Connect with us

Business

Songs By Taylor Swift, Drake And More Are Starting To Disappear From TikTok. Here’s Why

Published

on

tiktok

NEW YORK — TikTok may appear (or sound) slightly different as you continue to scroll through the app.

Universal Music Group, representing big-name artists such as Taylor Swift, Bad Bunny, and Drake, announced earlier this week that it would no longer allow its music to be played on the app after a licencing agreement between the two firms expired on Wednesday.

Owned by ByteDance, has verified to The Associated Press that the removal of UMG-related music has begun. As of early Thursday, many popular songs have disappeared from the social media platform’s catalogue.

Songs By Taylor Swift, Drake And More Are Starting To Disappear From TikTok. Here’s Why

Removing UMG-licensed music will likely take a few days, but hardcore TikTokers are already witnessing the results. Here’s an overview of where things stand.

What music is being removed from TikTok?

The songs being withdrawn from TikTok are those licenced by UMG, which has a massive reach across the music industry and, as a result, our current digital diet.

“Universal Music Group is literally the largest record label… in the history of the music industry,” stated Andrew Mall, an associate professor of music at Northeastern University. He stated that an “uncountable number of tracks and sounds” would impact TikTok, severely reducing creator possibilities.

TikTok users who signed up on Thursday will see that they can no longer search for many popular songs, including those by Ariana Grande, Justin Bieber, Billie Eilish, and others, under the “sounds” button.

Users will no longer be able to add these songs to the next dance craze or other trending material, and previous videos using UMG-licensed music will be removed. According to a UMG spokeswoman, TikTok will determine whether these existing films are muted or removed outright.

tiktok

Songs By Taylor Swift, Drake And More Are Starting To Disappear From TikTok. Here’s Why

Artists can also not share the audio of their UMG-licensed songs on TikTok. If UMG licences the music, it should be muted, according to the representative, who added that the business will safeguard its copyrights.

According to a person familiar with the situation, UMG’s representation of an artist’s tracks may also have an impact on their tour videos. This becomes more problematic if there are numerous songwriters, as it may affect recordings from other labels, according to the person.

Again, total eradication is likely to be a process. TikTok users may still be able to access some UMG music on Thursday, for example, and existing videos may take several days to be muted or removed.

How did we get here?

The licensing deal between UMG and TikTok expired after the two businesses could not reach a new agreement, prompting heated confrontations.

In a statement to artists and songwriters on Tuesday, UMG stated that it has pressed TikTok on three issues: “appropriate compensation for our artists and songwriters, protecting human artists from the harmful effects of AI, and online safety for TikTok’s users.”

tiktok

Songs By Taylor Swift, Drake And More Are Starting To Disappear From TikTok. Here’s Why

UMG stated that TikTok suggested paying its artists and songwriters at a fraction of the rate other major social platforms paid and that TikTok accounts for just approximately 1% of its total revenue. The music giant also criticised TikTok’s promotion of AI song creation, which UMG claims endangers human musicians, as well as the platform’s history of hate speech, intolerance, bullying, and harassment.

TikTok responded to UMG’s concerns, stating that it has negotiated “artist-first” agreements with every label and publisher.

“It is sad and disappointing that Universal Music Group has put their own greed above the interests of their artists and songwriters,” the founder of TikTok remarked.

WILL IT LAST?

Despite the expiration of the licencing agreement, observers note that UMG and TikTok are still in the midst of negotiations, which are unlikely to last forever.

“We have watched this movie before. “It’s a wonderful, theatrical standoff between two major corporations… who want to assert their authority on the landscape,” said Ted Cockle, former head of UMG’s Virgin EMI Records and current music advisory firm Mussel Music Management.

Users will most certainly find methods to cope in the meantime, according to Cockle, but he and others doubt that such a standoff would last long, pointing out that cooperation between UMG and TikTok benefits both parties greatly. According to Mall, gaps in other licencing agreements in the twenty-first century’s digital era have often lasted only a day to a few months.

There will likely be additional pressure from TikTok producers, artists, and fans.

“This is a platform that’s really important for artists,” said Alexandra J. Roberts, a Northeastern University law and media professor. “It may not have a significant impact on established musicians, but others will lose cash streams. And I believe we will see frustrated fans, correct? Users who don’t understand or are enraged by the fact that they can’t utilise, access, or interact with some artists’ work.”

Representatives for numerous UMG-licensed artists, including Taylor Swift, Bad Bunny, SZA, Drake, Ariana Grande, and Billie Eilish, did not immediately respond to The Associated Press’s requests for comment.

Mall emphasised the repercussions of removing music from social media platforms such as TikTok, especially for emerging musicians. In this case, UMG and its established major musicians will probably perform “just fine,” he claimed, but “smaller labels, smaller artists (couldn’t) afford to do something like this.”

Content writers and marketing gurus are already planning to pivot as needed. Jessica Henig, founder and CEO of music marketing business Unlocked Branding, which works on campaigns with UMG-licensed music, said it could be better, but her team has become accustomed to dealing with delays in the social media scene.

Still, Henig, who previously led influencer marketing at Virgin EMI, believes time will tell.

“If this is going to be a longevity thing, then we might have a different conversation,” she told me.

SOURCE – (AP)

 

Kiara Grace is a staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. Her writing focuses on technology trends, particularly in the realm of consumer electronics and software. With a keen eye for detail and a knack for breaking down complex topics.

Business

Walmart Charged With Unlawfully Establishing Bank Accounts for 1 Million Drivers

Published

on

Walmart
Photo: Reuters

(VOR News) – The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) filed a lawsuit against Walmart and a fintech company called Branch Messenger, alleging that the two companies forced more than a million delivery workers to use costly bank accounts to receive their paychecks. Both of these companies were the targets of the lawsuit.

According to the action filed by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), Walmart and Branch are accused of opening deposit accounts for Walmart’s Spark Drivers, who are considered independent contractors, without first getting their consent.

These bank accounts contained drivers’ personal data, including their Social Security numbers.

The lawsuit specifically claims that Walmart’s drivers, who are in charge of delivering goods from the company’s warehouses to consumers, are only allowed to have their earnings transferred into these branch accounts.

This goes against the company’s rules, which permit them to move their earnings to different accounts.

Walmart reportedly told employees in 2021 that using these accounts may lead to firing.

Additionally, the lawsuit claimed that accessing profits through the accounts was a “complex process,” typically causing weeks-long delays. Among the other accusations that were made was this one.

This was the predicament they ultimately found themselves in, even though the business had assured them that they would have prompt access to funds.

To make matters worse, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), drivers allegedly paid ten million dollars in “junk fees” to move their earnings to different bank accounts.

Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), Rohit Chopra, said, “Companies cannot force workers into getting paid through accounts that drain their earnings with junk fees,” in his criticism of the practice. “Junk fees are a waste of money.”

This case’s next section outlined the traits of the average Spark Driver: “in addition to being a woman, having children, not having a college degree, and having a low income.”

Walmart denied the accusations made by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and stated in a statement that it will firmly defend itself in court.

Walmart released a statement claiming that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) hurried lawsuit is full of factual errors, exaggerations, and blatant misrepresentations of basic legal principles.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) never gave Walmart a chance to make its case in an unbiased way throughout its rushed probe. In contrast to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, we are ready to fiercely defend the Company before a court that respects the due process of law principle.

Additionally, Branch was charged by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) with engaging in deceptive advertising and neglecting to look into and address issues pertaining to the accounts. In addition to earlier accusations, these were also made.

In contrast, Branch denied the accusations and defended its services, saying, “The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau rushed to file a lawsuit despite the company’s extensive cooperation with its investigation, refusing to engage with Branch in any meaningful way about this matter.”

Branch responded to the Walmart accusations with a statement.

Furthermore, Branch claimed that the case was motivated more by a desire for “media attention” than by concerns for the welfare of the employees. This is what he stated in his statement.

This case, which is part of a larger campaign to give these gig workers more rights, targets these individuals who work for firms like Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash who are supposed to be independent contractors. It is considered that gig workers are independent contractors.

Earlier this month, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) made claims against large financial firms, including Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and JPMorgan Chase.

According to the CFPB, these organizations did not stop fraud on the money-sending app Zelle, which is a platform that lets people send and receive money.

The choice of a new director may have an impact on the outcome of this lawsuit because President-elect Donald Trump is expected to choose a replacement for the present director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

When Jaret Seiberg was employed as a financial services policy analyst at TD Cowen Washington Research Group, she noted that the new director’s strategy for handling such matters would be the deciding element in the case’s future course.

SOURCE: TN

SEE ALSO:

Deal With Mexican Retailer, Nordstrom’s Founding Family Takes Nordstrom Private.

Sonic the Hedgehog Dominates Christmas Wish Lists

Continue Reading

Business

Naked Wines Issues 2024 Performance Review

Published

on

Naked Wines
Naked Wines claims to be in 'better position' despite falling sales

Naked Wines, an online retailer, has issued a performance review after announcing that sales declined 15% in the first half of the year to $112.3 million, despite management insisting it is in “a better position, both financially and strategically”.

Rodrigo Maza, who became CEO in February after joining the company as UK managing director in September 2023, stated that the company was in a better financial and strategic position, with “robust financial foundations” and committed and engaged members.

“Our strategic initiatives centred around customer acquisition and retention are generating learnings, and we are currently experiencing solid trading during the peak season period,” he told shareholders.

It also stated that a performance review is under underway in order to “proactively evaluate options to maximise shareholder value”. The end of the fiscal year will see the release of a report.

Naked Wines New CEO

He also welcomed new CFO Dominic Neary, who joined Naked Wines from Mind Gym in November, saying he was excited to collaborate with him “as we focus the business on cash, profitability, and growth with its rose wine and dry white wine.”A performance review is presently ongoing to “proactively evaluate options to maximise shareholder value,” according to the results, with a report expected to be released at the end of the fiscal year.

It also stated that it has continued to liquidate surplus inventory, with the UK and Australia returning to normal inventory levels, however US inventories remained “significantly” in excess, albeit being down $20.5 million from HY24.

It stated that it was “currently investigating options to reduce inventory levels more quickly,” which would help drive improved cash over the next two fiscal years, but “could lead to increased liquidation costs and result in EBIT at the lower end of guidance.”

Although active members (those with Angel or Wine Genie membership) declined 12% in the last 12 months, the statement noted retention of its ‘core’ members (those who had been customers for two years or more) was up two percentage points to 79%, and they remained “highly engaged”.

Customers’ total probability to refer the company to a friend (net promoter score) increased from 73 to 76 in the previous quarter, according to the report.

Turning Things Around

In August, the company reported a pre-tax loss of $16.3 million for the fiscal year ending 1 April 2024, up from $15 million in the fiscal year 2022/2023, with revenues down 18% to $290 million and repeat business down a quarter to $65 million.

Founder Rowan Gormley, on the other hand, asserted that the company was “making real progress in turning things around with its rose wine and dry white wine”.

It came after the engagement of debt consultants in March 2024 to look into refinancing possibilities and a possible wine company reorganization after the value of Naked Wines shares fell by about a third in the previous year.

Gormley increased his interest in Naked Wines significantly in December 2023, purchasing $9,600 in shares.

This was Gormley’s second round of stock purchases; he and other senior board members purchased a large number of shares in early November following a drop in share value after the firm stated it was lowering its full-year sales estimates to -12% to -16%.

Three of the company’s leaders at the time put a total of $94,000 in its stock.

Related News:

Brad Pitt And Angelina Jolie’s Winery Court Battle Heats Up

Continue Reading

Business

Deal With Mexican Retailer, Nordstrom’s Founding Family Takes Nordstrom Private.

Published

on

Nordstrom
Scott Olson | Getty Images

(VOR News) – The company made the news on Monday that it would transition into a private Nordstrom corporation after the conclusion of a buyout agreement with El Puerto de Liverpool, a Mexican department store, and the founding family of Nordstrom.

The arrangement was reached when the company acquired El Puerto de Liverpool. It is projected that the transaction will end up valued at around $6.25 billion.

The company’s board of directors came to a resolution that was unanimous in order to give their approval to the deal, which is expected to be completed in the first half of the year 2025.

The Nordstrom family would control the corporation under the agreement.

Which will equate to 50.1% of the business, while Liverpool will hold 49.9% of the company. In accordance with a press announcement, common stockholders would receive a cash payment of $24.25 for each share of Nordstrom common stock that they now hold in their possession.

According to a news release, Nordstrom’s Chief Executive Officer Erik Nordstrom remarked that the company has been working on the fundamental principle of assisting customers in feeling well and looking their best for more than a century.

This idea has been the driving force behind the company’s operations. The company is about to embark on an exciting new phase, and today marks the beginning of that chapter.

We, the members of my family, are looking forward to working together with our coworkers to make certain that Nordstrom will continue to be successful well into the foreseeable future.

Over the course of its history, the retail establishment has made repeated attempts to transition into a private operation. 2018 was the year that a previous attempt was unsuccessful at materializing.

In September, the Nordstrom family made an offer to purchase the company at a price of $23 per share, which resulted in the company being valued at around $3.76 billion. The offer was accepted by the company.

Over the course of the early trading session, the stock of Nordstrom witnessed a decrease of nearly one percent. As a result of a report that was published by Reuters in March, which said that the family intended to take the company private, the shares of the company have undergone a large boost.

November revenues beat Wall Street forecasts for Nordstrom’s fiscal third quarter.

This was due to the fact that the company’s revenue climbed approximately 4% year-over-year. However, the company claimed that it anticipated a dismal holiday season, which resulted in a little more optimistic prediction for the full year’s revenues. This was the case since the corporation anticipated that the holiday season would be weak.

Customers continue to be picky when it comes to purchasing things that are desires rather than needs, and they have paid greater attention to pricing, according to the majority of merchants, including Walmart, Best Buy, and Target.

These businesses have also said that customers have become more price conscious. This has led to an increase in the amount of pressure that is being placed on luxury clothing businesses.

Nordstrom, a department store, was initially founded in 1901 as a shoe business but later expanded into other areas. Since then, it has developed into a department store that provides customers with a diverse range of clothing and accessories at more than 350 sites around the United States. These locations include Nordstrom Rack, Nordstrom Local, and Nordstrom.

El Puerto de Liverpool is responsible for the management of two further department store chains under the names Liverpool and Suburbia. In addition, El Puerto de Liverpool is home to 29 shopping centers that are dispersed across the entirety of Mexico

SOURCE: CNBC

SEE ALSO:

Sonic the Hedgehog Dominates Christmas Wish Lists

Amazon Strike Called By Teamsters Union 10,000 Walkout

Continue Reading

Trending