Canada’s top news outlets have filed a possibly billion-dollar lawsuit against OpenAI, claiming the tech company is “strip-mining journalism” and unfairly benefiting from using news articles to train its well-known ChatGPT software.

The lawsuit, filed on Friday in Ontario’s superior court of justice, demands a portion of OpenAI’s earnings from exploiting the news organizations’ stories, punitive damages, and an order prohibiting the San Francisco-based business from using any news pieces.

According to the president of News Media Canada, Paul Deegan, “These AI companies are free-riding on the backs of news publishers who invest real money to employ real journalists who produce real stories for real people and cannibalize proprietary content.”

“They are severely, unfairly, and illegally enriching themselves at the expense of publishers while undermining journalism.”

The lawsuit involves the Globe and Mail, the Canadian Press, the CBC, the Toronto Star, Metroland Media, and Postmedia. The parties demand penalties of up to C$20,000 for every piece OpenAI uses, implying that a legal victory may be worth billions.

“The defendants have been involved in the ongoing, deliberate, and unauthorized misappropriation of the plaintiffs’ valuable news media works.” The news organizations’ statement of claim stated that the plaintiffs are bringing this action to prevent and seek compensation for these unlawful activities.

“OpenAI intentionally “scrapes” (i.e., accesses and copies) content from the websites of news media corporations to acquire the substantial quantities of text data required to develop their GPT models… It subsequently employs that proprietary content to create GPT models without obtaining consent or authorization.

There has been no legal testing of any of the claims.

The lawsuit is the most recent in a series of legal disputes between Canadian media and American tech firms, including a sour spat with Facebook’s parent company, Meta. The New York Times is one of the several news organizations in the US that have sued OpenAI.

OpenAI, valued at over $150 billion, has already inked licensing deals with a few media companies, such as NewsCorp, Condé Nast, and the Associated Press wire service.

Related News:

OpenAI Surges to 200 Million Weekly Users

Geoff Brown

Geoff Thomas is a seasoned staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. With his sharp writing skills and deep understanding of SEO, he consistently delivers high-quality, engaging content that resonates with readers. Thomas’ articles are well-researched, informative, and written in a clear, concise style that keeps audiences hooked. His ability to craft compelling narratives while seamlessly incorporating relevant keywords has made him a valuable asset to the VORNews team.

The Competition Bureau of Canada has announced it is suing Google for alleged anti-competitive behaviour in its internet advertising.

In a statement, Competition Bureau Commissioner Matthew Boswell said that Google improperly linked two advertising tools to retain market dominance and utilized this dominating position to rig ad auctions by favouring its tools.

He stated that the Competition Bureau has filed a case with the Competition Tribunal, a court-like independent entity, requiring Google to sell two of its ad technology products.

In a statement, Google stated that the Canadian complaint “ignores the intense competition where ad buyers and sellers have plenty of choice, and we look forward to making our case in court”.

“Our advertising technology tools help websites and apps fund their content, and they enable businesses of all sizes to effectively reach new customers,” said Dan Taylor, vice president of global advertising.

This case focuses on online web adverts, which appear to people when they visit other websites.

Digital ad inventory or the space website publishers make available for sale, is frequently purchased and sold through automated auctions conducted on digital platforms.

These platforms are known as ad tech tools, and the full set of tools utilized during the purchasing process is known as the ad tech stack.

According to the Competition Bureau, an inquiry revealed that Google “abused its dominant position” as Canada’s largest ad tech stack.

“Through a series of calculated decisions taken over multiple years, Google has excluded competitors and entrenched itself at the centre of online advertising,” the Competition Bureau stated in its notice announcing the claim on Thursday.

“Google’s near-total control of the ad-tech [software] is a function of premeditated design and conduct, rather than superior competitive performance or happenstance.”

The agency requested the Competition Tribunal to compel Google to sell two of its ad tech products and pay a fine of up to 3% of the company’s global revenue “to promote compliance” with Canadian competition laws.

Google has 45 days to file a response with the tribunal.

The case comes barely a week after the US Justice Department and a group of states asked that Google sell Chrome, the world’s most popular web browser, as part of a series of measures to prevent the internet behemoth from preserving its monopoly in online search.

The Competition Bureau is an independent law enforcement agency that protects and promotes competition for Canadian consumers and businesses. Competition drives lower prices and innovation while fueling economic growth.

The Competition Bureau website states:

The Competition Bureau is taking legal action against Google for anti-competitive conduct in online advertising technology services in Canada. The Bureau has filed an application with the Competition Tribunal for an order that, among other things:

• Requires Google to sell two of its advertising technology tools: its publisher ad server, DFP, and its ad exchange, AdX;
• directs Google to pay an administrative monetary penalty equal to three times the value of the benefit derived from Google’s anti-competitive practices, or if that amount cannot be reasonably determined, 3% of Google’s worldwide gross revenues and
• prohibits Google from continuing to engage in anticompetitive conduct and practices.

The final decision in this matter rests with the Competition Tribunal, independent of the Bureau.

Related News:

Google Provides a Free Gemini Live AI Assistant for All App Users

Google Provides a Free Gemini Live AI Assistant for All App Users.

Geoff Brown

Geoff Thomas is a seasoned staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. With his sharp writing skills and deep understanding of SEO, he consistently delivers high-quality, engaging content that resonates with readers. Thomas’ articles are well-researched, informative, and written in a clear, concise style that keeps audiences hooked. His ability to craft compelling narratives while seamlessly incorporating relevant keywords has made him a valuable asset to the VORNews team.

(VOR News) – The share prices of ASML and its competitors in the European computer chip equipment market increased significantly after an article appeared in Bloomberg News on Thursday.

It was also found that the share prices of other companies that operate within the sector increased, which was another trend that was observed within the industry.

According to what is indicated in the article, it is possible that the restrictions that the United States of America intends to place on the semiconductor industry in China would not be as severe as was initially feared.

As of 08:09 GMT, the shares of ASML had climbed by 4.3%, while the shares of BE Semiconductor and ASM International, two of ASML’s competitors in the Netherlands, had increased by 5% and 2.9%, respectively.

This meant that these two companies were among the most successful performers on the European benchmark STOXX 600 index. A company known as ASML is one that conducts business in the Netherlands.

There was a 4.3% increase in the value of ASML’s shares.

There is a corporation that operates in the Netherlands that is known by the name ASML and their operations are being carried out there.

According to a report that was published by Bloomberg, the United States of America will not include the giant Chinese memory chip manufacturer ChangXin Memory Technologies Inc (CXMT) on the list of trade restrictions that would be imposed by the United States.

This information was obtained from the article. The information that was supplied by Bloomberg allows for the acquisition of this particular piece of information. It was stated in the study that it was not practicable to identify sources who did not wish to be recognized without first obtaining their knowledge and consent.

An additional instance of interest that caught the attention of the reader was the fact that the report states that neither the time of the decision nor the particulars of the choice are known. This is yet another case of interest that drew the reader’s attention.

Following the Thanksgiving holiday break, the US Department of Commerce, which is in charge of monitoring the US export limitations to China, is expected to issue new directives. This is because the United States is responsible for enforcing these restrictions.

This is because the United States of America is responsible for monitoring the constraints. This is because the United States of America is accountable for safeguarding China’s interests. This explains why this is the case.

On the other hand, ASML has made the decision not to comment on the topic, despite the fact that it is by a substantial margin the most renowned provider of equipment for the manufacturing of semiconductors for the semiconductor industry.

During an investor day that took place two weeks ago, the firm announced that it anticipates the percentage of total revenues that includes sales of its instruments to China to decrease to twenty percent in the year 2025.

The investor day featured this ASML prediction.

The prediction was made during the day that was reserved for investors. There was a drop of approximately fifty percent at this point in time, which occurred throughout the course of the six quarters that came before this one.

When the current level, which is roughly fifty percent, is taken into consideration, this will be considered a big decline.

Applied Materials, KLA Corporation, Lam Research, and Tokyo Electron are just a few of the other leading providers of computer equipment that are based in the United States. Other firms that also fall into this category include Tokyo Electron.

The field of computer technology is home to each and every one of these businesses. There is not a single one of these businesses that does not have its headquarters in the United States of America.

SOUREC: USN

SEE ALSO:

Increasing its Stake in OpenAI by $1.5 Billion is a Possibility for SoftBank.

“Un-American Threats” Target Donald Trump’s Cabinet Nominees and Appointments.

Salman Ahmad

Salman Ahmad is a seasoned freelance writer who contributes insightful articles to VORNews. With years of experience in journalism, he possesses a knack for crafting compelling narratives that resonate with readers. Salman’s writing style strikes a balance between depth and accessibility, allowing him to tackle complex topics while maintaining clarity.