Connect with us

Politics

Former NDP Leader Mulclair Says Trudeau Should Retire

Published

on

When all hell broke loose in the House last week, those with experience as parliamentarians couldn’t believe our eyes. Speaker Greg Fergus tossed out the Leader of His Majesty’s Loyal Opposition, Pierre Poilievre, on the flimsiest pretenses.

Fergus is highly partisan. We all knew that when Trudeau backed him in the election to replace Anthony Rota), who’d been forced to step down after introducing a former Nazi soldier in Parliament.

When Fergus got caught making a partisan video for an Ontario Liberal colleague, many calls were made for him to resign. He had egregiously breached the most basic rules requiring neutrality in the chair. He’d even made the video in his Parliamentary quarters, wearing his robes of office.

I pleaded that his error was serious, but it was a rookie mistake, and he deserved a second chance. Watching his dreadful performance with Poilievre last week, I regretted defending him.

After Poilievre’s ejection, Trudeau and the company were gloves off. During a campaign, they put on a full-court press worthy of a war room. Other pundits I spoke with were dutifully spun by whatever Liberal had contact with them. They thought they had finally caught a break in their Holy War against the evil Poilievre.

The usual Liberal supporters were out there spinning that Poilievre had done it on purpose to get thrown out. That was nonsense as it was unpredictable that someone who’d “simply withdrawn” the word “wacko” — as requested by the Speaker — would nonetheless be turfed.

Trudeau had called Poilievre “spineless” with impunity

It was unprecedented to throw out the Leader of the Opposition without a clear final warning and unambiguous instructions, especially after Trudeau had called Poilievre “spineless” with impunity.

If anything, getting Poilievre turfed seemed to have been concerted and planned, not by Poilievre, but by the Liberals in cahoots with their Speaker.

My vantage point into that desperate, full-bore Liberal effort to spin this against Poilievre came from an early morning call from a senior Liberal minister. In my line of work, as an observer and analyst of the political scene, knowing and being able to speak with ministers is part and parcel of doing your job well. Being able to call us, in return, is no doubt also part of theirs.

My interlocutor quickly understood that, with my years of experience, no one would convince me that Fergus was right. I was elected for three mandates to the rough-and-tumble National Assembly in Quebec City, where I served as Deputy House Leader, both in opposition and power. I also served as Official Opposition House Leader in Ottawa before assuming the same role Thilievre has today: Leader of the Official Opposition.

I mention all that to reinforce that I know the ropes and the important institutional roles involved. My senior Liberal changed tack when it was clear I thought Fergus had to go. They went all-in, making a negative and personal attack against Poilievre. It was brutal and came off as orchestrated, if not contrived.

It was not just an attack on Poilievre. It was a plea for me to acknowledge just how awful he was. He represents a clear and present danger for our institutions. It had an air of fin de régime, the end of Trudeau’s political era, and it wasn’t going out on a high note.

Trudeau is still lagging 20 points behind.

It may mark the beginning of the end, but Trudeau isn’t about to leave simply because Canadian voters have decided to give him his pink slip. He has options, and he knows it. Sure, hardly a day goes by without an article detailing the plans of one cabinet minister to replace Trudeau or an outside potential successor giving an eloquent speech to the Liberal faithful.

Polls are being published to show which possible new leaders have the most public favor. This is happening against a backdrop of Trudeau still lagging 20 points behind, with nothing to show for his mammoth pre-budget tour or from the budget itself.

However, Trudeau still holds many good cards in his hand. He brought the Liberal Party back to life after the Ignatieff debacle. They owe him everything. He’s not about to be given the boot. He’ll be the only one to decide when and if he’ll leave. He’s won three elections in a row, but he should have noted that Canadians cast more votes for the Conservatives in the 2019 and 2021 campaigns. The writing was already on the wall. He couldn’t, or wouldn’t, decode it.

I know several senior Liberals, both high-level volunteers and MPs with access to Trudeau, who has been encouraging him to consider this is his ‘legacy mandate,’ to be graceful and leave his place to someone else so that the party still has the time to give a new leader a chance in the next election. All say that Trudeau refuses to admit that he may be the problem, much less listen to their heartfelt advice.

Of course, it’s not in Trudeau’s nature to admit he and his hapless administration of Canada could be to blame. Now that the proof is in front of him daily in the polls, how long can he deny the obvious?

The writing may be on the wall, but it’s important to remember that Trudeau could still decide tomorrow to walk across the lawn from Rideau Cottage, where he lives, to Rideau Hall and ask Gov.-Gen. Mary Simon to call an election, and she’d have no choice but to do so.

Those senior Liberal organizers know it as well. The longer Trudeau dithers, the less likely there will be a push by frustrated potential successors to drink from a poisoned chalice. With no time to fully present themselves to Canadians, much less organize properly for an election, they’d be cannon fodder for Poilievre’s Conservatives.

The Liberals I speak with still clutch at the hope that a lot of Singh’s NDP vote will drift over to them when progressives sense the impending doom of a Poilievre Conservative victory. The fact that a considerable cohort of NDP MPs has either quit or announced their intention not to run indicates that there may be far fewer votes to purloin than there may have been before the NDP-Liberal deal and before Poilievre’s ascendancy.

In the meantime, if last week’s shenanigans are any indication, Canadians can expect a brutal, personal knock-down, drag-out fight between the leaders of the two parties that have governed Canada since Confederation. It’s going to get ugly.

By Tom Mulcair, Leader of the federal New Democratic Party of Canada between 2012 and 2017

 

Continue Reading

Politics

Justin Trudeau Ignites a Political Firestorm With 1.4 Billion People in India

Published

on

Trudeau India Relations
Indians protest against Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi, India - NDTV Image

On Monday, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has sparked the greatest diplomatic quarrel between Canada and India in the history of their bilateral relations. Trudeau reiterated previous claims that Indian diplomats orchestrated the death of Khalistani rebel Hardeep Singh Nijjar.

In a tit-for-tat diplomatic exchange, India recalls six Indian diplomats, including the High Commissioner, and expelled six Canadian diplomats.

Justin Trudeau stated that his government had attempted to collaborate with India, but its response has been to deny, obfuscate, and attack him personally and the integrity of the government of Canada.

Melanie Joly, Canadian Minister of Foreign Affairs, stated that sitting Indian diplomats were involved in violent acts that increased following Trudeau’s allegation of India’s possible involvement in the murder of Hardeep Singh Nijjar.

India disputed Canada’s charges on Monday, accusing Justin Trudeau’s government of targeting Indian diplomates without justification and threatening their safety. “We have no faith in the current Canadian government’s resolve to secure their safety, New Deli stated yesterday.

The Indian Ministry of External Affairs stated in a statement that the Trudeau government has consciously provided space for violent extremists and terrorists to harass, threaten, and intimidate Indian diplomats and community leaders in Canada.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau with members of the Sikh Caucus.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau with members of the Sikh Caucus – VOR News Image

Trudeau’s Support of the Khalistan separatist movement

Justin Trudeau’s close ties to the Khalistan separatist movement, as well as his sympathies for declared terrorists and extremists who preach hatred, violence, and extremism on Canadian soil, are all intended to appeal to his voter base.

Trudeau’s claims on Monday sparked a firestorm in India, with a vast majority of the country’s 1.4 billion people rallying behind Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, according to (NDTV) New Deli Television News.

NDVT stated that Mr Trudeau is facing a series of political setbacks in Canada and he has frequently supported the Khalistani separatist movement and permitted them to operate in  Canada.

Justin Trudeau has stood shoulder to shoulder with terrorists, fanatics, and separatists at Khalistan demonstrations across Canada, and doing so, he has directly violated India’s national security concerns, as well as India’s sovereignty and territorial integrity by supporting those who want to carve out another nation from India – all under the guise of “free speech in Canada.”

According to New Deli television, Trudeau has lost significant electoral ground in recent months as a major ally, Jagmeet Singh, withdrew support from his party, and Trudeau is attempting to soothe his “voter bank.”

Justin Trudeau has suffered several political losses in recent months. What has alarmed him is that he has lost the backing of his crucial ally, Jagmeet Singh’s party. Singh openly supports ‘Khalistan’.

Protesters against COVID-19 restrictions march through the streets of Montreal

Protesters march against Trudeau on the streets of Montreal – Image The Canadian Press

Political fallout in Canada

Doubts about Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s leadership grew after his ruling Liberal Party suffered two humiliating defeats in a special election, but the unpopular leader is desperate to hold on to power ahead of a national election.

The result, which followed a defeat in Toronto in late June, reinforced the view that the Liberals’ chances in the next national election are bleak. The mandate for Trudeau’s minority administration expires at the end of October 2025, but an early election appears increasingly likely.

Although surveys show the Liberals will lose heavily to the official opposition right-of-center Conservatives in the next election due to dissatisfaction with inflation, healthcare, and the housing crisis, Trudeau and his closest aides insist he is not going anywhere and has time to help the party recover.

Faced with the possibility of losing his position as Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau has launched a series of claims against India in an attempt to polarize the electorate while catering to his vote bank in a desperate attempt to get as much support as possible in order to retain his position.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continue Reading

Politics

India Slams Trudeau for Accusing Diplomats of “Acts of Violence”

Published

on

Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau
Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau accuses India of Criminal Activity in Canada - Global Affairs Image

The Indian government slammed Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for accusing Indian diplomats of being involved in murder, harassment, and other “acts of violence” against Sikh separatists in the country.

India’s Ministry of External Affairs has called Trudeau’s accusations “preposterous” and said it was withdrawing its diplomats from Canada.

“There is a deliberate strategy by Justin Trudeau of smearing India for political gains,” the statement added Monday. “The aspersions cast on (High Commissioner Sanjay Kumar Verma) are ludicrous and deserve to be treated with contempt,” the Ministry of External Affairs said.

India’s condemnation follows Prime Minister Justin Trudeau ordering the expulsion of six Indian diplomats from Canada.

Trudeau stated that the RCMP and national security officials have made numerous endeavors to collaborate with the Government of India and Indian law enforcement counterparts on this issue; however, they have been consistently unsuccessful.

In an unprecedented move, Canadian officials convened a press conference where the RCMP publicly disclosed the specifics of numerous investigations into the alleged involvement of Indian government agents in “serious criminal activity” in Canada.

RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme informed reporters that the decision to publicly disclose the investigations was made “due to the significant threat to public safety” and after attempts to resolve the issue in collaboration with the Indian government had not yielded satisfactory results. Additionally, the RCMP had identified organized crime that targeted Canada’s South Asian community and interference in democratic processes.

Clandestine Activities by Indian Diplomats

He stated that investigations have revealed that Indian diplomats and consular officials stationed in Canada utilized their official positions to engage in clandestine activities, including the collection of information for the Indian government, either directly or through their proxies, and other individuals who acted voluntarily or through coercion.

“The information that is collected for India was subsequently utilized to target members of the South Asian community in Canada.

Global Affairs Canada announced that six Indian diplomats and consular officials had received a notice of expulsion from Canada in response to a targeted campaign against Canadian citizens by agents affiliated with the Government of India, immediately following the RCMP statement.

India responded by ordering the expulsion of six high-ranking Canadian diplomats, including the acting high commissioner, and informed Canada that it was withdrawing its diplomats from the country, which contradicted Canada’s statement of expulsion.

“We have no confidence in the current Canadian government’s dedication to the security of our diplomats.” Consequently, the Indian government has resolved to evacuate the High Commissioner and other diplomats and officials who are specific targets, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) of India issued a statement.

The MEA reiterated India’s previous stance on the matter, stating that “the Canadian Government has not shared a shred of evidence with the Government of India, despite many requests from our side,” since Prime Minister Trudeau’s allegations in September 2023.

Trudeau Accused of Pandering for Political Gain

The MEA statement continued by asserting that Canada’s most recent action “follows interactions that have again witnessed assertions without any facts.” It further stated that “this leaves little doubt that on the pretext of an investigation, there is a deliberate strategy of Justin Trudeau smearing India for his own political gain.”

Accusing Trudeau of pursuing a “political agenda” and pandering to the 700,000-strong Sikh community, which possesses significant political influence in Canada.

This escalation of tensions occurred shortly after Prime Minister Trudeau asserted that he had conversed with Prime Minister Narendra Modi on the margins of the ASEAN Summit in Laos.  A subsequent clarification by India’s Ministry of External Affairs indicated that no “substantive discussion” had occurred between the two leaders.

Ajay Srivastava, the founder of the Global commerce Research Initiative (GTRI), stated on Monday that the bilateral commerce in goods between India and Canada has not been affected by the diplomatic tensions between the two countries.

The bilateral merchandise commerce between India and Canada experienced a slight increase from $8.3 billion in 2022-23 to $8.4 billion in 2023-24. India’s imports from Canada increased to $4.6 billion, while exports experienced a marginal decline, declining to $3.8 billion.

“These figures indicate that, at least for the time being, economic relations are unaffected by the diplomatic storm that is developing in the background,” he stated.

At present, the resilience of trade between India and Canada underscores a critical lesson: diplomatic tensions, despite their detrimental effects, do not necessarily result in the destruction of economic relationships.

However, as this dispute continues, it will be imperative for both nations to exercise caution in order to prevent a full-scale economic repercussion.

Related News:

Indian Media Labels Trudeau a Lair Over Claims He Held Talks With Prime Minister Modi

Indian Media Labels Trudeau a Lair Over Claims He Held Talks With Prime Minister Modi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continue Reading

Politics

Indian Media Labels Trudeau a Lair Over Claims He Held Talks With Prime Minister Modi

Published

on

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau leaves a photo op with Mr. Modi - Image Canadian Press
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau leaves a photo op with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi - Image Canadian Press

Claims by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau that “safety of Canadians” was discussed when he came face-to-face with Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Laos have been rejected by India’s Government.

Trudeau declared during a press conference on Friday that he had addressed tensions between the two nations that had arisen after he accused India of murdering Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar on Canadian soil.

An Indian Government spokesperson responded by stating to India Today that there was no substantive discussion between Prime Minister Modi and Prime Minister Trudeau in Laos, and that the two leaders only exchanged greetings when they met in person at the summit.

The government spokesperson stated that India continues to anticipate that anti-India Khalistani activities will not be permitted to occur on Canadian soil and that Mr. Trudeau will take firm action against those advocating violence, extremism, and terrorism against India from Canada, which has been lacking thus far.

The brief exchange between Prime Minister Modi and Justin Trudeau occurred nearly a year after Trudeau accused India of murdering Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Nijjar in Surrey, British Columbia in June 2023.

Trudeau’s accusations despite no evidence have incited outrage in India, resulting in an all-time nadir in bilateral relations.

Hardeep Singh Nijjar interpol

Hardeep Singh Nijjar Interpol Warrant

In 2020, India officially designated Hardeep Singh Nijjar as a terrorist and accused Justin Trudeau of harboring a wanted terrorist for political gain within Canada’s 700,000-strong Sikh community.

1987 marked the signing of an Extradition Treaty between Canada and India.

Numerous Indians are of the opinion that Mr. Trudeau is politically dependent on the Sikh community, which is both substantial and influential in his country. This belief is well-founded as despite that the 770,000 Sikhs in Canada constitute only 2.1% of the population, their geographic concentration and close-knit community connections grant them disproportionate political influence.

The socialist New Democratic Party, which is led by Jagmeet Singh, a Sikh politician who is widely perceived in India as sympathetic to Sikh radicalism, is the foundation of Justin Trudeau’s minority administration. Singh has been prohibited from entering India since 2013.

Critics contend that Justin Trudeau has for political purposes dismissed security concerns from India regarding radical Sikhs in Canada.

Omer Aziz, a former foreign-policy adviser to Mr. Trudeau, wrote in an op-ed published in the Globe and Mail in Toronto that “Canada should have at least begun to take steps to ensure Canada was not used for terrorist financing.” The sole issue was that Mr. Trudeau was adamant about not losing the Sikh vote to Jagmeet Singh.

In the opinion of Indians, Canada should have extradited Nijjar to India, where he was classified as a terrorist and implicated in a series of severe crimes, including a theater bombing and murder.

India accuses Trudeau of fostering an environment in which Sikh extremists publicly advocate for the murder of Indian diplomats, commemorate the 1984 assassination of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi by her Sikh bodyguards, and urge Canadian Hindus to emigrate.

Related News:

Millennials in Canada Have Turned their Backs on Justin Trudeau

Millennials in Canada Have Turned their Backs on Justin Trudeau

 

 

 

 

 

Continue Reading

Download Our App

vornews app

Buy FUT Coins

comprar monedas FC 25

Volunteering at Soi Dog

Soi Dog

Trending