Connect with us

News

Biden Unveils A Proposal To Establish Term Limits For The Supreme Court

Published

on

Biden
Biden | AP News image

Washington  — President Joe Biden has launched a long-awaited proposal for changes to the United States Supreme Court, urging Congress to create term limits and an enforceable ethics code for the court’s nine members. He’s also urging Congress to pass a constitutional amendment that limits presidential immunity.

The White House disclosed the details of Biden’s court proposal on Monday. With only 99 days until Election Day, it appears to have little chance of passing through a deeply divided Congress.

biden

Biden | AP News image

Biden Unveils A Proposal To Establish Term Limits For The Supreme Court

Still, Democrats hope it will help voters focus as they make their choices in a close election. The likely Democratic nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris, who has sought to portray her run against Republican ex-President Donald Trump as “a choice between freedom and chaos,” has questioned the court’s fairness in light of recent judgments.

The White House is hoping to capitalize on Democrats’ mounting fury over the court’s 6-3 conservative majority, which has issued opinions overturning landmark abortion rights and government regulatory powers that have lasted for decades.

Liberals have also expressed concern over revelations of questionable relationships and choices made by some members of the court’s right side, which they claim undermine their impartiality.

“I have great respect for our institutions and the separation of powers,” Biden writes in a Washington Post op-ed published Monday. “What is going on currently is not normal, and it affects public trust in the court’s decisions, even those affecting personal liberties. “We are now in a breach.”

Harris later said that the American people must believe in a Supreme Court plagued by ethics scandals and judgments contradicting long-standing precedent. She stated that the proposed reforms “will help to restore confidence in the Court, strengthen our democracy, and ensure that no one is above the law.”

The president planned to discuss his proposal later Monday during a talk at the LBJ Presidential Library in Austin, Texas, commemorating the Civil Rights Act’s 60th anniversary.

Biden proposes eliminating lifetime appointments to the court. He believes Congress should approve legislation establishing a system in which the sitting president appoints a justice every two years for an 18-year term on the court. He says that term limits would assist in ensuring that court membership changes regularly and stabilize the nomination process.

He also wants Congress to enact legislation to create a court code of ethics that would force justices to disclose gifts, refrain from public political participation, and recuse themselves from cases in which they or their wives have financial or other conflicts of interest.

Biden is also urging Congress to propose a constitutional amendment overturning the Supreme Court’s recent landmark immunity decision, which found that former presidents had extensive immunity from prosecution.

That judge extended the delay in the Washington criminal case against Trump on allegations that he attempted to overturn his 2020 presidential election defeat, effectively ending the former president’s chances of being tried before the November election.

According to polls, Americans support reducing the time judges can serve on the Supreme Court. Last summer, a poll by The Associated Press-NORC Centre for Public Affairs Research revealed that 67% of Americans, including 82% of Democrats and 57% of Republicans, backed a plan to limit the number of years that justices can serve instead of life terms.

The first three justices who may be affected by term restrictions are on the right. Justice Clarence Thomas has served on the bench for nearly 33 years. Chief Justice John Roberts has served for 19 years, while Justice Samuel Alito has served for 18.

From its inception until 1970, Supreme Court judges served an average of 17 years, according to Gabe Roth, executive director of the Fix the Court organization. Since 1970, the average has been approximately 28 years. Both conservative and liberal politicians have supported term limits.

“If justices have this much power, then they should be individuals who reflect America as it currently is, not the America of 30 or 40 years ago, the dead hand of the president who appointed them still influencing policy,” according to Roth.

Meanwhile, an enforcement mechanism for the Supreme Court’s code of ethics might move the justices closer to other federal judges, who are subject to a disciplinary system in which anybody can make and examine a complaint. An investigation may result in censure and reprimand. Last week, Justice Elena Kagan became the first justice to publicly advocate for creating a mechanism to implement the new ethics code.

However, establishing an ethics code enforcement system for the Supreme Court is more complex than it may appear.

According to Stephen Gillers, a legal ethics specialist at NYU School of Law, the attorney general has always had the authority to prosecute violations of the financial and gift disclosure laws, but he has never utilized that power against federal judges.

Meanwhile, the group that oversees lower court judges is led by Roberts, “who might be reluctant to use whatever power the conference has against his colleagues,” Gillers added in an email.

It has been 32 years since Congress ratified a constitutional amendment. The 27th Amendment, approved in 1992, specifies that Congress can pass a measure modifying the salary of members of the House and Senate, but such a change cannot go into effect until after the next November House elections.

Trump has slammed judicial reform as Democrats’ desperate attempt to “play the ref.”

“The Democrats are seeking to disrupt the presidential election and undermine our justice system by targeting their political opponent, ME, and our Honourable Supreme Court. We must battle for our fair and independent courts while also protecting our country,” Trump said on his Truth Social page earlier this month.

Following revelations about some justices, like Thomas accepting luxurious trips from a GOP megadonor, doubts about the court’s ethics have grown.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, chosen during the Obama administration, has drawn criticism after it was revealed that her staff frequently pressured public organizations that hosted her to purchase copies of her memoir or children’s books.

biden

Biden | AP News image

Biden Unveils A Proposal To Establish Term Limits For The Supreme Court

Alito rebuffed requests to stand down from Supreme Court cases involving Trump and Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection suspects, despite a controversy over provocative flags posted at his houses, which some felt signaled sympathy for those charged with assaulting the U.S. Capitol to retain Trump in power. Alito claims his wife displayed the flags.

Democrats said Biden’s attempt would help shine a harsh light on recent Supreme Court decisions, such as the 2022 ruling that removed women’s constitutional abortion protections by the conservative-majority court, which includes three justices chosen by Trump.

The announcement is a significant shift for Biden, who, as a candidate, had been cautious of proposals to alter the Supreme Court. But, throughout his presidency, he has become increasingly public about his conviction that the court has abandoned conventional constitutional interpretation.

Last week, he stated in an Oval Office speech that he would pursue Supreme Court reform during his final months in office, calling it “critical to our democracy.”

SOURCE | AP

News

Trudeau Rocks to Taylor Swift While Montreal Burns

Published

on

Trudeau, Montreal

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has come under fire yet again after a video surfaced on X, showing him dancing at a Taylor Swift performance while anti-Nato protestors ransacked downtown Montreal.

Trudeau attended Taylor Swift’s concert in Toronto on Friday night. Before Taylor Swift approached the stage, X shared a viral video of him dancing and singing along to the song “You Don’t Own Me.”

The image of Trudeau dancing amid violent protests in Montreal generated widespread indignation online. Some social media users even compared Trudeau to the ancient Roman dictator Nero, known for “fiddling while Rome burned.”

Don Stewart, a Member of Parliament (MP) representing part of Toronto, called out the prime minister in a post on X.

“Lawless protesters run roughshod over Montreal in violent protest. The Prime Minister dances,” Stewart wrote. “This is the Canada built by the Liberal government.”

“Bring back law and order, safe streets and communities in the Canada we once knew and loved,” the MP added.

On Saturday, the day after Taylor Swift’s concert, Trudeau condemned the anti-NATO protests, calling them “appalling.”

Anti-NATO activists set off smoke bombs and marched through Montreal’s streets waving Palestinian flags. According to the Montreal Gazette, rioters set fire to automobiles and battled with police.

Pro-Palestinian protests

Protesters also tossed tiny explosives and metal objects at officers. At one point, the mob torched an effigy of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Police used tear gas and batons to disperse the gathering, and three persons were arrested for attacking officers and impeding police operations.

Masked protesters were seen burning flares and bashing storefront windows in videos and photographs shared on social media. Pro-Palestinian protests have been taking place across Canada since the Israel-Gaza conflict began late last year.

Critics have lambasted Trudeau for doing nothing to stop the violent pro-Palestinian marches, with some claiming he has fueled anti-Israel sentiment in Canada.

On Friday, Trudeau stated that Canada would respect the orders of the International Criminal Court (ICC), which issued an arrest warrant for Mr Netanyahu, even if it meant arresting the Israeli prime leader on Canadian soil.

Related News:

Trudeau Called the Greatest Threat to NATO

Trudeau Called the Greatest Threat to NATO

 

Continue Reading

News

Calgary Zoo Admits Human Error in Death of Baby Gorilla

Published

on

Baby Gorilla, Calgary Zoo
The zookeeper's negligence caused the death of a 2-year-old baby gorilla

The Calgary Zoo has admitted in a public statement that a zookeeper’s negligence caused the death of a 2-year-old baby gorilla. Eyare, a newborn gorilla, died last week after being slammed in the head by a hydraulic door.

The accident occurred when a zoo worker attempted to separate Eyare from the rest of the gorilla tribe for a solitary training session.

The gorilla died from significant head injuries, according to the zoo’s statement.

“This tragedy has struck us all in the deepest way imaginable,” Colleen Baird, director of animal care at the Calgary Zoo, said during a news conference. “Eyare’s brief but meaningful existence gave so much joy to our community, and all will sorely miss her. We will do everything possible to prevent repeat accidents.”

According to Baird, the staff member involved was immediately removed from the workplace and will be reassigned to another area of the zoo. The Calgary Zoo stated that it would take preventive steps, such as specialist personnel training and animal behavioral training, to avoid a similar incident.

Calgary Zoo Questioned

It is not the first time an animal at the zoo has died from negligence at the Calgary Zoo. A capybara was accidentally crushed by a hydraulic door similar to the one that killed Eyare in 2019.

An otter died in 2016 after being entangled in an “unauthorized” pair of jeans that a zookeeper had dropped in its enclosure. In 2013, a penguin died in “a freak accident” after swallowing a stick.

Animal Justice, a Canadian group that promotes animal welfare, has called for an independent investigation of animal safety and oversight at the Alberta facility.

“The Calgary Zoo appears to have a higher rate of animal deaths compared to other zoos, and in light of Eyare’s death there should be a systematic review of the zoo’s operations and practices, conducted transparently by the government or another outside party,” according to Camille Labchuk, the executive director of Animal Justice.

The Calgary Zoo refuted that it has more animal deaths than other zoos, emphasizing that it adheres to operating requirements and has maintained accreditation by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums’ independent Accreditation Commission since 1978.

“We love and care for more than 4,000 animals representing over 100 species that call our zoo home,” stated a Calgary Zoo representative.

“Human error-related deaths in animals are quite infrequent. We have lost two animals in the last ten years: a North American river otter in 2016 and ‘Eyare’ this week.

While rare, even one human-caused death is too many. These unfortunate instances have served as vital learning experiences, prompting us to examine and tighten protocols to provide the greatest level of care.”

Baird said at the news conference that using hydraulic doors is “common practice with accredited zoos,” adding that the facility will consider switching to alternate doors to improve safety.

The Calgary Zoo, which established the Wilder Institute in 2021, caters to nearly 4,000 creatures, including six more western lowland gorillas.

Related News:

Beluga Whales Dies at Canada’s Marineland

Outrage Erupts After 17th Beluga Whale Dies at Canada’s Marineland

Continue Reading

News

Canada’s Lotto Max jackpot Climbs to $80M

Published

on

lotto max, Canada

Lotto Max in Canada has reached $80 million for only the second time in Canadian lottery history. Friday’s draw sought a winner for a $75 million pool, but the top reward remained unclaimed as of Saturday, increasing the jackpot.

Only once did the jackpot reach $80 million in September, when it broke the previous record. Before that, the prize was $75 million, a record.

The Lotto Max prize maximum was boosted earlier this year, enabling for jackpots of more than $70 million. The cap is now at $80 million.
While a greater fee may encourage more people to play, the odds of winning the lottery remain extremely low.

According to the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation, the odds for a $5 ticket are around one in 33,294,800.

While there was no jackpot winner in Friday’s draw, someone did match six of the seven winning numbers, plus a bonus, earning them a payout of more than $320,000.

Lotto Max History

Lotto Max is one of three national lottery games in Canada, overseen by the Interprovincial Lottery Corporation. The game was introduced on September 19, 2009, and its inaugural draw occurred on September 25, 2009. It replaced Lotto Super 7.

The odds of winning the Lotto Max are 1 in 33,294,800. This is correct to a point but misleading.

Let’s have a look at the rules:

  1. Players choose 7 numbers out of 50
  2. Numbers cannot be repeated
  3. Numbers are automatically sorted into ascending order
  4. Each play buys 3 lines
  5. Each play costs $5

Seeing that players choose 7 out of 50 non-repeating numbers, the equation for the total number of possible combinations (this is different from permutations where the order in which the numbers appear is significant) when playing the Lotto Max is 50! / (7! x 43!)

Continue Reading

Trending