Connect with us

Politics

Biden’s Identity Politics and the Media Have Divided a Nation

Published

on

Biden' Identity Politics and the Liberal Media Dividing a Nation

President Joe Biden campaigned on a promise to unite the country, but three years later, the clear majority of Americans believe he and his administration are doing more to divide the country through identity politics.

A whopping 92% of Republicans polled claimed Biden was separating the country, while 84% of Democrats felt he was doing more to bring the country together. Half of independents, a major voting demographic that has been critical of Biden, said he was dividing the country.

On the campaign trail, in his victory speech, and in his inaugural address, Biden emphasised the importance of togetherness. Just last week, the president issued another call for peace when speaking on the one-year anniversary of the tragic U.S. Capitol riot.

“I believe the power and purpose of the presidency is to unite this nation, not divide it; to lift us up, not tear us apart; to be about us—about us, not’me,'” he stated. “Deep in the heart of America burns a flame lit nearly 250 years ago—of liberty, freedom, and equality.” This is not a land of monarchs, tyrants, or autocrats. We are a law-abiding people who value order over turmoil and peace over violence.”

Following the second anniversary of the January 6 riot, 53 percent of Americans believe a similar incident is either extremely likely or somewhat likely in the future.

Biden’s approval rating

Moreover, despite Biden’s appeals, more than half of Americans believe political polarisation would intensify throughout their lifetime. Furthermore, more than three-quarters of Americans believe that domestic political instability poses a greater threat than foreign foes.

The negative mindset of Americans extends beyond politics. Views of the economy remain overwhelmingly unfavourable, with nearly half of Americans (46%) expecting economic circumstances to worsen over the next year.

Furthermore, there has been a significant increase in the number of Americans who believe the country cannot fix many of its major problems, from 41% last year to 56% now.

Americans have become much more sceptical of the general public’s political knowledge. Approximately three-quarters of the population (76%) have little or no faith in the intelligence of the American people in making political decisions, up from 62% in 2021.

A recent Pew Research Centre survey of 5,079 members of the Center’s nationally representative American Trends Panel, conducted March 27-April 2, 2023, indicates that Biden’s job rating remains below 40%. Only 37% of those polled approve of his job performance, while 60% disapprove.

Americans fault news media for dividing nation

Meanwhile, when it comes to the liberal news media’s impact on democracy and political polarisation in the United States, Americans are more likely to believe it is causing more harm than good.

According to a new Associated Press poll, nearly three-quarters of U.S. adults believe the news media is growing political polarisation in the country, and just under half have little to no trust in the media’s ability to present the news fairly and honestly.

The poll found that while Americans are concerned about disinformation — and the role that the media, politicians, and social media corporations play in spreading it — many are also concerned about mounting risks to journalists’ safety.

This collapse in confidence may drive many Americans to abandon mainstream news sources in favour of social media and untrustworthy websites that distribute false information and can become partisan echo chambers, leading to increased polarisation.

While a narrow majority of Americans have some confidence in the liberal news media’s ability to convey the news fully and fairly, only 16% are very confident. 45 percent say they have little to no confidence in the future.

The survey reveals many Americans’ complicated relationship with the media: while the majority rate in-depth and investigative reporting as very helpful or extremely helpful for understanding the issues they care about, they are more likely to say they regularly scan the headlines rather than read an in-depth investigative article. While overall trust in the media is low, a majority of respondents believe the media does at least somewhat well in covering issues that are important to them.

American’s very divided

Four out of ten people believe the press is doing more to harm American democracy, while only around two out of ten believe the press is doing more to safeguard it. Another four in ten say neither applies.

According to Joe Salegna, a Republican from Long Island, New York, partisan news outlets and social media platforms have exacerbated the situation by teaching many Americans to view one another as enemies.

“I think it’s tearing this country apart,” Salegna, 50, said to the Associated Press. “I think it’s gotten a lot worse since the 2016 election.”

Republicans hold the news media in lower regard than Democrats, with 61% believing it harms democracy, compared to 23% of Democrats and 36% of independents who do not support either party. Majorities across party lines believe the news media causes political divisiveness, but Republicans are far more likely than Democrats to believe this occurs frequently.

More Republicans believe the news is heavily affected by the US government and journalists’ political opinions.

Coverage of recent presidential elections, the coronavirus pandemic, rallies against police deaths of Black Americans, and other incidents convinced Janis Fort that the media is untrustworthy. She claims that one network will cover a story that others will neglect, leaving viewers unsure who to believe.

“Everyone has a different story to share. “The media does nothing but instill fear,” said Fort, a 71-year-old retired Republican from Navarre, Florida. “Most of the people I know, including myself, feel completely in the dark.”

Media fragmentation

According to research, the fragmentation of the media ecosystem, mostly driven by the internet, has contributed to polarisation. Experts attribute America’s heightened political divisions to a variety of factors, including gerrymandering, which decreases political competition, and politicians who instill fear and distrust, but media fragmentation and misinformation are also playing a role.

“We should be concerned about the health of democracy,” said Joshua Tucker, a New York University political scientist who studies partisanship and co-directs NYU’s Centre for Social Media.

Concern about the threat posed by disinformation unifies Americans of both parties, with nearly nine out of ten U.S. adults stating that misinformation is a concern. Every day, one-third of American people say they encounter news with inaccurate claims made by politicians or misleading headlines.

“There is still good journalism, it’s just that the internet has made it so that anybody can be a quote-unquote journalist,” said Chris Nettell, a Democrat from Hickory Creek, Texas. “We have some news media that only targets a certain segment of society, and those people believe that because that’s all they read, everyone else believes it as well.”

Social media plays a significant role, with nearly two-thirds of respondents expecting an erroneous news report when they encounter it on social media. Those who claimed they get their news from social media on a regular basis were slightly more likely to believe it than others.

Spread of misinformation

Overall, around 6 in 10 believe the news media is to responsible for the spread of misinformation, and a comparable percentage believe it carries a significant degree of responsibility for resolving it. Majorities also believe that others, such as social media corporations and politicians, bear responsibility for both the propagation of disinformation and its prevention.

“So many people get their information from social media, and people believe whatever they want to believe,” said Araceli Cervantes, 39, a Republican mother of four from Chicago.

When it comes to defending press freedom in the United States, 44% of respondents feel the government is doing a good job, while 24% say it is doing a bad one. Most Americans are concerned about the safety of journalists, with nearly one-third stating they are very concerned or extremely concerned about attacks on the press.

The survey of 1,002 individuals was performed from March 30 to April 3 using a sample taken from NORC’s probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is intended to be representative of the U.S. population.

For all respondents, the margin of sampling error is 4.4 percentage points.

 

 

Geoff Brown is a seasoned staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. With his sharp writing skills he consistently delivers high-quality, engaging content that resonates with readers. Geoff's' articles are well-researched, informative, and written in a clear, concise style that keeps audiences hooked. His ability to craft compelling narratives while seamlessly incorporating relevant keywords has made him a valuable asset to the VORNews team.

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump Takes Aim at Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau

Published

on

Trump Takes Aim at Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau
President-elect Donald Trump this week once again issued several taunts at Justin Trudeau

President-elect Donald Trump has shifted his attention from Congress’s spending plans to criticize Canada and its Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau.

Trump’s provocative statements directed at Prime Minister Justin Trudeau made headlines this week, eliciting responses from both sides of the frontier.

Trump suggested on his platform, Truth Social, that Canadians may prefer their country to become the 51st state of the United States. He claimed that they would receive substantial benefits from reduced taxation and military protection.

He even addressed Justin Trudeau as “Governor,” a statement that has undoubtedly caused controversy in Canada. Many Canadian officials expressed their indignation in a prompt manner.

“We are Canadians first,” remarked a Canadian commentator, discounting Trump’s remarks as misguided.

The tension intensified after a surprise Thanksgiving dinner at Mar-a-Lago, during which Trump initially proposed that Canada could circumvent tariffs by becoming the 51st state to join the United States.

Trump has since expressed his apprehension regarding border security and has threatened to impose a substantial 25% tariff on all Canadian products.

It is important to acknowledge that the statistics provide a different perspective. The Canadian border has experienced a fraction of the number of arrests in comparison to the southern border of the United States with Mexico.

US Canada Ties

The economic relationship between the United States and Canada is substantial, with an exchange of products valued at approximately $2.7 billion on a daily basis.

Nevertheless, the notion of becoming the 51st state is profoundly offensive to many Canadians, despite the fact that Trump’s allies in Washington D.C. have characterized his remarks as humorous.

Kirsten Hillman, Canada’s ambassador to the United States, downplayed any indication of tensions between the two countries. Hillman stated, “I believe that the president-elect is enjoying himself.” “Canada is capable of accommodating it.” You are aware that we possess a robust sense of self and are capable of communicating it.

“The United States is like family,” she stated to Politico.

The president-elect is well-known to Hillman. She played a critical role in the negotiation of Canada’s portion of the United States-Mexico-Canada agreement during his most recent administration. Additionally, she traveled to Mar-a-Lago with Trudeau for the diplomatic dinner just a few weeks ago.

Canada is considering retaliatory tariffs in response to Trump’s threats. It is crucial to bear in mind that a significant fraction of the energy imports of the United States are sourced from Canada.

Specifically, approximately 60% of crude oil and 85% of electricity are sourced from our northern neighbor.

The consequences of Trump’s remarks on U.S.-Canada relations are far from clear as the situation continues to develop.

Navigating these tensions and preserving a robust economic partnership will require the ongoing dialogue between the two nations.

Support for Trudeau Diminishing

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is facing increasing pressure to resign, as an increasing number of Liberal MPs have joined the call for his resignation in response to the tumultuous week that has befallen his party.

Global News reported that over half of the 75 Liberal MPs from Ontario convened for a one-hour meeting on Saturday to discuss the leadership of their party.

At the caucus meeting, only a small number of MPs expressed their support for Trudeau’s continued leadership. However, a significant number of them expressed their desire for him to step down, stating that his brand has become “toxic.”

Chandra Arya, who represents the Ottawa constituency of Nepean, was among the attendees at the meeting on Saturday.

Arya published a letter he wrote to Trudeau on Friday, in which he requested that he “step aside as leader of the Liberal caucus immediately.”

Arya wrote in the letter dated Dec. 20 and shared on X, “I have consistently supported you since last summer, even when some of our colleagues called for your resignation, while I align as a fiscally-center-right Liberal and have often disagreed with your left-leaning positions.”

“However, it was evident today that the House of Commons no longer has faith in you.” I am now reasonably certain that the Liberal caucus’s majority no longer endorses your leadership.

Arya did not disclose the events of Saturday’s meeting during an interview with Global News on Sunday; however, he stated that it verified the information he had previously written in his letter.

He stated that the number of Liberal MPs who have joined calls for Trudeau to step down has “begun to increase” over the past 48 to 72 hours.

“I believe that the prime minister is seriously considering,” Arya stated.

Related News:

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh Vows to Topple Trudeau Government

 

Continue Reading

Politics

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh Vows to Topple Trudeau Government

Published

on

Jagmeet Singh, Trudeau
Jagmeet Singh says NDP will vote to bring down Trudeau government

Canada’s opposition leader said his caucus plans to vote against Justin Trudeau’s government. If the prime minister does not seek a temporary suspension of parliament, the country will be plunged into an election early next year.

If the NDP gains support from other major opposition parties, Trudeau’s government would be forced to step down, sparking an election shortly after Donald Trump’s expected return to the White House in Washington DC.

Trudeau’s Liberals currently lack a majority in the House of Commons and have relied on NDP backing to pass laws and remain in power. Singh and Trudeau previously agreed on a cooperation deal, but the NDP leader ended that arrangement in September.

Singh’s declaration came just before Trudeau unveiled changes to his cabinet, a move aimed at steadying his government following Chrystia Freeland’s surprising resignation as finance minister earlier in the week. Polls show the Liberals are unpopular, and Trudeau is under internal pressure to resign after Freeland’s departure.

“The Liberals don’t deserve another chance,” Singh said. “That’s why the NDP will vote to end this government and let Canadians choose new leadership.”

Trudeau is expected to consider his political future over the holidays, and parliament will reconvene on January 27.

One option for Trudeau is asking the governor-general to prorogue parliament, which would end the current session. This move could delay Singh’s non-confidence vote by postponing lawmakers’ return to Ottawa.

The new cabinet begins its term amid economic uncertainty, worsened by Trump’s threat to impose 25 percent tariffs on Canadian goods.

Dominic LeBlanc — who joined the prime minister at a dinner meeting with Trump at Mar-a-Lago in November — was sworn in as finance minister on Monday after Freeland quit.

Today, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced changes to his Cabinet. He said the new cabinet will prioritize Canadians’ most important objectives: enhancing the economy and reducing the cost of living.

The team will continue to advance in housing, child care, and school food while striving to return more money to Canadians’ wallets, building on the investments made since 2015.

The changes to the cabinet are as follows:

  • Anita Anand becomes Minister of Transport and Internal Trade
  • Gary Anandasangaree becomes Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs and Minister responsible for the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency
  • Steven MacKinnon becomes Minister of Employment, Workforce Development and Labour
  • Ginette Petitpas Taylor becomes President of the Treasury Board

The Prime Minister also welcomed the following new members of his Cabinet:

  • Rachel Bendayan becomes Minister of Official Languages and Associate Minister of Public Safety
  • Élisabeth Brière becomes Minister of National Revenue
  • Terry Duguid becomes Minister of Sport and Minister responsible for Prairies Economic Development Canada
  • Nate Erskine-Smith becomes Minister of Housing, Infrastructure and Communities
  • Darren Fisher becomes Minister of Veterans Affairs and Associate Minister of National Defence
  • David J. McGuinty becomes Minister of Public Safety
  • Ruby Sahota becomes Minister of Democratic Institutions and Minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario.
  • Joanne Thompson becomes Minister of Seniors.

These new ministers will work with all members of the Cabinet to deliver real, positive change for Canadians. They join the following ministers remaining in their portfolio:

  • Terry Beech, Minister of Citizens’ Services
  • Bill Blair, Minister of National Defence
  • François-Philippe Champagne, Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry
  • Jean-Yves Duclos, Minister of Public Services and Procurement and Quebec Lieutenant
  • Karina Gould, Leader of the Government in the House of Commons
  • Steven Guilbeault, Minister of Environment and Climate Change
  • Patty Hajdu, Minister of Indigenous Services and Minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Northern Ontario
  • Mark Holland, Minister of Health
  • Ahmed Hussen, Minister of International Development
  • Gudie Hutchings, Minister of Rural Economic Development and Minister responsible for the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
  • Marci Ien, Minister for Women and Gender Equality and Youth
  • Mélanie Joly, Minister of Foreign Affairs
  • Kamal Khera, Minister of Diversity, Inclusion and Persons with Disabilities
  • Dominic LeBlanc, Minister of Finance and Intergovernmental Affairs
  • Diane Lebouthillier, Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard
  • Lawrence MacAulay, Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food
  • Soraya Martinez Ferrada, Minister of Tourism and Minister responsible for the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec
  • Marc Miller, Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship
  • Mary Ng, Minister of Export Promotion, International Trade and Economic Development
  • Harjit S. Sajjan, President of the King’s Privy Council for Canada and Minister of Emergency Preparedness and Minister responsible for the Pacific Economic Development Agency of Canada
  • Ya’ara Saks, Minister of Mental Health and Addictions and Associate Minister of Health
  • Pascale St-Onge, Minister of Canadian Heritage
  • Jenna Sudds, Minister of Families, Children and Social Development
  • Rechie Valdez, Minister of Small Business
  • Arif Virani, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
  • Jonathan Wilkinson, Minister of Energy and Natural Resources

 

Continue Reading

Politics

Trudeau Accused of “Phony Feminism” After Freeland’s Departure

Published

on

Trudeau Accused of "Phony Feminism"
Freeland's resignation letter didn't mention gender, but Trudeau accused of phoney feminism anyway

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is facing a backlash for claiming to be a feminist after firing Chrystia Freeland as Finance Minister and replacing her with Dominic Leblanc on Tuesday.

Justin Trudeau has positioned himself as a feminist leader, a central element of his political identity. In 2015, Canada made history by appointing its first gender-equal cabinet, a significant step in the ongoing effort to champion women’s rights policies.

Trudeau aimed to solidify his reputation as a pioneer in the fight for gender equality. Recent accusations of “phoney feminism” have sparked a heated debate regarding the consistency between his statements and his actions.

Chrystia Freeland’s resignation from the cabinet has sparked criticism directed at Prime Minister Trudeau, raising questions about his approach to women in leadership roles.

Chrystia Freeland, previously regarded as one of Prime Minister Trudeau’s closest allies, has officially resigned from her position as Finance Minister. In her resignation letter, she notably omitted any reference to gender issues.

Freeland’s departure mirrors Trudeau’s removal of several high-profile women;

  • Jody Wilson-Raybould, former Attorney General, was removed in 2019 after the SNC-Lavalin controversy.
  • Jane Philpott, then President of the Treasury Board, was also ousted following her support for Wilson-Raybould.
  • Celina Caesar-Chavannes, a Liberal MP, left politics after claiming Trudeau didn’t handle internal disagreements well.

These firings have fuelled debates about his handling of women in leadership positions and made a mockery of his claims of being a feminist.

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre criticized Trudeau for the optics of replacing Freeland with a male cabinet member, calling it evidence of Trudeau’s “fake feminism.”

“Just blame Chrystia Freeland and make her wear it all. Some feminist,” Poilievre said at a news conference on Tuesday.

The same week as Trudeau was insulting Americans for not electing a woman president, he was busy throwing his own woman deputy prime minister under the bus to replace her with a man, Poilievre commented.

Prominent Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner asked how any woman in that caucus could “defend that man instead of calling for an election now,” while Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said Trudeau needed to start proving himself if he was going to keep declaring himself “to be such a supporter of women.”

MP Melissa Lantsman referred to an “old boys’ club” being in charge.

“It’s time for credible leadership in the seriousness of this moment, not the fake feminism of this phoney prime minister,” said Lantsman, who represents the Conservatives in the Thornhill riding.

Former Liberal MP Celina Caesar-Chavannes said she believes there is a pattern of female cabinet ministers who were “thrown under the bus” after “challenging someone whose name is Trudeau.”

Trudeau Defended

However, while Freeland’s resignation has sparked accusations of sexism, political experts suggest that focusing solely on gender may oversimplify the issue.

Freeland, an accomplished politician and the country’s first female Finance Minister left primarily due to policy disagreements. Her decision was less about being a powerful woman and more about divergent views on leadership and economic strategy.

Political scientist Dr. Melanee Thomas remarked that qualified women in politics often face frustrations when their expertise is dismissed.

She cautioned against reducing complex political dynamics to gender alone. By framing Freeland’s resignation solely as evidence of sexism, the broader challenges faced by all leaders in Trudeau’s cabinets—men and women alike—are overlooked.

Trudeau has remained relatively quiet, stating that Freeland’s departure was not an “easy day” for him.

Unlike previous controversies, he has not publicly defended his feminist credentials since Freeland’s resignation, leaving a vacuum for critics to dominate the narrative.

Over the years, Trudeau has said that “adding women changes politics,” presenting himself as an ally for feminist causes. His silence now begs the question: does he believe his track record speaks for itself, or is he struggling to respond to the growing skepticism?

Continue Reading

Trending