A 6-year-old girl in Massachusetts died of E. coli, and her mother alleges the poisoning came from a tainted McDonald’s cheeseburger.

“It was quick. Samantha Ocasio said of her daughter’s unexpected death, “It was really fast,” adding that she does not want it to happen to anybody else’s children, according to The New York Post.

Based in Springfield, Ocasio stated that her daughter, Angelica Vazquez, ate the food before trick-or-treating on Halloween and became ill the following evening.

As she began throwing up, Ocasio asked if she wanted to see a doctor, but the youngster answered, “No, my belly just hurts.”

At first, the mother of seven thought the illness was merely a stomach virus, so she gave her daughter Gatorade and instructed her to rest.

According to masslive.com, things spiralled out of control on November 2 when the girl passed out and suffered cardiac arrest during a bubble bath.

She was taken to Baystate Medical Centre and died 12 hours later. “I love you” was the last thing her daughter said, according to Ocasio.

According to health experts, the E. coli outbreak has been connected to onions served on some McDonald’s cheeseburgers after more than 100 people in 13 states were ill in recent weeks.

However, the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention reported no verified instances of the E. coli strain at McDonald’s in Massachusetts. “My main concern is, ‘OK, if it wasn’t McDonald’s, what is it?’… My daughter was pleased. “She was healthy,” Ocasio stated.

She said that Angelica Vazquez was the only person in her family to eat a McDonald’s cheeseburger, while her siblings preferred chicken nuggets.

McDonald’s stated that the epidemic was linked to slivered onions provided on Quarter Pounders, which differ from the chopped onions used on the smaller cheeseburger the girl ate. Following the outbreak, the restaurant chain announced that it had ceased serving the burgers and was locating a replacement slivered onion supplier for 900 locations.

“We are heartbroken for this family’s loss and express our sincere condolences. “We take any reports of potential food safety issues seriously,” the statement said.

Related News:

McDonald’s Tries To Reassure Customers After Deadly E. Coli Outbreak

McDonald’s Tries To Reassure Customers After Deadly E. Coli Outbreak

Geoff Brown

Geoff Thomas is a seasoned staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. With his sharp writing skills and deep understanding of SEO, he consistently delivers high-quality, engaging content that resonates with readers. Thomas’ articles are well-researched, informative, and written in a clear, concise style that keeps audiences hooked. His ability to craft compelling narratives while seamlessly incorporating relevant keywords has made him a valuable asset to the VORNews team.

Canada Post has recently been criticized for temporarily laying off striking postal workers. This move has aroused much controversy as the labour strike approaches its two-week milestone.

Canada Post recently announced layoffs aimed at individuals involved in the strike. According to accounts, these layoffs are temporary. However, the decision has exacerbated tensions between the corporation and the union.

Unfortunately, due to the continued national labour disruption caused by the Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW) and its severe impact on the company, we have adjusted our operations under the Canada Labour Code,” said Canada Post spokesperson Phil Rogers.

Exact figures are still unknown, but a major chunk of the 55,000 unionized workers is expected to be affected. The layoffs are mostly concentrated in areas where the strike severely affects services.

For many employees, this measure adds financial stress to a difficult situation. Striking workers lose pay during labour disputes, and layoffs exacerbate their capacity to make ends meet.

Canada Post Scare Tactic

The CUPW has slammed the layoffs as a “scare tactic.” They believe this action is intended to pressure workers to return before their demands are addressed. Meanwhile, Canada Post claims it’s an essential precaution to keep operations running throughout the strike.

According to labour and employment expert Deborah Hudson, Canada Post’s layoffs are unusual and will almost certainly face legal challenges from the union.

According to the Canada Post, its company suffered severely during the strike. It was previously stated that the labour interruption has affected approximately 10 million parcels since the job strike began on November 15.

Negotiations between the two sides are currently at a deadlock. The union continues to advocate for its demands, while Canada Post maintains its stance.

The postal strike has no end in sight. Labour Minister Steven MacKinnon said Wednesday that an Ottawa-appointed mediator was going nowhere because the sides were too far apart on fundamental topics. The mediation negotiations were temporarily postponed, and the administration has no plans to intervene.

Back to Work Legislation

In a statement Thursday, spokesman Rogers stated that Canada Post is “considering its options to move negotiations forward with greater urgency and remains committed to negotiating new collective agreements.”

Meanwhile, union president Jan Simpson stated Wednesday that the CUPW is battling to keep good full-time positions.

If the issue persists, the federal government may interfere. During previous labour disputes, Ottawa enforced back-to-work laws to restore mail services. Whether that happens this time depends on how long and disruptive the strike is.

The Labour Minister says the special mediator will re-engage with both parties once productive bargaining can resume.

Trending News:

Carney Says Canada Has Failed New Immigrants

Carney says Canada Has Failed New Immigrants

Geoff Brown

Geoff Thomas is a seasoned staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. With his sharp writing skills and deep understanding of SEO, he consistently delivers high-quality, engaging content that resonates with readers. Thomas’ articles are well-researched, informative, and written in a clear, concise style that keeps audiences hooked. His ability to craft compelling narratives while seamlessly incorporating relevant keywords has made him a valuable asset to the VORNews team.

(VOR News) – Two people who were present at the conference have claimed that the OPEC+ oil alliance decided to delay a meeting to discuss the next steps of its crude output plan until December 5. In order to accommodate the upcoming meeting, an alternative was chosen.

Due to the delicate nature of the discussions occurring at the time, the sources specifically did not want to be named.

The alliance, which consists of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and its partners, was supposed to meet on December 1st, according to the original plans. Nevertheless, the coalition conference did not proceed as well as expected.

The following week, OPEC will hold an online meeting.

Three different sets of oil output reductions are presently being implemented by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and its partners. This is a result of growing uncertainty in the demand situation.

The member countries have agreed to lower their overall production to 39.725 million barrels per day (bpd) during the course of the next year in compliance with the official output strategy. Eight OPEC+ countries are willingly reducing their output by 1.7 million barrels per day at this time.

This decrease is expected to continue throughout the whole of 2025. Furthermore, a second round of reductions is already underway. This stage, which will start in December, will involve 2.2 million barrels per day in total.

The Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) Secretariat said that the meeting would be rescheduled after the conference ended. This was because several ministers from member states will be attending the Gulf Summit, which is set for December 1 in Kuwait City.

It is unclear if this second voluntary output constraint of 2.2 million barrels per day will be extended, given the establishment of a cease-fire between Israel and Lebanon has reduced the probability of production disruptions in the oil-rich Middle East. Rather, it’s unclear if this restriction will be lifted.

The first to implement a cease-fire was OPEC.

This development may have been influenced by the considerable pressure that was placed on world’s oil prices earlier this week.

Iran, one of the main producers of the OPEC contingent, has supported terrorist groups like the Palestinian Hamas, the Houthis in Yemen, and Hezbollah in Lebanon during the one-year-old war with Israel.

Iran has also attempted to torture the Jewish nation by threatening it with rockets. The financial markets have been closely monitoring whether or not strikes on Iran’s vital oil infrastructure—the foundation of the sanctioned economy—could result in a prolonged or escalating conflict. Iran’s oil infrastructure accounts for a sizable amount of its GDP.

In the immediate aftermath of Wednesday’s settlement, the January-expiration Ice Brent contract was trading at $72.68 per barrel at 7:39 a.m. London time.

This time around, the settlement caused a 0.2% decline. Nymex WTI OPEC futures for the January front month were trading at $68.58 a barrel during Wednesday’s trading session, down 0.2% from the closing price of the market.

Furthermore, this represented a decrease from the closing price of the market on Wednesday.

The fact that President-elect Donald Trump will be returning to the White House in January is another factor that adds to the OPEC high degree of uncertainty. President Trump has previously made the case for the “drill, baby, drill” approach to increasing U.S. oil production.

Another interesting fact is that President Trump has already put in place a strict policy that includes sanctions against Iran because of its nuclear program.

For the few remaining consumers of Tehran’s crude oil, this approach might deter them. One of the clients that this strategy might deter from doing business with is China, the world’s biggest importer of crude oil.

SOURCE: CNBC

SEE ALSO:

Global Unease Arises in Response to Donald Trump’s Tariff Talks; Nations May “Retaliate”

“Un-American Threats” Target Donald Trump’s Cabinet Nominees and Appointments.

Salman Ahmad

Salman Ahmad is a seasoned freelance writer who contributes insightful articles to VORNews. With years of experience in journalism, he possesses a knack for crafting compelling narratives that resonate with readers. Salman’s writing style strikes a balance between depth and accessibility, allowing him to tackle complex topics while maintaining clarity.