South Korea was grieving Monday from the deaths of 179 people when a Jeju Air plane crashed and burst into flames, with a team of US investigators joining local officials to investigate possible causes.

The Boeing 737-800 was carrying 181 people from Thailand to South Korea when it crashed on arrival Sunday, killing everyone on board except two flight attendants rescued from the mangled wreckage of South Korea’s worst aviation catastrophe.

According to fire officials, a bird attack was most likely the cause of the disaster, which hurled passengers from the plane and left it “almost completely destroyed”.

The video showed Jeju Air, Boeing 737-800 Flight 2216, landing on its belly at Muan International Airport. It then slipped off the runway as smoke poured from the engines. The aircraft collided with a wall and erupted in flames.

On Sunday, the US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) announced that it would lead a team of investigators, including those from Boeing and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), to South Korea to investigate the Jeju Air disaster. The country has a strong track record in terms of air safety.

The Jeju Air  Boeing 737-800’s black boxes, the flight data recorder and the cockpit voice recorder were discovered.

Jeju Air Attendant Survies

According to Yonhap, one of the flight attendants who survived was awake in the hospital and able to talk late Sunday.

“When I woke up, I had already been rescued,” the 33-year-old informed physicians, according to the hospital. He suffered many fractures, while the other crew member, a 25-year-old woman, sustained ankle and head injuries, according to Yonhap.

Grieving family members gathered to await news inside the airport terminal late Sunday. Authorities said they were seeking to identify all victims.

The control tower warned of a bird hit minutes before the disaster, and the pilot quickly submitted a “mayday” distress call.

Officials refuted claims that the length of the runway may have played a role in the tragedy despite video footage showing the plane coming off the runway and hitting a wall.

According to a South Korean transport official, the plane attempted to land but was ordered to hold off after air traffic control issued a warning for a bird strike. This warning alerts pilots to the possibility of colliding with birds.

About two minutes later, the pilot issued a Mayday, and air traffic control approved the plane’s landing from the opposite direction, according to the official.

One video shows the jet landing without its wheels or other landing gear. It skidded down the runway, collided with a wall, and burst into flames.

More than 1,500 emergency workers, including 490 firefighters and 455 police officers, have been dispatched to assist with the recovery activities. They’ve been combing the area around the runway for plane components and passengers.

Related News:

Air Canada Dash 8-400 Crash Lands in Halifax, Nova Scotia

(VOR News) – According to a survey that was conducted not so long ago, more than half of the Financial Resolutions people living in the United States are considering making financial resolutions for the new year.

When inflation is a large role, this is because holiday spending leaves little money in wallets. This is especially true during times when inflation is a significant factor.

All of us are familiar with the traditional resolutions that people make for the New Year, such as increasing the amount of time spent exercising and making improvements to one’s diet.

They are, however, reevaluating the significance of those resolutions in this day and age, when rising costs are at the forefront of the minds of a great number of people.

With regard to the outcomes of the 2025 Financial Resolutions Study that was carried out by Fidelity Investments, it was discovered that over sixty-five percent of the individuals who took part in the study said that they are considering making Financial Resolutions for the New Year.

The findings of the study show that the year 2025 is expected to be the year of “living practically.” This is one of the most significant discoveries.

When compared to the previous year, the majority of Americans who have taken the decision to save more money are more concerned with short-term savings goals in the future year (55% versus 45%). This figure represents a significant increase from the previous year.

In comparison to the prior year, this is a change. Unanticipated costs are at the top of the list of individuals who are anxious about their Financial Resolutions situation for the coming year, and a whopping 79% of those who participated in the poll revealed that they aim to raise the amount of money they have set aside for situations that require immediate attention.

Issues that are at the top of the list for the year 2025 include:

Expenses that weren’t expected to arise

The effect that inflation has on daily savings and expenditure levels

Uncertainty about the economy and the impending recession

Most people who create goals for themselves claim to have a plan in place that will help them achieve their objectives. They replied that it would benefit them in the long run to have a goal that is both attainable and easy to sustain, with small benchmarks to help them along the way. Those who had failed to meet their financial objectives in the past year brought this up.

According to the survey’s results, younger generations are more inclined to make financial decisions and think they are more likely to be in a better financial position than earlier generations.

The vast majority of Americans believe that their financial situation will improve during the next 12 months. They state that the two main factors they mention as being significant are living a life free of obligations and feeling more at ease.

The Ohio Department of Commerce’s Division of Financial Institutions (DFI) recommends the following financial resolutions be put into effect.

These financial resolutions are as follows:

Put some additional money aside for your retirement income.

The goal is to improve your credit score.

Establish a reserve fund to cover any unforeseen costs.

A debt management strategy that is successful

Making a budget with your own money is a good idea.

Some examples of the kinds of security measures that, according to DFI, are effective ways to secure the money that you have worked so hard to acquire include changing your passwords and enabling two-step verification. Both of these are instances of security measures

SOURCE: WKBN

SEE ALSO:

Revolver News Carves Out a Distinctive Space for Itself

The Federal Reserve Was Sued By Big Banks Over Annual Stress Tests.

(VOR News) – The transition team led by Donald Trump is reportedly planning to remove the United States from the World Health Organization (WHO) on the first day of the next government, according to experts.

This would have a “catastrophic” impact on people’s health all throughout the world, these experts warn.

On January 20, the day the president-elect becomes office, these individuals want to announce their desire to depart the global health agency, Donald Trump’s team members informed analysts.

If the World Health Organization were to depart, it would lose its most significant source of funding, which would hinder its ability to respond to public health emergencies such as the Coronavirus pandemic.

Donald Trump’s leadership and funding for global health are noteworthy.

The United States of America is most likely to leave a significant void. According to Georgetown Law professor of global health Lawrence Gostin, “I see no one that is going to fill the breach.” He went on to say that the withdrawal “on day one” will have “catastrophic” effects on people’s health all around the world.

Trump’s nomination of several allies, including vaccine skeptic Robert F. Kennedy, for important health positions in the incoming government has led to a disagreement over US relations with the World Health Organization (WHO). Nevertheless, Gostin expressed doubt that Donald Trump would prioritize a prompt withdrawal as much as some of his colleagues.

The United States of America was the largest single donor to the World Health Organization (WHO), accounting for almost 16 percent of its funding in fiscal years 2022–2023.

In 2020, President Donald Trump began the process of disbanding the World Health Organization (WHO) after accusing it of being under Chinese control.

However, the process has never been completed, and his vice presidential replacement, Joe Biden, resumed relations with the agency on the first day of his administration in 2021.

Experts have seen that after initiating the process immediately, some Donald Trump administration officials are keen to proceed much more quickly this time.

Ashish Jha, a former White House Covid response coordinator for Biden and the director of Brown University’s school of public health, stated that the transition team wanted Donald Trump to withdraw on the first day because to the “symbolism” of reversing Biden’s own inauguration-day decision.

He remarked, “Many individuals within the administration’s inner circle lack trust in the WHO and wish to symbolically demonstrate their disassociation from it on the first day.”

“If you do not actively participate in these Donald Trump institutions.

You will not be able to respond quickly when the next outbreak happens,” he stated. Gostin predicted “very lean years for the WHO,” which would mean the organization would have to substantially cut back on its scientific workforce and struggle to respond to health emergencies.

If the United States withdrew, he said, European countries would likely not increase their contributions to the World Health Organization (WHO), and China might try to strengthen its influence. He claimed that since leaving would give China more authority, it would not be a smart move.

Questions concerning the possible withdrawal were not immediately answered by the Donald Trump transition team. “Is this the same WHO we left in place for the initial administration?” a person familiar with the arrangements told the Financial Times. Right now, we don’t appear to care all that much about what they have to say.

There was no response from the World Health Organization. The group’s director-general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, called it a “unique organization” earlier this month and said it aimed to collaborate with U.S. officials.

He continued, “From our end, we are prepared to collaborate with one another.” “I believe that the leaders of the United States of America are aware of the fact that the United States cannot be safe unless the rest of the world is safe.

SOURCE: FT

SEE ALSO:

The IRS Will Give a Million People Up To $1,400. Their Identity—And Why Now?

King Charles Could Millions Annually from Renting His Properties