Connect with us

Politics

Anger Erupts Over Trudeau’s’ Open Door Immigration Policies

Published

on

Provincial Premiers have had it with Trudeau and Mass Immigration - Image Post Media
Trudeau's open door policy crippling Canada - File Image

The premiers of British Columbia and Quebec, as well as the general people, are desperately trying to convince Justin Trudeau and the Liberals to abandon their open-door immigration policy.

Hard core reality is teaching Prime Minister Justin Trudeau some valuable lessons about flirting with the fantasy of virtually free borders.  The same is true for Canada’s premiers and the general people. Especially in relation to asylum seekers.

For months, British Columbia Premier David Eby and Quebec Premier François Legault have been working tirelessly to convince Justin Trudeau and his childhood buddy, Immigration Minister Marc Miller, to abandon their open border policy.

Provincial premiers have attempted to educate Justin Trudeau about the financial costs of such grandstanding on asylum seekers. According to Statistics Canada, there are now 363,000 asylum claimants in the country, which is more than double the number two years ago.

Most claimants were strolling across the US border into Eastern Canada a few years ago, which US President Joe Biden helped tighten last year.

Claimants arrive at airports in Toronto, Montreal, and, to a lesser extent, Calgary and Vancouver, primarily from Asia. They enter legitimately on study or travel visas and then make their claims after leaving the airport, claiming they are fleeing various sorts of persecution.

Trudeau Governments Failure of Vetting

According to Anne Michèle Meggs, a former Quebec immigration official who now writes independently on the subject, the refugee board typically takes around two years to study backgrounds and rule on a case, and often more if there is an appeal.

According to Meggs, the average number of asylum claims lodged per month in British Columbia this year has risen to 640, up 37% from previous year. B.C. has the third highest influx of asylum seekers in the country. Most still go to Ontario, where average monthly claims have increased by 53%, or Quebec, where they are up 20%.

Canada’s premiers have been telling Trudeau for months that, regardless of the legitimacy of their claims, asylum seekers cost taxpayers a lot of money.

Most arrive with no money. While they wait for their cases to be reviewed to determine whether they will be granted coveted permanent resident status, federal and provincial organisations frequently provide social services such as shelter, food, clothes, health care, children’s education, and (in Quebec) creche.

Stories about an out-of-control refugee system are likely contributing to rapidly changing opinion survey results. Last week, Leger discovered that 60 percent of Canadians believe there are “too many” newcomers. This represents a significant increase from 35 percent in 2019.

It is the highest level of unhappiness in decades, owing in part to demand pressure on housing and infrastructure expenses. The negative polling results are constant among white and non-white Canadians.

Provinces Overloaded Under Funded

In response to protests from Quebec, Trudeau provided an additional $750 million this year to support refugee claims who came in recent years, primarily at the land border. Last year, Quebec handled 65,000 claims, while Ontario handled 63,000, with the greatest groups coming from Mexico and India.

But, as Eby tells anyone who will listen, B.C. has received no funding from Ottawa. The premier expressed how “frustrating” it is for B.C. to “scrabble around” for cash in the province, where housing is among the most expensive in the world, while Quebec receives more.

“Our most recent total for last year was 180,000 new British Columbians,” Eby said last month, including asylum seekers and all other international migrants to the province. “And that’s great and that’s exciting and it’s necessary, and it’s completely overwhelming.”

Eby made no public mention of the increasingly strange anomaly based on the three-decade-old Quebec Accord, which results in Quebec receiving ten times more funds than British Columbia and Ontario to settle newcomers each year.

According to Postmedia News, Metro Vancouver’s shelters are being overcrowded as the number of asylum applicants in British Columbia has nearly doubled in the last year.

Canada’s Immigration out of control

The Salvation Army, which operates 100 beds in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside, reported that since last summer, the proportion of refugee claimants requesting shelter has increased to roughly 80%. Meanwhile, refugee claimants filled over 60% of the beds at the Catholic Charities Men’s Shelter in Vancouver. Taxpayers provide the majority of the funding for shelters.

According to Meggs, government figures reveal that British Columbia now has 16,837 asylum claimants. This excludes the 5,300 refugees who arrived in the province in a more organised manner last year, thanks to government assistance.

Meggs claims her “jaw dropped” when Trudeau stated in April that the number of temporary immigrants, including asylum seekers, was “out of control” and “growing at a rate far beyond what Canada has been able to absorb.”

The cognitive dissonance, she noted, stems from Trudeau’s government’s complete responsibility for the system’s spiralling out of control since 2015, not just in terms of numbers, but also in selection criteria, or lack thereof.

Trudeau has confessed that pandemonium characterises the situation with international students, whose numbers have risen under his leadership to 1.1 million. Many people are now demanding asylum. B.C. has 217,000 international students in post-secondary institutions and 49,000 in kindergarten-to-Grade-12 programs.

Vancouver immigration lawyer Richard Kurland is among many who believe it would be preferable if Canada processed roughly 50,000 refugee claims every year, as it lacks the absorptive capacity for more — such as the 144,000 who applied last year.

One major issue, according to Kurland, is that the government knows very little about many asylum seekers. The immigration department’s ignorance stems in part from the fact that many people file claims online. Officials don’t even know where tens of thousands of people reside.  Source: The Sun

Related News:

Justin Trudeau Needs to Read the Writing on the Wall

Justin Trudeau Needs to Read the Writing on the Wall

 

Geoff Brown is a seasoned staff writer at VORNews, a reputable online publication. With his sharp writing skills he consistently delivers high-quality, engaging content that resonates with readers. Geoff's' articles are well-researched, informative, and written in a clear, concise style that keeps audiences hooked. His ability to craft compelling narratives while seamlessly incorporating relevant keywords has made him a valuable asset to the VORNews team.

Politics

Trudeau Accused of “Phony Feminism” After Freeland’s Departure

Published

on

Freeland's resignation letter didn't mention gender, but Trudeau accused of phoney feminism anyway

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is facing a backlash for claiming to be a feminist after firing Chrystia Freeland as Finance Minister and replacing her with Dominic Leblanc on Tuesday.

Justin Trudeau has positioned himself as a feminist leader, a central element of his political identity. In 2015, Canada made history by appointing its first gender-equal cabinet, a significant step in the ongoing effort to champion women’s rights policies.

Trudeau aimed to solidify his reputation as a pioneer in the fight for gender equality. Recent accusations of “phoney feminism” have sparked a heated debate regarding the consistency between his statements and his actions.

Chrystia Freeland’s resignation from the cabinet has sparked criticism directed at Prime Minister Trudeau, raising questions about his approach to women in leadership roles.

Chrystia Freeland, previously regarded as one of Prime Minister Trudeau’s closest allies, has officially resigned from her position as Finance Minister. In her resignation letter, she notably omitted any reference to gender issues.

Freeland’s departure mirrors Trudeau’s removal of several high-profile women;

  • Jody Wilson-Raybould, former Attorney General, was removed in 2019 after the SNC-Lavalin controversy.
  • Jane Philpott, then President of the Treasury Board, was also ousted following her support for Wilson-Raybould.
  • Celina Caesar-Chavannes, a Liberal MP, left politics after claiming Trudeau didn’t handle internal disagreements well.

These firings have fuelled debates about his handling of women in leadership positions and made a mockery of his claims of being a feminist.

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre criticized Trudeau for the optics of replacing Freeland with a male cabinet member, calling it evidence of Trudeau’s “fake feminism.”

“Just blame Chrystia Freeland and make her wear it all. Some feminist,” Poilievre said at a news conference on Tuesday.

The same week as Trudeau was insulting Americans for not electing a woman president, he was busy throwing his own woman deputy prime minister under the bus to replace her with a man, Poilievre commented.

Prominent Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner asked how any woman in that caucus could “defend that man instead of calling for an election now,” while Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said Trudeau needed to start proving himself if he was going to keep declaring himself “to be such a supporter of women.”

MP Melissa Lantsman referred to an “old boys’ club” being in charge.

“It’s time for credible leadership in the seriousness of this moment, not the fake feminism of this phoney prime minister,” said Lantsman, who represents the Conservatives in the Thornhill riding.

Former Liberal MP Celina Caesar-Chavannes said she believes there is a pattern of female cabinet ministers who were “thrown under the bus” after “challenging someone whose name is Trudeau.”

Trudeau Defended

However, while Freeland’s resignation has sparked accusations of sexism, political experts suggest that focusing solely on gender may oversimplify the issue.

Freeland, an accomplished politician and the country’s first female Finance Minister left primarily due to policy disagreements. Her decision was less about being a powerful woman and more about divergent views on leadership and economic strategy.

Political scientist Dr. Melanee Thomas remarked that qualified women in politics often face frustrations when their expertise is dismissed.

She cautioned against reducing complex political dynamics to gender alone. By framing Freeland’s resignation solely as evidence of sexism, the broader challenges faced by all leaders in Trudeau’s cabinets—men and women alike—are overlooked.

Trudeau has remained relatively quiet, stating that Freeland’s departure was not an “easy day” for him.

Unlike previous controversies, he has not publicly defended his feminist credentials since Freeland’s resignation, leaving a vacuum for critics to dominate the narrative.

Over the years, Trudeau has said that “adding women changes politics,” presenting himself as an ally for feminist causes. His silence now begs the question: does he believe his track record speaks for itself, or is he struggling to respond to the growing skepticism?

Continue Reading

Politics

Liberal MPs Call on Trudeau to Resign

Published

on

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau may actually planning to resign.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is facing extreme political pressure, with Liberal MPs publicly urging him to step down for the sake of the Liberal Party of Canada.

Yesterday, Trudeau faced a triple setback: the resignations of Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland and Housing Minister Sean Fraser and a crushing byelection loss in British Columbia.

Trudeau is facing an uphill battle to maintain his grip on leadership as dissatisfaction among Liberal MPs is mounting. The recent events have added fuel to the fire.

Freeland, formerly one of Trudeau’s most prominent cabinet members, resigned in protest after allegedly being informed she’d be shuffled out of her role as finance minister. Many MPs believe this was poorly handled and symbolic of deeper issues within Trudeau’s leadership.

Adding insult to injury, the Liberals lost a B.C. byelection by 50 percentage points to the Conservatives—a seat they had held in the last general election. This loss has amplified concerns that Trudeau can no longer resonate with voters.

For the Good of the Party

Some Liberal MPs said Tuesday that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau cannot continue as party leader and needs to resign for the party’s good.

Liberal MPs like Wayne Long and Ken Hardie are now outspoken critics, claiming that Trudeau’s leadership is a huge liability for the party. Long described the Prime Minister as “living in a false reality,” warning that staying the course could lead the Liberals to electoral disaster.

Ontario MP Francis Drouin, a longstanding defender of Trudeau, has joined the chorus of dissent. He doubted the party’s ability to move forward under Trudeau, saying, “I’ve been a great defender, but I just don’t see how we recover.”

Other MPs, including Alexandra Mendès and Sean Casey, have echoed similar sentiments. Mendès stated she was deeply affected by Freeland’s treatment, while Casey suggested that Trudeau no longer enjoys the confidence of the caucus.

The Liberal caucus appears more divided than ever, with roughly a third of MPs reportedly favouring Trudeau’s immediate resignation. According to Long, between 40 and 50 MPs actively push for his resignation, while around 50 remain loyal to him. The rest are seemingly undecided or staying silent.

Trudeau’s Unwillingness to relinquish power

This lack of unity is becoming a significant issue. MP Chad Collins admitted, “I can say we’re united.” He suggested a secret ballot within the caucus would reveal overwhelming opposition to Trudeau’s continued leadership.

At a Liberal caucus meeting today, Trudeau acknowledged the growing discontent; however, he hasn’t shown any signs of stepping down. He assured MPs he understood their concerns, but many doubted his willingness to relinquish power.

The Liberals are at a crossroads. Liberal MPs worry they could lose the next general election if Trudeau remains in office, with polls showing Trudeau’s public support hovering around 20 percent.
MPs have called for a change before it’s too late, calling Trudeau’s leadership a “drag” on the party’s prospects.

The internal division might deepen if Trudeau doesn’t resign. According to some political analysts, more backbenchers will switch sides against Trudeau, especially if they are left out of the next cabinet move.

One thing is certain: the Liberal Party must decide soon. The longer the ambiguity persists, the more difficult it will be to regain voters’ confidence. For now, Canadians are left wondering whether Trudeau’s tenure as prime minister is ending—or if he will beat the odds once more.

Related News:

Dominic LeBlanc Sworn in as Canada’s New Finance Minister

Continue Reading

Politics

Justin Trudeau’s Fight for Gender Equity in Canada

Published

on

Justin Trudeau made news in 2015 by introducing Canada’s first gender-balanced cabinet, a decision that established the tone for the government’s commitment to gender equity and representation.

Since his election in 2015, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government has prioritized gender parity. From cabinet makeup to legislative efforts, the government has taken significant steps to reduce disparities and promote inclusion in Canada.

By assuring equal representation in top positions, the Trudeau government sends a strong message: varied perspectives improve governance.

While symbolic steps such as a balanced cabinet are vital, some believe that more than representation alone needs to address underlying issues. The Trudeau government has supported representation through measures to overcome these hurdles, leading us to the following issue.

Gender Equity in Pay

In 2021, Canada passed the Pay Equity Act, which requires federal workplaces to provide equal pay for equal work. This was a significant step towards narrowing the salary disparity between men and women.

The rule applies to firms with ten or more employees in federally regulated industries, promoting openness and fair compensation.

The government also developed the National Strategy to Prevent and Address Gender-Based Violence, prioritizing prevention, social services, and judicial reforms. Shelters, crisis centres, and advocacy groups have received extra funding to ensure survivors can access support.

Affordable childcare is crucial for allowing women to participate in the workforce. The Liberal government implemented a $10-per-day childcare program to alleviate the financial burden on families. This approach benefits parents, particularly mothers, who bear the burden of caring tasks.

One of the Trudeau administration’s most prominent innovations is using a “gender-based analysis plus” (GBA+) methodology for federal budgeting. This guarantees that government spending decisions consider the effects on different genders and other intersecting characteristics such as race, handicap, and income level.

Sexual and reproductive health projects

For example, the 2024 Autumn Economic Statement included continuous spending to protect women’s reproductive health and eliminate disparities in healthcare access. This approach prioritizes equity in resource allocation, recognizing that blanket policies frequently fail to adequately serve marginalized people.

In September 2024, Trudeau announced over $200 million in funding for worldwide sexual and reproductive health projects. These initiatives prioritize education, contraceptive access, and maternity healthcare.

Domestically, the government has boosted funding for abortion services, especially in impoverished areas. These initiatives demonstrate a commitment to empowering women and giving them authority over their healthcare decisions.

Despite these attempts, women in Canada continue to encounter challenges in the workplace. The gender pay gap is severe, particularly among racialized and Indigenous women. Critics believe that while regulations like the Pay Equity Act are a fine place to start, enforcement and oversight must improve.

Some campaigners have argued that the government’s approach to gender equity fails to address the unique issues that non-binary people confront, as well as those who face numerous types of discrimination. For example, racialized women and women with disabilities frequently suffer compounded injustices that broad measures can not fully address.

Advocating for Gender Equity

Efforts to promote gender equality have also encountered opposition. Some accuse the administration of focusing too much on identity politics, claiming that these programs take attention away from more serious issues.

However, supporters argue that equity is essential for a successful society and economy.

The Trudeau government continues to advocate for gender equality on several fronts. There is reason to be optimistic about future policy reforms and increased investments in healthcare and education.

Simultaneously, persistent advocacy will be required to guarantee that progress accomplished thus far does not stall.

Gender fairness isn’t just a moral obligation; it’s also a sound policy. The Trudeau government has worked to make Canada more equitable and inclusive by removing barriers and providing new possibilities.

While problems persist, the foundation has been created for future improvement. The challenge is how to capitalize on this momentum to achieve long-term change. Gender equity is a never-ending goal through policy, representation, or public dialogue.

It’s a difficult but important trip, and everyone’s opinion counts.

Related News:

Walmart Abandons DEI Ahead of Trump’s Inauguration

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version