Connect with us

U.K News

A Neonatal Nurse In A British Hospital Has Been Found Guilty Of Killing 7 Babies

Published

on

hospital

LONDON, England – A neonatal nurse in a British hospital was found guilty Friday of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder six more following a yearlong deception campaign in which she preyed on the weaknesses of ailing newborns and their worried parents.

The jury at Manchester Crown Court convicted Lucy Letby, 33, of killing the babies, including two triplet boys, in the newborn ward at the Countess of Chester Hospital in northwest England between June 2015 and June 2016. On Monday, she will be sentenced.

“Parents were exposed to her morbid curiosity and fake compassion,” senior prosecutor Pascale Jones said. “Far too many of them went home to empty baby rooms.” Many surviving children are still dealing with the long-term effects of her assaults on their lives.”

Jones described her attacks as “a complete betrayal of the trust placed in her.”

Families of the victims said they would “forever be grateful” to jurors who had to suffer through 145 days of “gruelling” evidence since last October.

They also expressed their appreciation to all individuals who came to give evidence throughout the trial, which they described as “extremely harrowing and distressing” to listen to in a joint statement read outside court.

“Losing a baby is a heartbreaking experience that no parent should ever have to go through,” they stated. “But losing a baby or having a baby harmed in these specific circumstances is unimaginable.”

Letby’s motivations are unknown, but the scope of her acts suggests meticulous planning.

hospital

A neonatal nurse in a British hospital was found guilty Friday of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder six more.

She was accused of intentionally injuring the newborns, pumping air into their bloodstreams and putting air or milk into their stomachs through nasogastric tubes. She was also accused of poisoning infants by tainting intravenous feeding with insulin and messing with breathing tubes.

Soon after the verdicts, the British government established an independent review into the broader circumstances surrounding what happened at the hospital, including handling employee concerns.

“This inquiry will seek to ensure that the parents and families affected receive the answers they require,” stated Health Secretary Steve Barclay. “I am determined that their voices are heard, and that they are involved in shaping the scope of the inquiry if they so desire.”

One of the Countess of Chester Hospital ‘s senior doctors told the BBC that he had frequently sought to raise the alarm about Letby, but hospital management refused to investigate the claims.

Dr. Stephen Brearley, the neonatal unit’s lead doctor, stated that the hospital attempted to suppress clinicians who complained about Letby and delayed notifying the police.

Before reaching its decision, the jury of seven women and four men pondered for 22 days. One juror was excused for personal reasons during deliberations, and the judge later allowed the other 11 jurors to reach a result with 10 individuals in agreement rather than a unanimous vote.

Letby was convicted guilty of seven murders and seven attempted murder charges involving six minors. She was found not guilty on two counts of attempted murder, and the jury could not decide on several others.

hospital

A neonatal nurse in a British hospital was found guilty Friday of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder six more.

Some verdicts were announced in court earlier this month, but the judge barred them from being reported until the deliberations were completed.

During the lengthy trial, prosecutors said that in 2015, the hospital began to see a large increase in the number of babies dying or suffering rapid deterioration in their health for no apparent cause. Some experienced “serious catastrophic collapses” but lived thanks to medical assistance.

Prosecutors described Letby as a “constant malevolent presence” in the neonatal ward when the children collapsed or died in all of the incidents. They said the nurse damaged the newborns inconspicuously and convinced her colleagues that the collapses and deaths were normal.

Letby was accused in November 2020 after police inquired into the hospital’s baby fatalities in May 2017.

“The last thing we expected to find was a suspect responsible for these deaths and non-fatal collapses,” said Detective Superintendent Paul Hughes, the lead investigating officer.

“It’s difficult enough to show up at the home of a family who has lost a baby, grieved for their loss, and is trying to move on from that, but having to tell them that someone who was supposed to be caring for their little one could ultimately be responsible for their death — that’s not an easy task,” he added.

hospital

A neonatal nurse in a British hospital was found guilty Friday of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder six more.

Letby testified for 14 days and declared her innocence. During the trial, the defense argued that she was a “hard-working, dedicated, and caring” nurse who loved her job and that the infants’ sudden collapses and deaths could have been caused by natural causes or by other factors such as hospital staffing shortages or failure by others to provide appropriate care.

Letby fought back tears as the jury found her guilty of two counts of attempted murder on Aug. 8 and burst into tears as she exited the courtroom. She was back in court three days later when she was found guilty of four murders and two attempted murders.

She did not appear in court as more verdicts were revealed on Friday, and she has informed the court that she does not desire to be in court on Monday or to watch the sentencing hearing by video link.

A message discovered at Letby’s home following her arrest in 2018 will now be used as a terrifying confession.

“I don’t deserve to live,” she scribbled on a green sticky note displayed in court. “I killed them on purpose because I’m not good enough to care for them.”

“I am a horrible evil person,” she said. “I AM THE EVIL WHO DID THIS.”

SOURCE – (AP)

Continue Reading

U.K News

Returning to the UK a “No Go” for Prince Harry and Meghan

Published

on

Prince Harry and Meghan
Prince Harry and Meghan - Facebook Image

A source close to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex claim that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle do not want to return permanently to the United Kingdom. Prince Harry will stay stationed in the United States, where he resides with his wife and their children.

It is known that worries about his and his family’s safety in the UK still exist.

According to the BBC, Prince Harry and Meghan are also unlikely to wish to abandon the business and charitable endeavours they developed while residing in the US.

There have been rumours of a disgruntled prince in California, who is getting close to turning forty and is unhappy with his life among the unrooted rich, trying to re-establish ties with his former life in the UK before he resigned as a working royal.

However, reliable sources have asserted a different story, stating that a return to royal life in the UK is not likely.

They contend that Prince Harry can visit the UK again and is just as capable of funding his charitable endeavours and charities from the US.

He flew back to the US after visiting the UK last week for his uncle’s memorial ceremony.

Claims that Prince Harry and Prince William had not talked throughout the church service in Norfolk, despite their growing frigid distance from one another, accounted for a large portion of the attention around the ceremony.

Prince Harry appeared to have maintained strong ties to the late Lord Robert Fellowes, who was Princess Diana’s brother-in-law on the Spencer side of the family.

The prince was spotted beside his Spencer family members during an Invictus Games service held at St. Paul’s Cathedral earlier this summer. Senior royals were not present at the event.

As soon as it was known that King Charles had cancer, the prince swiftly left for the UK, meeting briefly with his father in London.

There have also been excursions to London’s legal courts, when he fought the tabloids over allegations of illegal information collecting.

His security status in the UK is the subject of a continuing, intricate legal battle with the Home Office that has become a contentious topic in any conversation of a return.

The prince stated that he wouldn’t “bring my wife back to this country” in an interview with ITV because he was afraid for their safety.

But now that the pair has made such a public exit from royal life in the UK—in a Netflix movie and his book Spare—there will undoubtedly be speculative discussions about what will happen to them next.

Prince Harry and Meghan could reside anywhere in the virtual world if they didn’t have a royal duty; currently, that’s WFC (where they work from California).

In addition to their charitable endeavours, Meghan has teased a lifestyle cooking business on social media.

Though it is difficult to imagine they won’t want to stir up more than pots of jam given the impending US presidential election and the likelihood that topics they have brought up, including internet disinformation, would likely be debatable.

There have been other visits as well, most notably to Colombia, but they had so many of the hallmarks of a royal visit that it made one wonder whether they were actually travelling back to the world of the royals they were trying to leave behind.

There will be more inquiries about Prince Harry’s long-term future job as his 40th birthday draws near and there is a great deal of public curiosity.

Related News:

Prince Harry Opens Up About Emotional Distance in Royal Family

Prince Harry Opens Up About Emotional Distance in Royal Family

 

Continue Reading

U.K News

Uk Weather: Thunderstorm warning for England and East Wales

Published

on

Uk Weather Thunderstorm warning for England and East Wales

Uk Weather: Forecasters have issued warnings for thunderstorms and heavy showers for Sunday, protecting a significant portion of England and portions of eastern Wales from the potential for severe weather.

According to the Met Office, the phenomenon could cause “a small chance of flooding and disruption” in some regions. At four o’clock British Summer Time, the yellow warning that urges people to “be aware” goes into effect, encompassing significant portions of southern England, the Midlands, and the north.

Forecasters are warning that thunderstorms and heavy rain are expected to develop in the southern region of England on Sunday morning and move northward during the day.

In England, the warning applies to a region located in the middle of the nation, stretching from the Isle of Wight to Newcastle upon Tyne. The warning has been issued for the counties of Monmouthshire, Newport, Torfaen, and Wrexham, which are located in the eastern part of Wales.

The Metropolitan Office has warned of flooding and stated that “frequent lightning strikes and hail will be additional hazards” across the southern and central regions of England.

The BBC Weather predicts that the United Kingdom will see a swarm of warm and humid air coming from the south-eastern direction until Sunday. In addition, a series of intense rainstorms will sweep northward over the central spine of England and east Wales.

In the event that these thunderstorms do materialize, there is a possibility that they will be accompanied by intense, gusty winds, lightning, and heavy rain. However, it is also possible that they may be fairly sporadic.

In spite of the fact that pinpointing the precise areas of these showers is rather difficult, it is recommended that you remain current with the most recent prediction since it is subject to change, as stated by BBC weather.

There is a possibility that temperatures may reach as high as 27 degrees Celsius in some regions of south-eastern England as a result of the warmer and more humid air. Temperatures will range from the low to the middle of the 20s Celsius in many locations.

Source: BBC

 

Continue Reading

U.K News

UK Immigration Raids Increase Risks of Exploitation for Undocumented Migrants

Published

on

UK Immigration Raids Increase Risks of Exploitation for Undocumented Migrants

In a growing chorus of concern, over 80 charities, including prominent organizations like Care4Calais, City of Sanctuary UK, and Anti-Slavery International, have called on the Home Secretary to overhaul the UK’s immigration policies.

Their joint letter, coordinated by Migrant Voice, criticizes the government’s recent intensification of immigration raids and deportations, arguing that these measures are exacerbating the risks faced by undocumented migrants.

The letter, sent on Friday, highlights the increasing danger of exploitation faced by migrants who are driven further underground by aggressive enforcement actions.

These policies, they argue, not only fail to address the root causes of undocumented status but also make migrants more vulnerable to abuse by unscrupulous employers and human trafficking gangs.

On August 27, the Home Office announced the results of a week-long “intensive operation” targeting illegal working, which saw 275 premises investigated and 135 issued notices for employing undocumented workers.

Despite the government’s assertion that such operations aim to protect vulnerable individuals, the raids led to the detention of 85 “illegal workers.”

The situation has been compounded by a recent record-breaking deportation event. Earlier this month, the government deported over 200 individuals to Brazil, marking the largest single deportation flight on record.

Since the Labour government came to power, there have been at least nine such deportation charter flights.

Nazek Ramadan, Director of Migrant Voice, criticized the government’s approach, stating, “Immigration raids and deportations do not address the fundamental issue that many individuals become undocumented through no fault of their own.

Errors in paperwork or poor communication from the Home Office can result in people losing their status overnight.”

Ramadan advocates for a policy shift towards regularisation, arguing that it would be more cost-effective and beneficial for the economy than current detention and deportation practices.

“Rather than penalising people for their undocumented status, the government should simplify the process for them to regain documented status,” Ramadan suggested.

Many undocumented individuals have established lives and families in the UK, having lived in the country for years or even decades.

The letter contends that regularisation would not only reduce the financial burden of detention and deportation but also boost economic growth by enabling these individuals to contribute more fully to the economy.

“The raids are very traumatising,” Ramadan added. “People who are already vulnerable are becoming more so, retreating further underground. This policy has been tried and failed by many governments.

Regularisation offers a better solution, allowing people to come out of the shadows and live normal lives.”

The Home Office has been contacted for comment on the letter’s allegations and the ongoing concerns raised by the charities.

Continue Reading

Download Our App

vornews app

Advertise Here

Volunteering at Soi Dog

Soi Dog

Trending