Connect with us

Money

Did You Know Your $2 Bill, Could Be Worth $20,000.00!

Published

on

$2 Bill

According to the US Currency Auctions, a U.S. $2 bill that features Thomas Jefferson, the third President of the United States could be worth a whopping $20,000.00. Turning $2 bill into $20,000 has never been easier, that is if you’re lucky enough to have one.

According to Heritage Auctions, one of the world’s top auction houses, some uncirculated U.S. $2 bills can be worth up to $20,000 depending on a few conditions. And it’s possible that you have one in your wallet or in your kitchen junk drawer.

Why? Because many of us are preoccupied with preserving these specific bills.

“Americans don’t spend $2 bills because they believe they are scarce.” “However, the numbers tell us a different story,” Heritage Auctions vice president Dustin Johnston told MarketWatch. “They’ve printed 100 million $2 bills in the last five years.” It’s a little strange that they don’t circulate and are retained as souvenirs. There are very few of them that have numismatic or collector value.”

Because there are so many $2 bills, chances are your own legal money in that denomination is worth face value. But it can’t hurt to see whether it’s worth more, right?

So, what distinguishes the $2 bills that may be valuable? It all comes down to three crucial factors: serial numbers, the date of printing, and the quality of the banknotes.

The serial number is the most important. It is normally printed on the left and right sides of the front of the bill, with a letter in the centre. “What we’re looking at is fancy serial numbers,” Johnston explained. “A 1976 $2 bill with serial number ‘1’ is worth $20,000 or more.” However, for the vast majority of those holding 1976 $2 bills, they are only of face value. There are very few that genuinely outperform their face value.”

Other valuable serial numbers include what collectors refer to as “solid” or “ladders.” Solid serial numbers have all the same digit, such as 88888888888, whereas ladder numbers include digits listed in ascending sequence, such as 12345678910.

And, as one might expect, older $2 bills are more scarce than younger ones. Collectors consider bills to be “older” if they are more than 100 years old.

“Aside from the fancy serial numbers, the majority of the value will be in the large size notes [from] 1918 and prior.” [The] 1918s are extremely prevalent. “They usually start around $80 to $100 and go up from there,” Johnston explained. “The more recent ones, the 1920s and beyond, well over 99% are going to be worth marginally over face value.”

However, it is not as simple as saying that the older the $2 bill, the more valuable it may be, because the amount of bills created in a given year and the overall number in circulation can both influence rarity.

The condition of a $2 note is the final important criterion to consider. A crumpled and shredded $2 bill from a high-value year, such as 1880, is less valuable than one in excellent condition. Banknotes, like other collectibles, can be graded and encapsulated to aid with preservation. Typically, notes and other artefacts sold at auction are graded.

“Grading can be costly; it can range from $20 to $30 per note.” “As a result, we don’t always have everything graded,” Johnston explained. “Many of the modern $2 bills, they can [be] crisp uncirculated and grade pretty high, but have marginal values, enough that they are not even worth being graded, so condition is not everything.”

There are various organisations that grade collectibles, including PCGS, PSA, and SGC.

Heritage Auctions offers free online appraisals where collectors can upload photographs to their website if they have any questions regarding the worth of their $2 bill or any other valuable banknote.

The United States $2 bill is a denomination of US currency depicting Thomas Jefferson, the third President of the United States, on the front and the signing of the Declaration of Independence on the back. It’s a rather rare denomination in circulation, and many Americans have never seen or used a $2 bill.

The $2 bill was originally issued in the United States in 1862, and it has undergone various design revisions since then. While it is still legal money, it is not as commonly circulated as bills in amounts such as $1, $5, $10, $20, or $100. As a result, some people regard $2 bills as novelty items or collectibles.

If you stumble across a $2 bill, it is still legal tender and can be used for transactions in the same way as any other US dollar. While they are less common in regular transactions, they can sometimes be received from banks or requested when withdrawing money from ATMs. Some people collect $2 notes because of their distinct status and patterns.

Geoff Brown is a seasoned staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. With his sharp writing skills he consistently delivers high-quality, engaging content that resonates with readers. Geoff's' articles are well-researched, informative, and written in a clear, concise style that keeps audiences hooked. His ability to craft compelling narratives while seamlessly incorporating relevant keywords has made him a valuable asset to the VORNews team.

Continue Reading

Money

Nigeria Releases American Crypto Executive After Dropping Money Laundering Case

Published

on

Washington — An American cryptocurrency executive who had been detained in Nigeria for the previous eight months has been released after officials there announced they were discontinuing his money laundering trial on health and diplomatic reasons.

According to a statement released Thursday by White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan, Tigran Gambaryan, Binance’s chief of financial crime compliance, was released on humanitarian parole and will return to the United States for medical treatment.

“I am grateful to my Nigerian colleagues and partners for the productive discussions that have resulted in this step and look forward to working closely with them on the many areas of cooperation and collaboration critical to the bilateral partnership between our two countries,” according Sullivan.

Nigeria Releases American Crypto Executive After Dropping Money Laundering Case

Gambaryan was arrested in February during a business trip to Nigeria, along with Nadeem Anjarwalla, the company’s regional manager in Africa, who escaped custody and is still at large.

Nigerian officials accused Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, and Gambaryan of exploiting the site to launder up to $35 million and manipulate the local naira currency, which they reject.

Nigeria has Africa’s largest crypto economy regarding trade volume, with many citizens using cryptocurrency to protect their wallets from rising inflation and a weakening local currency.

However, as its user base increased and the government attempted to stabilize the currency, officials publicly accused the platform of being used to launder money and fuel terrorism, forcing it to suspend all trading using the local currency on its platform.

R.U. Adaba, a prosecution lawyer with Nigeria’s Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, told the Federal High Court in Abuja on Wednesday that the government was closing the case after “taking into consideration some critical international and diplomatic reasons.”

Binance is still facing charges for tax evasion and operating without a license.

Nigeria Releases American Crypto Executive After Dropping Money Laundering Case

Gambaryan’s trial has been fraught with controversy, including claims that he and a coworker were unjustly imprisoned and their passports taken. Binance also claimed that Nigerian officials sought money to release him and Anjarwalla.

The Nigerian government refuted the bribery allegations and defended the prosecution as adhering to the rule of law.

Gambaryan’s health deteriorated while his legal proceedings dragged on. The court in Abuja denied him bail twice after a judge determined that he was a flight risk and should remain in the capital’s Kuje jail.

SOURCE | AP

Continue Reading

Money

TD Bank Hit With Record $3 Billion Fine Over Drug Cartel Money Laundering

Published

on

TD Bank will pay $3 billion to settle allegations that it failed to adequately supervise money laundering by drug gangs, officials stated Thursday.

The fine includes a $1.3 billion penalty to the US Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, which is a bank-record fine. TD also expects to pay $1.8 billion to the US Justice Department and plead guilty to end the US government’s investigation into the bank’s violations of the Bank Secrecy Act and money laundering.

The US Department of Justice claimed in a statement that TD Bank has “long-term, pervasive, and systemic deficiencies” in its transaction monitoring methods. The Wall Street Journal first broke the news late Wednesday.

TD Bank Hit With Record $3 Billion Fine Over Drug Cartel Money Laundering

“By making its services convenient for criminals, it became one,” Attorney General Merrick Garland stated at a press conference on Thursday.

More than 90% of transactions went unmonitored between January 2018 and April 2024, allowing “three money laundering networks to collectively transfer more than $670 million through TD Bank accounts,” according to a judicial complaint.

“I want to be clear, these systemic failures did not just create hypothetical vulnerabilities, but they resulted in actual, material harm to American citizens and communities,” said Deputy Treasury Secretary Wally Adeyemo. “TD Bank, unlike its counterparts, has repeatedly put growth and profit over legal compliance. “The bank facilitated drug trafficking.”

In one case, TD Bank workers collected over $57,000 in gift cards to process more than $470 million in cash deposits from a money laundering network in order to “ensure employees would continue to process their transactions” and not reveal them in necessary reports, according to the DOJ.

In a separate statement, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), a US banking regulator, stated that TD handled hundreds of millions of dollars in transactions that clearly suggested extremely suspicious conduct.

“This is a difficult chapter in our bank’s history,” Bharat Masrani, CEO of TD Bank, stated. “These failures took place on my watch as CEO and I apologize to all our stakeholders.”

“We have taken full responsibility for the failures of our US [anti-money laundering] program and are making the investments, changes and enhancements required to deliver on our commitments,” Masrani told reporters.

TD is stepping up its anti-money laundering surveillance efforts, including the hiring of over 700 new specialists with “experience and qualifications in money laundering prevention, financial crimes, and AML remediation,” as well as the implementation of new processes to “better prevent, detect, and measure financial crime risk,” the bank stated.

FinCEN will monitor the Canadian bank for four years to guarantee compliance with the arrangement.

The US Federal Reserve also penalized TD Bank and ordered that its anti-money laundering compliance division be relocated to the United States.

And, as part of the agreement, the OCC limits TD Bank’s growth in the United States. Although remarkable, the US government’s monitoring and restriction of a bank’s expansion is not uncommon. Wells Fargo was hit with similar growth limits and large penalties for “widespread consumer abuses” in 2018, but has yet to persuade regulators to lift the asset cap. Wells Fargo already revealed that its employees responded to drastically unrealistic sales targets by creating up to 3.5 million bogus accounts.

The severe penalties imposed by regulators on Thursday caught Wall Street off guard. TD Bank’s (TD) US-listed shares fell 6% as investors expect more litigation costs and slower growth.

TD assured that it had sufficient liquidity to pay the penalties and continue operations. In a call with analysts, the bank stated that it expects a one-time charge of $1.5 billion after taxes and will cut 10% of its assets to cover the huge penalties.

TD Bank Hit With Record $3 Billion Fine Over Drug Cartel Money Laundering

“We believe that the market was becoming increasingly comfortable with the idea that there would be no growth restrictions imposed on TD,” wrote John Aiken, analyst at Jefferies, in a note to investors on Thursday. “TD will need to find a new avenue for growth from its traditional reliance on US retail banking.”

Cartel fears
Officials at the Justice and Treasury departments have grown more concerned about Mexican cartels’ use of the US banking system to launder earnings from the sale of fentanyl and other drugs, which kill tens of thousands of Americans each year.

Couriers laundering money for the cartels “are opening accounts in banks big and small here in the US,” a senior Treasury official told CNN in May.

Treasury and IRS authorities began briefing US banks and social media companies earlier this year in an effort to gain a better understanding of how the cartels are exploiting the financial system, CNN reports.

According to the Treasury source, one of the talks’ main topics will be how to leverage intelligence offered by smaller banks that can detect laundering fronts in their communities.

Some critics, including Democratic Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren, said that the punishments were insufficient given the gravity of the allegations.

“Big banks treat government fines as the cost of doing business,” Warren stated in a statement. “This deal absolves irresponsible bank management of the responsibility for allowing TD Bank to be used as a criminal slush fund. The Department of Justice and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency must do better in implementing our anti-money laundering legislation.”

Last year, TD Bank paid $1.2 billion to settle a lawsuit alleging its role in an infamous $7 billion Ponzi scheme conducted by convicted financier Allen Stanford over a decade ago.

The funds were used to repay victims of the scheme, but the bank denied any wrongdoing.

SOURCE | CNN

Continue Reading

Money

Judge Rules The FTC Can Proceed With Antitrust Lawsuit Against Amazon, Tosses Out Few State Claims

Published

on

A federal judge ruled that the Federal Trade Commission can proceed with its blockbuster antitrust lawsuit against Amazon. However, he did give the firm a modest victory by dismissing a few allegations made by states interested in the legal dispute.

The order, granted last week by Judge John H. Chun and unsealed on Monday, is a significant defeat for Amazon, which has attempted for months to have the lawsuit dismissed in court. A trial in the case is scheduled for October 2026.

“We are pleased with the court’s decision and look forward to moving this case forward,” FTC spokesperson Doug Farrar said in a prepared statement. “The ways Amazon illegally maintains its monopolies and the harm they cause—including suppressed competition and higher prices for shoppers and sellers—will be on full display at trial.”

Judge Rules The FTC Can Proceed With Antitrust Lawsuit Against Amazon, Tosses Out Few State Claims

The FTC and the attorneys general of 18 states, including Puerto Rico, have sued the e-commerce juggernaut, alleging that it is abusing its market position to raise prices on and off its platform, overcharge vendors, and discourage new competitors.

The case, filed in September 2023, is the culmination of a years-long probe of the company’s operations and is one of the most major legal challenges to Amazon in its almost 30-year history.

US authorities and state attorneys general have accused the online retailer of breaking federal and state antitrust and consumer protection laws.

Judge Chun of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington issued the ruling allowing the federal challenges and many of the state claims to proceed. However, he dismissed some allegations filed by New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Oklahoma, and Maryland under state antitrust or consumer protection statutes.

Amazon, for its part, expressed confidence that it could prove its claim in court as the matter moves forward.

“The ruling at this early stage requires the court to assume that all of the facts asserted in the complaint are accurate. They are not,” Tim Doyle said in a statement, adding that the agency’s case “falsely” alleges people only shop for household products on prominent websites such as Walmart.com, Target.com, Amazon, and eBay.

Judge Rules The FTC Can Proceed With Antitrust Lawsuit Against Amazon, Tosses Out Few State Claims

“Moving forward the FTC will have to prove its claims in court, and we’re confident those claims will not hold up when the FTC has to prove them with evidence,” Doyle said to the press. He also stated that the FTC’s strategy “would make shopping more difficult and costly.”

The FTC is also targeting Meta Platforms for alleged monopolistic actions, while the Department of Justice has sued Apple and Google with some success.

In August, a federal judge declared that Google’s ubiquitous search engine is improperly using its power to impede competition and innovation.

SOURCE | AP

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version