News
Dutch and Canadian Farmers Fight Against Absurd Climate Policies
Thousands of farmers demonstrated in The Hague on Saturday against government plans to limit nitrogen emissions, which they say will put many farms out of business and harm food production.
During the demonstration, many people held the national flag upside down as a symbol of the upcoming March 15 regional elections, which followed similar protests by farmers in Belgium earlier this month over nitrogen emission rules.
Thousands of environmentalists also blocked a major thoroughfare in an unauthorized protest against tax rules encouraging fossil fuel use. Late in the afternoon, police used water cannons to disperse a group of about 100 activists.
The pro-farm protesters carried banners reading “No farmers, no food” and “There is no nitrogen ‘problem'” during the peaceful demonstration organized by the Farmers’ Defence Force group.
Because of the relatively large number of livestock and the heavy use of fertilizers, nitrogen oxide levels in the soil and water in the Netherlands and Belgium are higher than European Union regulations allow.
Farm organizations claim that the problem has been exaggerated and that the proposed solutions are unfair and ineffective.
Next week’s regional elections are significant because they will determine the composition of the Dutch Senate and because regional governments are in charge of translating national government goals, such as nitrogen caps, into concrete plans.
Environmentalists led by the climate activist group Extinction Rebellion scaled a wall next to the road they had blocked to hang a banner reading “Stop fossil subsidies”.
Reuters reports protesters are calling for an end to fuel tax exemptions for oil refineries and coal plants and exemptions for the aviation and shipping industries agreed upon at the EU level.
Farmers hammered by Trudeau’s climate alarmist policies
Meanwhile, while farm groups are “making nice” with the federal government on climate change policies, some outspoken academics and scientists argue that Canadian agriculture will suffer.
Ross McKitrick, an environmental economics professor at the University of Guelph, is one of the most vocal critics of the federal government’s “destructive agenda of removing fertilizer use.”
The federal government has called for net-zero production of some greenhouse gas emissions (excluding the most common: water vapor) by 2050 and has recast agricultural scientists’ roles to prioritize climate change.
“I believe it is completely inappropriate for Agriculture Canada to shift its focus away from assisting farmers in increasing productivity,” McKitrick said. “We already have controls on nitrogen emissions, and most conservation areas have long been working with farmers with nutrient flows into rivers, so it’s not like this work wasn’t happening.
But this new push to eliminate fertilizer use is frightening, as is the lack of analysis, which is typical of the federal government right now.”
He noted that previous administrations had all collaborated with independent modeling groups within the government to determine the effects of policy and economic analysts outside the government. “And now it’s all gone. “None of that happens anymore,” he lamented.
“I’ve heard this over and over again in a variety of policy settings. The government is simply winging it. They are motivated by ideology and do not consider the costs of these policies.
They will not release any results as long as people in the government are still doing them. There is nothing in the regulatory impact analysis statements that are issued. They are empty assertions that this will cause no harm and that they will impose policies” that disproportionately harm agriculture.
He warned farm groups to bolster their message and push back, or they would be burned.
“If they believe that making nice with the government over the net-zero agenda will make them friends with environmental groups or get the government to leave them alone, they are sadly mistaken,” he said.
“Canada’s energy sector did that for years. They stated that they fully support your climate agenda. ‘We’d rather be at the table than the meal on the table,’ they used to say, and guess what happened? If you endorse the government’s alarmist rhetoric and agenda, they will turn on you and say, ‘now that you agree that you are the problem, we must eliminate your nitrogen fertilizers.
Now farmers must phase out the fossil fuels we use on our farms.
“At that point, you could argue, we’re going to fight against that agenda. But you can’t because you’ve already agreed to all of the agenda’s thinking. So, I would advise farm groups not to make the same mistake as the energy sector. Consider how that worked in the energy sector.”
He agreed that many people would remain silent about the drastic changes in government policy. “I can stand up and say it, but there are many people in government and other areas of academia who would like to say it but don’t because of the risk of repercussions.”
McKitrick also told Farmers Forum that some global warming benefits Canada, and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concurs.
“Most studies — Canadian academic studies and IPCC reports — have concluded that if climate change occurs as predicted by models, regions such as Canada will benefit from it. It will benefit agriculture in the long run.
Farmers must adapt to changing expectations in crop management and everything else they do to deal with weather patterns from year to year.
Small changes that may trend over 50 or 100 years cannot be expected to be a major issue for farmers dealing with natural weather variability.”
McKitrick also stated that Canada is working from a worst-case scenario of the future based on one of the IPCC’s models, which it admits is too extreme to be considered realistic.
“The IPCC has a long history of using very extreme emissions scenarios to project exceptionally high amounts of warming,” McKitrick said, adding that hundreds of studies now show that the extreme temperature scenarios will not occur.
News
The US Election Causes Bluesky To Gain One Million Users Since People Are Leaving X.
(VOR News) – The social media network Bluesky has seen a spike in the number of new users, with over a million people signing up since the conclusion of the U.S. presidential election.
This rise can be linked to the fact that users left the platform because they were unhappy with the direction that X was taking under the direction of Elon Musk, the company’s billionaire owner.
It was announced on Wednesday that the microblogging site had achieved 15 million subscribers. Compared to the roughly nine million members it had in September, this is a considerable increase.
However, Bluesky subscriptions have grown since September.
Jack Dorsey, the founder of Twitter, founded Bluesky in 2019, and it has become known as a safe haven for left-leaning users who are unhappy with the route that X has taken under Musk’s leadership. On Twitter, Bluesky has established a reputation as a safe haven.
Throughout its history, BlueSky has established a solid reputation as a safe and secure location.
Bluesky users have attributed their decision to transfer to Bluesky to an increase in offensive content on X and Musk’s connection to Donald Trump, the incoming US president. Bluesky is a social networking site that facilitates knowledge sharing and discussion. These two factors have been mentioned as justifications for switching to the new system.
On Tuesday, Mark Cuban, a billionaire who had previously backed Kamala Harris for vice president prior to the election, released a statement titled “Hello, Less Hateful World.” On Tuesday, Cuban’s comments was made public. When it came to several problems, Cuban supported Harris.
Due to the “disturbing content” that was accessible on the “toxic media platform,” The Guardian newspaper said in a statement on Wednesday that it will no longer print any information about X. This decision was made in part due to the “toxic media platform.”
Racist remarks and Bluesky conspiracy ideas were in this text.
The Guardian stated on its website, “The U.S. presidential campaign has underscored our long-held belief that X is a detrimental media platform, and its owner, Elon Musk, has leveraged its influence to shape political discourse.”
“The presidential election campaign in the United States merely underscored our long-held beliefs.” “The presidential election campaign in the United States merely underscored our long-held beliefs.”
Since we feel that there are more disadvantages to being on X right now than advantages, we think that promoting our work elsewhere would make better use of the resources we now have.
The business has helped to strengthen Bluesky’s reputation as a haven for liberals who are unhappy with their experiences.
There has been conjecture about Musk’s potential presence to observe election results alongside Trump. X responded by saying that none of its employees would be “sitting with a presidential candidate tonight and giving them direct access to control what you see online.”
This was done in response to the accusations made on the website. This was a reaction to the rumor that Musk would be there when Trump announced the election results. Musk was supposed to be there to witness the declaration.
Since Musk took over the site in October 2022, X has experienced multiple waves of user departures, although it still has a far larger user base than Bluesky. This is true even though Bluesky’s user base is already much larger. There are far less users using Bluesky.
Similarweb, a company that tracks internet traffic, estimates that on the day following the U.S. election, approximately 115,000 users who live in the country deleted their X accounts.
According to Similarweb, this figure was roughly determined. This falls into the category of the biggest single-day decrease in history, according to Musk’s leadership.
SOURCE: AJ
SEE ALSO:
Concerned About Matt Gaetz’s Campaign, Senate Republicans Call for a House Ethics Investigation.
President-Elect Trump Picks Matt Gaetz to Be Attorney General
News
Telehealth May Be Able to Stop Suicide in High-Risk Individuals.
(VOR News) – The results of a recent study suggest that telehealth therapy may lower the risk of suicide. In the United States, a study was conducted.
The results of a study that was published in the journal JAMA Network Open on November 12 indicate that cognitive behavior therapy can help lower the number of suicide attempts and thoughts.
US Telehealth researchers conducted the study.
This predicament is still true even when therapy is delivered via telehealth for a little period of time. As a result of the information they discovered during the investigation, the researchers finally reached this conclusion.
According to a study conducted by clinical psychologist Justin Baker, a researcher at Ohio State University, this is information that should be promoted.
According to Baker, this is a result of the fact that, at this specific point in history, therapy is increasingly being delivered via the use of virtual methods.
Baker was said to have stated, “The nearly overnight shift from mostly in-person to mostly virtual therapy appointments following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic was the impetus for this research question.” Ohio State published a press release that contained this message.
In making this claim, Baker was alluding to the fact that the shift occurred very immediately after the outbreak began. Baker was referring to the changes brought about by the pandemic outbreak spreading significantly.
It has long been thought that patients who are deemed to be at high risk are not suitable candidates for virtual healthcare. This is because the use of virtual healthcare is linked to both accountability and the possibility of harm.
We randomly assigned the following telehealth programs to 96 Americans:
They received instruction on how to control and alter the disturbing ideas and bad notions they were experiencing through telehealth cognitive behavioral therapy, with a special emphasis on suicide. They received this instruction while participating in the activity.
A treatment method called present-centered therapy is used to help patients deal with the difficulties they are currently confronting in their life.
The results of the study conducted by the researchers demonstrated that a present-focused approach to treatment is a successful way to reduce depressive symptoms and suicidal thoughts. Research has shown that therapeutic approaches that focus on the present moment are useful.
However, the results of this study show that when it came to reducing the proportion of patients who attempted suicide while getting telehealth services, cognitive behavioral therapy outperformed present-centered therapy.
Furthermore, the results showed that both treatments were effective in lowering the number of suicidal thoughts that patients thought about taking their own lives. The effectiveness of both therapies served as evidence for this.
Craig Bryan, a researcher and the chairman of telehealth Ohio State University’s Suicide Prevention Program, says, “We have good, tested treatments that will lead to significant symptom reduction and improved quality of life for those who are suffering from suicidal thoughts and behaviors.”
In addition, Bryan is currently the program’s leader. Additionally, Bryan is currently in charge of the program. “We have treatments that have been proven to be effective.”
Bryan said that a considerable percentage of therapists are still maintaining some aspect of their telemedicine practice following the epidemic, even though limitations are being loosened.
This leads to the scenario even when boundaries are being loosened. “The results of this study have the potential to expand access to essential treatments that are supported by evidence for people living in rural and difficult-to-reach areas.”
You should call the telehealth Suicide and Crisis Lifeline at 988 if you or a loved one is experiencing an emotional or suicide crisis if you are experiencing emotional distress. They are available to listen to your issues as well as offer support.
SOURCE: USN
SEE ALSO:
Trudeau Government Forces Port Workers Back to Work
The Main US Inflation Tracker Increased For The First Time Since March.
News
The Main US Inflation Tracker Increased For The First Time Since March.
(VOR News) – The challenging road to lower levels is demonstrated by the fact that one of the most important measures of inflation in the United States has increased for the first time since March.
The consumer price index (CPI), a metric that gauges price inflation across a variety of goods, at an annual rate of 2.6% as October reached its peak. The CPI has never been higher than it was at this time.
According to reports, the rate was 2.4% last month, the lowest in over three years. This rate is higher than the one that was noted the month before.
Eliminating food and energy, “core” inflation stayed at 3.3%.
This occurred upon completion of the computation. Following this stage, the index underwent a thorough analysis. A reading was considered accurate if it agreed with the estimates provided by economists.
Even though inflation has somewhat decreased since reaching its greatest level in four decades in the summer of 2022, many Americans still face financial hardship as a result of years of rising prices. This can be attributed to the fact that inflation peaked in the summer of 2022.
According to exit poll results, a significant number of Republican voters expressed dissatisfaction with their own financial circumstances as well as the state of the US economy.
Their voiced displeasure was a reflection of their dissatisfaction. A significant factor that contributed to the election was the ire generated by the rising cost of living. This rage was among the most important factors.
Concerns have been expressed regarding the real effects that these reforms would have on the inflation rate. Donald Trump proposed tax cuts and tariffs as workable answers throughout his campaign, but there have been questions raised over the real effects of these measures.
The next president has promised to levy tariffs on all U.S. imports that are at least 10 percent higher than the current rate, according to the results of a research by Yale’s Budget Lab.
The implementation of this strategy, which many industry experts believe would almost surely result in an increase in inflation of up to 5.1%, has already been made public.
It was the first time in four years that the Federal Reserve started lowering interest rates in September, which marked the first time in four years they had done so.
This was the first time they had ever implemented inflation.
The Federal Reserve has reached a significant turning point in its attempts to control inflation at this particular moment. Additional interest rate cuts were implemented Monday, lowering them to their lowest point since February 2023. Since February 2023, they have not been this low.
The Federal Reserve’s chairman, Jerome Powell, said the Fed “has gained confidence that we’re on a sustainable path down to 2%,” the target it has set for its inflation rate.
He hosted a news conference where he made this declaration. Considering the previously mentioned, he added that “the task is incomplete.”
As part of its “dual mandate,” the Fed is working to keep inflation from rising while also keeping the unemployment rate from rising. This is being done from the Federal Reserve’s point of view.
Over the past few months, the labor market has been significantly slowing down; in October, the United States created just 12,000 new jobs.
This suggests that there is a downturn in the labor market. In October 2023, the unemployment rate was 4.1%, which was a low figure that was similar to levels before the sickness started. Since the illness had not yet spread, this was the situation. This occurred following a reduction in the rate, which came to 3.4% in February 2023.
In response to a query concerning the impact of the election on the Federal Reserve’s interest rate decisions, Powell said that officials “do not know the timing or substance of any policy changes.”
Powell was questioned on the significance of the election. As a consequence, we are unable to determine the possible economic impact of this. The current circumstances are to blame for this.
SOURCE: TG
SEE ALSO:
TikTok Initiates Integration With Lemon8 Amid Impending US Ban
Trudeau Government Forces Port Workers Back to Work
Trudeau Insists Trump Isn’t a Threat Despite His Past Rhetoric
-
Tech3 weeks ago
Apple Unveiled A Fresh Glimpse Of Their AI Featuring ChatGPT Integration.
-
Tech4 weeks ago
Connection Problems With The App Store Are Stopping Customers From Downloading Apps.
-
Tech4 weeks ago
The Meta Foundation Launches a New Anti-Sextortion Campaign on Instagram.
-
Tech4 weeks ago
Adobe Commences The Implementation Of AI Video Tools, Which Poses A Challenge To OpenAI And Meta.
-
Tech4 weeks ago
Appeals Court Delays Order For Google To Open Its App Store In Antitrust Case
-
Business4 weeks ago
Arthur Hayes Predicts Bitcoin Will “Rise Stupendously” When Middle East Conflict Escalates.