Connect with us

Business

Apple Has Kept An Illegal Monopoly Over Smartphones In US, Justice Department Says In Antitrust Suit

Published

on

apple-lawsuit

Washington —A.P.he Justice Department announced a broad antitrust case against Apple on Thursday, accusing the company of creating an illegal smartphone monopoly that excludes competitors and stifles innovation.

The case, filed in federal court in New Jersey, claims that Apple has monopoly power in the smartphone market and utilizes its control over the iPhone to “engage in a broad, sustained, and illegal course of conduct.”

The lawsuit, which was also filed with 16 state attorneys general, is the latest example of the Justice Department’s aggressive enforcement of federal antitrust law. Officials say it is intended to ensure a fair and competitive market, despite the fact that it has lost some significant anticompetition cases.

Apple deemed the case “wrong on the facts and the law” and stated it “will vigorously defend against it.”

apple

Apple Has Kept An Illegal Monopoly Over Smartphones In US, Justice Department Says In Antitrust Suit

President Joe Biden has urged the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission to rigorously enforce antitrust laws. Some business executives have objected to the Democratic administration’s increasing surveillance of corporate mergers and business deals, calling it overreaching, but others have praised it as long necessary.

The case is directly aimed at the digital fortress that Apple Inc., based in Cupertino, California, has painstakingly built around the iPhone and other popular products such as the iPad, Mac, and Apple Watch to create what is often referred to as a “walled garden” in which its meticulously designed hardware and software can coexist while requiring consumers to do little more than turn the devices on.

The strategy has helped Apple become the world’s most affluent corporation, with annual revenue of about $400 billion and, until recently, a market value of more than $3 trillion. However, Apple’s stock has declined 7% this year, while the rest of the stock market has risen to new highs, allowing long-time rival Microsoft — the target of a major Justice Department antitrust action a quarter-century ago — to take the lead as the world’s most valuable corporation.

According to Apple, a victory in the lawsuit would “hinder our ability to create the kind of technology people expect from Apple — where hardware, software, and services intersect” and that it would “set a dangerous precedent, empowering government to take a heavy hand in designing people’s technology.”

“At Apple, we innovate every day to make technology people love — designing products that work seamlessly together, protect people’s privacy and security, and create a magical experience for our users,” the company said in a press release. “This action undermines who we are and the ideals distinguishing Apple goods in intensely competitive marketplaces.

Apple has defended the walled garden as an essential feature valued by users seeking the best protection possible for their personal information. It has framed the barrier as a means for the iPhone to separate itself from handsets using Google’s Android software, which is less restrictive and available to a wider range of manufacturers.

Fears of an antitrust crackdown on Apple’s business model and concerns that it is falling behind Microsoft and Google in the race to build artificial intelligence-powered devices have all contributed to the company’s stock price decline.

However, antitrust investigators made it clear in their complaint that they saw Apple’s walled garden primarily as a tool to ward off competition. It established market circumstances that allowed it to charge higher prices, which have pushed its soaring profit margins while limiting innovation.

apple

Apple Has Kept An Illegal Monopoly Over Smartphones In US, Justice Department Says In Antitrust Suit

Attorney General Merrick Garland said in a statement, “Consumers should not be forced to pay higher prices because businesses violate antitrust laws. “We contend that Apple has maintained monopoly strength in the smartphone industry not just by outperforming competitors on merit but also by breaching federal antitrust laws. If left undisturbed, Apple would simply strengthen its smartphone monopoly.”

The Biden administration is escalating an antitrust siege in an attempt to limit Apple’s dominance, which has already resulted in lawsuits against Google and Amazon accusing them of using illegal tactics to stifle competition, as well as unsuccessful attempts to block acquisitions by Microsoft and Facebook parent Meta Platforms.

Apple’s economic interests are also entangled in the Justice Department’s case against Google, which went to trial last October and is set to begin closing arguments on May 1 in Washington, D.C. In D.Cthat case, regulators claim Google has stifled competition by paying for the rights to its already dominant online search engine to be the default place to handle queries on the iPhone and a variety of web browsers, in an arrangement worth an estimated $15 billion to $20 billion per year.

Now that the Justice Department is directly attacking Apple’s business, the company will lose considerably more.

The Justice Department is following up on other recent attempts to compel Apple to change how it operates the iPhone and other elements of its company.

Epic Games, the creator of the blockbuster video game Fortnite, filed an antitrust action against Apple in 2020 to break down the barriers safeguarding the iPhone App Store and a profitable payment system that operates within it. Apple has traditionally charged commissions ranging from 15% to 30% on digital transactions performed within applications, which Epic claimed was possible by an illegal monopoly that drives up consumer prices.

apple

Apple Has Kept An Illegal Monopoly Over Smartphones In US, Justice Department Says In Antitrust Suit

Following a month-long trial in 2021, a federal court decided primarily in Apple’s favour, except for allowing links to other payment alternatives within iPhone apps. Apple unsuccessfully contested that section of the verdict until the United States Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal in January, forcing the corporation to concede. However, Apple’s concessions to comply with the verdict are still being challenged as “bad faith” by Epic, seeking an April 30 hearing to ask U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers to require additional revisions.

Apple also had to open up the iPhone to allow apps to be downloaded and installed from competing stores in Europe earlier this month to comply with a new set of regulators known as the Digital Markets Act, or DMA, but critics see its approach as little more than a workaround that will allow it to continue to stifle true competition. European Union regulators have already promised to tighten down on Apple if the company’s actions continue to stifle meaningful consumer choice.

This comes on top of a $2 billion (1.8 billion euro) fine that European regulators levied earlier this month after determining that Apple had harmed competition in music streaming via the iPhone, despite Spotify being the market leader.

SOURCE – (AP)

author avatar
Kiara Grace
Kiara Grace is a staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. Her writing focuses on technology trends, particularly in the realm of consumer electronics and software. With a keen eye for detail and a knack for breaking down complex topics. Kiara delivers insightful analyses that resonate with tech enthusiasts and casual readers alike. Her articles strike a balance between in-depth coverage and accessibility, making them a go-to resource for anyone seeking to stay informed about the latest innovations shaping our digital world.

Business

Canadian Port Workers Back Trudeau Government Into a Corner

Published

on

Trudeau, port workers, canada
On Sunday, employers at Montreal's port locked out 1,200 unionized workers.

Business groups are urging Justin Trudeau’s government to stop labor unrest at Canada’s main ports, as it did with railways in August, to avoid supply chain disruptions.

Hundreds of dock foremen in British Columbia ports have been on strike for a week. On Sunday, employers at Montreal’s port locked out 1,200 unionized workers after they rejected a contract offer that promised a 20% salary raise over six years.

Businesses report that the work disruptions are harming ports that handle approximately C$1.2 billion ($860 million) of products daily. They want Labor Minister Steven MacKinnon to refer the case to the Canada Industrial Relations Board, which can send the parties to arbitration to settle the disagreement.

He used that technique over two months ago to halt labor stoppages at Canada’s two main railways. However, the government’s use has sparked resentment among some unions.

The Teamsters Canada Rail Conference has filed a court challenge, claiming that the government’s actions in the railway conflict set a dangerous precedent by breaching workers’ constitutional rights.

Soon after, the pro-union New Democratic Party ripped up a legislative arrangement in which it committed to vote with Trudeau’s Liberals to advance critical legislation.

It’s unclear whether the government currently has enough support to enact a back-to-work law, which would be required to end the port issue.

According to Michel Murray, a Montreal Longshoremen’s Union representative, the port employers “act as bullies,” and refusing to talk indicates that “they clearly want the federal government to intervene.”

“Nearly C$6 billion worth of goods are expected to arrive at the port over the next two weeks,” Michel Leblanc, CEO of the Chamber of Commerce of Metropolitan Montreal, said in a statement. “The urgency is real.”

Goldy Hyder, CEO of the Business Council of Canada, stated that the conflicts “continue to weaken Canada’s economy and tarnish its reputation as a reliable trading partner.”

“Canada’s ports will continue to lose market share if the country’s reputation for labor instability is not corrected soon,” Hyder wrote in a letter to MacKinnon and Transport Minister Anita Anand on November 9.

According to a group of port employers, the Montreal offer would have increased the average dockworker’s pay by more than C$200,000 annually.

Related News:

A Trump Presidency Spells Disaster for Trudeau

A Trump Presidency Spells Disaster for Trudeau

author avatar
Geoff Thomas
Geoffrey Thomas is a seasoned staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. With his sharp writing skills and deep understanding of SEO, he consistently delivers high-quality, engaging content that resonates with readers. Thomas' articles are well-researched, informative, and written in a clear, concise style that keeps audiences hooked. His ability to craft compelling narratives while seamlessly incorporating relevant keywords has made him a valuable asset to the VORNews team.
Continue Reading

Business

Amazon Says a Hacker Breached MOVEIT, Stealing Employee Data. Employee data.

Published

on

Amazon
Marcos del Mazo/LightRocket / Getty Images

(VOR News) – Amazon has verified that employee data was stolen to the extent that it was compromised as a result of a “security event” that took place at a third-party vendor. The event brought about the compromise of data.

According to a statement that was provided to TechCrunch on Monday, the information that pertains to Amazon employees was revealed as a result of a data breach. This information related to Amazon employees was disclosed.

Amazon spokesman Adam Montgomery issued the statement.

When it comes to Amazon’s or Amazon Web Services (AWS) systems, there have been no security breaches that have taken place, and we have not encountered any security problems. An incident that occurred at one of our property management providers and included security was brought to our attention over the course of the investigation.

This problem had an effect on a number of the company’s customers, including Amazon, and we were informed about it. Other customers were also affected. Montgomery asserts that the only information that was disclosed was that of the work contact information of Amazon workers. As far as Montgomery is concerned, there was no further breach of security.

Among the things that were listed in this category were things like work email addresses, desk phone numbers, and the locations of buildings.

The number of employees who were affected by the security vulnerability has not been acknowledged by Amazon, nor has the total number of employees who were affected been released.

Additionally, it was stated that the third-party vendor, which was not named, does not have access to sensitive data such as Social Security numbers or financial information. This information was described as being kept confidential. The information in question was not made public. The vendor has reportedly fixed the security flaw that was responsible for the data breach that took place, according to reports that were received.

Hackers said they posted Amazon data on Breach Forums. It has been determined that the information in question is accurate as a consequence of this declaration. Additionally, the individual alleges that they have more than 2.8 million lines of data, which they allege was stolen during the mass-exploitation of MOVEit Transfer that took place the previous year.

Using the alias “Nam3L3ss,” the threat actor claims that they have disclosed information that was purportedly taken from twenty-five big corporations, as indicated in a study that was carried out by the cybersecurity company Hudson Rock. The analysis was done by Hudson Rock.

The assumption that the threat actor makes is that “the data that you have seen up to this point is less than .001% of the total data that I possess.”

This is the Amazon assertion that they make.

The public will have access to one thousand releases that have never been seen before in the history of record releases. The journal TechCrunch has attempted to get in touch with the other firms that were identified by the threat actor; however, the magazine has not yet received any additional responses to the inquiries that it has made.

It was the MOVEit breach, which took place in 2023, that was the most catastrophic breach that ever took place. The file-transfer software that was developed by Progress Software was vulnerable to a zero-day vulnerability, which allowed attackers to take advantage of the weakness and cause this breach.

More than one thousand businesses were impacted by these incursions, and it is believed that the notorious Clop ransomware and extortion ring was responsible for them. Through the utilization of ransomware, hacks were successfully carried out.

Not only did the data breach affect the Oregon Department of Transportation, which had 3.5 million pieces of information stolen, but it also affected the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing, which had four million pieces of information stolen, and Maximus, which is a giant in the United States government services contracting market, which had 11 million pieces of information stolen.

SOURCE: TC

SEE ALSO:

Bitcoin Goes Over $80,000 As Buyers Guess Whether Trump Will Run For President.

Subsidies for Electric Vehicles Cut as Consumer Interest Fades

Chewy Slides After Filing Shows 3rd-Biggest Shareholder, ‘Roaring Kitty,’ Sold His Stake

author avatar
Salman Ahmad
Salman Ahmad is a seasoned freelance writer who contributes insightful articles to VORNews. With years of experience in journalism, he possesses a knack for crafting compelling narratives that resonate with readers. Salman's writing style strikes a balance between depth and accessibility, allowing him to tackle complex topics while maintaining clarity. His commitment to thorough research ensures his pieces are well-informed and thought-provoking. Salman's contributions enrich VORNews' content, offering readers a fresh perspective on current events and pressing issues.
Continue Reading

Business

Bitcoin Goes Over $80,000 As Buyers Guess Whether Trump Will Run For President.

Published

on

Bitcoin
PHOTO:REUTERS

(VOR News) – The following day, Bitcoin achieved a new record high as a consequence of traders’ wagers on the potential benefits of Donald Trump’s return to the White House for the cryptocurrency.

This was an additional factor contributing to Bitcoin’s recent record-breaking performance.

This resulted in Bitcoin’s first-ever record-breaking high.

The digital currency’s inaugural transaction, valued at eighty thousand dollars, was executed one hundred twenty minutes after twelve o’clock in the afternoon (1200 GMT). This occurred shortly after the timepiece reached twelve.

The conviction that President Trump may reduce laws on digital currencies has increased as a result of his victory in the presidential election that occurred in the United States on Tuesday. This conviction has been bolstered by his election victory. Since the election was won by the Republican nominee, Trump, this mentality has been gradually cultivated.

On Wednesday, the price of bitcoin achieved a new all-time high of $75,000, surpassing the previous all-time high of $73,797.98, which was achieved in March. This item has attained the highest price to date.

It was widely believed that Trump was the politician who embraced Bitcoin during his campaign against Kamala Harris, the Democratic Party candidate. Harris was a candidate for the Democratic Party in the Senate campaign.

Donald Trump employed the term “hoax” to describe cryptocurrencies during his inaugural tenure as president of the United States. However, in the time that has passed since then, he has experienced a substantial change in his viewpoints, which has even resulted in the creation of his own committee platform.

In addition to his pledge to establish the United States of America as the “bitcoin and cryptocurrency capital of the world,” he has also committed to appointing Elon Musk, a tech entrepreneur and right-wing conspiracy theorist, to the role of overseeing a comprehensive investigation into the government’s wasteful practices.

Both of these commitments are components of his strategy to enhance the prosperity of the United States of America. It is crucial to acknowledge that he has made a commitment to both of these.

The administration of President Trump was responsible for the reduction of corporation taxes, which resulted in an increase in market liquidity and facilitated the investment in high-growth assets, such as cryptocurrencies. Through the administration of President Trump’s predecessor, this was accomplished.

The previous administration benefited from a decrease in the tax rate for Bitcoin companies.

In September, President Trump announced that he, his sons, and other organizations would be creating a digital currency platform known as World Liberty Financial. The development of this platform would also incorporate the participation of other businesses. The network would facilitate the conversion of digital currency into corporeal currency.

Nevertheless, it experienced an unsuccessful sales launch earlier this month, with only a small percentage of the tokens that were placed on the market being purchased by consumers. This incident transpired earlier this month. From this, it is possible to infer that the launch was unsuccessful.

Cryptocurrencies have been the subject of numerous news articles since their inception. The FTX exchange platform is the most notable of the numerous industry stalwarts that have fallen, and these stories have covered a wide variety of subjects, including the immense volatility of their pricing. Numerous topics have been addressed in these narratives.

According to reports that circulated in the days preceding the election, he made history by becoming the first former president to utilize bitcoin to conduct a transaction. Donald Trump achieved historical significance by conducting a transaction using bitcoin. This could be considered a significant accomplishment.

He accomplished this by purchasing hamburgers from a restaurant in New York City, which characterized the transaction as “historic.” He succeeded in achieving these objectives. Because of this opportunity, he capitalized on it.

Bitcoin, a digital currency, is transacted on the market every day of the week, including Sundays.

SOURCE: TET

SEE ALSO:

Subsidies for Electric Vehicles Cut as Consumer Interest Fades

Chewy Slides After Filing Shows 3rd-Biggest Shareholder, ‘Roaring Kitty,’ Sold His Stake

Canada CBC News CEO Catherine Tait Recalled to Parliamentary Committee

author avatar
Salman Ahmad
Salman Ahmad is a seasoned freelance writer who contributes insightful articles to VORNews. With years of experience in journalism, he possesses a knack for crafting compelling narratives that resonate with readers. Salman's writing style strikes a balance between depth and accessibility, allowing him to tackle complex topics while maintaining clarity. His commitment to thorough research ensures his pieces are well-informed and thought-provoking. Salman's contributions enrich VORNews' content, offering readers a fresh perspective on current events and pressing issues.
Continue Reading

Download Our App

vornews app

Buy FUT Coins

comprar monedas FC 25

Volunteering at Soi Dog

Soi Dog

Trending