the lawyer.

However, he questioned if the Maid standards were correctly applied, given that her condition “may not only be remediable, but remediable relatively quickly”.

Source: The Canadian Press

Related News:

Richard Simmons’ Cause Of Death Revealed

Richard Simmons’ Cause Of Death Revealed

Ana Wong

Ana Wong is a sharp and insightful journalist known for her in-depth reporting on tech and finance. With a knack for breaking down complex topics, she makes them accessible for everyday readers.

See Full Bio