Politics
Canada’s Trudeau Should Be More Worried About Poilievre than Trump
Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau warned Tuesday that if former President Donald Trump wins the U.S. presidential election in November, it will be “a step back” for Canada.
Trudeau, whose progressive-left Liberals took power in November 2015, had tense relations with Trump during his first four-year administration. In 2018, Trump described Trudeau as weak and extremely dishonest.
“It wasn’t easy the first time, and it won’t be easy the second time,” Trudeau remarked in French at a Montreal Chamber of Commerce event.
He said, “But we can’t see ever having it easy with the Americans. The primary obligation of any prime minister is to represent and defend Canada’s interests… we’ve done an excellent job of this in recent years.”
Canada exports 75% of its goods and services to the United States, making it particularly vulnerable to any shift toward protectionism.
When Trump took office, he renegotiated the free trade agreements that bound the United States, Canada, and Mexico.
Ottawa spent nearly two years negotiating a trilateral agreement that benefited the United States above Canadian interests.
Meanwhile, the National Post commissioned a Spark Advocacy poll to gauge Canadian sentiments about the 2024 presidential race, which is no exception. However, the unexpected success of Republican nominee Donald Trump, particularly among young Canadians, may indicate a much bigger shift toward populism than previously thought.
Neither of the two major political parties in the United States has declared their choice for 2024, but Spark asked Canadians about a possible matchup between Trump and the Democratic president, Joe Biden.
Biden was the obvious winner with 67 per cent, while Trump received unexpectedly strong support from 33 per cent of Canadian respondents.
That’s higher than Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s current approval rating, which the Angus Reid Institute last put at 31%. It’s also somewhat higher than the proportion by which Trudeau won his previous federal election; the Liberals achieved a minority government in 2021 with only 32.62 per cent of votes cast.
However, the survey’s most surprising finding was that younger Canadians were more likely to support Trump over Biden. So much so that young Canadian voters supported Trump more than young voters in the United States.
More than one-third (36%) of Canadian women aged 18 to 44 supported Trump, far exceeding the 21% of women over 44 who did.
Young Canadian men appeared as the most pro-Trump cohort in the poll. According to the survey, most (52%) Canadian men under 44 supported Trump over Biden. This was higher than Trump support among Conservative respondents; those Canadians chose Trump over Biden in 50% of cases.
According to the most recent US polls, young Canadians favour Trump even more than their American counterparts. A YouGov poll last week states that Trump is performing in the mid-30s among voters under 44.
The Spark Advocacy findings align with a growing body of evidence showing young Canadians are flocking to the Conservatives. For months, polls have revealed that young people are the Conservatives’ single greatest support base under leader Pierre Poilievre.
“If someone told me that the Conservative leader would be MORE popular with younger Canadians than older ones a few years ago, I’d tell you you were nuts,” said Abacus CEO David Coletto in September.
According to a recent Abacus Data poll, the Conservatives have a dominant 44% of respondents aged 30-44, greater than the combined NDP/Liberal vote (42%). Even among the youngest voters (18-29), the Tories were the most popular party, with a 32% plurality.
It is an unusual occurrence in any Western democracy for a conservative party to win the youth vote, and it hasn’t happened in Canada since Brian Mulroney’s landslide victory in 1984.
However, Mulroney never witnessed how young Canadians supported him more than their parents and grandparents.
The typical rationale for this is economic.
Rising unaffordability, particularly in housing, has disproportionately affected young people. According to an August Ipsos study, more than half of Canadians under 34 now consider homeownership an impossible luxury reserved for the wealthy.
Poilievre has made housing affordability a cornerstone of his political platform, and his popularity has frequently risen in line with his promises to increase residential buildings and lower home prices.
Even before Poilievre secured the Conservative leadership in mid-2022, he created a successful social media video blaming Canadian housing unaffordability on an entrenched elite of “gatekeepers.”
At the time, Conservatives were still ranking third among Canadian youth. However, an Abacus survey found that six out of ten Canadians aged 30 to 44 agreed with Poilievre’s “gatekeeper” video, and a majority indicated respondents would vote Tory with Poilievre in charge.
However, the Spark Advocacy poll results show that many young Canadians will support a right-wing populist politician, even if the candidate has no clear link to Canadian affordability issues.
Why Canadian young people may be turning toward Trump for the same reason the former president continues to enjoy enormous cult status in the United States: a broad distrust of the establishment.
An Angus Reid Institute poll conducted in March may shed light on this issue.
When Canadians were asked about their overall perceptions of the country, young people emerged as the demographic most likely to believe that Canada was unsafe, unprosperous, and had a broken governmental structure.
Around the same time, a National Post-commissioned Leger poll yielded nearly identical results.
In contrast to the notion of the curmudgeonly senior voter, the study discovered that younger generations were disproportionately unhappy with “how Canada is being managed today,” and more likely to agree with the statement that Canada is “broken.”
New Immigrants Fleeing Trudeau’s Canada Over High Living Costs
New Immigrants Fleeing Trudeau’s Canada Over High Living Costs
Politics
Trudeau Accused of “Phony Feminism” After Freeland’s Departure
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is facing a backlash for claiming to be a feminist after firing Chrystia Freeland as Finance Minister and replacing her with Dominic Leblanc on Tuesday.
Justin Trudeau has positioned himself as a feminist leader, a central element of his political identity. In 2015, Canada made history by appointing its first gender-equal cabinet, a significant step in the ongoing effort to champion women’s rights policies.
Trudeau aimed to solidify his reputation as a pioneer in the fight for gender equality. Recent accusations of “phoney feminism” have sparked a heated debate regarding the consistency between his statements and his actions.
Chrystia Freeland’s resignation from the cabinet has sparked criticism directed at Prime Minister Trudeau, raising questions about his approach to women in leadership roles.
Chrystia Freeland, previously regarded as one of Prime Minister Trudeau’s closest allies, has officially resigned from her position as Finance Minister. In her resignation letter, she notably omitted any reference to gender issues.
Freeland’s departure mirrors Trudeau’s removal of several high-profile women;
- Jody Wilson-Raybould, former Attorney General, was removed in 2019 after the SNC-Lavalin controversy.
- Jane Philpott, then President of the Treasury Board, was also ousted following her support for Wilson-Raybould.
- Celina Caesar-Chavannes, a Liberal MP, left politics after claiming Trudeau didn’t handle internal disagreements well.
These firings have fuelled debates about his handling of women in leadership positions and made a mockery of his claims of being a feminist.
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre criticized Trudeau for the optics of replacing Freeland with a male cabinet member, calling it evidence of Trudeau’s “fake feminism.”
“Just blame Chrystia Freeland and make her wear it all. Some feminist,” Poilievre said at a news conference on Tuesday.
The same week as Trudeau was insulting Americans for not electing a woman president, he was busy throwing his own woman deputy prime minister under the bus to replace her with a man, Poilievre commented.
Prominent Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner asked how any woman in that caucus could “defend that man instead of calling for an election now,” while Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said Trudeau needed to start proving himself if he was going to keep declaring himself “to be such a supporter of women.”
MP Melissa Lantsman referred to an “old boys’ club” being in charge.
“It’s time for credible leadership in the seriousness of this moment, not the fake feminism of this phoney prime minister,” said Lantsman, who represents the Conservatives in the Thornhill riding.
Former Liberal MP Celina Caesar-Chavannes said she believes there is a pattern of female cabinet ministers who were “thrown under the bus” after “challenging someone whose name is Trudeau.”
Trudeau Defended
However, while Freeland’s resignation has sparked accusations of sexism, political experts suggest that focusing solely on gender may oversimplify the issue.
Freeland, an accomplished politician and the country’s first female Finance Minister left primarily due to policy disagreements. Her decision was less about being a powerful woman and more about divergent views on leadership and economic strategy.
Political scientist Dr. Melanee Thomas remarked that qualified women in politics often face frustrations when their expertise is dismissed.
She cautioned against reducing complex political dynamics to gender alone. By framing Freeland’s resignation solely as evidence of sexism, the broader challenges faced by all leaders in Trudeau’s cabinets—men and women alike—are overlooked.
Trudeau has remained relatively quiet, stating that Freeland’s departure was not an “easy day” for him.
Unlike previous controversies, he has not publicly defended his feminist credentials since Freeland’s resignation, leaving a vacuum for critics to dominate the narrative.
Over the years, Trudeau has said that “adding women changes politics,” presenting himself as an ally for feminist causes. His silence now begs the question: does he believe his track record speaks for itself, or is he struggling to respond to the growing skepticism?
Politics
Liberal MPs Call on Trudeau to Resign
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is facing extreme political pressure, with Liberal MPs publicly urging him to step down for the sake of the Liberal Party of Canada.
Yesterday, Trudeau faced a triple setback: the resignations of Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland and Housing Minister Sean Fraser and a crushing byelection loss in British Columbia.
Trudeau is facing an uphill battle to maintain his grip on leadership as dissatisfaction among Liberal MPs is mounting. The recent events have added fuel to the fire.
Freeland, formerly one of Trudeau’s most prominent cabinet members, resigned in protest after allegedly being informed she’d be shuffled out of her role as finance minister. Many MPs believe this was poorly handled and symbolic of deeper issues within Trudeau’s leadership.
Adding insult to injury, the Liberals lost a B.C. byelection by 50 percentage points to the Conservatives—a seat they had held in the last general election. This loss has amplified concerns that Trudeau can no longer resonate with voters.
For the Good of the Party
Some Liberal MPs said Tuesday that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau cannot continue as party leader and needs to resign for the party’s good.
Liberal MPs like Wayne Long and Ken Hardie are now outspoken critics, claiming that Trudeau’s leadership is a huge liability for the party. Long described the Prime Minister as “living in a false reality,” warning that staying the course could lead the Liberals to electoral disaster.
Ontario MP Francis Drouin, a longstanding defender of Trudeau, has joined the chorus of dissent. He doubted the party’s ability to move forward under Trudeau, saying, “I’ve been a great defender, but I just don’t see how we recover.”
Other MPs, including Alexandra Mendès and Sean Casey, have echoed similar sentiments. Mendès stated she was deeply affected by Freeland’s treatment, while Casey suggested that Trudeau no longer enjoys the confidence of the caucus.
The Liberal caucus appears more divided than ever, with roughly a third of MPs reportedly favouring Trudeau’s immediate resignation. According to Long, between 40 and 50 MPs actively push for his resignation, while around 50 remain loyal to him. The rest are seemingly undecided or staying silent.
Trudeau’s Unwillingness to relinquish power
This lack of unity is becoming a significant issue. MP Chad Collins admitted, “I can say we’re united.” He suggested a secret ballot within the caucus would reveal overwhelming opposition to Trudeau’s continued leadership.
At a Liberal caucus meeting today, Trudeau acknowledged the growing discontent; however, he hasn’t shown any signs of stepping down. He assured MPs he understood their concerns, but many doubted his willingness to relinquish power.
The Liberals are at a crossroads. Liberal MPs worry they could lose the next general election if Trudeau remains in office, with polls showing Trudeau’s public support hovering around 20 percent.
MPs have called for a change before it’s too late, calling Trudeau’s leadership a “drag” on the party’s prospects.
The internal division might deepen if Trudeau doesn’t resign. According to some political analysts, more backbenchers will switch sides against Trudeau, especially if they are left out of the next cabinet move.
One thing is certain: the Liberal Party must decide soon. The longer the ambiguity persists, the more difficult it will be to regain voters’ confidence. For now, Canadians are left wondering whether Trudeau’s tenure as prime minister is ending—or if he will beat the odds once more.
Related News:
Dominic LeBlanc Sworn in as Canada’s New Finance Minister
Politics
Justin Trudeau’s Fight for Gender Equity in Canada
Justin Trudeau made news in 2015 by introducing Canada’s first gender-balanced cabinet, a decision that established the tone for the government’s commitment to gender equity and representation.
Since his election in 2015, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government has prioritized gender parity. From cabinet makeup to legislative efforts, the government has taken significant steps to reduce disparities and promote inclusion in Canada.
By assuring equal representation in top positions, the Trudeau government sends a strong message: varied perspectives improve governance.
While symbolic steps such as a balanced cabinet are vital, some believe that more than representation alone needs to address underlying issues. The Trudeau government has supported representation through measures to overcome these hurdles, leading us to the following issue.
Gender Equity in Pay
In 2021, Canada passed the Pay Equity Act, which requires federal workplaces to provide equal pay for equal work. This was a significant step towards narrowing the salary disparity between men and women.
The rule applies to firms with ten or more employees in federally regulated industries, promoting openness and fair compensation.
The government also developed the National Strategy to Prevent and Address Gender-Based Violence, prioritizing prevention, social services, and judicial reforms. Shelters, crisis centres, and advocacy groups have received extra funding to ensure survivors can access support.
Affordable childcare is crucial for allowing women to participate in the workforce. The Liberal government implemented a $10-per-day childcare program to alleviate the financial burden on families. This approach benefits parents, particularly mothers, who bear the burden of caring tasks.
One of the Trudeau administration’s most prominent innovations is using a “gender-based analysis plus” (GBA+) methodology for federal budgeting. This guarantees that government spending decisions consider the effects on different genders and other intersecting characteristics such as race, handicap, and income level.
Sexual and reproductive health projects
For example, the 2024 Autumn Economic Statement included continuous spending to protect women’s reproductive health and eliminate disparities in healthcare access. This approach prioritizes equity in resource allocation, recognizing that blanket policies frequently fail to adequately serve marginalized people.
In September 2024, Trudeau announced over $200 million in funding for worldwide sexual and reproductive health projects. These initiatives prioritize education, contraceptive access, and maternity healthcare.
Domestically, the government has boosted funding for abortion services, especially in impoverished areas. These initiatives demonstrate a commitment to empowering women and giving them authority over their healthcare decisions.
Despite these attempts, women in Canada continue to encounter challenges in the workplace. The gender pay gap is severe, particularly among racialized and Indigenous women. Critics believe that while regulations like the Pay Equity Act are a fine place to start, enforcement and oversight must improve.
Some campaigners have argued that the government’s approach to gender equity fails to address the unique issues that non-binary people confront, as well as those who face numerous types of discrimination. For example, racialized women and women with disabilities frequently suffer compounded injustices that broad measures can not fully address.
Advocating for Gender Equity
Efforts to promote gender equality have also encountered opposition. Some accuse the administration of focusing too much on identity politics, claiming that these programs take attention away from more serious issues.
However, supporters argue that equity is essential for a successful society and economy.
The Trudeau government continues to advocate for gender equality on several fronts. There is reason to be optimistic about future policy reforms and increased investments in healthcare and education.
Simultaneously, persistent advocacy will be required to guarantee that progress accomplished thus far does not stall.
Gender fairness isn’t just a moral obligation; it’s also a sound policy. The Trudeau government has worked to make Canada more equitable and inclusive by removing barriers and providing new possibilities.
While problems persist, the foundation has been created for future improvement. The challenge is how to capitalize on this momentum to achieve long-term change. Gender equity is a never-ending goal through policy, representation, or public dialogue.
It’s a difficult but important trip, and everyone’s opinion counts.
Related News:
Walmart Abandons DEI Ahead of Trump’s Inauguration
-
Politics3 weeks ago
Miller Expects 4.9 Million Foreigners to Leave Canada Voluntarily
-
News3 weeks ago
Nolinor Boeing 737 Crash Lands in Montreal
-
News2 weeks ago
“Shocking Video” Vancouver Police Shoot Armed Suspect 10 Times
-
Tech3 weeks ago
Increasing its Stake in OpenAI by $1.5 Billion is a Possibility for SoftBank.
-
News4 weeks ago
Facebook Securities Fraud Case Dropped
-
Health4 weeks ago
A Canadian Teenager’s Bird Flu Virus Has Mutations