Connect with us

U.K News

Kate, Princess Of Wales, Apologizes For Altering Family Photo That Fueled Rumors About Her Health

Published

on

kate

LONDON (AP)— Kate, Princess of Wales, apologized on Monday for “confusion” caused by her alteration of a family photo posted by the palace — an image of Kate and her children that was supposed to alleviate concern and speculation about the British royal’s health but had the opposite effect.

Several news organizations who originally published the photo, including The Associated Press, removed it due to suspicions about digital alteration. The couple’s Kensington Palace staff released the first official portrait of 42-year-old Kate following her stomach surgery nearly two months ago on Sunday in honour of Mother’s Day in the United Kingdom.

The retractions fueled the online rumour mill, which was already rife with speculation about Kate’s surgery and recovery. The public relations calamity demonstrates that the royal family’s long-held mantra — “never complain, never explain” — is hard to follow in today’s social media-driven world.

Kate, Princess Of Wales, Apologizes For Altering Family Photo That Fueled Rumors About Her Health

Kate wrote on social media that “like many amateur photographers, I do occasionally experiment with editing.”

“I wanted to express my apologies for any confusion the family photograph we shared yesterday caused,” the post text read.

The palace has already released various family photos of Kate and the heir to the throne, Prince William, along with their children Prince George, 10, Princess Charlotte, 8, and Prince Louis, 5.

Kensington Palace confirmed that William took the most recent snapshot. Kate wrote on social media, “Thank you for your kind wishes and continued support over the last two months.” I wish everyone a happy Mother’s Day.

While there was no indication that the photo was fabricated, AP retracted it after further investigation discovered that the source had modified the image in a way that did not fit AP’s photo standards. For example, there was an inconsistency in the alignment of Princess Charlotte’s left hand with the sleeve of her sweater.

Other major news organizations, including Getty, Reuters, AFP, and the United Kingdom’s official agency, PA, also removed the photo.

Kensington Palace declined to release the original unedited photos. While Kate’s speech gave some clarification, it was unlikely to quell the rumour mill that had grown during her absence from public duties.

Former BBC royal correspondent Peter Hunt stated that the bungled photo release “is damaging for the royals.”

“They knew there would be intense interest in any picture they released of Kate,” he posted on X, previously known as Twitter. “Their challenge is that people will now question whether they can be trusted and believed when they next issue a health update.”

The royal family is under particular scrutiny because King Charles III has had to cancel public appearances while undergoing treatment for an unidentified type of cancer. The monarch has cancelled all of his public appearances, but he has been photographed walking to church and meeting privately with government officials and dignitaries.

Charles’ relative candour regarding his health was unusual for the often-guarded royal family. However, attention to Kate’s condition has overshadowed it. In the lack of solid evidence, conspiracy theorists have rushed to fill the void.

Kate, Princess Of Wales, Apologizes For Altering Family Photo That Fueled Rumors About Her Health

The photo’s release came after weeks of speculation on social media regarding Kate’s whereabouts since leaving a hospital on Jan. 29 after a nearly two-week stay following scheduled surgery. She had not been seen in public since Christmas Day.

Kate underwent surgery on January 16, and her condition and the cause for the operation have not been divulged. However, Kensington Palace stated that it was not cancer-related.

Although the palace first stated that it would only release substantial updates and that she would not return to royal responsibilities before Easter (March 31 this year), it later issued a statement last month stating that she was doing well.

At the time, royal officials told The Sun newspaper: “We’ve seen the chaos of social media, and it won’t change our tactics. There has been a lot of talk on social media, but the princess has the right to privacy and wants the public to respect that.”

Further suspicions were raised this week when the British military appeared to act prematurely in announcing Kate’s attendance at a June Trooping the Colour ceremony, allegedly without consulting palace officials.

It is up to palace officials, not government ministries, to publicize the royals’ appearances at events. Kensington Palace did not confirm Kate’s attendance at any scheduled public events, and the army later erased any mention of her presence.

On Monday, William, Queen Camilla, and other senior royals attended a Commonwealth Day service at Westminster Abbey. Neither Kate nor the king were scheduled to attend the ceremony, which drew a few dozen anti-monarchist demonstrators waving posters reading “Down with the Crown.”

Kate, Princess Of Wales, Apologizes For Altering Family Photo That Fueled Rumors About Her Health

William was also scheduled to speak at an event for the Earthshot Prize, the environmental competition he founded.

A veteran public relations consultant, Mark Borkowski said the photo mistake revealed a larger PR problem for the monarchy.

“There doesn’t seem to be that much joined-up strategic thinking at the heart of the royal family at the moment, which leads to these problems where it’s a very difficult organization to manage in terms of PR,” he added.

“I find they have risen to the challenge, provided the statement as an explanation,” he added about Kate’s apologies on Monday. “The difficulty, with all the conspiracy ideas floating about, is whether people believe them. And I am not convinced they will.”

SOURCE – (AP)

Kiara Grace is a staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. Her writing focuses on technology trends, particularly in the realm of consumer electronics and software. With a keen eye for detail and a knack for breaking down complex topics. Kiara delivers insightful analyses that resonate with tech enthusiasts and casual readers alike. Her articles strike a balance between in-depth coverage and accessibility, making them a go-to resource for anyone seeking to stay informed about the latest innovations shaping our digital world.

U.K News

Keir Starmer Rejects Meeting With WW2 Veteran Over Her Frozen Pension

Published

on

"It's the injustice of it that is so unfair, the fact that we were never warned."

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has rejected a request from a 99-year-old WW2 for a meeting to discuss the frozen state pension policy for citizens living abroad. Starmer declined the meeting but offered an alternative meeting with Pensions Minister Emma Reynolds.

Anne Puckridge, who turns 100 this month, went from her home in Canada to agitate Keir Starmer’s Labour government over the state pension freeze.

The World War II veteran told the BBC that she is “angry” and “heartbroken” following a meeting with the pensions minister, who led her to believe that the government will not reconsider its policy of freezing the state pensions of some British people living abroad.

Anne Puckridge is one of approximately 453,000 British retirees living overseas who do not receive an annual increase in their state pension.

Pensions Minister Emma Reynolds agreed to a meeting after Sir Keir Starmer’s request to meet was denied owing to purported “pressures on his diary.”

Ms. Puckridge stated that the meeting in Parliament left her feeling “bitterly disappointed” and “disgusted”.

She stated that she had the idea Reynolds had been “polite enough and kind enough to come in and spend her time with her,” but that her mind had already been made up before the meeting began.

Ms Puckridge stated that she and her other campaigners would have to think carefully about what they could do from now on, but she assured them that they would take action.

State Pension Minister Reynolds thanked Ms Puckridge for the meeting and for sharing her insights.

A Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) representative stated that the government recognizes that “people move abroad for various reasons, and we provide clear information on how this can affect their pensions.”

The policy of increasing the UK state pension for recipients living abroad has existed for many years.

Since she relocated to Canada in 2001 at the age of 76 to live closer to her daughter, Ms Puckridge has received £72.50 (C$129.00) per week.

Her state pension is now less than half the £169.50 (C$302.00) paid to seniors still residing in the United Kingdom. She told the BBC that frozen pensions touch all aspects of life.

“You’ve got to be careful about entertainment,” she told me. “You must realize that you cannot be as kind to your grandkids as you would like.

“You feel you’ve lost all sense of dignity, the government has thrown you away, you know, out of sight out of mind.”

Ms. Puckridge stated that when she alerted the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) that she was moving to Canada, “they never said a word about [my] pension being frozen”.

“The first I knew about it was when my first rise was due,” she recalled.

“I didn’t understand it. So I wrote and enquired about it, and I was told no… you will not receive any additional pension rises when you leave the UK.” She said, “It’s the injustice of it that is so unfair, the fact that we were never warned.”

Related News:

Paris Trash Strike Ends, Pension Protest Numbers Shrink

 

 

 

Continue Reading

U.K News

Air Force Drones Spotted Over UK Military Bases

Published

on

The drones were not considered hostile, the USAF said,

British military expertise has been brought in to assist in identifying persons responsible for flying Air Force drones near US military locations. According to the BBC, 60 RAF troops have been dispatched to assist the US Air Force with its probe.

The Air Force drones were not deemed hostile, according to the USAF, who added that the sightings “fluctuated and varied between the bases” and “ranged in sizes and configurations”.

According to the Ministry of Defence, “We are supporting the US Air Force response.”

The announcement follows several recent reports of unmanned aerial vehicles sighted near RAF Lakenheath and RAF Mildenhall in Suffolk and RAF Feltwell in adjacent Norfolk.

There have been other reports of drone activity overnight. According to the USAF, the vehicles were few in number and modest in size.

A representative for the US Air Forces in Europe stated, “We can confirm that there were sightings yesterday during nighttime hours, but the number fluctuated and varied between the bases throughout the night.”

The official stated that since the first sightings on November 20th, there has been “no impact on residents or infrastructure, and they have not been identified as hostile.”

However, the Air Force drones remained under surveillance “to ensure the safety and security of the installations.”

They said, “We request individuals in the area to contact either local police or security forces if they see anything suspicious.”

Treat threats seriously’

Officials in the United States and the United Kingdom have not said who is responsible for the recent drone activity.

However, the BBC understands there were worries that a state actor could be involved.

In recent months, intelligence officials have warned of increasing Russian sabotage operations against Western countries supporting Ukraine.

RAF Mildenhall is primarily home to the USAF’s 100th Air Refuelling Wing; RAF Lakenheath is home to USAF F-35A and F-15E fighter jets; and RAF Feltwell is mainly concerned with logistics and provides housing for military personnel.

A spokesman for the MoD, which owns the bases, said: “We take threats seriously and maintain robust measures at defence sites.

“We are supporting the US Air Force response.”

The USAF has not said who it believed to be behind the incidents.

Related News:

US Military Shoots Down Missiles And Drones

US Military Shoots Down Missiles And Drones As It Faces Growing Threats In Volatile Middle East

Continue Reading

U.K News

General Election Petition in UK Hits 2 Million Signatures

Published

on

Starmer has ruled out an general election after a petition reached two million signatures

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has ruled out holding an early general election after a petition calling for a second vote garnered two million signatures.

Over the weekend, a petition calling for another general election was started on the UK Parliament website. It cited Starmer’s failure to keep all his pledges made in the run-up to the previous election. By Monday mid-morning, it had surpassed two million signatures.

When asked about the petition, Starmer said he was “not surprised” that some individuals who did not vote for Labour in the previous election want a “re-run” of the poll.

He claimed that he had “inherited a lot of problems” from the previous administration and had resolved to “take the hard decisions first.”

Starmer ruled out an early general election, stating that only the Prime Minister can request that the King call a general election; it simply will not happen, he said.

This petition, started last week and sponsored by Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, calls on the government to schedule a new general election.
To sign a petition, you must verify that you are a British citizen or resident and provide a postcode.

The petition states, “I would prefer there to be another general election. I believe the present Labour government has broken the pledges they made before the last election.”

The petition comes only five months after Labour won the July general election with 9.7 million votes and 412 seats in the House of Commons.

However, the Labour Party garnered only 35% of the vote, the lowest percentage gained by a single-party administration since the conclusion of WWII.

Some of the policies implemented by Starmer and his Labour government have received significant criticism, including an inheritance tax on farms, a reduction in winter heating payments, an increase in employers’ national insurance, and applying VAT to private school fees.

According to the most recent Ipsos political pulse poll, the Labour Party is unpopular, with 28% of the public favoring it and 49% opposing it.

Related News:

Hamas Calls for Peace After Trump Wins General Election

Hamas Calls for Peace After Trump Wins Election

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version