Connect with us

News

Key Questions As Trump Approaches Monday’s Deadline To Pay $454 Million Fraud Penalty

Published

on

trump

NEW YORK — Donald Trump is approaching a significant deadline in his most expensive court battle. Suppose the former president does not provide a financial guarantee by Monday. In that case, New York’s attorney general can begin collecting on the more than $454 million Trump owes the state in a civil fraud action.

Trump’s lawyers are attempting to prevent that from happening. They have urged a judge to halt collection attempts while he appeals the verdict.

The likely Republican presidential nominee attempted to obtain a bond for the full amount, which would have halted the clock on collection during his appeal and ensured the state received its money if he lost.

However, Trump’s lawyers told the court that more than 30 underwriters declined. They stated that getting a bond for such a vast sum is “a practical impossibility.”

This raises the potential that New York Attorney General Letitia James will try to implement the ruling as soon as Monday.

Here’s a look at what that could look like and what it means for Trump’s corporate empire.

Could New York seize Trump’s assets?

Yes. If Trump cannot pay, the state “could levy and sell his assets, lien his real property, and garnish anyone who owes him money,” Syracuse University Law Professor Gregory Germain stated.

Potential targets include his Trump Tower penthouse, the Wall Street office building, and golf clubs. James’ agency could potentially seek court authorization to drain Trump’s bank accounts and investment portfolios and sell off other assets such as his planes, helicopters, and golf carts.

When someone cannot pay a civil penalty, a typical legal technique is to seize assets.

In a well-known case, O.J. Simpson’s Heisman Trophy was seized and auctioned to cover a portion of a $33.5 million wrongful death verdict. More recently, a Miami, Florida, municipal commissioner fought to save his home after a federal judge ordered it seized and auctioned off to help pay a $63.5 million verdict in a political retribution lawsuit.

In 1999, New York state seized three moving trucks to help pay off a $250,000 judgment against a corporation that defrauded its clients. In 2006, the authorities seized a $342,000 investment account to pay a portion of a $2 million judgment against illegal tire dump operators.

Could it happen soon?

It’s not likely. State officials can’t simply padlock Trump Tower. Any attempt to collect would be made through legal means, such as liens and foreclosures. However, the state might establish the stage by subpoenaing Trump to provide details on his assets.

James, a Democrat, recently told ABC that if Trump cannot pay, her agency “will ask the judge to seize his assets.”

WHY DOES TRUMP OWE THIS MONEY?

In 2022, the state sued Trump through James’ office, alleging that he had been defrauding banks and insurance companies for years by exaggerating his wealth on financial statements concerning different business transactions.

In February, following a 2½-month trial, Judge Arthur Engoron ordered Trump to pay $355 million plus interest, saying, “The frauds found here leap off the page and shock the conscience.”.

Trump rejects any attempt to deceive banks or others about his wealth. He has claimed that the judge’s judgment and the lawsuit were politically motivated attempts to prevent him from retaking the White House in 2024.

He has also argued that it is unreasonable to force him to sell assets or spend large sums of money on a bond while the case is still being reviewed, even though courts in New York and other jurisdictions frequently require an appeal bond.

When asked Tuesday if he is certain he can pay, Trump slammed what he called “a rigged trial by a crooked judge and a crooked attorney general.”

“We have a lot of cash and a terrific company, but they want to take it all away, or at least the cash. Billions of dollars in value and billions of dollars in property. But they want to take the money away so I can’t use it for the campaign,” Trump remarked after voting in Florida’s Republican primary.

“We’ll see how the courts rule on it,” he told reporters.

COULD TRUMP PAY IF HE WANTED?
Although much comes from his real estate assets, Trump claims to be worth several billion dollars.

On his most recent publicly available financial statement, he reported possessing approximately $294 million in cash or cash equivalents such as stocks. However, the document is out of date, covering the fiscal year ending June 30, 2021. It’s also one of the documents Engoron judged fake because it exaggerated Trump’s wealth.

Since then, Trump has made roughly $187 million by selling the lease to his Washington, D.C. hotel and the rights to manage a New York City golf club. His current cash situation needs to be clarified. He claimed over $400 million in cash during his civil fraud trial. However, this is unsubstantiated.

Trump has additional legal obligations. In January, a jury ordered him to pay $83.3 million for defaming writer E. Jean Carroll, who accused him of sexual assault. This month, Trump obtained a $91.6 million bond to guarantee the decision while he appealed.

Trump’s lawyers said freeing up cash by selling some of his properties in a “fire sale” would result in large, irrecoverable losses.

ARE THERE OTHER WAYS TRUMP CAN RAISE MONEY?

Trump might benefit financially from a planned deal to list his social media company, Trump Media & Technology Group, on the stock exchange under the symbol DJT.

If the purchase is approved at a shareholder meeting on Friday, Trump would own at least 58% of the shares in the firm that runs his Truth Social platform. Depending on the share price, that could be worth several billion dollars, but he may need more time to convert the stock into cash.

Meanwhile, the amount Trump owes grows by approximately $112,000 daily due to interest. As of Tuesday, he owes the state around $457 million.

To secure a bond, Trump’s lawyers stated they would have to deposit collateral equaling 120% of the verdict.

Last month, Trump’s lawyers proposed posting a $100 million bond, but a judge in the state’s mid-level appeals court ruled that he must pay the entire sum. Trump has appealed the judgment.

COULD TRUMP DECLARATE BANKRUPTCY?

If he entered bankruptcy, the judgment would be stayed under federal bankruptcy law. However, he would still be personally accountable if only his company, the Trump Organization, or other organizations went bankrupt.

Trump has consistently claimed that he has never personally declared bankruptcy, even though several of his past firms have.

“If he can’t post a bond or meet the appellate division’s bonding requirements, then I would expect him to file bankruptcy to take advantage of the automatic stay on collection,” the law professor said.

SOURCE – (AP)

Kiara Grace is a staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. Her writing focuses on technology trends, particularly in the realm of consumer electronics and software. With a keen eye for detail and a knack for breaking down complex topics. Kiara delivers insightful analyses that resonate with tech enthusiasts and casual readers alike. Her articles strike a balance between in-depth coverage and accessibility, making them a go-to resource for anyone seeking to stay informed about the latest innovations shaping our digital world.

Continue Reading

News

Man Creates Candy Cane Car to Spread Christmas Cheer

Published

on

Clayman in his Grinch costume poses with his Candy Cane Car

In a delightful display of holiday spirit, a local resident in North Providence, Maine, has transformed his vehicle into a candy cane delight that is capturing hearts and spreading Christmas Cheer.

Over the past 15 years, Dave Clayman has transformed a simple 1991 Toyota Camry into a rolling holiday icon that captivates everyone who encounters it.

It’s wrapped in $3,000 worth of reflective tape, the same kind used on trailer trucks. Whether parked at a mall or cruising down the highway, you can’t miss it with its candy cane decorations.

This whimsical project started with an unusual idea. When an old exercise bike landed in Clayman’s possession, he mounted it on top of his car instead of letting it gather dust in his garage.

“There’s nothing like working out in the fresh air,” Dave said. That quirky addition quickly drew eyes, inspiring him to keep going.

The car features homemade rockets built from trash cans and salad bowls, candy cane-themed hubcaps, and candy cane lights dangling from the mounted exercise bike.

The Candy Cane Car cost Clayman $3,000

To top it off, it boasts a PA system and a custom horn, making it a true sensory experience.

The candy cane car has now become a local landmark every Christmas. Parked outside Clayman’s house, it’s a favourite backdrop for people snapping photos or simply stopping to admire it.

Some visitors even share stories of seeing the car as a child, reminiscing about how it’s been a beloved part of their neighbourhood for years.

“When people see it, their mood amplifies,” Clayman explained. “If they’re happy, they become happier. If they’re upset, well, they sometimes get angrier.” But for the most part, he estimates that over 96% of people love the festive car, particularly around Christmas.

Clayman said he used to wear a Santa costume when riding in his festive car for years. A few years ago, he bought a Grinch costume and never looked back.

“It’s like a state of euphoria. Every time I get behind the wheel and people see it,” he said. “Anything that people are in a better mood, it seems to make you in a better mood. It’s a labor of love you got to be committed to it.”

Related News:

Costco Is Offering The Peloton Bike+ At 300 Locations This Holiday Season.

Continue Reading

News

Senate Approves Social Security Fairness Act, Heads to Final Vote

Published

on

Kent Nishimura/Los Angeles Times/TNS

(VOR News) – On Wednesday, the United States Senate Social Security passed a measure with a vote of 73-27, indicating that the legislation, which is co-sponsored by Senator Susan Collins of Maine, is likely to be implemented before the end of the year.

The law may be beneficial to personnel working in the public sector in Maine, including teachers, firefighters, and other workers.

The Social Security Fairness Act would repeal two restrictions that lower the amount of Social Security payments paid to public employees.

These regulations would be eliminated with the passage of the act. A provision known as the Windfall Elimination Provision makes it impossible for public employees who are currently receiving pensions to continue receiving them.

The Government Pension Offset, as it is commonly referred to, is designed to limit the amount of money that can be paid to the surviving spouses of recipients who are also receiving government pensions.

This problematic situation impacts Social Security benefits.”

In November 2024, the Social Security Administration reported that more than 2 million individuals, including more than 20,000 in the state of Maine, had their Social Security benefits reduced as a result of the Windfall Elimination Provision,” Collins stated in a statement that was released by her department.

In November 2024, the Government Pension Offset had an impact on more than 650,000 individuals, with more than 6,000 of those individuals residing in the state of Maine, according to the previously mentioned line of reasoning.

A vote of 327 to 75 was necessary for the measure to be approved by the House of Representatives the previous month. On Wednesday, Chuck Schumer, the Democratic leader of the Senate, announced that he intended to work rapidly in order to deliver the act from the House of Representatives to the president’s desk.

As indicated by Schumer, who was speaking on the floor of the United States Senate today, “Passing this Social Security fix right before Christmas would be a great gift for our retired firefighters, police officers, postal workers, teachers, and others who have contributed to Social Security for years but are now being penalised because of their time spent serving the public.”

In the beginning, the measure was supported by two individuals: Sherrod Brown, a Democrat from Ohio, and Collins, a Republican. During her speech in support of the proposal, which was made on the floor of the Senate on Wednesday afternoon, Collins stated that the idea will have a significant impact on a number of individuals, including teachers in the state of Maine.

These advantages are the direct result of the effort that they put forth. During the course of her remarks, Collins asserted that the punishment in question was both unreasonable and unacceptable.

This will strain Social Security’s already shaky budget.

In a recent examination, it was discovered that the Windfall Elimination Provision was one of the primary problems that contributed to the difficulties that the teacher workforce in Maine is experiencing, which experts are referring to as a crisis.

A poll that was conducted and released by the non-profit organisation Educate Maine found that teachers in each and every county in the state of Maine identified the provision as a hindering factor in the process of recruiting new teachers.

According to the findings of the study, “this federal policy that reduces social security payouts is a disincentive,” which implies that it is detrimental to teachers who take on additional work and discourages people from switching careers in order to become teachers.

Sharon Gallant, a retired educator who worked in Gardiner for a total of 31 years, is one of the educators that are now employed there. Prior to beginning his career as a teacher in the public school system, Gallant was employed in the business sector. He made a little contribution to the Social Security system during the entirety of this time period.

“When you move into public education, you are faced with a certain degree of punishment,” according to her statement.

In letters that Gallant sent to Collins and to Sen. Angus King of Maine, who is an independent, he urged both of them to support the concept. She stated that even if it is unsuccessful, Maine will still have a difficult time recruiting teachers because of the clause that deters them from employment.

She made the observation, “If this does not pass, then it is just another reason not to enter public service.”

SOURCE: FR

SEE ALSO:

The Federal Reserve Will Drop Key Rates, But Consumers May Not Gain Immediately.

Canadian Dollar Hits Multi-Year Low Over Political Unrest

Continue Reading

News

The Federal Reserve Will Drop Key Rates, But Consumers May Not Gain Immediately.

Published

on

(VOR News) – If the Federal Reserve indicates on Wednesday that interest rate reductions will proceed more gradually next year than in recent months, the United States may experience only slight alleviation from the persistently elevated costs of borrowing for credit cards, auto loans, and mortgages.

The Federal Reserve is set to announce a quarter-point reduction in its benchmark rate, anticipated to decrease from around 4.6% to approximately 4.3%.

This represents the latest action undertaken, subsequent to a quarter-point cut in interest rates in November and a larger-than-usual half-point reduction in September.

The Wednesday meeting may mark a new era for the Federal Reserve.

The Federal Reserve is more inclined to adjust its monetary policy at alternate meetings, rather than at each meeting. The central bank policymakers may announce that they now expect to reduce their primary rate only two or three times in 2025, instead of the four reductions previously planned three months ago.

The Federal Reserve has utilised the rationale of a “recalibration” of ultra-high interest rates, originally aimed at curbing inflation that peaked at a four-decade high in 2022, to defend its measures thus far.

A considerable number of Federal Reserve officials contend that interest rates should not remain as elevated as they currently are, given the substantial decline in inflation. The Federal Reserve’s chosen index shows that inflation was 2.3% in October, a notable decline from the peak of 7.2% in June 2022.

Conversely, despite the swift economic growth, inflation has consistently exceeded the Federal Reserve’s 2% target for several months. The monthly retail sales statistics released by the government on Tuesday reveals that Americans, especially those with higher incomes, are inclined to spend liberally.

These trends, as per the views of several economists, suggest that further rate decreases could unduly stimulate the economy, perhaps leading to sustained high inflation.

The incoming president, Donald Trump, has advocated reducing taxes on overtime income, tips, and Social Security benefits, along with diminishing regulations in these domains.

When combined, these Federal Reserve practices can advance progress.

Alongside the threat of imposing various tariffs, President Trump has pledged to execute extensive deportations of migrants, both of which could exacerbate inflation.

Chair Jerome Powell and other Federal Reserve officials have indicated that they cannot assess the potential effects of President-elect Trump’s policies on the economy or their own interest rate decisions until further information is available and the likelihood of the proposed initiatives being enacted becomes clearer.

Consequently, the result of the presidential election has predominantly led to heightened economic uncertainty up to that point.

It seems improbable that the United States would soon experience the advantages of significantly reduced loan interest rates. As of last week, the average rate for a 30-year mortgage was 6.6%, lower than the top rate of 7.8% recorded in October 2023, according to Freddie Mac.

It is quite unlikely that mortgage rates of approximately three percent, which were common for nearly a decade prior to the onset of the pandemic, would be restored in the foreseeable future.

Federal Reserve officials have indicated a deceleration in interest rate reductions as the benchmark rate nears what policymakers designate as a “neutral” rate, a one that provides neither advantages nor disadvantages to the economy.

During a recent meeting, Powell stated, “Inflation is slightly elevated, and growth is unequivocally stronger than we anticipated.” Nevertheless, the positive aspect is that we can afford to use greater caution while we persist in our pursuit of neutrality.

Most other central banks globally are likewise lowering their benchmark interest rates. This week, the European Central Bank lowered its benchmark interest rate for the fourth time this year, from 3.25% to 3%.

This action was taken in reaction to the decline of inflation in the 20 euro-using countries, which has fallen to 2.3% from a peak of 10.6% in late 2022.

SOURCE: AP

SEE ALSO:

Liberal MPs Call on Trudeau to Resign

ABC Gives Donald Trump’s Presidential Library $15 Million To Settle a Defamation Dispute.

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version