Connect with us

News

6 Takeaways From President Joe Biden’s High-Stakes ABC Interview

Published

on

President joe Biden

An aggressive President Joe Biden downplayed his bad performance in last week’s debate in what had become a high-stakes appearance on ABC, as speculation about his candidacy’s future circulated.

During his discussion with anchor George Stephanopoulos, Biden dismissed the idea of resigning from the ticket while simultaneously presenting changing justifications for his bad performance.

The conversation was Biden’s first public interview since his debate performance, and it came at a critical time for his political future. A growing number of Democrats—lawmakers, contributors, and voters—expressed doubts about his candidacy’s viability.

Here are six key points from Biden’s interview with ABC News.

Biden claims the debate was a ‘poor night,’ not a larger issue.
The president admitted in the interview that he was “sick” and “feeling terrible” prior to the debate. When asked if it was a bad incident or a symptom of a more serious ailment, Biden downplayed the concerns.

“This was a poor episode. There is no evidence of a major condition. “I didn’t listen to my instincts in terms of preparation, and I had a bad night,” he admitted.

6 Takeaways From President Joe Biden’s High-Stakes ABC Interview

In the interview, Biden elaborated on how he was feeling during the debate, stating that he was exhausted from illness and had even tested for Covid-19. The White House did not immediately reply to CNN’s questions on whether the president took the test before or after the debate.

He stated, “I was feeling dreadful. In fact, when I asked the doctors if they had done a Covid test, they said they were attempting to figure out what was wrong. They ran a test to discover if I was infected with a virus. I did not. I simply got a very severe cold.”

The revelation regarding his illness was the latest shift in the White House’s portrayal of the president’s physical condition during the debate. During the discussion, White House officials stated that the president had a cold, and on Wednesday, press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre denied that Biden had visited his doctor, repeatedly stating that the president had not had a medical exam since his physical in February.

“It is a cold, gentlemen. “It’s a cold,” she explained at the time. “I understand that it impacts everyone differently. We’ve all had colds; therefore, the doctor didn’t check him out.”

A day later, the White House verified that the president had indeed seen a doctor about his condition, and on Friday, Jean-Pierre told reporters aboard Air Force One that Biden had a “verbal check-in” with his doctor following the debate.

She described Biden’s check-in as “a conversation” with his physician, Kevin O’Connor after reporters reported that the president informed a gathering of Democratic governors that he had seen a doctor.

The president admits to bad performance but provides a fresh reason.
The president stated that he had not watched a repeat of his performance. When questioned if he knew how awful things were going, he replied, “Nobody’s fault but mine.”

Biden’s response to the question was confused about New York Times polls.

“I prepared what I always do sitting down when I return as foreign leaders or the National Security Council – for explicit detail. And I noticed, about halfway through, that all I get mentioned is that The New York Times had me down 10 points prior to the debate, nine now, or whatever. The truth is that, from what I saw, he lied 28 times,” he stated.

When pressed on his performance, he replied, “Well, I was just having a bad night.”

But later in the conversation, Biden provided a different answer. He said he was distracted by Trump speaking out of turn even though Trump’s microphone was muted.

“I understood I was having a difficult night when I noticed that even while I was answering a question and they switched off his microphone, he was still shouting. I let it distract me. I’m not blaming anything on it, but I recognized I simply wasn’t in control,” Biden told Stephanopoulos.

Biden, Trump, and their teams agreed on the rules before the debate.

Biden stated that “no one said I had to” undergo cognitive and neurological testing, telling Stephanopoulos that “I get a full neurological test every day” – referring to his job responsibilities.

“I have medical doctors who travel everywhere. You are aware that every president does this. I am accompanied by world-class medical doctors wherever I go. I am always evaluating my work. “They don’t hesitate to tell me if they suspect anything else is wrong,” he said.

When asked if he had any cognitive testing or a neurology checkup, Biden responded no.

“No one told me I had to… “They said I was fine.”

In a Friday analysis, CNN Chief Medical Correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta, a practicing neurosurgeon, asked Biden to undergo extensive cognitive and neurological testing and report his findings.

Gupta expressed concern about Biden’s performance during the debate. According to him, comprehensive examinations “can help determine whether there is a simpler explanation for the symptoms displayed or if there is something more concerning.”

Biden rejects polls that show him losing to Trump.
When Stephanopoulos asked Biden if he was honest with himself about his capacity to overcome Trump, he responded, “Yes.” “Yes, yes, yes.”

He cited prior surveys that suggested he couldn’t win in 2020 and subsequent down-ballot elections while dismissing comprehensive polling that shows he is lagging in the race.

When asked if his low approval rating would make it more difficult to win four years later, Biden replied, “Not when you’re running against a pathological liar. Not when he hasn’t been challenged in the same way that he is about to be.”

The president stated that all his pollsters regard the race as a “toss up” as he cited particular polls before trailing off.

Biden dismisses worried Democrats: Only the ‘Lord Almighty’ could persuade him to withdraw from the race.
When asked if he would step aside if he became persuaded he couldn’t win Trump, Biden responded he would only do so “if the Lord Almighty comes down” and tells him so.

“If the Lord Almighty came down and said, ‘Joe, get out of the race,’ I’d get out of the race,” stated Vice President Biden.

“The Lord Almighty’s not coming down,” said Biden, a devoted Catholic.

Stephanopoulos replied, “I agree that the Lord Almighty will not come down.” But what will you do if you are reliably informed by your allies, friends, and supporters in the Democratic Party, the House, and the Senate that they are frightened you will lose the House and the Senate if you remain?

Biden declined to address the question. “It’s not going to happen,” he explained.

The president later questioned whether any other Democratic leader would possess his foreign policy expertise.

“Who will be able to hold NATO together as I can? Who will be able to put me in a position to keep the Pacific basin in check now that we are in China? Who’s going to do it? “Who has that reach?” Biden asked.

Four Democratic members of Congress have urged Biden to step aside. Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey published a statement Friday, urging Biden to “carefully evaluate” whether he is the party’s best candidate to oppose Donald Trump. According to CNN, Virginia Sen. Mark Warner is trying to get Senate Democrats on the same page regarding Biden’s reelection attempt, placing additional pressure on the White House.

Warner, who is leading the effort, has reached the point where he believes Biden’s reelection campaign should be suspended, according to a source familiar with the situation.

When asked about Warner’s efforts, Biden said, “Mark is a good man.” He also attempted to secure the nomination. Warner was considered a vice presidential candidate in 2008, a position Biden subsequently won but withdrew from consideration.

“Mark’s not—Mark and I have a different perspective,” Biden told Stephanopoulos.

biden

Biden | Rolling stoneg

6 Takeaways From President Joe Biden’s High-Stakes ABC Interview

When asked if he would alter his stance if additional high-ranking Democrats, such as Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, or House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, persuaded him to drop out, Biden replied, “They’re not going to do that.”

Just before the ABC interview, Biden addressed voter concerns at a campaign rally in Wisconsin. A rallygoer displayed a banner that read, “Pass the torch, Joe.” The placard was visible briefly before someone attempted to conceal it with a Biden-Harris sign.

Biden’s remarks at that rally was enthusiastic and vibrant, but he appeared to be aware that every word he said would be dissected and carefully scrutinized during this strategically critical era. He vowed to “beat Trump again in 2020” before swiftly recognizing his error and amending himself: “By the way, we’re gonna do it again in 2024.” Biden criticized Trump’s economic policies, saying his opponent “wants another 5 billion – trillion, trillion, not billion – $5 trillion tax cut.”

He answered criticism regarding his age, stating, “I wasn’t too old to create over 50 million new jobs, ensure 21 million Americans are insured under the Affordable Care Act, and beat Big Pharma.” Was I too old to help over 5 million Americans with college debt? Too elderly to appoint the first Black woman to the Supreme Court of the United States? To sign the Respect for Marriage Act?

Biden claimed unspecified forces are “trying to push him out of the race.”

“Well, let me say this as quick as I can,” he joked. “I’m staying in the race.”

That theme was highlighted by the song that played at the end of Biden’s speech: Tom Petty’s “I Won’t Back Down.”

SOURCE – CNN

News

Howard Schultz Violated Labor Law By Telling Employee ‘If You’re Not Happy At Starbucks, You Can Go Work For Another Company’

Published

on

starbucks Schultz

Starbucks’ interim CEO, Howard Schultz, violated federal labor law in 2022 by telling a California barista who expressed concerns about unionization that “if you’re not happy at Starbucks, you can go work for another company.”

The National Labor Relations Board ruled on Wednesday that Schultz’s statement constituted an unconstitutional, coercive threat.

The decision highlights Starbucks’ difficult relationship with organized labor, as more and more employees at its outlets unionize.

Howard Schultz Violated Labor Law By Telling Employee ‘If You’re Not Happy At Starbucks, You Can Go Work For Another Company’

In 2022, as interim CEO, Schultz visited a business event in Long Beach, California, to address and improve working conditions at Starbucks locations. According to the NLRB, Barista Madison Hall attempted to discuss the benefits of unionization as well as Starbucks’ claimed history of unfair labor practices.

“Why are you angry at Starbucks?” Schultz inquired. He stated that the occasion was not the appropriate forum for discussing union problems before remarking on working elsewhere. The administrative law decision states that he “had an angry expression on his face.” The NLRB ruling maintains an administrative law judge’s decision from October 2023.

Starbucks issued a statement expressing its disagreement with the board’s decision. “Our focus remains on training and supporting our managers to ensure respect for our partners’ right to organize, and we are making progress in our discussions with Workers United,” a business representative said in a statement Thursday.

Though Schultz stepped down from his third term as CEO in March 2023, he remains involved with the company. When he retired from Starbucks’ board of directors in September, the business named him “lifelong chairman emeritus.”

“We note that the judge identified the Respondent’s highest official, interim CEO Schultz, as a ‘legendary leader,’ a status that would exacerbate the coercive nature of Schultz’s statement,” the ruling read.

Since the first Starbucks branch in Buffalo, New York, unionized in 2021, the coffee business has been embroiled in hundreds of labor battles over alleged union-busting practices. In June, the Supreme Court heard Starbucks v. McKinney, a case involving seven employees who were fired after attempting to form a union. The Supreme Court agreed with Starbucks.

An NLRB administrative law judge earlier stated that Starbucks had engaged in “egregious and widespread misconduct” in its dealings with employees involved in unionization efforts at Buffalo outlets, including the first site to unionize. Starbucks dispatched high-level executives into Buffalo-area stores on a “relentless” campaign, according to the judge, which “likely left a lasting impact as to the importance of voting against representation.”

Starbucks stated at the time that it is “considering all options to obtain further legal review,” and that “we believe the decision and remedies ordered are inappropriate given the record in this matter.”

schultz

Howard Schultz Violated Labor Law By Telling Employee ‘If You’re Not Happy At Starbucks, You Can Go Work For Another Company’

The union reports that on October 1, the 500th Starbucks location in Washington state decided to unionize.

The NLRB ordered Starbucks on Wednesday to stop threatening to terminate employees for unionizing and to post a notice of employee rights in all of its Long Beach outlets.

“We are pleased to see the NLRB continuing to advocate for workers and their legal right to organize. At the same time, we’re looking ahead and proud to be on a new journey with the firm,” said Michelle Eisen, co-chair of Starbucks Workers United’s national organizing committee and bargaining delegate, in a statement to CNN on Thursday.

SOURCE | CNN

Continue Reading

News

Tesla Recalls 27,000 Cybertrucks Due To A Rearview Camera Issue

Published

on

cybertruck
CNN | Tesla

Tesla is recalling around 27,000 Cybertrucks due to a rearview camera issue that delays the image being presented on the dashboard, increasing the danger of a collision.

According to a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) report, the rearview display may appear blank for up to 8 seconds when the Cybertruck is in reverse. That is far over the two seconds required by US federal safety regulations.

tesla

Tesla Recalls 27,000 Cybertrucks Due To A Rearview Camera Issue

Tesla has issued a free, over-the-air software update to address the issue. Drivers can also reverse the Cybertruck by “performing a shoulder check and using their mirrors,” according to the NHTSA.

This is the fifth recall for the electric vehicle, which was released last year. The most recent recall, in June, concerns the truck’s large single windshield wiper and a piece of plastic trim along the edge of the truck bed that might become loose and detach from the vehicle while driving.

In April, the trucks were recalled because the accelerator pedal could become stuck when depressed. Tesla launched a software recall in January for 2.2 million of its cars, including Cybertrucks, due to warning light letters that were too small to read. That issue was likewise resolved with an over-the-air software upgrade.

Tesla Recalls 27,000 Cybertrucks Due To A Rearview Camera Issue

Tesla announced a rise in sales this week for the first time this year, however, year-to-date sales still trail the same period in 2023.

The company delivered approximately 463,000 automobiles worldwide in the third quarter, rising 6% from the previous year’s sales number and 4% from the second quarter of this year.

SOURCE | CNN

Continue Reading

News

The Biden Administration can go Ahead With Student Loan Forgiveness, Says a Federal Judge.

Published

on

Student Loan

(VOR News) – A temporary restraining order that was obtained against the expansive new student loan forgiveness system that was planned by the administration of Vice President Joe Biden will be allowed to expire by a federal judge.

Injunction was issued against the program that was being proposed. It is possible that the execution of this strategy may reduce the suffering of tens of millions of people in the United States of America.

There is a possibility that the idea might be beneficial to as many as three out of every four people who are now in possession of federal student loans, as stated by an estimate that was provided by the Center for American Progress.

This happens because the student loan plan takes into account government initiatives.

A victory was granted to the administration of Vice President Joe Biden, according to an announcement made by United States District Judge Randal Hall in Georgia before the close of the day on Wednesday. The previous Republican president, George W. Bush, was the one who appointed Hall to his current post. Hall now serves in that capacity.

In the next few weeks leading up to the election that will take place in November, it is quite likely that Vice President Joe Biden will press forward with the proposition that his administration has offered to cancel student loans. There is a chance that this will occur given the verdict.

A new condition has emerged as a result of a lawsuit that was filed against the aid package by seven states that are run by Republicans. This lawsuit was filed against the aid package after it was submitted.

There are a number of states that have ruled that the debt cancellation scheme that is now being carried out by the United States Department of Education is illegal. These states include Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Missouri, North Dakota, and Ohio, amongst others.

The conclusions of Hall, on the other hand, indicate that Georgia did not have the legal jurisdiction to launch a legal action against the relief plan. As a result, the state was unable to fulfill the duty of the forum for the application.

The judge made an order that the case be relocated to Missouri because the states argue that the notion that was proposed by Biden would be most detrimental to Mohela, which is the Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority.

Which is responsible for servicing student loans?

The judge issued the order as a result. The United States Department of Education’s spokesman applauded the judge’s finding that Georgia had “no legal basis” to pursue the action; yet, the spokesperson also criticized the Republican drive to prevent relief from being granted. The verdict made by the judge was lauded by the authorized spokesperson.

This case is the outcome of an ongoing campaign by Republican elected officials who, according to what they claimed, seek to prevent millions of their own people from having breathing room on their student loans. This campaign is the cause of this complaint.

That campaign is reflected in this lawsuit that has been filed. “The fact remains that this lawsuit reflects an ongoing effort.”

Our efforts to improve the flawed student loan system and to provide support and relief to borrowers all throughout the country are not going to be abandoned, and we are not going to stop up on providing these services. We have declared our intention to carry on with our work.

Under the plan that was proposed by Vice President Joe Biden, student debt would be forgiven for four different groups of borrowers:

Those who owe more than they initially took out; those who have been in repayment already for decades; students who attend schools with a low financial value; and those who are eligible for loan forgiveness under an existing program but have not yet implemented the program.

SOURCE: CNBC

SEE ALSO:

Uber Hires Yandex Spinoff Ride-Hail and Autonomous Delivery With Avride

Donald Trump Withdraws from the ’60 Minutes’ Election Interview.

The Rupee Versus The US Dollar is Still Mainly Constant.

Continue Reading

Download Our App

vornews app

Buy FUT Coins

comprar monedas FC 25

Volunteering at Soi Dog

Soi Dog

Trending