Business
Songs By Taylor Swift, Drake And More Are Starting To Disappear From TikTok. Here’s Why
NEW YORK — TikTok may appear (or sound) slightly different as you continue to scroll through the app.
Universal Music Group, representing big-name artists such as Taylor Swift, Bad Bunny, and Drake, announced earlier this week that it would no longer allow its music to be played on the app after a licencing agreement between the two firms expired on Wednesday.
Owned by ByteDance, has verified to The Associated Press that the removal of UMG-related music has begun. As of early Thursday, many popular songs have disappeared from the social media platform’s catalogue.
Songs By Taylor Swift, Drake And More Are Starting To Disappear From TikTok. Here’s Why
Removing UMG-licensed music will likely take a few days, but hardcore TikTokers are already witnessing the results. Here’s an overview of where things stand.
What music is being removed from TikTok?
The songs being withdrawn from TikTok are those licenced by UMG, which has a massive reach across the music industry and, as a result, our current digital diet.
“Universal Music Group is literally the largest record label… in the history of the music industry,” stated Andrew Mall, an associate professor of music at Northeastern University. He stated that an “uncountable number of tracks and sounds” would impact TikTok, severely reducing creator possibilities.
TikTok users who signed up on Thursday will see that they can no longer search for many popular songs, including those by Ariana Grande, Justin Bieber, Billie Eilish, and others, under the “sounds” button.
Users will no longer be able to add these songs to the next dance craze or other trending material, and previous videos using UMG-licensed music will be removed. According to a UMG spokeswoman, TikTok will determine whether these existing films are muted or removed outright.
Songs By Taylor Swift, Drake And More Are Starting To Disappear From TikTok. Here’s Why
Artists can also not share the audio of their UMG-licensed songs on TikTok. If UMG licences the music, it should be muted, according to the representative, who added that the business will safeguard its copyrights.
According to a person familiar with the situation, UMG’s representation of an artist’s tracks may also have an impact on their tour videos. This becomes more problematic if there are numerous songwriters, as it may affect recordings from other labels, according to the person.
Again, total eradication is likely to be a process. TikTok users may still be able to access some UMG music on Thursday, for example, and existing videos may take several days to be muted or removed.
How did we get here?
The licensing deal between UMG and TikTok expired after the two businesses could not reach a new agreement, prompting heated confrontations.
In a statement to artists and songwriters on Tuesday, UMG stated that it has pressed TikTok on three issues: “appropriate compensation for our artists and songwriters, protecting human artists from the harmful effects of AI, and online safety for TikTok’s users.”
Songs By Taylor Swift, Drake And More Are Starting To Disappear From TikTok. Here’s Why
UMG stated that TikTok suggested paying its artists and songwriters at a fraction of the rate other major social platforms paid and that TikTok accounts for just approximately 1% of its total revenue. The music giant also criticised TikTok’s promotion of AI song creation, which UMG claims endangers human musicians, as well as the platform’s history of hate speech, intolerance, bullying, and harassment.
TikTok responded to UMG’s concerns, stating that it has negotiated “artist-first” agreements with every label and publisher.
“It is sad and disappointing that Universal Music Group has put their own greed above the interests of their artists and songwriters,” the founder of TikTok remarked.
WILL IT LAST?
Despite the expiration of the licencing agreement, observers note that UMG and TikTok are still in the midst of negotiations, which are unlikely to last forever.
“We have watched this movie before. “It’s a wonderful, theatrical standoff between two major corporations… who want to assert their authority on the landscape,” said Ted Cockle, former head of UMG’s Virgin EMI Records and current music advisory firm Mussel Music Management.
Users will most certainly find methods to cope in the meantime, according to Cockle, but he and others doubt that such a standoff would last long, pointing out that cooperation between UMG and TikTok benefits both parties greatly. According to Mall, gaps in other licencing agreements in the twenty-first century’s digital era have often lasted only a day to a few months.
There will likely be additional pressure from TikTok producers, artists, and fans.
“This is a platform that’s really important for artists,” said Alexandra J. Roberts, a Northeastern University law and media professor. “It may not have a significant impact on established musicians, but others will lose cash streams. And I believe we will see frustrated fans, correct? Users who don’t understand or are enraged by the fact that they can’t utilise, access, or interact with some artists’ work.”
Representatives for numerous UMG-licensed artists, including Taylor Swift, Bad Bunny, SZA, Drake, Ariana Grande, and Billie Eilish, did not immediately respond to The Associated Press’s requests for comment.
Mall emphasised the repercussions of removing music from social media platforms such as TikTok, especially for emerging musicians. In this case, UMG and its established major musicians will probably perform “just fine,” he claimed, but “smaller labels, smaller artists (couldn’t) afford to do something like this.”
Content writers and marketing gurus are already planning to pivot as needed. Jessica Henig, founder and CEO of music marketing business Unlocked Branding, which works on campaigns with UMG-licensed music, said it could be better, but her team has become accustomed to dealing with delays in the social media scene.
Still, Henig, who previously led influencer marketing at Virgin EMI, believes time will tell.
“If this is going to be a longevity thing, then we might have a different conversation,” she told me.
SOURCE – (AP)
Business
Canadian Port Workers Back Trudeau Government Into a Corner
Business groups are urging Justin Trudeau’s government to stop labor unrest at Canada’s main ports, as it did with railways in August, to avoid supply chain disruptions.
Hundreds of dock foremen in British Columbia ports have been on strike for a week. On Sunday, employers at Montreal’s port locked out 1,200 unionized workers after they rejected a contract offer that promised a 20% salary raise over six years.
Businesses report that the work disruptions are harming ports that handle approximately C$1.2 billion ($860 million) of products daily. They want Labor Minister Steven MacKinnon to refer the case to the Canada Industrial Relations Board, which can send the parties to arbitration to settle the disagreement.
He used that technique over two months ago to halt labor stoppages at Canada’s two main railways. However, the government’s use has sparked resentment among some unions.
The Teamsters Canada Rail Conference has filed a court challenge, claiming that the government’s actions in the railway conflict set a dangerous precedent by breaching workers’ constitutional rights.
Soon after, the pro-union New Democratic Party ripped up a legislative arrangement in which it committed to vote with Trudeau’s Liberals to advance critical legislation.
It’s unclear whether the government currently has enough support to enact a back-to-work law, which would be required to end the port issue.
According to Michel Murray, a Montreal Longshoremen’s Union representative, the port employers “act as bullies,” and refusing to talk indicates that “they clearly want the federal government to intervene.”
“Nearly C$6 billion worth of goods are expected to arrive at the port over the next two weeks,” Michel Leblanc, CEO of the Chamber of Commerce of Metropolitan Montreal, said in a statement. “The urgency is real.”
Goldy Hyder, CEO of the Business Council of Canada, stated that the conflicts “continue to weaken Canada’s economy and tarnish its reputation as a reliable trading partner.”
“Canada’s ports will continue to lose market share if the country’s reputation for labor instability is not corrected soon,” Hyder wrote in a letter to MacKinnon and Transport Minister Anita Anand on November 9.
According to a group of port employers, the Montreal offer would have increased the average dockworker’s pay by more than C$200,000 annually.
Related News:
A Trump Presidency Spells Disaster for Trudeau
Business
Amazon Says a Hacker Breached MOVEIT, Stealing Employee Data. Employee data.
(VOR News) – Amazon has verified that employee data was stolen to the extent that it was compromised as a result of a “security event” that took place at a third-party vendor. The event brought about the compromise of data.
According to a statement that was provided to TechCrunch on Monday, the information that pertains to Amazon employees was revealed as a result of a data breach. This information related to Amazon employees was disclosed.
Amazon spokesman Adam Montgomery issued the statement.
When it comes to Amazon’s or Amazon Web Services (AWS) systems, there have been no security breaches that have taken place, and we have not encountered any security problems. An incident that occurred at one of our property management providers and included security was brought to our attention over the course of the investigation.
This problem had an effect on a number of the company’s customers, including Amazon, and we were informed about it. Other customers were also affected. Montgomery asserts that the only information that was disclosed was that of the work contact information of Amazon workers. As far as Montgomery is concerned, there was no further breach of security.
Among the things that were listed in this category were things like work email addresses, desk phone numbers, and the locations of buildings.
The number of employees who were affected by the security vulnerability has not been acknowledged by Amazon, nor has the total number of employees who were affected been released.
Additionally, it was stated that the third-party vendor, which was not named, does not have access to sensitive data such as Social Security numbers or financial information. This information was described as being kept confidential. The information in question was not made public. The vendor has reportedly fixed the security flaw that was responsible for the data breach that took place, according to reports that were received.
Hackers said they posted Amazon data on Breach Forums. It has been determined that the information in question is accurate as a consequence of this declaration. Additionally, the individual alleges that they have more than 2.8 million lines of data, which they allege was stolen during the mass-exploitation of MOVEit Transfer that took place the previous year.
Using the alias “Nam3L3ss,” the threat actor claims that they have disclosed information that was purportedly taken from twenty-five big corporations, as indicated in a study that was carried out by the cybersecurity company Hudson Rock. The analysis was done by Hudson Rock.
The assumption that the threat actor makes is that “the data that you have seen up to this point is less than .001% of the total data that I possess.”
This is the Amazon assertion that they make.
The public will have access to one thousand releases that have never been seen before in the history of record releases. The journal TechCrunch has attempted to get in touch with the other firms that were identified by the threat actor; however, the magazine has not yet received any additional responses to the inquiries that it has made.
It was the MOVEit breach, which took place in 2023, that was the most catastrophic breach that ever took place. The file-transfer software that was developed by Progress Software was vulnerable to a zero-day vulnerability, which allowed attackers to take advantage of the weakness and cause this breach.
More than one thousand businesses were impacted by these incursions, and it is believed that the notorious Clop ransomware and extortion ring was responsible for them. Through the utilization of ransomware, hacks were successfully carried out.
Not only did the data breach affect the Oregon Department of Transportation, which had 3.5 million pieces of information stolen, but it also affected the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing, which had four million pieces of information stolen, and Maximus, which is a giant in the United States government services contracting market, which had 11 million pieces of information stolen.
SOURCE: TC
SEE ALSO:
Bitcoin Goes Over $80,000 As Buyers Guess Whether Trump Will Run For President.
Subsidies for Electric Vehicles Cut as Consumer Interest Fades
Chewy Slides After Filing Shows 3rd-Biggest Shareholder, ‘Roaring Kitty,’ Sold His Stake
Business
Bitcoin Goes Over $80,000 As Buyers Guess Whether Trump Will Run For President.
(VOR News) – The following day, Bitcoin achieved a new record high as a consequence of traders’ wagers on the potential benefits of Donald Trump’s return to the White House for the cryptocurrency.
This was an additional factor contributing to Bitcoin’s recent record-breaking performance.
This resulted in Bitcoin’s first-ever record-breaking high.
The digital currency’s inaugural transaction, valued at eighty thousand dollars, was executed one hundred twenty minutes after twelve o’clock in the afternoon (1200 GMT). This occurred shortly after the timepiece reached twelve.
The conviction that President Trump may reduce laws on digital currencies has increased as a result of his victory in the presidential election that occurred in the United States on Tuesday. This conviction has been bolstered by his election victory. Since the election was won by the Republican nominee, Trump, this mentality has been gradually cultivated.
On Wednesday, the price of bitcoin achieved a new all-time high of $75,000, surpassing the previous all-time high of $73,797.98, which was achieved in March. This item has attained the highest price to date.
It was widely believed that Trump was the politician who embraced Bitcoin during his campaign against Kamala Harris, the Democratic Party candidate. Harris was a candidate for the Democratic Party in the Senate campaign.
Donald Trump employed the term “hoax” to describe cryptocurrencies during his inaugural tenure as president of the United States. However, in the time that has passed since then, he has experienced a substantial change in his viewpoints, which has even resulted in the creation of his own committee platform.
In addition to his pledge to establish the United States of America as the “bitcoin and cryptocurrency capital of the world,” he has also committed to appointing Elon Musk, a tech entrepreneur and right-wing conspiracy theorist, to the role of overseeing a comprehensive investigation into the government’s wasteful practices.
Both of these commitments are components of his strategy to enhance the prosperity of the United States of America. It is crucial to acknowledge that he has made a commitment to both of these.
The administration of President Trump was responsible for the reduction of corporation taxes, which resulted in an increase in market liquidity and facilitated the investment in high-growth assets, such as cryptocurrencies. Through the administration of President Trump’s predecessor, this was accomplished.
The previous administration benefited from a decrease in the tax rate for Bitcoin companies.
In September, President Trump announced that he, his sons, and other organizations would be creating a digital currency platform known as World Liberty Financial. The development of this platform would also incorporate the participation of other businesses. The network would facilitate the conversion of digital currency into corporeal currency.
Nevertheless, it experienced an unsuccessful sales launch earlier this month, with only a small percentage of the tokens that were placed on the market being purchased by consumers. This incident transpired earlier this month. From this, it is possible to infer that the launch was unsuccessful.
Cryptocurrencies have been the subject of numerous news articles since their inception. The FTX exchange platform is the most notable of the numerous industry stalwarts that have fallen, and these stories have covered a wide variety of subjects, including the immense volatility of their pricing. Numerous topics have been addressed in these narratives.
According to reports that circulated in the days preceding the election, he made history by becoming the first former president to utilize bitcoin to conduct a transaction. Donald Trump achieved historical significance by conducting a transaction using bitcoin. This could be considered a significant accomplishment.
He accomplished this by purchasing hamburgers from a restaurant in New York City, which characterized the transaction as “historic.” He succeeded in achieving these objectives. Because of this opportunity, he capitalized on it.
Bitcoin, a digital currency, is transacted on the market every day of the week, including Sundays.
SOURCE: TET
SEE ALSO:
Subsidies for Electric Vehicles Cut as Consumer Interest Fades
Chewy Slides After Filing Shows 3rd-Biggest Shareholder, ‘Roaring Kitty,’ Sold His Stake
Canada CBC News CEO Catherine Tait Recalled to Parliamentary Committee
-
Tech3 weeks ago
Apple Unveiled A Fresh Glimpse Of Their AI Featuring ChatGPT Integration.
-
Tech4 weeks ago
Connection Problems With The App Store Are Stopping Customers From Downloading Apps.
-
Tech4 weeks ago
The Meta Foundation Launches a New Anti-Sextortion Campaign on Instagram.
-
Tech4 weeks ago
Adobe Commences The Implementation Of AI Video Tools, Which Poses A Challenge To OpenAI And Meta.
-
Tech4 weeks ago
Appeals Court Delays Order For Google To Open Its App Store In Antitrust Case
-
Business4 weeks ago
Arthur Hayes Predicts Bitcoin Will “Rise Stupendously” When Middle East Conflict Escalates.