Connect with us

U.K News

Nassar Survivors Sue Michigan State, Saying It Made ‘Secret Decisions’ About Releasing Documents

Published

on

nassar

EAST LANSING, Michigan In a lawsuit filed on Thursday, women who had been sexually assaulted by former Michigan State University sports physician Larry Nassar claimed the university had made “secret decisions” about disclosing information in the case.

According to the survivors and parents’ group, the lawsuit is meant to hold the university accountable, not to demand money. They claim that the institution withheld emails about the board of trustees’ deliberations and later failed to turn over more than 6,000 documents to investigate how Nassar was permitted to get away with his behavior. According to the school, the records are shielded by the attorney-client privilege.

After confessing to assaulting some of the best gymnasts in the country for years under the pretense of medical care, Nassar was given a sentence of 40 to 175 years in jail in 2018. He was charged with assaulting hundreds of women and girls sexually.

How Michigan State handled the Nassar investigation and its interactions with survivors after his arrest and conviction have drawn criticism. Nassar victims’ cases against the institution were resolved for $500 million.

A representative for Michigan State, Mark Bullion, stated in an email on Thursday that the university does not comment on ongoing legal matters and has not been informed of or served with the new lawsuit.

Women who had been sexually assaulted by former Michigan State University sports physician Larry Nassar claimed the university had made “secret decisions” about disclosing information in the case.

According to a news release, the legal suit names the school and its elected trustee board and claims that decisions and “secret votes” made by a public body violated Michigan’s open meetings regulations and the state Constitution.

Victims’ attorney Azzam Elder stated in a release that “we contend that board members made a behind-closed-doors secret decision not to release the records in blatant violation of the Open Meetings Act.” When we asked for emails demonstrating that they debated and reached a decision on the topic behind closed doors in violation of the law, they responded by violating the Freedom of Information Act.

The lawsuit demands that the university hand over emails and other communications regarding any decisions that trustees may have made privately, that a court rule that Michigan State violated the Freedom of Information Act and that the university subsequently adheres to both the FOIA and the Open Meetings Act.

Women who had been sexually assaulted by former Michigan State University sports physician Larry Nassar claimed the university had made “secret decisions” about disclosing information in the case.

To shed light on what the school knew regarding the abuse, Attorney General Dana Nessel has requested that the school provide more than 6,000 records. Due to the university’s refusal to turn over records about the issue, she had to call a stop to her inquiry into the school’s handling of the Larry Nassar case in 2021.

Before the lawsuit was filed on Thursday, Nasar victim Melissa Brown Hudecz said, “This is about who knew what, when at the university.” “Until we are certain that everyone who supported a predator is responsible, our community won’t be able to recover. The board is increasing survivors’ trauma by safeguarding the 6,000 secret documents and anyone named in them while also abdicating institutional responsibility.

Nassar was stabbed numerous times earlier this month in his Florida federal prison cell by another inmate. A person with knowledge of the situation told The Associated Press that the prisoner said Nassar incited the attack by making a vulgar remark about wanting to watch ladies compete in Wimbledon women’s tennis matches while they were watching the tournament on television. The individual spoke anonymously because they were not authorized to publicly discuss the attack’s specifics or the current investigation.

SOURCE – (AP)

Kiara Grace is a staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. Her writing focuses on technology trends, particularly in the realm of consumer electronics and software. With a keen eye for detail and a knack for breaking down complex topics. Kiara delivers insightful analyses that resonate with tech enthusiasts and casual readers alike. Her articles strike a balance between in-depth coverage and accessibility, making them a go-to resource for anyone seeking to stay informed about the latest innovations shaping our digital world.

Continue Reading

U.K News

Keir Starmer Rejects Meeting With WW2 Veteran Over Her Frozen Pension

Published

on

"It's the injustice of it that is so unfair, the fact that we were never warned."

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has rejected a request from a 99-year-old WW2 for a meeting to discuss the frozen state pension policy for citizens living abroad. Starmer declined the meeting but offered an alternative meeting with Pensions Minister Emma Reynolds.

Anne Puckridge, who turns 100 this month, went from her home in Canada to agitate Keir Starmer’s Labour government over the state pension freeze.

The World War II veteran told the BBC that she is “angry” and “heartbroken” following a meeting with the pensions minister, who led her to believe that the government will not reconsider its policy of freezing the state pensions of some British people living abroad.

Anne Puckridge is one of approximately 453,000 British retirees living overseas who do not receive an annual increase in their state pension.

Pensions Minister Emma Reynolds agreed to a meeting after Sir Keir Starmer’s request to meet was denied owing to purported “pressures on his diary.”

Ms. Puckridge stated that the meeting in Parliament left her feeling “bitterly disappointed” and “disgusted”.

She stated that she had the idea Reynolds had been “polite enough and kind enough to come in and spend her time with her,” but that her mind had already been made up before the meeting began.

Ms Puckridge stated that she and her other campaigners would have to think carefully about what they could do from now on, but she assured them that they would take action.

State Pension Minister Reynolds thanked Ms Puckridge for the meeting and for sharing her insights.

A Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) representative stated that the government recognizes that “people move abroad for various reasons, and we provide clear information on how this can affect their pensions.”

The policy of increasing the UK state pension for recipients living abroad has existed for many years.

Since she relocated to Canada in 2001 at the age of 76 to live closer to her daughter, Ms Puckridge has received £72.50 (C$129.00) per week.

Her state pension is now less than half the £169.50 (C$302.00) paid to seniors still residing in the United Kingdom. She told the BBC that frozen pensions touch all aspects of life.

“You’ve got to be careful about entertainment,” she told me. “You must realize that you cannot be as kind to your grandkids as you would like.

“You feel you’ve lost all sense of dignity, the government has thrown you away, you know, out of sight out of mind.”

Ms. Puckridge stated that when she alerted the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) that she was moving to Canada, “they never said a word about [my] pension being frozen”.

“The first I knew about it was when my first rise was due,” she recalled.

“I didn’t understand it. So I wrote and enquired about it, and I was told no… you will not receive any additional pension rises when you leave the UK.” She said, “It’s the injustice of it that is so unfair, the fact that we were never warned.”

Related News:

Paris Trash Strike Ends, Pension Protest Numbers Shrink

 

 

 

Continue Reading

U.K News

Air Force Drones Spotted Over UK Military Bases

Published

on

The drones were not considered hostile, the USAF said,

British military expertise has been brought in to assist in identifying persons responsible for flying Air Force drones near US military locations. According to the BBC, 60 RAF troops have been dispatched to assist the US Air Force with its probe.

The Air Force drones were not deemed hostile, according to the USAF, who added that the sightings “fluctuated and varied between the bases” and “ranged in sizes and configurations”.

According to the Ministry of Defence, “We are supporting the US Air Force response.”

The announcement follows several recent reports of unmanned aerial vehicles sighted near RAF Lakenheath and RAF Mildenhall in Suffolk and RAF Feltwell in adjacent Norfolk.

There have been other reports of drone activity overnight. According to the USAF, the vehicles were few in number and modest in size.

A representative for the US Air Forces in Europe stated, “We can confirm that there were sightings yesterday during nighttime hours, but the number fluctuated and varied between the bases throughout the night.”

The official stated that since the first sightings on November 20th, there has been “no impact on residents or infrastructure, and they have not been identified as hostile.”

However, the Air Force drones remained under surveillance “to ensure the safety and security of the installations.”

They said, “We request individuals in the area to contact either local police or security forces if they see anything suspicious.”

Treat threats seriously’

Officials in the United States and the United Kingdom have not said who is responsible for the recent drone activity.

However, the BBC understands there were worries that a state actor could be involved.

In recent months, intelligence officials have warned of increasing Russian sabotage operations against Western countries supporting Ukraine.

RAF Mildenhall is primarily home to the USAF’s 100th Air Refuelling Wing; RAF Lakenheath is home to USAF F-35A and F-15E fighter jets; and RAF Feltwell is mainly concerned with logistics and provides housing for military personnel.

A spokesman for the MoD, which owns the bases, said: “We take threats seriously and maintain robust measures at defence sites.

“We are supporting the US Air Force response.”

The USAF has not said who it believed to be behind the incidents.

Related News:

US Military Shoots Down Missiles And Drones

US Military Shoots Down Missiles And Drones As It Faces Growing Threats In Volatile Middle East

Continue Reading

U.K News

General Election Petition in UK Hits 2 Million Signatures

Published

on

Starmer has ruled out an general election after a petition reached two million signatures

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has ruled out holding an early general election after a petition calling for a second vote garnered two million signatures.

Over the weekend, a petition calling for another general election was started on the UK Parliament website. It cited Starmer’s failure to keep all his pledges made in the run-up to the previous election. By Monday mid-morning, it had surpassed two million signatures.

When asked about the petition, Starmer said he was “not surprised” that some individuals who did not vote for Labour in the previous election want a “re-run” of the poll.

He claimed that he had “inherited a lot of problems” from the previous administration and had resolved to “take the hard decisions first.”

Starmer ruled out an early general election, stating that only the Prime Minister can request that the King call a general election; it simply will not happen, he said.

This petition, started last week and sponsored by Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, calls on the government to schedule a new general election.
To sign a petition, you must verify that you are a British citizen or resident and provide a postcode.

The petition states, “I would prefer there to be another general election. I believe the present Labour government has broken the pledges they made before the last election.”

The petition comes only five months after Labour won the July general election with 9.7 million votes and 412 seats in the House of Commons.

However, the Labour Party garnered only 35% of the vote, the lowest percentage gained by a single-party administration since the conclusion of WWII.

Some of the policies implemented by Starmer and his Labour government have received significant criticism, including an inheritance tax on farms, a reduction in winter heating payments, an increase in employers’ national insurance, and applying VAT to private school fees.

According to the most recent Ipsos political pulse poll, the Labour Party is unpopular, with 28% of the public favoring it and 49% opposing it.

Related News:

Hamas Calls for Peace After Trump Wins General Election

Hamas Calls for Peace After Trump Wins Election

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version