Connect with us

Politics

Trudeau’s India Fiasco Shows He’s Lost Control of Foreign Policy

Published

on

Trudeau’s India Fiasco Shows He's Lost Control of Foreign Policy

Anyone with eyes and brains can see that rogue Canadian spies are de facto running the country’s foreign policy. Foreign Minister Melanie Joly is formally second in command to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who is the de facto head of diplomatic missions.

The events of the past year have proven, however, that Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is powerless in the face of the unaccountable security services, over which he, his cabinet, and his inept national security advisers have no control.

Giddy editorial writers and columnists have been celebrating the planned behaviour of nameless bureaucrats with badges focused on getting their way regardless of the human and geopolitical implications, instead of acknowledging this alarming fact.

For months, an entitled group of spies has been responsible for the leak — drip, drip, drip — of cherry-picked so-called “intelligence” fragments concerning China’s purported intervention in Canada’s domestic affairs, with handpicked, credulous conduits in the press at the agreeable ready.

In my opinion, Trudeau and his closest advisors saw early on that caving to pressure would set a terrible example. Instead of taking either extreme, Trudeau appointed a special rapporteur to investigate the mounting charges.

Trudeau’s Bungling

The spooks’ explicit demand at the base of the domino-like series of hyperbolic, uncorroborated “revelations” was the institution of a public inquiry, and he bungled it and then caved to it.

Canadian spies, now full of arrogance and convinced they will never be caught, have apparently set their sights on India.

While appearing on the podcast of Canada’s national newspaper, The Globe and Mail, a journalist revealed that he had been briefed by “sources” on the emerging allegation that India had murdered Canadian Sikh separatist Hardeep Singh Nijjar in Canada.

Later, he claimed, the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) asked the paper’s editor to delay the story’s publication for at least a week so that Canadian intelligence agencies could continue their “work,” presumably to gather and corroborate the still nebulous “evidence” connecting India to the murder plot.

The Globe declined. The newspaper counter offered that, due to the importance of the subject, it may wait a day or two before publishing.

At some point, just before Trudeau was to make his hasty, qualified address to parliament and the nation, the Globe published an article online suggesting a “potential link” between Indian “agents” and Nijjar’s June killing in the parking lot of a Sikh temple in British Columbia.

Canada’s failed trade mission

As far as I can gather from unofficial sources, the PMO had approached a small number of reporters in order to inform them of the prime minister’s upcoming announcement on India’s alleged role in Nijjar’s killing.

The goal of this move was to head off any inquiries or criticisms that might have arisen from Canada’s failed trade mission to New Delhi or from Trudeau’s weak, clumsy handshake with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the G20 meeting.

The fact that Trudeau felt pressured to “get ahead” of the leak to the Globe is further proof that emboldened spies are in charge of what amounts to a parallel administration out to shame and blackmail a sitting prime minister into doing their bidding.

This is a gross disregard for the democratic process and a serious breach of the security services’ advisory role in Canada.

Starry-eyed commentators and writers, who have lost sight of the enormous damage being done, celebrate these shadowy scoundrels as “whistle blowers” rather than censoring them for gross abuses of power and dangerous behaviour.

Champion of foreign interference

Here’s the other inconvenient truth that journalists-turned-cheerleaders who don’t know anything about the seedy underbelly of “espionage” fail to understand: There are more sinners than saints living there, and it doesn’t matter where they came from.

Take, for example, the “disclosure” that a member of the Five Eyes, a group consisting of Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand, had spied on Indian diplomats and allegedly passed on incriminating information about Nijjar’s killing to Ottawa.

These ignorant defenders seem to believe that the Five Eyes alliance only spies on the “bad guys” since that is what “we” (the “good guys”) do to keep you and me safe.

I hate to be the one to break news to the wish-upon-a-star-Jiminy-Cricket brigade, but the Five Eyes constantly spies on its closest allies and each other as well.

Why? In order to gain future power and influence, it is necessary to amass vast amounts of sensitive diplomatic, military, and commercial information, as well as personal, lurid details.

Oh, where is the outcry over involvement from abroad? The New York Times, that champion of “foreign interference,” gave full voice to the lowest point of the West’s always convenient and galling duplicity on the “extrajudicial” killing count.

Orchestrated assassinations by the spy services

Meanwhile, India is definitely snooping on its “strategic allies” in retaliation (nudge nudge, wink wink). For the “good guys” who engage in interference and “targeted killings” (the Times’ sterile euphemism for murder), the Times has recently supplied expected cover.

The crime and the potential participation of the Indian government have stunned officials in Washington. It is unusual for a democratic country to conduct a lethal covert action in another democracy,” the Times wrote, contrasting this with the practise of targeted killing by democracies in unstable countries or regions and the orchestration of assassinations by the spy services of more authoritarian governments, such as Russia.

Yes, the “good guys” kill people, but they only do it in “unstable countries or regions.” That appears to be the majority of our tumultuous globe right now. Anyway, autocratic “bad guys” like Putin kill people all around the world, unlike the democratic “good guys.”

Reports out of Washington DC indicate widespread disbelief and perplexity in the White House and State Department. Their friend Modi may be either a “good guy” or a “bad guy,” and they can’t decide which he is.

The Times, of course, has forgotten America’s long, bloody, not-so-distant and recent history of encouraging and helping orchestrate coups against democratically elected governments in the Balkans, Central and South America, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia, not to mention the disastrous invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan.

They seem to be irrelevant. To put it bluntly, Trudeau needs to catch Canada’s freelance spies and make it quite obvious who the boss is.

He may also be curious as to how an Indian agent who is sure to get away with murdering a Canadian on Canadian soil was able to get away with it, and how they and their similarly groggy colleagues at the Royal Canadian Mounted Police allowed it to happen.

A second investigation by the public might be in order in that case.

By Andrew Mitrovica

Continue Reading

Politics

Trudeau GST Tax Holiday to Cost Taxpayers $6.3 Billion

Published

on

Trudeau. GST

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced a two-month GST break on some purchases and a one-time $250 rebate for all Canadians earning less than $150,000. The proposed GST break would last from December 14 to February 15.

The Liberals said it would cover various things, including children’s clothing and shoes, toys, diapers, restaurant meals, and beer and wine. It also refers to real and artificial Christmas trees, snack foods and beverages, and video game systems.

The move will cost taxpayers almost $4.7 billion, and the GST exemption will cost an additional $1.6 billion, totaling $6.3 Billion.

The federal government is now running a significant deficit. This raises the question of who will have to foot the $6.3 billion bill for today’s one-time payments. The government will have to borrow the money, and future taxpayers must either repay it or service the additional debt perpetually.

Critics argue that the GST credit is a collection of terrible ideas that will do little to lift Canada out of the long-term economic rut in which our economy is stuck.

Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre responded Thursday to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s pledge of a “GST Holiday” for Canadians, calling it a “tax trick.”

Poilievre stated that the temporary exemption from the Goods and Services Tax on various ordinary commodities “would not make up for the permanent quadrupling carbon tax on heat, housing, food, and fuel.”

Bloc Québécois leader Yves-François Blanchet stated he is “against any idea of a prime minister who says, ‘I will give you money in order for you to consider voting for me.'”

According to the Canadian Federation of Independent Business, temporary sales tax holidays will only increase confusion and administrative burden for small business owners.

A temporary sales tax decrease would help boost demand in some industries, including restaurants, Canadians, and companies, which require sustainable tax relief during the slow post-holiday season.

The changes amid an inflation-driven affordability crisis have left many dissatisfied with the Trudeau government. A federal election is scheduled for before next October, although it might happen sooner if the minority government falls before then.

For months, the Conservatives have held a double-digit lead over the Liberals in public opinion polls, with Leader Pierre Poilievre promising to cut taxes and government spending to restore affordability.

High inflation has also pressured the Liberals to avoid proposing policies that would boost spending and raise fuel prices.

According to the Fraser Institute, The Trudeau government got one thing fundamentally right: Lowering the tax burden on Canadians has benefits. Unfortunately, the policy package it has proposed to deliver tax relief is completely wrong.

It lowers the incorrect taxes, moves taxes temporarily rather than lowering them, does little to improve economic incentives, and punishes future taxpayers. With the holiday season approaching, this attempt at a gift for Canadian taxpayers is the economic equivalent of a lump of coal in the stocking.

Related News:

Trudeau Blames Immigration Failures on Bad Actors

Justin Trudeau Blames Immigration Failures on Bad Actors

 

Continue Reading

Politics

Matt Gaetz Withdraws as Trump’s Pick for Attorney General

Published

on

Matt Gaetz,attorney general, Trump
Matt Gaetz talks to reporters

Congressman Matt Gaetz has withdrawn as President-elect Donald Trump’s candidate for Attorney General, citing concerns about a federal sex trafficking probe that cast doubt on his ability to be confirmed.

Gaetz resigned after failing to persuade the Senate to endorse his contentious candidacy. Shortly after Gaetz’s unexpected departure, the president-elect issued a statement applauding his former AG nominee’s choice to seek Senate confirmation.

“I greatly appreciate the recent efforts of Matt Gaetz in seeking approval to be Attorney General. He was doing very well but, at the same time, did not want to be a distraction for the Administration, for which he has much respect. Matt has a wonderful future, and I look forward to watching all the great things he will do!” the president-elect wrote on Truth Social.

Gaetz had earlier stated that he was retiring from his current seat in Congress and would not take the oath of office for the upcoming session, which begins in January. Now that he has withdrawn from consideration for AG, his future in Washington is uncertain.

Related News:

Concerned About Matt Gaetz Senate Republicans Call for a House Ethics Investigation

Concerned About Matt Gaetz’s Campaign, Senate Republicans Call for a House Ethics Investigation.

 

 

Continue Reading

Politics

Eric Hovde Concedes The United States Senate Race To Tammy Baldwin.

Published

on

Eric Hovde

(VOR News) – Eric Hovde, the Republican candidate for the United States Senate, has acknowledged that he was defeated by Tammy Baldwin, the Democratic candidate for the same seat on the ballot.

Baldwin acknowledged Hovde’s defeat and consented to it. Furthermore, he released a statement in which he contends that the election results are not only inaccurate, but also devoid of any factual foundation.

Eric Hovde experienced this two weeks after the election.

Baldwin emerged as the unofficial victor of the Senate campaign in Wisconsin, a race that was closely monitored by a significant number of individuals. Baldwin was awarded the title of victor on November 6th. Baldwin emerged victorious by a razor-thin margin.

According to the data provided by the Associated Press, Baldwin emerged victorious by a margin of 29,116 ballots, which is approximately equivalent to 0.9 percent of the total votes cast. Baldwin emerged victorious by a substantial margin, as indicated by the results.

Hovde issued his public apology subsequent to the conclusion of the canvassing of the results by the majority of county clerks throughout the state. This process will ultimately result in the results being recognized as official. Publication of Eric Hovde’s decision. Not only were the results announced at this time, but they were also proclaimed in an official capacity.

The exact phrase of the announcement, “Thank you for your support,” was included in a post by Eric Hovde on Monday and published on the social networking site X.

The public was notified of this announcement. The announcement was public on Monday. It has drawn a lot of attention. “It is time to begin moving on.”

In contrast, Eric Hovde’s film began with a somewhat less inclusive tone, which persisted throughout. He made this assumption without offering any evidence to back it up, and his claims that there were “many troubling issues” with absentee ballots tabulated late on election night were factually incorrect. His claims were not supported by empirical evidence.

His claims were unsupported by any proof. Not a single piece of evidence could possibly prove that his allegations were correct. He stated in the statement that “numerous supporters” had demanded that he challenge the election results. He acknowledged receiving the request.

Eric Hovde acknowledged receiving these demands.

In particular, Eric Hovde asserts, “However, a request for a recount would serve no purpose if it were not for a detailed review of all the ballots and their legitimacy, which will be difficult to obtain in the courts.”

Subsequently, you would recount the identical ballots, regardless of their authenticity. This is the reason, as elucidated in this article. This is the rationale for the current state of affairs.

Hovde and his campaign refrained from issuing any public statements subsequent to Baldwin’s disclosure that Eric Hovde had emerged victorious in the election, which transpired over a week after Baldwin’s initial announcement.

The previous week, he uploaded a video to social media platforms that expressed his “deeply concerned” sentiments regarding the election results in Milwaukee.

The election was conducted in Milwaukee. While the film was being screened, there was a discussion regarding the results of the election in Milwaukee. As the ballots were still being counted in the largest city in Wisconsin on the evening of the election, he expressed his “shock” at the sequence of events that had transpired.

Eric Hovde was emphasizing the occurrence of specific events.

In addition, he declared that ballots were still being tallied at the time of the election. Eric Hovde made this declaration during the voting period, while ballots were still being tabulated.

Baldwin’s team referenced her victory speech, which she delivered the week prior to the election, in response to a request for comment that was submitted on Monday.

In response to the campaign’s request, this action was implemented.

A representative of Baldwin’s team has verified that “Hovde has not called,” which is consistent with the information that was disclosed on Monday morning. The representative who provided these details has worked in a variety of capacities throughout their career.

SOURCE: WPR

SEE ALSO:

Tesla Shares Rise After Trump Proposes liberalizing Self-Driving Vehicle Laws.

Despite losing, Kamala Harris raised more than a billion dollars. She continues to appeal to donors.

Continue Reading

Trending