News
Donald Trump Falsely Suggests Kamala Harris Misled Voters About Her Race
CHICAGO — Donald Trump erroneously claimed Kamala Harris deceived voters about her race during an interview with the National Association of Black Journalists in Chicago on Wednesday, which rapidly turned confrontational.
The Republican former president falsely claimed that Harris, the first Black woman and Asian American to serve as Vice President, had previously solely highlighted her Indian origin.
“I didn’t realise she was Black until a few years back, when she happened to turn Black and now wants to be known as such. So, I’m not sure, is she Indian or Black?” Trump said this when speaking at the group’s annual convention.
Donald Trump Falsely Suggests Kamala Harris Misled Voters About Her Race
Harris is the daughter of a Jamaican father and an Indian mother who both immigrated to the United States. Harris was an undergraduate at Howard University, one of the nation’s most notable historically Black schools and universities, when she pledged the historically Black sorority Alpha Kappa Alpha. As a senator in the United States, Harris was a member of the Congressional Black Caucus, which advocated for legislation to improve voting rights and police reform.
Trump has slammed Harris since she replaced President Joe Biden as the presumptive Democratic nominee last week. Throughout his political career, the former president has consistently questioned the backgrounds of racial minority candidates.
Michael Tyler, Harris’ campaign’s communications director, said in a statement that “the hostility Donald Trump showed on stage today is the same hostility he has shown throughout his life, his term in office, and his campaign for president as he seeks to regain power.”
“Trump lobbed personal attacks and insults at Black journalists the same way he did throughout his presidency — while he failed Black families and left the entire country digging out of the ditch he left us in,” Tyler told the crowd. “Donald Trump has already demonstrated that he cannot unify America, so he seeks to divide us.
When asked about Trump’s statements during a news briefing on Wednesday, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre expressed disbelief and said, “Wow.”
Jean-Pierre, a Black man, termed Trump’s remarks “repulsive” and said, “It’s insulting, and no one has any right to tell someone who they are, how they identify.”
Trump has routinely targeted his opponents and detractors based on race. He rose to notoriety in Republican politics by spreading false information that President Barack Obama, the country’s first black president, was not born in the United States. “Birtherism,” as it came to be known, was only the beginning of Trump’s history of doubting Black politicians’ credentials and qualifications.
He has disputed claims of racism. And, after Biden chose Harris as his running mate four years ago, a Trump campaign official used a previous Trump political contribution to Harris as proof that he was not racist.
“The president, as a private businessman, donated to candidates from all sides,” spokesperson Katrina Pierson told reporters. “And I’ll note that Kamala Harris is a Black woman and he donated to her campaign, so I hope we can squash this racism argument now,” Pierson told the crowd.
During this year’s Republican campaign, he once referred to former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley, the daughter of Indian immigrants, as “Nimbra.”
Later Wednesday, Trump did not repeat his critique of Harris’ race at a campaign rally in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, despite calling her “phoney” and claiming she has been attempting to modify her image. He also regularly mispronounces her first name.
“If she becomes your president, our country is finished,” Trump claimed.
Before he entered the stage, Trump’s crew showed what appeared to be years-old news stories proclaiming Harris as the “first Indian-American senator” on the arena’s large screen.
Trump’s appearance Wednesday at the annual gathering of Black journalists quickly became heated, with the former president sparring with ABC News interviewer Rachel Scott, accusing her of giving him a “very rude introduction” with a tough first question about his past criticism of Black people and Black journalists, his attack on Black prosecutors who have pursued cases against him, and the dinner he had with a white supremacist at his Florida club.
“I think it’s disgraceful,” Trump stated. “I arrived here with a nice spirit. I adore the Black population in our country. I’ve done so much for the Black population in this country.”
Despite his earlier agreement with the Biden campaign, Trump continued to criticise Scott’s network, ABC News, suggesting that it should not hold the next presidential debate. He also branded her tone and questioning as “nasty,” a phrase he has previously used to criticize women such as Hillary Clinton and Meghan the Duchess of Sussex.
The Republican also repeated his bogus accusation that undocumented immigrants are “taking Black jobs.” When pressed by Scott on what constitutes a “Black job,” Trump said, “A Black job is anybody that has a job,” eliciting gasps from the audience.
He once claimed, “I have been the best president for the Black population since Abraham Lincoln.”
The audience replied with a combination of boos and applause.
Scott questioned Trump about his promise to pardon people convicted of their roles in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the United States Capitol, including whether he would pardon those who assaulted police officers.
“Oh, absolutely, I would,” Trump responded, “If they’re innocent, I would pardon them.”
Scott pointed out that they had been convicted and thus were not innocent.
“Well, they were convicted by a very, very tough system,” he informed me.
Defending his followers who entered the Capitol on Jan. 6, he added, “Nothing is perfect in life.”
He contrasted the 2021 uprising to protests in Minneapolis and other places in 2020 following the death of George Floyd by Minneapolis police, as well as more recent rallies at the Capitol last week by people opposed to the war in Gaza. Trump erroneously claimed that no one was arrested during the previous demonstrations and that only his followers were targeted.
As Trump made the connection, a man in the back of the room exclaimed, “Sir, do you have no shame?”
The previous president’s offer to address the organisation caused a heated internal disagreement among NABJ members, which erupted online. During election years, organizations for journalists of color frequently ask presidential candidates to speak at their summer events.
As he campaigns for the presidency for the third time, Trump has pushed to appear outside of his typical support base, and his campaign has emphasized his efforts to win over Black Americans, who have historically been Democrats’ most loyal voting demographic.
Donald Trump Falsely Suggests Kamala Harris Misled Voters About Her Race
His campaign has emphasised economic and immigration messaging as part of his appeal, but some of his outreach has relied on racial stereotypes, such as the notion that African Americans would sympathise with the criminal accusations he has faced and his sale of branded trainers.
Trump and the National Association of Black Journalists have also had a contentious relationship regarding his treatment of Black female journalists. In 2018, the National Association of Black Journalists slammed Trump for regularly referring to Black women journalists as “stupid,” “losers,” and “nasty.”
The vice president is not slated to attend the convention, but NABJ said in a statement posted on X that it was in discussions with her campaign about having her speak online or in person for a chat in September.
Harris responded briefly to Trump’s remarks Wednesday night while speaking to Sigma Gamma Rho, a historically Black sorority in Houston.
“It was the same old show,” she explained. “The divisiveness and the disrespect.”
Harris went further: “And let me just say, the American people deserve better.”
SOURCE | AP
News
Man Creates Candy Cane Car to Spread Christmas Cheer
In a delightful display of holiday spirit, a local resident in North Providence, Maine, has transformed his vehicle into a candy cane delight that is capturing hearts and spreading Christmas Cheer.
Over the past 15 years, Dave Clayman has transformed a simple 1991 Toyota Camry into a rolling holiday icon that captivates everyone who encounters it.
It’s wrapped in $3,000 worth of reflective tape, the same kind used on trailer trucks. Whether parked at a mall or cruising down the highway, you can’t miss it with its candy cane decorations.
This whimsical project started with an unusual idea. When an old exercise bike landed in Clayman’s possession, he mounted it on top of his car instead of letting it gather dust in his garage.
“There’s nothing like working out in the fresh air,” Dave said. That quirky addition quickly drew eyes, inspiring him to keep going.
The car features homemade rockets built from trash cans and salad bowls, candy cane-themed hubcaps, and candy cane lights dangling from the mounted exercise bike.
The Candy Cane Car cost Clayman $3,000
To top it off, it boasts a PA system and a custom horn, making it a true sensory experience.
The candy cane car has now become a local landmark every Christmas. Parked outside Clayman’s house, it’s a favourite backdrop for people snapping photos or simply stopping to admire it.
Some visitors even share stories of seeing the car as a child, reminiscing about how it’s been a beloved part of their neighbourhood for years.
“When people see it, their mood amplifies,” Clayman explained. “If they’re happy, they become happier. If they’re upset, well, they sometimes get angrier.” But for the most part, he estimates that over 96% of people love the festive car, particularly around Christmas.
Clayman said he used to wear a Santa costume when riding in his festive car for years. A few years ago, he bought a Grinch costume and never looked back.
“It’s like a state of euphoria. Every time I get behind the wheel and people see it,” he said. “Anything that people are in a better mood, it seems to make you in a better mood. It’s a labor of love you got to be committed to it.”
Related News:
Costco Is Offering The Peloton Bike+ At 300 Locations This Holiday Season.
News
Senate Approves Social Security Fairness Act, Heads to Final Vote
(VOR News) – On Wednesday, the United States Senate Social Security passed a measure with a vote of 73-27, indicating that the legislation, which is co-sponsored by Senator Susan Collins of Maine, is likely to be implemented before the end of the year.
The law may be beneficial to personnel working in the public sector in Maine, including teachers, firefighters, and other workers.
The Social Security Fairness Act would repeal two restrictions that lower the amount of Social Security payments paid to public employees.
These regulations would be eliminated with the passage of the act. A provision known as the Windfall Elimination Provision makes it impossible for public employees who are currently receiving pensions to continue receiving them.
The Government Pension Offset, as it is commonly referred to, is designed to limit the amount of money that can be paid to the surviving spouses of recipients who are also receiving government pensions.
This problematic situation impacts Social Security benefits.”
In November 2024, the Social Security Administration reported that more than 2 million individuals, including more than 20,000 in the state of Maine, had their Social Security benefits reduced as a result of the Windfall Elimination Provision,” Collins stated in a statement that was released by her department.
In November 2024, the Government Pension Offset had an impact on more than 650,000 individuals, with more than 6,000 of those individuals residing in the state of Maine, according to the previously mentioned line of reasoning.
A vote of 327 to 75 was necessary for the measure to be approved by the House of Representatives the previous month. On Wednesday, Chuck Schumer, the Democratic leader of the Senate, announced that he intended to work rapidly in order to deliver the act from the House of Representatives to the president’s desk.
As indicated by Schumer, who was speaking on the floor of the United States Senate today, “Passing this Social Security fix right before Christmas would be a great gift for our retired firefighters, police officers, postal workers, teachers, and others who have contributed to Social Security for years but are now being penalised because of their time spent serving the public.”
In the beginning, the measure was supported by two individuals: Sherrod Brown, a Democrat from Ohio, and Collins, a Republican. During her speech in support of the proposal, which was made on the floor of the Senate on Wednesday afternoon, Collins stated that the idea will have a significant impact on a number of individuals, including teachers in the state of Maine.
These advantages are the direct result of the effort that they put forth. During the course of her remarks, Collins asserted that the punishment in question was both unreasonable and unacceptable.
This will strain Social Security’s already shaky budget.
In a recent examination, it was discovered that the Windfall Elimination Provision was one of the primary problems that contributed to the difficulties that the teacher workforce in Maine is experiencing, which experts are referring to as a crisis.
A poll that was conducted and released by the non-profit organisation Educate Maine found that teachers in each and every county in the state of Maine identified the provision as a hindering factor in the process of recruiting new teachers.
According to the findings of the study, “this federal policy that reduces social security payouts is a disincentive,” which implies that it is detrimental to teachers who take on additional work and discourages people from switching careers in order to become teachers.
Sharon Gallant, a retired educator who worked in Gardiner for a total of 31 years, is one of the educators that are now employed there. Prior to beginning his career as a teacher in the public school system, Gallant was employed in the business sector. He made a little contribution to the Social Security system during the entirety of this time period.
“When you move into public education, you are faced with a certain degree of punishment,” according to her statement.
In letters that Gallant sent to Collins and to Sen. Angus King of Maine, who is an independent, he urged both of them to support the concept. She stated that even if it is unsuccessful, Maine will still have a difficult time recruiting teachers because of the clause that deters them from employment.
She made the observation, “If this does not pass, then it is just another reason not to enter public service.”
SOURCE: FR
SEE ALSO:
The Federal Reserve Will Drop Key Rates, But Consumers May Not Gain Immediately.
News
The Federal Reserve Will Drop Key Rates, But Consumers May Not Gain Immediately.
(VOR News) – If the Federal Reserve indicates on Wednesday that interest rate reductions will proceed more gradually next year than in recent months, the United States may experience only slight alleviation from the persistently elevated costs of borrowing for credit cards, auto loans, and mortgages.
The Federal Reserve is set to announce a quarter-point reduction in its benchmark rate, anticipated to decrease from around 4.6% to approximately 4.3%.
This represents the latest action undertaken, subsequent to a quarter-point cut in interest rates in November and a larger-than-usual half-point reduction in September.
The Wednesday meeting may mark a new era for the Federal Reserve.
The Federal Reserve is more inclined to adjust its monetary policy at alternate meetings, rather than at each meeting. The central bank policymakers may announce that they now expect to reduce their primary rate only two or three times in 2025, instead of the four reductions previously planned three months ago.
The Federal Reserve has utilised the rationale of a “recalibration” of ultra-high interest rates, originally aimed at curbing inflation that peaked at a four-decade high in 2022, to defend its measures thus far.
A considerable number of Federal Reserve officials contend that interest rates should not remain as elevated as they currently are, given the substantial decline in inflation. The Federal Reserve’s chosen index shows that inflation was 2.3% in October, a notable decline from the peak of 7.2% in June 2022.
Conversely, despite the swift economic growth, inflation has consistently exceeded the Federal Reserve’s 2% target for several months. The monthly retail sales statistics released by the government on Tuesday reveals that Americans, especially those with higher incomes, are inclined to spend liberally.
These trends, as per the views of several economists, suggest that further rate decreases could unduly stimulate the economy, perhaps leading to sustained high inflation.
The incoming president, Donald Trump, has advocated reducing taxes on overtime income, tips, and Social Security benefits, along with diminishing regulations in these domains.
When combined, these Federal Reserve practices can advance progress.
Alongside the threat of imposing various tariffs, President Trump has pledged to execute extensive deportations of migrants, both of which could exacerbate inflation.
Chair Jerome Powell and other Federal Reserve officials have indicated that they cannot assess the potential effects of President-elect Trump’s policies on the economy or their own interest rate decisions until further information is available and the likelihood of the proposed initiatives being enacted becomes clearer.
Consequently, the result of the presidential election has predominantly led to heightened economic uncertainty up to that point.
It seems improbable that the United States would soon experience the advantages of significantly reduced loan interest rates. As of last week, the average rate for a 30-year mortgage was 6.6%, lower than the top rate of 7.8% recorded in October 2023, according to Freddie Mac.
It is quite unlikely that mortgage rates of approximately three percent, which were common for nearly a decade prior to the onset of the pandemic, would be restored in the foreseeable future.
Federal Reserve officials have indicated a deceleration in interest rate reductions as the benchmark rate nears what policymakers designate as a “neutral” rate, a one that provides neither advantages nor disadvantages to the economy.
During a recent meeting, Powell stated, “Inflation is slightly elevated, and growth is unequivocally stronger than we anticipated.” Nevertheless, the positive aspect is that we can afford to use greater caution while we persist in our pursuit of neutrality.
Most other central banks globally are likewise lowering their benchmark interest rates. This week, the European Central Bank lowered its benchmark interest rate for the fourth time this year, from 3.25% to 3%.
This action was taken in reaction to the decline of inflation in the 20 euro-using countries, which has fallen to 2.3% from a peak of 10.6% in late 2022.
SOURCE: AP
SEE ALSO:
Liberal MPs Call on Trudeau to Resign
ABC Gives Donald Trump’s Presidential Library $15 Million To Settle a Defamation Dispute.
-
Politics3 weeks ago
Miller Expects 4.9 Million Foreigners to Leave Canada Voluntarily
-
News3 weeks ago
Nolinor Boeing 737 Crash Lands in Montreal
-
News2 weeks ago
“Shocking Video” Vancouver Police Shoot Armed Suspect 10 Times
-
Tech3 weeks ago
Increasing its Stake in OpenAI by $1.5 Billion is a Possibility for SoftBank.
-
News4 weeks ago
Facebook Securities Fraud Case Dropped
-
Health4 weeks ago
A Canadian Teenager’s Bird Flu Virus Has Mutations