Connect with us

News

The New York Times Endorses Kamala Harris For President as the Sole Patriotic Option.

Published

on

Kamala Harris

(VOR News) – New York Times editorial board member Kamala Harris was the focus of a statement released on Monday.

The editorial board expressed their support for the person in the statement. In a statement they released in reaction to Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, they called the Democratic nominee “the only patriotic choice for president.” In their statement, they made reference to this.

However, the vice president’s name was not mentioned by the magazine until the fourth paragraph of the written support it offered. That was the situation.

A significant omission has been made by Kamala Harris.

It defined Trump as “unfit” on a moral and temperamental basis, instead of emphasising that he is undeserving of the role. This was where attention was directed. But that didn’t stop this from happening because Trump is a presidential candidate.

“Should any voter care about the health of our country or the stability of our democracy, this unambiguous, dispiriting truth — Donald Trump is not fit to be president — should be enough to deny him re-election.”

The New Yorker editors had declared the previous day that the Republican candidate embodied the “continuous attack on the stability, the fortitude, and the essence of the United States.” This event served as the official kickoff for the magazine’s “anyone but Trump” campaign, which it had started the day before.

Kamala Harris was the impetus for developing this strategy and executing it.

The method that The New Yorker employed is similar to the one that is being discussed in this article. After giving thorough support, the New York Times acknowledged that Kamala Harris “may not be the perfect candidate for every voter, especially those who are frustrated and angry about our government’s failures to fix what’s broken.”

Regarding Kamala Harris’s chances of winning the race, this assertion was made. The Times made a concession to their audience with this. This was stated prior to endorsement appearing in the journal. That was stated prior to endorsement’s publication.

More precisely, this comment was directed at the possible rival Kamala Harris would face down the road.”Yet we urge Americans to contrast Kamala Harris’s record with her opponent’s,” was stated in the newspaper article, implying that “Kamala Harris is more than a necessary alternative.” Therefore, the statement was made.

There has not been a single Republican presidential candidate who has received the editorial board of The New York Times’ endorsement since 1956, when Dwight Eisenhower received their endorsement. This kind of situation is unprecedented and occurs for the first time ever.

Conversely, the magazine claims that in a democracy with two electoral parties, this election is “about something more foundational” than “competing politics and principles”. There is something deeper at stake in this election than “competing politics and principles.” It is entirely unrelated to that.

The newspaper said in its story that “Mr. Trump will have the power to do profound and lasting harm to our democracy unless American voters stand up to him.” “This is a significant threat to our democracy.” “This is Unless American voters stand up to him.”

“Kamala Harris’ democracy is at risk.”

“Given the stakes of this election, Ms. Harris may think that she is running a campaign designed to minimise the risks of an unforced error… under the belief that being the only viable alternative to Mr. Trump may be enough to bring her to victory,” the Times said, arguing that voters are right to demand more information from Kamala Harris regarding specific policy details.

“That strategy may ultimately be successful, but it undermines the American populace and her own legacy.” The Republican Party was described as “merely an instrument” in Trump’s “endeavour to reclaim power,” according to the allegations made.

The assertions stated that a second term for Trump “would be significantly more detrimental and polarising than the first.” This information was provided to the pertinent persons during the timeframe in which the aforementioned occurrences transpired.

According to the editorial board, “Kamala Harris is the only choice,” when they made their announcement in their publication. “They have no other opportunity.”

SOURCE: NDTV

SEE ALSO:

This Week, Biden Will Tour The Areas Devastated By Hurricane Helene.

Some Republicans Are Not Supporting Trump’s New Attack on Harris’ Mental Health.

Amazon’s $4 Billion Partnership With AI Startup Anthropic Gets UK Competition Clearance

Continue Reading

News

Trudeau Rocks to Taylor Swift While Montreal Burns

Published

on

Trudeau, Montreal

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has come under fire yet again after a video surfaced on X, showing him dancing at a Taylor Swift performance while anti-Nato protestors ransacked downtown Montreal.

Trudeau attended Taylor Swift’s concert in Toronto on Friday night. Before Taylor Swift approached the stage, X shared a viral video of him dancing and singing along to the song “You Don’t Own Me.”

The image of Trudeau dancing amid violent protests in Montreal generated widespread indignation online. Some social media users even compared Trudeau to the ancient Roman dictator Nero, known for “fiddling while Rome burned.”

Don Stewart, a Member of Parliament (MP) representing part of Toronto, called out the prime minister in a post on X.

“Lawless protesters run roughshod over Montreal in violent protest. The Prime Minister dances,” Stewart wrote. “This is the Canada built by the Liberal government.”

“Bring back law and order, safe streets and communities in the Canada we once knew and loved,” the MP added.

On Saturday, the day after Taylor Swift’s concert, Trudeau condemned the anti-NATO protests, calling them “appalling.”

Anti-NATO activists set off smoke bombs and marched through Montreal’s streets waving Palestinian flags. According to the Montreal Gazette, rioters set fire to automobiles and battled with police.

Pro-Palestinian protests

Protesters also tossed tiny explosives and metal objects at officers. At one point, the mob torched an effigy of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Police used tear gas and batons to disperse the gathering, and three persons were arrested for attacking officers and impeding police operations.

Masked protesters were seen burning flares and bashing storefront windows in videos and photographs shared on social media. Pro-Palestinian protests have been taking place across Canada since the Israel-Gaza conflict began late last year.

Critics have lambasted Trudeau for doing nothing to stop the violent pro-Palestinian marches, with some claiming he has fueled anti-Israel sentiment in Canada.

On Friday, Trudeau stated that Canada would respect the orders of the International Criminal Court (ICC), which issued an arrest warrant for Mr Netanyahu, even if it meant arresting the Israeli prime leader on Canadian soil.

Related News:

Trudeau Called the Greatest Threat to NATO

Trudeau Called the Greatest Threat to NATO

 

Continue Reading

News

Calgary Zoo Admits Human Error in Death of Baby Gorilla

Published

on

Baby Gorilla, Calgary Zoo
The zookeeper's negligence caused the death of a 2-year-old baby gorilla

The Calgary Zoo has admitted in a public statement that a zookeeper’s negligence caused the death of a 2-year-old baby gorilla. Eyare, a newborn gorilla, died last week after being slammed in the head by a hydraulic door.

The accident occurred when a zoo worker attempted to separate Eyare from the rest of the gorilla tribe for a solitary training session.

The gorilla died from significant head injuries, according to the zoo’s statement.

“This tragedy has struck us all in the deepest way imaginable,” Colleen Baird, director of animal care at the Calgary Zoo, said during a news conference. “Eyare’s brief but meaningful existence gave so much joy to our community, and all will sorely miss her. We will do everything possible to prevent repeat accidents.”

According to Baird, the staff member involved was immediately removed from the workplace and will be reassigned to another area of the zoo. The Calgary Zoo stated that it would take preventive steps, such as specialist personnel training and animal behavioral training, to avoid a similar incident.

Calgary Zoo Questioned

It is not the first time an animal at the zoo has died from negligence at the Calgary Zoo. A capybara was accidentally crushed by a hydraulic door similar to the one that killed Eyare in 2019.

An otter died in 2016 after being entangled in an “unauthorized” pair of jeans that a zookeeper had dropped in its enclosure. In 2013, a penguin died in “a freak accident” after swallowing a stick.

Animal Justice, a Canadian group that promotes animal welfare, has called for an independent investigation of animal safety and oversight at the Alberta facility.

“The Calgary Zoo appears to have a higher rate of animal deaths compared to other zoos, and in light of Eyare’s death there should be a systematic review of the zoo’s operations and practices, conducted transparently by the government or another outside party,” according to Camille Labchuk, the executive director of Animal Justice.

The Calgary Zoo refuted that it has more animal deaths than other zoos, emphasizing that it adheres to operating requirements and has maintained accreditation by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums’ independent Accreditation Commission since 1978.

“We love and care for more than 4,000 animals representing over 100 species that call our zoo home,” stated a Calgary Zoo representative.

“Human error-related deaths in animals are quite infrequent. We have lost two animals in the last ten years: a North American river otter in 2016 and ‘Eyare’ this week.

While rare, even one human-caused death is too many. These unfortunate instances have served as vital learning experiences, prompting us to examine and tighten protocols to provide the greatest level of care.”

Baird said at the news conference that using hydraulic doors is “common practice with accredited zoos,” adding that the facility will consider switching to alternate doors to improve safety.

The Calgary Zoo, which established the Wilder Institute in 2021, caters to nearly 4,000 creatures, including six more western lowland gorillas.

Related News:

Beluga Whales Dies at Canada’s Marineland

Outrage Erupts After 17th Beluga Whale Dies at Canada’s Marineland

Continue Reading

News

Canada’s Lotto Max Jackpot Climbs to $80M

Published

on

lotto max, Canada

Lotto Max in Canada has reached $80 million for only the second time in Canadian lottery history. Friday’s draw sought a winner for a $75 million pool, but the top reward remained unclaimed as of Saturday, increasing the jackpot.

Only once did the jackpot reach $80 million in September, when it broke the previous record. Before that, the prize was $75 million, a record.

The Lotto Max prize maximum was boosted earlier this year, enabling for jackpots of more than $70 million. The cap is now at $80 million.
While a greater fee may encourage more people to play, the odds of winning the lottery remain extremely low.

According to the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation, the odds for a $5 ticket are around one in 33,294,800.

While there was no jackpot winner in Friday’s draw, someone did match six of the seven winning numbers, plus a bonus, earning them a payout of more than $320,000.

Lotto Max History

Lotto Max is one of three national lottery games in Canada, overseen by the Interprovincial Lottery Corporation. The game was introduced on September 19, 2009, and its inaugural draw occurred on September 25, 2009. It replaced Lotto Super 7.

The odds of winning the Lotto Max are 1 in 33,294,800. This is correct to a point but misleading.

Let’s have a look at the rules:

  1. Players choose 7 numbers out of 50
  2. Numbers cannot be repeated
  3. Numbers are automatically sorted into ascending order
  4. Each play buys 3 lines
  5. Each play costs $5

Seeing that players choose 7 out of 50 non-repeating numbers, the equation for the total number of possible combinations (this is different from permutations where the order in which the numbers appear is significant) when playing the Lotto Max is 50! / (7! x 43!)

Continue Reading

Trending