The Munich Security Report Believes Donald Trump’s “Land Grabs” Make the US a Threat.

(VOR News) – According to the pre-summit study of the Munich Security Conference, Donald Trump’s anticipated “land grabs” have caused the US to be viewed as “a risk to be mitigated” rather than “an anchor of stability.”

The report, which highlights the shift from a US-led, unipolar post-Cold War era to a multipolar world where no single ideological perspective prevails, will provide the background for this year’s conference.

The US president has stated since taking office that the US Donald Trump should buy Greenland and Panama and that Canada might become the 51st state.

Though it’s unclear which other nations can supply the desperately needed global public goods, Washington’s indications that the US no longer wishes to defend the liberal international order are more obvious.

Donald Trump’s departure from global leadership has serious consequences:

“It is difficult to foresee the international community effectively confronting the myriad serious threats to humanity or supplying global public goods like freedom of navigation without the leadership that the United States has offered for the past several decades.”

According to the authors, “multiploidization” will make it more difficult for the US president to establish a new primary format. According to their survey results, Brazil, India, South Africa, and China are probably going to view the trend favorably.

Commencing on Friday, the meeting serves as the premier platform for discussions among those who decide international security policy. The first talks since Donald Trump’s inauguration will take place between European political and military leaders and a Donald Trump delegation headed by US Vice President JD Vance.

Vance will be joined by US Secretary of Defense Peter Hegseth, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and US Special Envoy for Ukraine Keith Kellogg.

They will probably be questioned about a potential US leadership role and the terms of their suggested ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine. It is untrue for Kellogg to say that a peace proposal will be presented during the summit.

European leaders will encourage Vance to do more to undermine Putin before they speak. After a truce, they will also see if the US, either by itself or through NATO, can support a stabilizing force in Ukraine that is led by Europe.

The EU was threatened with “reciprocal tariffs” by Donald Trump.

According to the MSC study, “an increasing number of states are competing for influence” and “the future order may be considerably more chaotic.”

The article states: “We may live in a world where many orders coexist or compete for power, and where few universal laws, values, or cooperative patterns remain.” Liberal order may endure in a “multi-order” or “multiplex” society. However, it will eventually be restricted to what remains of the western section.

As indicated in the new security treaties Moscow offered to the US and NATO in late 2021, the authors caution that Russia is not just neutralizing Ukraine as a military threat but is working toward a Russian-led Eurasian order.

They gently nudge Donald Trump to think about what would happen if Putin lost. According to them, “Russia’s imperialist goals are uncertain due to economic instability, imperial overreach, and a long conflict.” The international community must choose between upholding international law and allowing Russia to carry on with its actions.

The US will undoubtedly work to curtail China’s power, but Beijing might gain from Washington’s disregard for its obligations abroad or its alienation of allies. According to the poll, across all G7 countries, the perceived threat from Russia has declined more than the risk from the US.

With the exception of the UK and Germany, every country under study views the environment-particularly severe weather—as a significant concern.

The authors state that it is “rather unlikely” that the new orders would coexist peacefully because it is unknown whether the main ordering poles can agree on fundamental frameworks, concepts, and standards for handling inter-order relationships.

During his Senate Foreign Relations Committee meeting last month, Rubio seemed to be in favor of a multipolar world. He stated, “The world usually lacks a unipolar power.”

It was unusual. A multipolar world with numerous big powers in diverse fields resulted from the end of the Cold War. Along with Donald Trump rogue regimes like Iran and North Korea, we are also facing challenges from China and, to a lesser extent, Russia.

SOURCE: TG

SEE ALSO:

Trump to Hit Canada with 25% Tariff on Steel and Aluminum

Why the FBI Warns Android and iPhone Users to Delete Text Messages?