Business
States Sue TikTok, Claiming Its Platform Is Addictive And Harms The Mental Health Of Children
More than a dozen states and the District of Columbia filed complaints against TikTok on Tuesday, claiming that the popular short-form video app is damaging teenage mental health by creating its platform to be addicting to children.
The cases originate from a national TikTok investigation begun in March 2022 by a bipartisan coalition of state attorneys general, including New York, California, Kentucky, and New Jersey. All of the allegations were filed in state court.
At the center of each case is the TikTok algorithm, which determines what users view on the site by populating the app’s primary “For You” stream with content suited to their preferences. The claims also highlight design aspects that they claim cause children to become addicted to the platform, such as the ability to browse endlessly through information, push alerts with built-in “buzzes,” and face filters that create unrealistic appearances for users.
States Sue TikTok, Claiming Its Platform Is Addictive And Harms The Mental Health Of Children
In its pleadings, the District of Columbia referred to the algorithm as “dopamine-inducing,” and claimed it was designed to be purposely addictive so that the corporation could ensnare many young people into excessive use and keep them on its app for hours on end. TikTok engages in these actions while knowing that they will cause “profound psychological and physiological harms,” including anxiety, sadness, body dysmorphia, and other long-term issues, according to the lawsuit.
“It is profiting from the fact that it is addicting young people to its platform,” District of Columbia Attorney General Brian Schwalb stated in an interview.
“We strongly disagree with many of these allegations, which we believe are false and misleading. In response to the lawsuits, TikTok spokesman Alex Haurek stated, “We are proud of and remain deeply committed to the work we’ve done to protect teens, and we will continue to update and improve our product.” “We’ve endeavored to work with the Attorneys General for over two years, and it is incredibly disappointing they have taken this step rather than work with us on constructive solutions to industrywide challenges.”
The social networking company does not let minors under the age of 13 sign up for its main service, and some content is restricted to anyone under the age of 18. Despite the company’s assertions that its platform is safe for children, Washington and several other states stated in their petition that children may simply bypass those limits, allowing them to access the services that adults use.
“TikTok claims to be safe for young people, however this is far from accurate. In New York and across the country, young people have died or been injured while participating in deadly TikTok challenges, and many more are feeling sad, frightened, and depressed as a result of TikTok’s addictive elements,” New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a statement.
Their complaint also targets other aspects of the company’s business.
The district claims TikTok is functioning as a “unlicensed virtual economy” by allowing users to buy TikTok Coins, a virtual currency within the platform, and send “Gifts” to TikTok LIVE streamers, who can then cash out for real money. TikTok charges a 50% commission on these financial transactions but has not registered as a money transmitter with the United States Treasury Department or district authorities, according to the complaint.
Officials claim that minors are routinely exploited for sexually explicit content via TikTok’s LIVE streaming feature, which has enabled the app to function essentially as a “virtual strip club” with no age limitations. They argue that the cut the corporation receives from financial transactions allows it to benefit from exploitation.
The 14 attorneys general say their lawsuits aim to stop TikTok from employing these features, impose financial penalties for suspected illegal actions, and recover damages for aggrieved users.
Many states have filed lawsuits against TikTok and other internet companies in recent years, as concern rises over prominent social media platforms and their ever-increasing impact on young people’s lives. In some cases, the challenges were coordinated in a manner similar to how states had organized against the tobacco and pharmaceutical companies.
States Sue TikTok, Claiming Its Platform Is Addictive And Harms The Mental Health Of Children
Last week, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a lawsuit against TikTok, alleging that the firm shared and sold children’s personal information in violation of a new state law that bars such operations. TikTok, which denies the charges, is simultaneously battling a similar data-related federal case launched in August by the Department of Justice.
Several Republican-led states, including Nebraska, Kansas, New Hampshire, Kansas, Iowa, and Arkansas, have previously sued the company, some unsuccessfully, over claims that it harms children’s mental health, exposes them to “inappropriate” content, or allows young people to be sexually exploited on its platform. Arkansas has filed a lawsuit against YouTube and Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, which is being sued by dozens of states on allegations that it is damaging young people’s mental health. New York City and certain public school districts have filed their own cases.
TikTok, in particular, is encountering additional hurdles at the national level. According to a federal rule that went into force earlier this year, TikTok might be outlawed in the United States by mid-January if its Chinese parent firm ByteDance does not sell the site by that time.
TikTok and ByteDance are both appealing the statute in Washington’s appeals court. A panel of three justices heard oral arguments in the case last month and is anticipated to announce a decision that might be appealed to the US Supreme Court.
SOURCE | AP
Business
Walmart Charged With Unlawfully Establishing Bank Accounts for 1 Million Drivers
(VOR News) – The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) filed a lawsuit against Walmart and a fintech company called Branch Messenger, alleging that the two companies forced more than a million delivery workers to use costly bank accounts to receive their paychecks. Both of these companies were the targets of the lawsuit.
According to the action filed by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), Walmart and Branch are accused of opening deposit accounts for Walmart’s Spark Drivers, who are considered independent contractors, without first getting their consent.
These bank accounts contained drivers’ personal data, including their Social Security numbers.
The lawsuit specifically claims that Walmart’s drivers, who are in charge of delivering goods from the company’s warehouses to consumers, are only allowed to have their earnings transferred into these branch accounts.
This goes against the company’s rules, which permit them to move their earnings to different accounts.
Walmart reportedly told employees in 2021 that using these accounts may lead to firing.
Additionally, the lawsuit claimed that accessing profits through the accounts was a “complex process,” typically causing weeks-long delays. Among the other accusations that were made was this one.
This was the predicament they ultimately found themselves in, even though the business had assured them that they would have prompt access to funds.
To make matters worse, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), drivers allegedly paid ten million dollars in “junk fees” to move their earnings to different bank accounts.
Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), Rohit Chopra, said, “Companies cannot force workers into getting paid through accounts that drain their earnings with junk fees,” in his criticism of the practice. “Junk fees are a waste of money.”
This case’s next section outlined the traits of the average Spark Driver: “in addition to being a woman, having children, not having a college degree, and having a low income.”
Walmart denied the accusations made by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and stated in a statement that it will firmly defend itself in court.
Walmart released a statement claiming that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) hurried lawsuit is full of factual errors, exaggerations, and blatant misrepresentations of basic legal principles.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) never gave Walmart a chance to make its case in an unbiased way throughout its rushed probe. In contrast to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, we are ready to fiercely defend the Company before a court that respects the due process of law principle.
Additionally, Branch was charged by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) with engaging in deceptive advertising and neglecting to look into and address issues pertaining to the accounts. In addition to earlier accusations, these were also made.
In contrast, Branch denied the accusations and defended its services, saying, “The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau rushed to file a lawsuit despite the company’s extensive cooperation with its investigation, refusing to engage with Branch in any meaningful way about this matter.”
Branch responded to the Walmart accusations with a statement.
Furthermore, Branch claimed that the case was motivated more by a desire for “media attention” than by concerns for the welfare of the employees. This is what he stated in his statement.
This case, which is part of a larger campaign to give these gig workers more rights, targets these individuals who work for firms like Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash who are supposed to be independent contractors. It is considered that gig workers are independent contractors.
Earlier this month, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) made claims against large financial firms, including Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and JPMorgan Chase.
According to the CFPB, these organizations did not stop fraud on the money-sending app Zelle, which is a platform that lets people send and receive money.
The choice of a new director may have an impact on the outcome of this lawsuit because President-elect Donald Trump is expected to choose a replacement for the present director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).
When Jaret Seiberg was employed as a financial services policy analyst at TD Cowen Washington Research Group, she noted that the new director’s strategy for handling such matters would be the deciding element in the case’s future course.
SOURCE: TN
SEE ALSO:
Deal With Mexican Retailer, Nordstrom’s Founding Family Takes Nordstrom Private.
Sonic the Hedgehog Dominates Christmas Wish Lists
Business
Naked Wines Issues 2024 Performance Review
Naked Wines, an online retailer, has issued a performance review after announcing that sales declined 15% in the first half of the year to $112.3 million, despite management insisting it is in “a better position, both financially and strategically”.
Rodrigo Maza, who became CEO in February after joining the company as UK managing director in September 2023, stated that the company was in a better financial and strategic position, with “robust financial foundations” and committed and engaged members.
“Our strategic initiatives centred around customer acquisition and retention are generating learnings, and we are currently experiencing solid trading during the peak season period,” he told shareholders.
It also stated that a performance review is under underway in order to “proactively evaluate options to maximise shareholder value”. The end of the fiscal year will see the release of a report.
Naked Wines New CEO
He also welcomed new CFO Dominic Neary, who joined Naked Wines from Mind Gym in November, saying he was excited to collaborate with him “as we focus the business on cash, profitability, and growth with its rose wine and dry white wine.”A performance review is presently ongoing to “proactively evaluate options to maximise shareholder value,” according to the results, with a report expected to be released at the end of the fiscal year.
It also stated that it has continued to liquidate surplus inventory, with the UK and Australia returning to normal inventory levels, however US inventories remained “significantly” in excess, albeit being down $20.5 million from HY24.
It stated that it was “currently investigating options to reduce inventory levels more quickly,” which would help drive improved cash over the next two fiscal years, but “could lead to increased liquidation costs and result in EBIT at the lower end of guidance.”
Although active members (those with Angel or Wine Genie membership) declined 12% in the last 12 months, the statement noted retention of its ‘core’ members (those who had been customers for two years or more) was up two percentage points to 79%, and they remained “highly engaged”.
Customers’ total probability to refer the company to a friend (net promoter score) increased from 73 to 76 in the previous quarter, according to the report.
Turning Things Around
In August, the company reported a pre-tax loss of $16.3 million for the fiscal year ending 1 April 2024, up from $15 million in the fiscal year 2022/2023, with revenues down 18% to $290 million and repeat business down a quarter to $65 million.
Founder Rowan Gormley, on the other hand, asserted that the company was “making real progress in turning things around with its rose wine and dry white wine”.
It came after the engagement of debt consultants in March 2024 to look into refinancing possibilities and a possible wine company reorganization after the value of Naked Wines shares fell by about a third in the previous year.
Gormley increased his interest in Naked Wines significantly in December 2023, purchasing $9,600 in shares.
This was Gormley’s second round of stock purchases; he and other senior board members purchased a large number of shares in early November following a drop in share value after the firm stated it was lowering its full-year sales estimates to -12% to -16%.
Three of the company’s leaders at the time put a total of $94,000 in its stock.
Related News:
Brad Pitt And Angelina Jolie’s Winery Court Battle Heats Up
Business
Deal With Mexican Retailer, Nordstrom’s Founding Family Takes Nordstrom Private.
(VOR News) – The company made the news on Monday that it would transition into a private Nordstrom corporation after the conclusion of a buyout agreement with El Puerto de Liverpool, a Mexican department store, and the founding family of Nordstrom.
The arrangement was reached when the company acquired El Puerto de Liverpool. It is projected that the transaction will end up valued at around $6.25 billion.
The company’s board of directors came to a resolution that was unanimous in order to give their approval to the deal, which is expected to be completed in the first half of the year 2025.
The Nordstrom family would control the corporation under the agreement.
Which will equate to 50.1% of the business, while Liverpool will hold 49.9% of the company. In accordance with a press announcement, common stockholders would receive a cash payment of $24.25 for each share of Nordstrom common stock that they now hold in their possession.
According to a news release, Nordstrom’s Chief Executive Officer Erik Nordstrom remarked that the company has been working on the fundamental principle of assisting customers in feeling well and looking their best for more than a century.
This idea has been the driving force behind the company’s operations. The company is about to embark on an exciting new phase, and today marks the beginning of that chapter.
We, the members of my family, are looking forward to working together with our coworkers to make certain that Nordstrom will continue to be successful well into the foreseeable future.
Over the course of its history, the retail establishment has made repeated attempts to transition into a private operation. 2018 was the year that a previous attempt was unsuccessful at materializing.
In September, the Nordstrom family made an offer to purchase the company at a price of $23 per share, which resulted in the company being valued at around $3.76 billion. The offer was accepted by the company.
Over the course of the early trading session, the stock of Nordstrom witnessed a decrease of nearly one percent. As a result of a report that was published by Reuters in March, which said that the family intended to take the company private, the shares of the company have undergone a large boost.
November revenues beat Wall Street forecasts for Nordstrom’s fiscal third quarter.
This was due to the fact that the company’s revenue climbed approximately 4% year-over-year. However, the company claimed that it anticipated a dismal holiday season, which resulted in a little more optimistic prediction for the full year’s revenues. This was the case since the corporation anticipated that the holiday season would be weak.
Customers continue to be picky when it comes to purchasing things that are desires rather than needs, and they have paid greater attention to pricing, according to the majority of merchants, including Walmart, Best Buy, and Target.
These businesses have also said that customers have become more price conscious. This has led to an increase in the amount of pressure that is being placed on luxury clothing businesses.
Nordstrom, a department store, was initially founded in 1901 as a shoe business but later expanded into other areas. Since then, it has developed into a department store that provides customers with a diverse range of clothing and accessories at more than 350 sites around the United States. These locations include Nordstrom Rack, Nordstrom Local, and Nordstrom.
El Puerto de Liverpool is responsible for the management of two further department store chains under the names Liverpool and Suburbia. In addition, El Puerto de Liverpool is home to 29 shopping centers that are dispersed across the entirety of Mexico
SOURCE: CNBC
SEE ALSO:
Sonic the Hedgehog Dominates Christmas Wish Lists
Amazon Strike Called By Teamsters Union 10,000 Walkout
-
Politics4 weeks ago
Miller Expects 4.9 Million Foreigners to Leave Canada Voluntarily
-
News4 weeks ago
Nolinor Boeing 737 Crash Lands in Montreal
-
News3 weeks ago
“Shocking Video” Vancouver Police Shoot Armed Suspect 10 Times
-
Tech4 weeks ago
Increasing its Stake in OpenAI by $1.5 Billion is a Possibility for SoftBank.
-
Tech4 weeks ago
Canadian Media Firms Are Suing OpenAI in a Potential Billion-Dollar Dispute.
-
Finance2 weeks ago
Chrystia Freeland Promises Mini-Budget By Dec 16th