Connect with us

Business

States Sue TikTok, Claiming Its Platform Is Addictive And Harms The Mental Health Of Children

Published

on

tiktok

More than a dozen states and the District of Columbia filed complaints against TikTok on Tuesday, claiming that the popular short-form video app is damaging teenage mental health by creating its platform to be addicting to children.

The cases originate from a national TikTok investigation begun in March 2022 by a bipartisan coalition of state attorneys general, including New York, California, Kentucky, and New Jersey. All of the allegations were filed in state court.

At the center of each case is the TikTok algorithm, which determines what users view on the site by populating the app’s primary “For You” stream with content suited to their preferences. The claims also highlight design aspects that they claim cause children to become addicted to the platform, such as the ability to browse endlessly through information, push alerts with built-in “buzzes,” and face filters that create unrealistic appearances for users.

States Sue TikTok, Claiming Its Platform Is Addictive And Harms The Mental Health Of Children

In its pleadings, the District of Columbia referred to the algorithm as “dopamine-inducing,” and claimed it was designed to be purposely addictive so that the corporation could ensnare many young people into excessive use and keep them on its app for hours on end. TikTok engages in these actions while knowing that they will cause “profound psychological and physiological harms,” including anxiety, sadness, body dysmorphia, and other long-term issues, according to the lawsuit.

“It is profiting from the fact that it is addicting young people to its platform,” District of Columbia Attorney General Brian Schwalb stated in an interview.

“We strongly disagree with many of these allegations, which we believe are false and misleading. In response to the lawsuits, TikTok spokesman Alex Haurek stated, “We are proud of and remain deeply committed to the work we’ve done to protect teens, and we will continue to update and improve our product.” “We’ve endeavored to work with the Attorneys General for over two years, and it is incredibly disappointing they have taken this step rather than work with us on constructive solutions to industrywide challenges.”

The social networking company does not let minors under the age of 13 sign up for its main service, and some content is restricted to anyone under the age of 18. Despite the company’s assertions that its platform is safe for children, Washington and several other states stated in their petition that children may simply bypass those limits, allowing them to access the services that adults use.

“TikTok claims to be safe for young people, however this is far from accurate. In New York and across the country, young people have died or been injured while participating in deadly TikTok challenges, and many more are feeling sad, frightened, and depressed as a result of TikTok’s addictive elements,” New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a statement.

Their complaint also targets other aspects of the company’s business.

The district claims TikTok is functioning as a “unlicensed virtual economy” by allowing users to buy TikTok Coins, a virtual currency within the platform, and send “Gifts” to TikTok LIVE streamers, who can then cash out for real money. TikTok charges a 50% commission on these financial transactions but has not registered as a money transmitter with the United States Treasury Department or district authorities, according to the complaint.

Officials claim that minors are routinely exploited for sexually explicit content via TikTok’s LIVE streaming feature, which has enabled the app to function essentially as a “virtual strip club” with no age limitations. They argue that the cut the corporation receives from financial transactions allows it to benefit from exploitation.

The 14 attorneys general say their lawsuits aim to stop TikTok from employing these features, impose financial penalties for suspected illegal actions, and recover damages for aggrieved users.

Many states have filed lawsuits against TikTok and other internet companies in recent years, as concern rises over prominent social media platforms and their ever-increasing impact on young people’s lives. In some cases, the challenges were coordinated in a manner similar to how states had organized against the tobacco and pharmaceutical companies.

States Sue TikTok, Claiming Its Platform Is Addictive And Harms The Mental Health Of Children

Last week, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a lawsuit against TikTok, alleging that the firm shared and sold children’s personal information in violation of a new state law that bars such operations. TikTok, which denies the charges, is simultaneously battling a similar data-related federal case launched in August by the Department of Justice.

Several Republican-led states, including Nebraska, Kansas, New Hampshire, Kansas, Iowa, and Arkansas, have previously sued the company, some unsuccessfully, over claims that it harms children’s mental health, exposes them to “inappropriate” content, or allows young people to be sexually exploited on its platform. Arkansas has filed a lawsuit against YouTube and Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, which is being sued by dozens of states on allegations that it is damaging young people’s mental health. New York City and certain public school districts have filed their own cases.

TikTok, in particular, is encountering additional hurdles at the national level. According to a federal rule that went into force earlier this year, TikTok might be outlawed in the United States by mid-January if its Chinese parent firm ByteDance does not sell the site by that time.

TikTok and ByteDance are both appealing the statute in Washington’s appeals court. A panel of three justices heard oral arguments in the case last month and is anticipated to announce a decision that might be appealed to the US Supreme Court.

SOURCE | AP

Business

Trudeau Accelerates Bond Selloff Over Mass Spending Fears

Published

on

Trudeau, Bond Market
Trudeau accelerated a bond selloff due to expectations of faster growth and a deeper deficit

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has accelerated bond selloffs, citing fears of a larger deficit over his GST giveaway. Investors were concerned he was returning to his free-spending strategy as an election loom.

On Thursday, Trudeau unveiled a C$6.3 billion ($4.5 billion) tax relief and rebate program. It includes a two-month moratorium on federal sales tax on various commodities such as Christmas trees, wine, toys, and books and a C$250 check for almost 19 million Canadians, or over half of the population.

The declaration looked to mark the end of a brief period of fiscal restraint, as Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland committed to contain budget deficits to prevent stoking inflationary pressures.

Now that inflation has returned to the Bank of Canada’s 2% target, policymakers have reduced the benchmark interest rate by 125 basis points since June.

Trudeau’s Liberal government sees an opportunity to dig deeper into the public purse, but some analysts believe investors are keeping a careful eye on the country’s debt.

Bonds continued to fall on Thursday following the announcement, as the 10-year benchmark yield rose 7 basis points to 3.457%. After retail data showed a rise in consumer spending on Friday, it increased by up to 3.488%.

As the Trudeau government considers additional fiscal spending, concerns about Canada’s financial situation persist.

Budget Shortfall

Freeland has yet to publish final spending and income figures for the fiscal year that ended in October. Parliamentary Budget Officer Yves Giroux predicts a deficit of C$46.8 billion, much exceeding Freeland’s self-imposed aim of a C$40 billion shortfall.

Despite promises to reduce deficits, the Trudeau government continues to increase expenditure. This year’s budget includes a new capital gains tax inclusion rate to balance the cost of new housing and social initiatives.

This sparked anger from investors and entrepreneurs but allowed Freeland to present a consistent deficit despite significant spending.

The recent declaration indicates that Trudeau’s government no longer feels restrained in its capacity to use economic stimulus to restore favor.

Pierre Poilievre’s Conservatives have led most surveys by roughly 20 points for over a year. They have pounded the prime minister on affordability and promised to reduce taxes, especially income taxes. An election is expected in late October 2025.

The sales tax break will run from December 14 to February 15. The left-wing New Democratic Party intends to support it but has stated that it will continue to advocate for its permanent implementation and expansion to include additional items.

Let the Bankers Worry

Following Trudeau’s announcement, traders in overnight swap markets reduced their bets that the Bank of Canada will drop interest rates by 50 basis points for the second time in December, lowering the odds to fewer than 25% by the end of Thursday. As of late Friday morning, the odds were less than 17%.

The announcement also encouraged several experts to improve their short-term projections for Canada’s GDP. Analysts at the Bank of Montreal predict that the country’s GDP will increase at a 2.5% annualized rate in the first three months of 2025, up from 1.7%.

Speaking to reporters on Friday, Trudeau praised his government’s approach to program expenditure, claiming it fosters optimism and possibilities for families and the middle class.

“We’re focusing on Canadians. “Let the bankers worry about the economy,” Trudeau stated.

Related:

Canada’s Budgetary Watchdog Warns Over Trudeau’s Spending

Canada’s Budgetary Watchdog Warns Over Trudeau’s Spending

Continue Reading

Business

Forced Sale Google Chrome Could Fetch $20 Billion

Published

on

Sale Google Chrome

Antitrust officials in the US could force the sale of Google’s Chrome browser for up to $20 billion, demonstrating the tremendous worth of the world’s most popular web browser.

Bloomberg Intelligence attributes Chrome’s projected worth to its more than 3 billion monthly active users. The US Department of Justice is preparing to request a federal judge order the browser’s separation from Google’s parent company, Alphabet.

Chrome’s worth comes from its overwhelming 61% market share and its crucial role in Google’s advertising ecosystem. User data enables businesses to better target adverts, and the browser also acts as an important distribution mechanism for Google’s AI technologies.

Industry analysts think it may be difficult to find a suitable buyer. While tech behemoths like Amazon could finance the purchase, they would likely face regulatory scrutiny.

AI businesses, such as OpenAI, may emerge as more viable contenders. They could potentially leverage Chrome to broaden their reach and develop an advertising business.

“It’s not directly monetizable,” one analyst told Bloomberg. “It functions as a gateway to other things. It’s unclear how you would assess that in terms of pure revenue generation.”

Google opposes prospective sales, claiming that they will hamper innovation. The firm does not break out Chrome’s revenue individually in its financial filings, even though the browser’s user data plays an important part in the company’s principal revenue stream, advertising.

The DOJ’s suggestion follows Judge Amit Mehta’s August decision that Google had illegally monopolized the search industry. The judge will consider the recommended remedies at a two-week hearing in April 2024, with a final judgment due in August 2025.

Related News:

Appeals Court Delays Order For Google To Open Its App Store In Antitrust Case

Appeals Court Delays Order For Google To Open Its App Store In Antitrust Case

Continue Reading

Business

Bitcoin Has Set a New Record And Is Approaching $100,000.

Published

on

Bitcoin

(VOR News) – Bitcoin broke beyond the $98,000 mark for the first time on Thursday as investors awaited Donald Trump’s second term as president. All of this happened during the day. As such, cryptocurrency has reached a significant turning point.

According to Coin Metrics, the top cryptocurrency was trading at $97,541.61 during the most recent trading session. Merchants provided this information. This suggests a price gain of more than three percent during the previous trading session.

When the period began, Bitcoin peaked at $98,367.00.

During the premarket trading session, MicroStrategy, a platform that facilitates cryptocurrency foreign exchange trading and serves as a bitcoin proxy, saw a 13% gain. Coinbase, on the other hand, had a 2% rise during that period. Furthermore, all of these increases occurred simultaneously.

The market value of Mara Holdings increased by 9%, which helped raise the valuation of mining companies overall. This was among the factors that led to the total rise.

Because of the widespread belief that President Trump will usher in a new era of prosperity for cryptocurrencies, one marked by more favorable laws and the possible creation of a national strategic bitcoin reserve, the price of Bitcoin has been rising steadily this month.

The most recent change brought about by the increase was the consequence of higher financing rates and more open interest in the futures market during Asian trading hours. The rise was the catalyst for this change. This action was prompted by the ensuing rush.

Throughout its lifespan, this legislation was the catalyst for this change for a variety of reasons. At the same time, spot market premiums decreased, according to CryptoQuant statistics. All of this happened at the same time.

Furthermore, a number of short liquidations have been sparked by the recent spikes in Bitcoin’s price, which has caused the price to rise overnight. As a result, the price has gone up much more. As a result, the total number of short liquidations has increased.

According to CoinGlass, these liquidations have effectively produced more than $88 million in capital during the last 24 hours.

Rob Ginsberg, an analyst at Wolfe Research, noted in a study released on Wednesday that “historically, following previous movements of this magnitude, Bitcoin has either entered a consolidation phase or disregarded the overbought condition as investors accumulate.” This phrase relates to the fact that this particular move has happened before.

Ginsberg stated this in reference to the evolution of Bitcoin over time.

Ginsberg’s answer makes reference to Bitcoin’s propensity to go through a period of consolidation. The comment also made reference to this.

He said, “Considering we are emerging from an extended consolidation phase and the price has reached a new high, it suggests that the pursuit is underway.”

The crucial psychological milestone of $100,000 is expected to be reached in the upcoming weeks, and this breakthrough could happen as early as Thursday. It seems likely that this level will be reached. There is a chance that this new development will take place.

This task will be carried out against the backdrop of this historical era. In addition, if Trump were to win a second term, federal budget deficits would increase, inflation would likely increase, and the dollar’s position in international affairs would change.

The administration that Trump would run during his presidency would be responsible for these consequences. All of these characteristics would positively impact the value of Bitcoin as a currency if they were taken into account in the order that they are presented.

The price of bitcoin had risen by more than 130% by the beginning of 2024.

SOUREC: CNBC

SEE ALSO:

PayPal’s Technical Challenges Are Affecting Thousands Of Customers Globally.

NVIDIA’s Earnings: The Leader In AI Chips Demonstrates Relentless Growth.

 

Continue Reading

Trending