Connect with us

Politics

President Biden Faces Impeachment for Withholding Aid to Israel

Published

on

President Biden

The Biden administration has halted a shipment of military supplies to Israel in a blatantly political move to sway voters in critical swing states. Presidents have faced impeachment for far less. Nine Republican has urged impeaching Joe Biden for withholding US aid from Israel, and the president’s biggest Senate friend has gone against him, saying the IDF should ‘finish the job’ in Rafah.

Sen. Chris Coons, a Delaware Democrat, is Biden’s main worldwide surrogate. His public split with Biden’s policy is almost unique. Coons told the Senate floor on Thursday that he spoke with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu last night.

You don’t just have right to defend the Israeli people against Hamas, you have the obligation,’ Coons said he told Netanyahu. ‘You have go after them. You have to finish the job. You have to go into Rafah.’

Still, he called on Israel to allow Palestinian civilians a pathway out of Rafah.

The Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (ICA) oversees the use of monies appropriated by Congress. It was intended to restore Congress’ sovereignty over the purse and prevent the president from simply substituting their own funding decisions for those of Congress.

While it was originally an obscure law limiting spending, the public may remember it for its brief appearance in President Donald J. Trump’s first impeachment. According to the Democratic-led impeachment inquiry report:

President Trump Impeached for Suspending Aid to Ukraine

President Trump ordered the suspension of $391 million in critical military assistance required by Ukraine, a strategic partner, to confront Russian aggression. Because the aid was appropriated by Congress on a bipartisan basis and signed into law by the president, its expenditure was mandated by law.

The president, acting directly and through his subordinates inside the US administration, withheld military assistance from Ukraine for no valid foreign policy, national security, or anti-corruption reasons.

The president did so despite Congress’s longstanding bipartisan support, unanimous support across federal departments and agencies for providing military assistance to Ukraine, and his obligations under the Impoundment Control Act.

If you replace Ukraine with Israel and Hamas with Russia, the rest of the paragraph will remain same. Except, of course, that Trump denies improperly withholding the help, while President Biden has not.

How awful is it for a president to withhold congressionally authorized military aid to another country? And to do this to a democratic ally fighting an existential war? Why, it is nothing short of a “abuse of power”—as then-Presidential candidate Joe Biden put it in 2020.

Congress foreign aid

Foreign Aid Controlled by Congress

The ICA does allow the president to withhold or delay the delivery of funds in certain circumstances, but it also includes very specific procedures that the administration must follow in order to notify Congress, which still has the authority to approve or disapprove of the President’s decision. None of these procedures were followed here.

What does it say about a president who unilaterally decides not to observe the law, particularly the ICA? It would imply that “we have a president who believes there is no limit to his power.” We have a president who believes he can do whatever he wants without consequences. We have a president who thinks he’s above the law. Or at least it was how then-candidate Biden rationalized the appearance of impropriety in 2020.

Some may argue that, while wrong, this behavior does not constitute the high crimes and misdemeanors that could lead to a president’s impeachment. Nonetheless, as the US Government Accountability Office discovered in January 2020, this type of illegal judgment has very substantial constitutional implications.

“The president cannot substitute his own policy preferences for those that Congress has placed into law through faithful implementation of the law.

In fact, Congress was concerned about exactly these types of withholding when it adopted and later amended the ICA… All federal officials and employees swear an oath to maintain and protect the Constitution and its essential tenants, including the congressional authority of the purse.”

In fact, in its Principles of Federal Appropriations Law, Fourth Edition, Ch. 1 (2016), the GAO referred to the legislative authority of the purse as “the most important single curb in the Constitution on presidential power.”

Numerous lawmakers have already contacted the White House, seeking explanations and accountability. The deadline for responding to at least some of those letters has gone.

So, what should happen to a president who acts like a king? It’s difficult to say in these trying circumstances, but at least some people believe that this “will leave Congress with no choice but to initiate impeachment proceedings.” Or at least, it is what then-candidate Biden believed in 2020, when that was the most popular response.

Experts, such as Colonel John Spencer, head of urban warfare at West Point, believe Israel is fighting a righteous war in the most humanitarian manner conceivable. The shortest way to halt the war, save as many Israeli, Palestinian, and American lives as possible, and preserve the globe safe for democracy is to defeat Hamas. And the president understands this, even if potential voters in Michigan do not.

Making actions that harm our own national security and the security of our allies for personal political benefit is the “definition of corruption.” Or so said then-candidate Joe Biden in 2020, when he wasn’t doing it himself.

Source: NewsWeek

 

Continue Reading

Politics

Justin Trudeau Ignites a Political Firestorm With 1.4 Billion People in India

Published

on

Trudeau India Relations
Indians protest against Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi, India - NDTV Image

On Monday, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has sparked the greatest diplomatic quarrel between Canada and India in the history of their bilateral relations. Trudeau reiterated previous claims that Indian diplomats orchestrated the death of Khalistani rebel Hardeep Singh Nijjar.

In a tit-for-tat diplomatic exchange, India recalls six Indian diplomats, including the High Commissioner, and expelled six Canadian diplomats.

Justin Trudeau stated that his government had attempted to collaborate with India, but its response has been to deny, obfuscate, and attack him personally and the integrity of the government of Canada.

Melanie Joly, Canadian Minister of Foreign Affairs, stated that sitting Indian diplomats were involved in violent acts that increased following Trudeau’s allegation of India’s possible involvement in the murder of Hardeep Singh Nijjar.

India disputed Canada’s charges on Monday, accusing Justin Trudeau’s government of targeting Indian diplomates without justification and threatening their safety. “We have no faith in the current Canadian government’s resolve to secure their safety, New Deli stated yesterday.

The Indian Ministry of External Affairs stated in a statement that the Trudeau government has consciously provided space for violent extremists and terrorists to harass, threaten, and intimidate Indian diplomats and community leaders in Canada.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau with members of the Sikh Caucus.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau with members of the Sikh Caucus – VOR News Image

Trudeau’s Support of the Khalistan separatist movement

Justin Trudeau’s close ties to the Khalistan separatist movement, as well as his sympathies for declared terrorists and extremists who preach hatred, violence, and extremism on Canadian soil, are all intended to appeal to his voter base.

Trudeau’s claims on Monday sparked a firestorm in India, with a vast majority of the country’s 1.4 billion people rallying behind Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, according to (NDTV) New Deli Television News.

NDVT stated that Mr Trudeau is facing a series of political setbacks in Canada and he has frequently supported the Khalistani separatist movement and permitted them to operate in  Canada.

Justin Trudeau has stood shoulder to shoulder with terrorists, fanatics, and separatists at Khalistan demonstrations across Canada, and doing so, he has directly violated India’s national security concerns, as well as India’s sovereignty and territorial integrity by supporting those who want to carve out another nation from India – all under the guise of “free speech in Canada.”

According to New Deli television, Trudeau has lost significant electoral ground in recent months as a major ally, Jagmeet Singh, withdrew support from his party, and Trudeau is attempting to soothe his “voter bank.”

Justin Trudeau has suffered several political losses in recent months. What has alarmed him is that he has lost the backing of his crucial ally, Jagmeet Singh’s party. Singh openly supports ‘Khalistan’.

Protesters against COVID-19 restrictions march through the streets of Montreal

Protesters march against Trudeau on the streets of Montreal – Image The Canadian Press

Political fallout in Canada

Doubts about Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s leadership grew after his ruling Liberal Party suffered two humiliating defeats in a special election, but the unpopular leader is desperate to hold on to power ahead of a national election.

The result, which followed a defeat in Toronto in late June, reinforced the view that the Liberals’ chances in the next national election are bleak. The mandate for Trudeau’s minority administration expires at the end of October 2025, but an early election appears increasingly likely.

Although surveys show the Liberals will lose heavily to the official opposition right-of-center Conservatives in the next election due to dissatisfaction with inflation, healthcare, and the housing crisis, Trudeau and his closest aides insist he is not going anywhere and has time to help the party recover.

Faced with the possibility of losing his position as Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau has launched a series of claims against India in an attempt to polarize the electorate while catering to his vote bank in a desperate attempt to get as much support as possible in order to retain his position.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continue Reading

Politics

India Slams Trudeau for Accusing Diplomats of “Acts of Violence”

Published

on

Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau
Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau accuses India of Criminal Activity in Canada - Global Affairs Image

The Indian government slammed Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for accusing Indian diplomats of being involved in murder, harassment, and other “acts of violence” against Sikh separatists in the country.

India’s Ministry of External Affairs has called Trudeau’s accusations “preposterous” and said it was withdrawing its diplomats from Canada.

“There is a deliberate strategy by Justin Trudeau of smearing India for political gains,” the statement added Monday. “The aspersions cast on (High Commissioner Sanjay Kumar Verma) are ludicrous and deserve to be treated with contempt,” the Ministry of External Affairs said.

India’s condemnation follows Prime Minister Justin Trudeau ordering the expulsion of six Indian diplomats from Canada.

Trudeau stated that the RCMP and national security officials have made numerous endeavors to collaborate with the Government of India and Indian law enforcement counterparts on this issue; however, they have been consistently unsuccessful.

In an unprecedented move, Canadian officials convened a press conference where the RCMP publicly disclosed the specifics of numerous investigations into the alleged involvement of Indian government agents in “serious criminal activity” in Canada.

RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme informed reporters that the decision to publicly disclose the investigations was made “due to the significant threat to public safety” and after attempts to resolve the issue in collaboration with the Indian government had not yielded satisfactory results. Additionally, the RCMP had identified organized crime that targeted Canada’s South Asian community and interference in democratic processes.

Clandestine Activities by Indian Diplomats

He stated that investigations have revealed that Indian diplomats and consular officials stationed in Canada utilized their official positions to engage in clandestine activities, including the collection of information for the Indian government, either directly or through their proxies, and other individuals who acted voluntarily or through coercion.

“The information that is collected for India was subsequently utilized to target members of the South Asian community in Canada.

Global Affairs Canada announced that six Indian diplomats and consular officials had received a notice of expulsion from Canada in response to a targeted campaign against Canadian citizens by agents affiliated with the Government of India, immediately following the RCMP statement.

India responded by ordering the expulsion of six high-ranking Canadian diplomats, including the acting high commissioner, and informed Canada that it was withdrawing its diplomats from the country, which contradicted Canada’s statement of expulsion.

“We have no confidence in the current Canadian government’s dedication to the security of our diplomats.” Consequently, the Indian government has resolved to evacuate the High Commissioner and other diplomats and officials who are specific targets, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) of India issued a statement.

The MEA reiterated India’s previous stance on the matter, stating that “the Canadian Government has not shared a shred of evidence with the Government of India, despite many requests from our side,” since Prime Minister Trudeau’s allegations in September 2023.

Trudeau Accused of Pandering for Political Gain

The MEA statement continued by asserting that Canada’s most recent action “follows interactions that have again witnessed assertions without any facts.” It further stated that “this leaves little doubt that on the pretext of an investigation, there is a deliberate strategy of Justin Trudeau smearing India for his own political gain.”

Accusing Trudeau of pursuing a “political agenda” and pandering to the 700,000-strong Sikh community, which possesses significant political influence in Canada.

This escalation of tensions occurred shortly after Prime Minister Trudeau asserted that he had conversed with Prime Minister Narendra Modi on the margins of the ASEAN Summit in Laos.  A subsequent clarification by India’s Ministry of External Affairs indicated that no “substantive discussion” had occurred between the two leaders.

Ajay Srivastava, the founder of the Global commerce Research Initiative (GTRI), stated on Monday that the bilateral commerce in goods between India and Canada has not been affected by the diplomatic tensions between the two countries.

The bilateral merchandise commerce between India and Canada experienced a slight increase from $8.3 billion in 2022-23 to $8.4 billion in 2023-24. India’s imports from Canada increased to $4.6 billion, while exports experienced a marginal decline, declining to $3.8 billion.

“These figures indicate that, at least for the time being, economic relations are unaffected by the diplomatic storm that is developing in the background,” he stated.

At present, the resilience of trade between India and Canada underscores a critical lesson: diplomatic tensions, despite their detrimental effects, do not necessarily result in the destruction of economic relationships.

However, as this dispute continues, it will be imperative for both nations to exercise caution in order to prevent a full-scale economic repercussion.

Related News:

Indian Media Labels Trudeau a Lair Over Claims He Held Talks With Prime Minister Modi

Indian Media Labels Trudeau a Lair Over Claims He Held Talks With Prime Minister Modi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continue Reading

Politics

Indian Media Labels Trudeau a Lair Over Claims He Held Talks With Prime Minister Modi

Published

on

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau leaves a photo op with Mr. Modi - Image Canadian Press
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau leaves a photo op with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi - Image Canadian Press

Claims by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau that “safety of Canadians” was discussed when he came face-to-face with Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Laos have been rejected by India’s Government.

Trudeau declared during a press conference on Friday that he had addressed tensions between the two nations that had arisen after he accused India of murdering Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar on Canadian soil.

An Indian Government spokesperson responded by stating to India Today that there was no substantive discussion between Prime Minister Modi and Prime Minister Trudeau in Laos, and that the two leaders only exchanged greetings when they met in person at the summit.

The government spokesperson stated that India continues to anticipate that anti-India Khalistani activities will not be permitted to occur on Canadian soil and that Mr. Trudeau will take firm action against those advocating violence, extremism, and terrorism against India from Canada, which has been lacking thus far.

The brief exchange between Prime Minister Modi and Justin Trudeau occurred nearly a year after Trudeau accused India of murdering Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Nijjar in Surrey, British Columbia in June 2023.

Trudeau’s accusations despite no evidence have incited outrage in India, resulting in an all-time nadir in bilateral relations.

Hardeep Singh Nijjar interpol

Hardeep Singh Nijjar Interpol Warrant

In 2020, India officially designated Hardeep Singh Nijjar as a terrorist and accused Justin Trudeau of harboring a wanted terrorist for political gain within Canada’s 700,000-strong Sikh community.

1987 marked the signing of an Extradition Treaty between Canada and India.

Numerous Indians are of the opinion that Mr. Trudeau is politically dependent on the Sikh community, which is both substantial and influential in his country. This belief is well-founded as despite that the 770,000 Sikhs in Canada constitute only 2.1% of the population, their geographic concentration and close-knit community connections grant them disproportionate political influence.

The socialist New Democratic Party, which is led by Jagmeet Singh, a Sikh politician who is widely perceived in India as sympathetic to Sikh radicalism, is the foundation of Justin Trudeau’s minority administration. Singh has been prohibited from entering India since 2013.

Critics contend that Justin Trudeau has for political purposes dismissed security concerns from India regarding radical Sikhs in Canada.

Omer Aziz, a former foreign-policy adviser to Mr. Trudeau, wrote in an op-ed published in the Globe and Mail in Toronto that “Canada should have at least begun to take steps to ensure Canada was not used for terrorist financing.” The sole issue was that Mr. Trudeau was adamant about not losing the Sikh vote to Jagmeet Singh.

In the opinion of Indians, Canada should have extradited Nijjar to India, where he was classified as a terrorist and implicated in a series of severe crimes, including a theater bombing and murder.

India accuses Trudeau of fostering an environment in which Sikh extremists publicly advocate for the murder of Indian diplomats, commemorate the 1984 assassination of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi by her Sikh bodyguards, and urge Canadian Hindus to emigrate.

Related News:

Millennials in Canada Have Turned their Backs on Justin Trudeau

Millennials in Canada Have Turned their Backs on Justin Trudeau

 

 

 

 

 

Continue Reading

Download Our App

vornews app

Buy FUT Coins

comprar monedas FC 25

Volunteering at Soi Dog

Soi Dog

Trending