Connect with us

Entertainment

‘Lost’ Found The Path To An Equation That Changed The Future Of TV

Published

on

lost
Lost - CNN Image

ABC was struggling to find hits in 2004 when it introduced two of them: “Desperate Housewives,” a new take on a primetime soap opera, and “Lost,” a sci-fi-tinged mystery that quickly became a fan sensation, from its cryptic numbers to what happened to that crashed plane and its passengers.

Of the two, however, it was “Lost” that fundamentally changed television and the relationship between the creative talent behind TV shows and the networks that carried them, fueling what could be called the novelization of television – not in the way the series began, but in how it concluded in 2010.

The roots of this may be traced back several years, when the show’s chief producers, Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse, realized that the twisting, mysterious series’ ratings were beginning to suffer due to viewers’ open-ended commitment. Fans wanted to know when they would get some answers.

lost

Lost | LA Times Image

‘Lost’ Found The Path To An Equation That Changed The Future Of TV

At their request, in what Variety dubbed a “paradigm-shifting play,” ABC enabled them to establish a definitive end date for the series, ordering 48 episodes over three seasons to finish the story.

The declaration showed that the series was building toward something, that a payoff awaited those who had invested so much time – and graduate-school-level thought and analysis – in the show and its meaning.

Until then, the dominant wisdom in television was if it isn’t broken, don’t repair it. The series aired until the public stopped watching them, not when the creators said so, as if they were authors nearing the end of their story.

“I think for story-based shows like ‘Lost,’ as opposed to franchise-based shows like ‘ER’ or ‘CSI,’ the audience wants to know when the story is going to be over,” Cuse stated at the time, spelling out the novel comparison by adding, “When J.K. Rowling announced there would be seven ‘Harry Potter’ books, it gave the readers a clear sense of exactly what their investment would be. We encourage our readers to do the same.”

Producer J.J. Abrams, who co-created the series with Lindelof and Jeffrey Lieber, described the move as “the right choice,” praising ABC for having “real foresight and guts to make a call like this.”

Since then, a new type of television has arisen and taken root, providing creative talent more freedom to determine the shelf life of their stories. This has included the rise of limited series that promise closure and finality, resulting in distinct beginning and finish arcs.

Others followed suit, including “Game of Thrones,” with its two-season finale, “Stranger Things,” and, most recently, “The Boys,” which revealed that the superhero satire’s fifth season will conclude the plot.

That equation has made television richer, more ambitious, and capable of dealing with various types of serialized storytelling.

In the immediate aftermath, the children of “Lost” profited from that thirst, as networks ordered additional programs with mysteries baked in, even if few of them lived up to their promise.

Tellingly, even “Lost” didn’t nail the landing, producing a finale that answered many of its issues yet felt unsatisfying in its conclusion. Knowing when to stop is different from knowing how.

lost

Lost | CNN Image

‘Lost’ Found The Path To An Equation That Changed The Future Of TV

However, the show’s legacy was already assured by that point. Bringing things full circle, all 121 episodes of the show are now available on Netflix, where they may be rediscovered – and binged in a more concentrated manner – by people who don’t have to wait years to find out how it all ends. Welcome to the 2020s.

The “Lost” finale may not have delivered an ending worthy of all the anticipation. By then, however, it had served to steer television toward a new style of storytelling, which, regardless of the numbers (for the record, 4, 8, 15, 16, 23, and 42), maybe the formula that is most important.

SOURCE – (CNN)

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Reviews of Silent Hill 2 Provide a Higher-Than-Expected Metacritical Score.

Published

on

Silent Hill 2

(VOR News) – The Bloober Team and Konami-produced remake of the horror game Silent Hill 2 is scheduled to launch the following week, but reviews have already started to surface, giving players a sneak peek at the updated version of the game before it is made available to the public.

It would be an understatement to say that Bloober Team was under a great deal of pressure to get the game right, especially considering that the survival-horror genre’s enthusiasts regard Silent Hill almost as highly as Resident Evil.

Considering the Metacritic score that the game has received thus far, Silent Hill 2 players shouldn’t have any worries when the game launches on November 8

. This is due to the score, which shows that the game has only ever earned favorable reviews up to this point. Fans of the Bloober Team and Silent Hill will be happy to hear this news.

Silent Hill 2 currently has an 87 Metacritic rating.

In 50 reviews, the PlayStation 5 version received a score of 87, meaning that it also received an 87 on that platform. This is based on the fact that the score was given to the PlayStation 5 version. The Silent Hill 2 personal computer version received an overall rating of 88 out of 5, placing it somewhat higher than the PlayStation 5 version.

There isn’t an Xbox version of Silent Hill 2 that can be regarded as existing because it wasn’t part of the Xbox Series X|S. There isn’t any information available at this time on whether or not it will ever be made accessible on that specific platform.

A considerable portion of Silent Hill fans had not in the slightest expected that Silent Hill 2 would achieve five flawless scores of one hundred before these reviews were published. It is extremely unlikely that they expected anything at all. Actually, the great majority of reviews are favorable.

They also call it a welcome return to form for the Silent Hill brand, complimenting the Bloober Team for their appreciation for the first Silent Hill 2. Furthermore, they believe it to be the ideal starting point for beginners who have never really experienced Silent Hill before.

Due of this, Silent Hill 2 has few Metacritic reviews, both positive and negative.

No bad reviews have been posted. Some people think that the remake may have retained some of the most annoying and constrictive elements of the original Silent Hill 2 by staying too close to the original. These individuals believe that there might have been some issues brought on by the remake.

Thankfully for those of us who are now playing Silent Hill 2, those reviews are the exception rather than the rule, with the vast majority of positive reviews making up the small amount of negative reviews.

It is true that some people became skeptical about the remake because the Bloober Team was in charge of it. Furthermore, in the perspective of both its own series and the genre at large, Silent Hill 2 has been held in the highest regard ever since it was first made accessible to the general public.

Games like Layers of Fear, The Medium, and the Blair Witch game were all made by the Bloober Team; nevertheless, no matter which game was reviewed, none of these titles received particularly high review scores. With the release of Silent Hill 2, it’s possible that the public’s perception of the Bloober Team may undergo a significant shift.

Additionally, we are now writing our own review of Silent Hill 2.

Although it has taken longer than expected because we acquired our review copy after the game was already in progress.

However, even though more reviews are being received, it is highly doubtful that these would significantly lower Silent Hill 2’s Metacritic score. despite the fact that more reviews are coming in. Players of Silent Hill 2 should have a lot to look forward to in the upcoming week as a result of this.

SOURCE: CB

SEE ALSO:

Maya Rudolph As Harris And Dana Carvey As Biden Open The 50th Season Of ‘Saturday Night Live’

In “The Electric State,” Millie Bobby Brown and Chris Pratt Battle Robots.

 

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Maya Rudolph As Harris And Dana Carvey As Biden Open The 50th Season Of ‘Saturday Night Live’

Published

on

rudolph

“Saturday Night Live” kicked off its 50th season with a parade of past cast members, including Maya Rudolph as Vice President Kamala Harris, Andy Samberg as her husband Doug Emhoff, and Dana Carvey as President Joe Biden.

“We’ve got to stay focused,” Rudolph-as-Harris stated at a faux rally during the show’s chilly open. “If we win, together, we can end the drama-la and the trauma-la and go relax in our pajama-las.”

After introducing running mate Tim Walz, portrayed by comedian and actor Jim Gaffigan, she summoned Samberg-as Emhoff to the stage, followed by Biden, played by the group’s oldest member, 69-year-old Carvey.

rudolph

Maya Rudolph As Harris And Dana Carvey As Biden Open The 50th Season Of ‘Saturday Night Live’

“A lot of people forget I’m president, including me,” said Carvey, who played President George H.W. Bush on the sitcom in the late 1980s.

Rudolph and Carvey performed the “Live from New York, it’s Saturday night” that kicked off season 50 of the sketch comedy classic.

Rudolph’s return to play Harris, for which she had won an Emmy, was publicized, but it was unclear when she would appear. The appearances by Carvey, Samberg, and Gaffigan were all surprises.

Jean Smart, who recently won her sixth Emmy for her starring part in “Hacks,” hosted, a role the 73-year-old has never played in her nearly four-decade career.

“I remember watching the first episode of ‘SNL’ and thinking,’someday I’m going to host that show,” Smart remarked in her opening monologue. “And this is the first Saturday that fit my schedule.”

The inaugural episode aired on October 11, 1975, with Lorne Michaels at the helm, as he is now.

George Carlin hosted, and the public was introduced to the Not Ready for Prime Time Players: Chevy Chase, John Belushi, Gilda Radner, Dan Akroyd, Jane Curtin, Laraine Newman, and Garrett Morris.

There were two musical guests, Billy Preston and Janis Ian, each performing two songs, as was customary in the early days.

Jelly Roll, a country singer and rapper, had the music spotlight Saturday, performing his songs “Liar” and “Sober.” Like Smart, he was a first-timer.

Smart debuted Jelly Roll alongside her “Hacks” co-star Hannah Einbinder, the daughter of original cast member Newman.

That debut episode is documented and re-enacted in the recently released Jason Reitman film “Saturday Night,” which is part of a wave of contemplation and celebration as the show approaches its 50th anniversary.

Despite the spectacular guest stars on this Saturday night, regular cast members carried the majority of the show, which swiftly settled into its usual pattern.

At his rally, James Austin Johnson reprised his role as Donald Trump, claiming he preferred Biden to Harris as his opponent.

“We miss Joe Biden, folks,” Johnson’s Trump stated. “What we wouldn’t give to have him stand next to me and be old.”

Colin Jost and Michael Che returned for another season of the mock-news show “Weekend Update.”

“There were so many insane political stories this summer and everyone kept asking, ‘Are you are you so bummed you aren’t on the air right now?” Jost instructed me to begin the part. “And I was like, ‘I have a feeling there’s going to be more that happens when we get back.'”

Maya Rudolph As Harris And Dana Carvey As Biden Open The 50th Season Of ‘Saturday Night Live’

Rudolph, Carvey, Gaffigan, and Samberg joined Smart, Jelly Roll, and the cast on stage for the usual finale.

Upcoming episodes will feature host Nate Bargatze and musical guests Coldplay, Ariana Grande and Stevie Nicks, Michael Keaton and Billie Eilish, and John Mulaney and Chappell Roan.

Those shows will build up to a three-hour primetime special on February 16 that will mark the official 50th season celebration. Bill Murray, Eddie Murphy, Billy Crystal, Julia Louis-Dreyfus, Robert Downey Jr., Mike Myers, Adam Sandler, Chris Rock, Tina Fey, Amy Poehler, and Will Ferrell are among the many talents who have appeared on the show.

SOURCE | AP

Continue Reading

Entertainment

In “The Electric State,” Millie Bobby Brown and Chris Pratt Battle Robots.

Published

on

Millie Bobby Brown

(VOR News) – The brothers and brothers-in-law Joe and Anthony Russo, the directors of “Avengers: Endgame” and Millie Bobby Brown, are back at it with “The Electric State.”

A view into a dismal future, this film stars Chris Pratt (“The Super Mario Bros. Movie”) and Millie Bobby Brown (“Stranger Things”). But the year is 1994.

The events depicted in “The Electric State” follow a sad and fruitless standoff between humanity and artificial intelligence. The bodies of the dead humans were buried, and the husks of the automatons they had fought with rusted where they had fallen. All of the living robots ended up in the “exclusion zone” of the southern desert. People are trying to rebuild society without the aid of technology as a result.

Anthony Russo stated, “You can recognise humanity in humans, and you can recognise humanity in technology,” in a Millie Bobby Brown Vanity Fair interview. These two scenarios are both plausible. That is the constant battle.

This is the plot.

Michelle, played by Millie Bobby Brown, is a young woman who believes her brother has long since passed away and is looking for him. However, it is a remote-controlled robot that resembles a life-sized, tiny-toy version of Kid Cosmo, his beloved science fiction hero, who helps him locate her. The robot, whose language consists of catchphrases, tries to guide her towards him.

Millie Bobby Brown thinks everyone can agree on anything and sees her brother in the doll.

Pratt’s portrayal of Keats, a former soldier turned long-haul truck driver, joins them on their adventure. This old enemy, played by Anthony Mackie, is involved in a construction machine smuggling operation called Millie Bobby Brown Herman.

He acts like a Russian nesting doll, transforming into smaller or larger versions of himself. Michelle needs help finding her lost brother in a difficult area, and only the two of them can do that.

“It felt like a story about broken families and broken people trying to find each other in a broken world,” Joe stated. “The texture in the images was really powerful,” he stated. “It was a story about how this world is broken.” It resonated with us since we are raising our kids in a digitally dependent society.

But Wait, There’s Still More

If the previously described situation doesn’t seem complicated enough, the background of Walt Disney’s early animatronics provides more insight into the motivation behind the robots’ rebellion: Millie Bobby Brown.

“The Electric State,” a theme park experience at Disneyland, takes some of its fundamental ideas and gives them a very sophisticated twist. This leads, after a few decades, to the creation of robots intelligent enough to rebel against their creators.

“These robots had the most benign appearance possible, and they end up feeling that they are being mistreated, and they have a Millie Bobby Brown desire to be treated as equals with humans, which leads to a war,” Joe said in his clarification. “And now you have this strange dichotomy playing out, where these service bots that are very pleasing and palatable from a service perspective are now attempting to kill you.”

For what reason was it 1994?

Joe contends that the topic of aggression might come up if the novel were set in the present era. Information that has been taken out of its immediate context and narratively presented might occasionally lead to people perceiving it in various ways. It turns out that this is the case.

Simon Stalenhag has done an amazing job pointing out how people are dehumanising themselves through technology and then creating a story about technology that attempts to be human. The query is, “At what point do they intersect, and at what point does technology become more hum

Joe continues by saying, “The intention was to create complex feelings for you, where it is both funny and tragic at the same time.”

The Millie Bobby Brown movie is based on the theory that robots were designed to be tranquil, visually beautiful, and non-threatening in addition to making people feel attached to them. in order to provide for you, sell you goods, and ensure your happiness. Stated differently, the movie’s goal was to make them resemble cartoon figures.

SOURCE: NB

SEE ALSO:

‘Better Man’ Trailer: The Robbie Williams biopic features a singing monkey as the main character.

John Amos, Patriarch On ‘Good Times’ And An Emmy Nominee For The Blockbuster ‘Roots,’ Dies At 84

Continue Reading

Download Our App

vornews app

Buy FUT Coins

comprar monedas FC 25

Volunteering at Soi Dog

Soi Dog

Trending