Connect with us

News

Biden Unveils A Proposal To Establish Term Limits For The Supreme Court

Published

on

Biden
Biden | AP News image

Washington  — President Joe Biden has launched a long-awaited proposal for changes to the United States Supreme Court, urging Congress to create term limits and an enforceable ethics code for the court’s nine members. He’s also urging Congress to pass a constitutional amendment that limits presidential immunity.

The White House disclosed the details of Biden’s court proposal on Monday. With only 99 days until Election Day, it appears to have little chance of passing through a deeply divided Congress.

biden

Biden | AP News image

Biden Unveils A Proposal To Establish Term Limits For The Supreme Court

Still, Democrats hope it will help voters focus as they make their choices in a close election. The likely Democratic nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris, who has sought to portray her run against Republican ex-President Donald Trump as “a choice between freedom and chaos,” has questioned the court’s fairness in light of recent judgments.

The White House is hoping to capitalize on Democrats’ mounting fury over the court’s 6-3 conservative majority, which has issued opinions overturning landmark abortion rights and government regulatory powers that have lasted for decades.

Liberals have also expressed concern over revelations of questionable relationships and choices made by some members of the court’s right side, which they claim undermine their impartiality.

“I have great respect for our institutions and the separation of powers,” Biden writes in a Washington Post op-ed published Monday. “What is going on currently is not normal, and it affects public trust in the court’s decisions, even those affecting personal liberties. “We are now in a breach.”

Harris later said that the American people must believe in a Supreme Court plagued by ethics scandals and judgments contradicting long-standing precedent. She stated that the proposed reforms “will help to restore confidence in the Court, strengthen our democracy, and ensure that no one is above the law.”

The president planned to discuss his proposal later Monday during a talk at the LBJ Presidential Library in Austin, Texas, commemorating the Civil Rights Act’s 60th anniversary.

Biden proposes eliminating lifetime appointments to the court. He believes Congress should approve legislation establishing a system in which the sitting president appoints a justice every two years for an 18-year term on the court. He says that term limits would assist in ensuring that court membership changes regularly and stabilize the nomination process.

He also wants Congress to enact legislation to create a court code of ethics that would force justices to disclose gifts, refrain from public political participation, and recuse themselves from cases in which they or their wives have financial or other conflicts of interest.

Biden is also urging Congress to propose a constitutional amendment overturning the Supreme Court’s recent landmark immunity decision, which found that former presidents had extensive immunity from prosecution.

That judge extended the delay in the Washington criminal case against Trump on allegations that he attempted to overturn his 2020 presidential election defeat, effectively ending the former president’s chances of being tried before the November election.

According to polls, Americans support reducing the time judges can serve on the Supreme Court. Last summer, a poll by The Associated Press-NORC Centre for Public Affairs Research revealed that 67% of Americans, including 82% of Democrats and 57% of Republicans, backed a plan to limit the number of years that justices can serve instead of life terms.

The first three justices who may be affected by term restrictions are on the right. Justice Clarence Thomas has served on the bench for nearly 33 years. Chief Justice John Roberts has served for 19 years, while Justice Samuel Alito has served for 18.

From its inception until 1970, Supreme Court judges served an average of 17 years, according to Gabe Roth, executive director of the Fix the Court organization. Since 1970, the average has been approximately 28 years. Both conservative and liberal politicians have supported term limits.

“If justices have this much power, then they should be individuals who reflect America as it currently is, not the America of 30 or 40 years ago, the dead hand of the president who appointed them still influencing policy,” according to Roth.

Meanwhile, an enforcement mechanism for the Supreme Court’s code of ethics might move the justices closer to other federal judges, who are subject to a disciplinary system in which anybody can make and examine a complaint. An investigation may result in censure and reprimand. Last week, Justice Elena Kagan became the first justice to publicly advocate for creating a mechanism to implement the new ethics code.

However, establishing an ethics code enforcement system for the Supreme Court is more complex than it may appear.

According to Stephen Gillers, a legal ethics specialist at NYU School of Law, the attorney general has always had the authority to prosecute violations of the financial and gift disclosure laws, but he has never utilized that power against federal judges.

Meanwhile, the group that oversees lower court judges is led by Roberts, “who might be reluctant to use whatever power the conference has against his colleagues,” Gillers added in an email.

It has been 32 years since Congress ratified a constitutional amendment. The 27th Amendment, approved in 1992, specifies that Congress can pass a measure modifying the salary of members of the House and Senate, but such a change cannot go into effect until after the next November House elections.

Trump has slammed judicial reform as Democrats’ desperate attempt to “play the ref.”

“The Democrats are seeking to disrupt the presidential election and undermine our justice system by targeting their political opponent, ME, and our Honourable Supreme Court. We must battle for our fair and independent courts while also protecting our country,” Trump said on his Truth Social page earlier this month.

Following revelations about some justices, like Thomas accepting luxurious trips from a GOP megadonor, doubts about the court’s ethics have grown.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, chosen during the Obama administration, has drawn criticism after it was revealed that her staff frequently pressured public organizations that hosted her to purchase copies of her memoir or children’s books.

biden

Biden | AP News image

Biden Unveils A Proposal To Establish Term Limits For The Supreme Court

Alito rebuffed requests to stand down from Supreme Court cases involving Trump and Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection suspects, despite a controversy over provocative flags posted at his houses, which some felt signaled sympathy for those charged with assaulting the U.S. Capitol to retain Trump in power. Alito claims his wife displayed the flags.

Democrats said Biden’s attempt would help shine a harsh light on recent Supreme Court decisions, such as the 2022 ruling that removed women’s constitutional abortion protections by the conservative-majority court, which includes three justices chosen by Trump.

The announcement is a significant shift for Biden, who, as a candidate, had been cautious of proposals to alter the Supreme Court. But, throughout his presidency, he has become increasingly public about his conviction that the court has abandoned conventional constitutional interpretation.

Last week, he stated in an Oval Office speech that he would pursue Supreme Court reform during his final months in office, calling it “critical to our democracy.”

SOURCE | AP

News

Elon Musk has Often Stirred Up Political Unrest, Which Makes People Worry About the US Election.

Published

on

Elon Musk

(VOR News) – Following the weekend Trump assassination attempt, Elon Musk informed X that “no one is even trying to assassinate” the Democratic president and vice president.

Musk declared, “civil war is inevitable,” during UK anti-Muslim riots brought on by unfounded allegations. Musk called the allegation of fake voter registrations in three US states raised “very concerning” by an unidentified X user.

Authorities have labelled Musk’s three tweets dishonest and careless. One of the most powerful people in the world can spread hate, terror, and false information with millions of views and hundreds of likes during political unrest.

Elon Musk runs Twitter and might change how material is distributed.

Musk’s website’s lack of security and his false assertions to his 200 million fans raise public trust issues as Election Day draws near. Should Trump be reelected and increase his political activity, he volunteered to supervise a government efficiency committee.

Monday night at X, Trump referred to Musk as a “friend.” Musk turned down a comment email request. Experts and electoral officials claim Elon Musk’s vote might be called into doubt. They fear that bringing this up could encourage harassment of candidates and election volunteers.

Co-founder of the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism Heidi Beirich notes “X and Musk are dangerously and irresponsibly raising the temperature of politics at a critical juncture.” Such shame.

Conservatives praise the 53-year-old entrepreneur who bought Twitter in 2022 and turned it into a free market for ideas. X is better than conventional media since people may write freely and find the “truth”.

Elon Musk let false information spread about the company’s changes over the past two years.

Following his takeover, the hate speech policy, content moderation, and Trust and Safety advisory council were wiped from the website. He established content partnerships, restored conspiracy theorist accounts, and produced fictitious Community Notes.

Both sides lie and buy thousands of X shares. Following a Pennsylvania gunman’s ear shot of Trump, the left spread false rumours. Following the discussion between Trump and Harris, far-right trolls asserted Harris wore an earpiece.

Elon Musk endangered the 2020 trustworthy information center, says Rick Hasen. People nowadays see Twitter (X) differently. Hasen thinks millions of viewers and sponsors left the network for a specific reason. His data is inaccurate. Hasen thinks the market of ideas should be efficient enough for consumers to find false claims.

Numerous Republicans disagree with Elon Musk. They assert that the prior proprietor of the website misled regarding Hunter Biden, President Joe Biden’s son, and COVID-19’s beginnings.

Elon Musk discusses kids, memes, Tesla, SpaceX, and On the website, he disseminates incorrect political assertions including Democrats “importing” immigrants to vote and Haitian immigrants in Ohio slaughtering and eating pets.

Jocelyn Benson, Democratic secretary of state for Michigan, said in an interview last month that Musk’s election tweets were a “maelstrom of disinformation” making voter education challenging.

“I know most election officials just keep their heads down and work,” he continues. “How do we inform the public about our work—many of whom follow Musk, X, or the platform?”

Election officials have told Elon Musk supporters. Using X post, the Republican recorder for Maricopa County, Arizona, covering Phoenix, offered Musk an all-access tour of an election centre.

Four secretaries, including Minnesota Democrat Steve Simon, wrote to Elon Musk following the publication of erroneous election rules this summer by Grok, an artificial intelligence tool. Musk’s most recent modification earned praise.

Like Twitter before Musk, Elon Musk may find electoral fallacies.

“It’s one thing to not like the Minnesota election system, or any election system for that matter,” he continued, “but incorrect vote totals have to be fixed.”

Head of the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Jen Easterly responded to Elon Musk’s claim last month that most U.S. elections do not use paper ballots. The 2020 election was the last chance “all states w/close presidential vote counts actually used paper records, allowing votes to be counted, recounted, & audited to ensure accuracy.”

Once the X owner realises his posts are incorrect, he deletes them. Supporting a Tucker Carlson Holocaust revisionist interview last month set off wrath. Deleted.

On Sunday, Musk wrote off Biden and Harris’ lack of assassination attempts. Andrew Bates, a White House spokesman, labelled the remarks “irresponsible” and stated, “violent jokes should only be condemned.”

Most celebrities, according to University of Virginia media studies professor Siva Vaidhyanathan, are careful while making jokes since they know not everyone will understand them or react suitably. Musk refuted owning such a filter.

Vaidhyanathan doubts Musk’s political dishonesty. His phoney election expenses cost him and others sponsors’ platform money. Musk, he said, “just one more voice in that cacophony.”

SOURCE: AP

SEE ALSO:

Market Speculation Over the Next Fed Rate Reduction Hides More Fundamental Issues.

Uber will Introduce Trip Recording Tools and a “Verified” Rider Badge in the United States.

 

Continue Reading

News

Market Speculation Over the Next Fed Rate Reduction Hides More Fundamental Issues.

Published

on

Fed

(VOR News) – This is the best of times for someone setting US rates from a chair.

The Federal Reserve is now open to criticism from all directions since the meeting on September monetary policy concluded on Wednesday.

Given its painstaking preparation for its first cut since the epidemic, there is little question at all that it will decrease prices. Trading floors, newsroom nerds, and investment offices are rife with arguments about whether it will be cut by a half percentage point or the typical quarter-point haircut.

Head of macro and strategic asset allocation at investing company Fidelity Salman Ahmed says “the obsession has been like it’s the end of the world.”

“It looks like the market is putting pressure on the Fed.”

Arguing for a quarter-point cut from the present 5.25 percent to the 5.5% target range is really simple. Given inflation has returned to the Fed’s target and the employment market is slowing but not collapsing, it is now time to slightly ease the brakes using the standard step.

As Team “Go Large” notes, Fed Chairman Jay Powell’s comments on the “pace” of easing at the Jackson Hole conference back in the summer inadvertently set the ground for a debate on the degree of rate cuts.

More recently, quite serious people have argued for a half-point cut, including former New York Fed president Bill Dudley.

Noticing this, rate speculators suddenly shifted their predictions from a certain little cut to a respectable possibility of a significant one.

Here the Fed runs in the danger of coming across as scared. Going big on paper suggests that rate setters believe they have to fast turn around their course because they believe they have made a mistake in maintaining interest rates at their highest level in decades for too long and that it is too late to avert a recession from commencing.

Still, markets have embraced the concept of such a sizable decrease this time around. If it doesn’t horrify the markets, why not start with a bang?

The general view seems to be that they are trying to squeeze the Federal Reserve. A double chop, especially as the first action in an easing cycle, usually implies that investors believe a recession is approaching since the markets for interest rates point to more notable declines in the next year.

Studies show, meanwhile, that investors do not truly believe that. More politely, they are bluffing on this point; else, they are hedging for worst-case conditions.

Based on Bank of America’s weekly fund manager poll this week, just 11% of investors believe the US economy is likely to land gently. Still, 79% of respondents expect a more subdued slowdown. Once more the rates markets are showing their extroversion.

The greatest immediate source of difficulty for the markets will thus be Powell’s communication skills, which will be tested during the back-and-forth of the press conference following the meeting.

Would it be a fearful half-point cut to prevent catastrophe or a joyful half-point cut announcing success against inflation? Would a quarter suggest that the central bank is still terrified of inflation and is still too rigid to take chances?

The Fed’s army of relentless internet enemies is showing off their strength.

Strong possibility of volatile market fluctuations exists here. A paper published this week by the Bank of International Settlements, the think tank for big central banks, highlights “hypersensitive” market conditions brought up by this summer’s run-to-the-hills.

All of this thrill, though, hides a more important and broader statement about a change in the global asset hierarchy. Usually, the Fed shapes the global monetary policy scene. Still, the US economy is slowing down to more closely match those of other countries rather than imploding.

“Fading US exceptionalism is an important theme,” says Sam Lynton-Brown, global head of macro strategy at French bank BNP Paribas. That suggests that US GDP is larger than that of its peers, US bond yields are more than those of its peers, and US assets outperform peers is most likely going to decrease.

Though a nice diversion from other, far more significant issues and from the debate of where rates should decrease, it is nevertheless a diversion. “Once you get past the Fed, it’s going to be election risk, recession risk, or, at least we forget, inflation could come back,” Ahmed of Fidelity says.

The stakes will then be so great that today’s frantic supposition about the narcissism of small distinctions will seem meagre.

SOURCE: FT

SEE ALSO:

Uber will Introduce Trip Recording Tools and a “Verified” Rider Badge in the United States.

Amazon Mandates that Employees Report to the Office on Five Consecutive Days.

Continue Reading

News

Uber will Introduce Trip Recording Tools and a “Verified” Rider Badge in the United States.

Published

on

Uber

(VOR News) – Uber is currently in the process of integrating new capabilities into its operations, as indicated in a statement that was officially posted by the ride-hailing company on Tuesday.

The company disclosed this information at the time of its announcement. Uber drivers will be able to confirm “verified” badges on client profiles and record journeys using their cellphones instead of a dashcam with the newly expanded capabilities.

This will be feasible due to the recently enhanced capabilities. Furthermore, drivers will have the ability to record trips on their mobile devices, specifically their computers.

This is part of Uber’s safety study for 2021 and 2022.

The research indicated that drivers were accountable for 31% of sexual assaults directed at passengers, while they were responsible for 68% of sexual assaults directed at Uber drivers.

This information is presented in the context of Uber’s reporting of this safety report. Although this information is presented in the context of Uber’s publication of this study, it is crucial to emphasise that Uber disclosed the study. It is anticipated that the implementation of this invention will result in a greater sense of safety being exhibited by vehicles, which will be beneficial to motorists.

Uber drivers in the United States will be able to ascertain whether or not a passenger has completed additional verification procedures starting on Wednesday.

They will have access to this capability. This capability will be accessible to them. To achieve this objective, it will be necessary to exhibit a “Verified” passenger badge throughout the entire travel request process. In order to achieve this objective, this approach will be implemented.

Uber effectively implemented a pilot program in a limited number of locations throughout the United States during the initial months of this year.

A diverse array of states in the United States are home to this collection of locations. The majority of passengers who originate from that specific location have been validated, and the app has received fewer complaints from drivers regarding these customers. This is consistent with the information that the organisation furnished.

The corporation asserts that approximately 15,000 passenger accounts with fictitious identities have been blocked. The corporation provided this information. The corporation provided us with this information, which is commendable.

Uber drivers can record audio and video with their phones’ front cameras.

They will have access to this trait in the future. Immediately, they will have access to this capability that is within their reach. Drivers will no longer be required to acquire dashcams as a result of the endeavours that have been undertaken. This outcome is a direct result of our endeavours.

Furthermore, it is anticipated that each recording will be encrypted and stored on the devices being used by chauffeurs. This is anticipated to occur as a result.

Uber and the drivers will be unable to access the recordings until either the drivers voluntarily submit them to the company for review or the drivers themselves transmit them to the company.

Furthermore, Uber is presently engaged in a test program that allows drivers to decline to transport a customer if the passenger has rated the journey with two or three stars.

Uber is presently conducting this test program. In addition, Uber is also closely monitoring the implementation of this experimental program. It is a continuation of Uber’s current policy, which stipulates that drivers are immediately mismatched with passengers immediately after rating a ride with one star. This alternative is an extension of that methodology.

This alternative is indicative of the policy’s perpetuation. By carrying over this policy into this possibility, this option is established, which symbolises Uber’s perpetuation of that policy. This option is currently available for consideration.

SOURCE: USN

SEE ALSO:

Sebastian Coe Among 7 IOC Members To Enter Race To Succeed Thomas Bach As President

Amazon Mandates that Employees Report to the Office on Five Consecutive Days.

Continue Reading

Download Our App

vornews app

Advertise Here

Volunteering at Soi Dog

Soi Dog

Trending